pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23188 · v1 · pith:QRNLQKV3new · submitted 2026-05-22 · 💻 cs.NE

SpikingMoE: SDPrompt-Guided Dynamic Expert Fusion in Spiking Neural Networks

Yukai Yang , Chenxi Qin , Jungang Li , Xin Zhang , Wenwei Shao , Liqun Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NE
keywords spiking neural networksmixture of expertsdynamic routingneuromorphic computingSDpromptimage classificationspike-driven transformer
0
0 comments X

The pith

A spike-driven prompt enables input-dependent expert routing in spiking neural networks while keeping all signals binary.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces SpikingMoE to combine a spike-driven Transformer with a Mixture-of-Experts structure. An SDprompt modeled on the lateral geniculate nucleus routes each input to appropriate expert modules. All communication stays binary spikes so the system remains compatible with neuromorphic hardware. Accuracy reaches 94.09 percent on CIFAR-10 and 74.54 percent on CIFAR-100, showing that dynamic modular computation can be added without destroying the basic performance of spiking models. A reader would care because this suggests energy-efficient spiking networks can gain the adaptability usually associated with conventional deep networks.

Core claim

SpikingMoE replaces standard MLPs with spike-compatible expert modules and uses an SDprompt inspired by the lateral geniculate nucleus to enable input-dependent expert routing. Binary spike communication is enforced throughout the network. On CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 the model reaches 94.09 percent and 74.54 percent top-1 accuracy. The work claims this is the first open-source SNN framework that integrates MoE into a spike-driven Transformer with LGN-inspired routing.

What carries the argument

The SDprompt, a spike-driven mechanism that produces input-dependent routing signals to select among expert modules while preserving binary spike communication.

If this is right

  • Modular expert routing becomes feasible inside spiking networks without breaking binary spike rules.
  • Dynamic computation can be added to SNNs while accuracy on image tasks stays competitive.
  • The resulting models remain deployable on neuromorphic hardware.
  • Biologically inspired routing can be realized inside existing spike-driven Transformer blocks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Only the active experts need to compute per input, which could lower average energy use on hardware.
  • The routing idea might transfer to other spiking tasks such as event-based vision or audio if the prompt mechanism generalizes.
  • Hardware-specific measurements could quantify whether the added routing overhead is offset by selective expert activation.

Load-bearing premise

The spike-driven prompt can achieve effective input-dependent routing while staying strictly within binary spike signals and neuromorphic constraints.

What would settle it

An implementation on actual neuromorphic hardware that either loses input-dependent routing, requires non-binary signals, or drops accuracy far below the reported CIFAR levels.

read the original abstract

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) provide an energy-efficient paradigm for visual recognition. We present SpikingMoE, which integrates a spike-driven Transformer with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework for dynamic computation. Inspired by the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), a spike-driven prompt (SDprompt) enables input-dependent expert routing in a biologically plausible manner. By replacing standard MLPs with spike-compatible expert modules and enforcing binary spike communication, SpikingMoE is designed for neuromorphic hardware. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 achieve 94.09% and 74.54% top-1 accuracy, showing that modular expert routing can be incorporated while retaining reasonable performance. To our knowledge, SpikingMoE is the first open-source SNN framework that integrates MoE into a spike-driven Transformer with LGN-inspired routing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SpikingMoE, which augments a spike-driven Transformer with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. An LGN-inspired spike-driven prompt (SDprompt) performs input-dependent expert routing while enforcing binary spike communication for neuromorphic compatibility. Experiments report 94.09% top-1 accuracy on CIFAR-10 and 74.54% on CIFAR-100, positioning the work as the first open-source SNN framework to integrate MoE into a spike-driven Transformer.

Significance. If the experimental claims are substantiated with baselines and ablations, the work would provide concrete evidence that dynamic expert routing can be added to spike-driven Transformers without destroying performance on standard image-classification benchmarks, thereby opening a route toward conditional computation in energy-efficient neuromorphic models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported accuracies (94.09% CIFAR-10, 74.54% CIFAR-100) are presented without any baseline SNN or MoE results, ablation studies, error bars, or statistical comparisons. This omission makes it impossible to determine whether the MoE integration contributes to the observed performance, directly undermining the central claim that modular expert routing can be incorporated while retaining reasonable performance.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the SDprompt enables biologically plausible, input-dependent routing while preserving binary spike communication is stated without reference to any supporting derivation, architectural diagram, or empirical validation that would allow the reader to assess whether the routing mechanism actually satisfies the stated constraints.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract claims the framework is the 'first open-source' integration but supplies no citation or link to the promised repository, which should be added for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed feedback on the abstract. We agree that the abstract should better contextualize the results and provide pointers to supporting material. We will revise accordingly while preserving the manuscript's core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported accuracies (94.09% CIFAR-10, 74.54% CIFAR-100) are presented without any baseline SNN or MoE results, ablation studies, error bars, or statistical comparisons. This omission makes it impossible to determine whether the MoE integration contributes to the observed performance, directly undermining the central claim that modular expert routing can be incorporated while retaining reasonable performance.

    Authors: The full manuscript (Sections 4 and 5) includes direct comparisons against prior SNN baselines such as Spiking Transformer and other spike-driven models, along with ablations isolating the MoE and SDprompt components, error bars from multiple independent runs, and statistical comparisons. The abstract is intentionally concise and therefore omits these details. We will revise the abstract to briefly reference the baseline accuracies and direct readers to the experimental sections for the full ablation and statistical analysis, thereby clarifying the contribution of the dynamic routing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the SDprompt enables biologically plausible, input-dependent routing while preserving binary spike communication is stated without reference to any supporting derivation, architectural diagram, or empirical validation that would allow the reader to assess whether the routing mechanism actually satisfies the stated constraints.

    Authors: Section 3.2 derives the SDprompt from LGN biology, Figure 2 provides the architectural diagram, and the binary-spike constraint is enforced by construction (all routing signals remain spike-based). Empirical support appears in the routing statistics and end-to-end accuracy reported in Section 4. We will add an explicit reference to Section 3 in the revised abstract so readers can immediately locate the derivation, diagram, and validation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical performance result: SpikingMoE achieves 94.09% and 74.54% top-1 accuracy on CIFAR-10/100 while enforcing binary spike communication. No equations, derivations, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The LGN-inspired SDprompt is presented as an architectural choice enabling input-dependent routing, not as a derived quantity that reduces to a fitted parameter or prior self-citation by construction. The 'first open-source' statement is a factual claim about release status, not a mathematical premise. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract supplies insufficient technical detail to enumerate free parameters or axioms; the only identifiable element is the biological-inspiration assumption.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The lateral geniculate nucleus provides a biologically plausible model for input-dependent expert routing via SDprompt.
    Stated as inspiration in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • SDprompt no independent evidence
    purpose: Spike-driven prompt for input-dependent expert routing.
    Introduced in the abstract as the mechanism enabling dynamic fusion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5696 in / 1175 out tokens · 29589 ms · 2026-05-25T02:50:44.259024+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION SNNs, regarded as the third generation of neural networks [1], emulate the brain’s event-driven communication, offering exceptional energy efficiency and biological plausibility on neuromorphic hardware such as Loihi and TrueNorth [ 2, 3]. By transmitting binary spike signals, SNNs replace energy- intensive multiply-accumulate (MAC) operation...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    RELATED WORK Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) offer a biologically inspired, energy-efficient alternative via event-driven computation. Recent SNN–Transformer variants—Spikformer [ 5] and the Spike-driven Transformer [6]—adapt self-attention to spikes, replacing softmax/multiplications with spike-domain opera- tions, thereby reducing energy while retaining ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The design preserves event-driven efficiency while enabling input-dependent specialization

    METHOD We presentSpikingMoE, an extension of the spike-driven Transformer that integrates a spike-compatible Mixture-of- Experts (MoE) with an SDprompt mechanism for dynamic routing. The design preserves event-driven efficiency while enabling input-dependent specialization. 3.1. Overall Architecture Given an input sequence I, the Spiking Patch Splitting (...

    work page

  4. [4]

    EXPERIMENTS We evaluate SpikingMoE on four benchmarks: CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, CIFAR10-DVS, and DVS128 Gesture, covering both static image classification and neuromorphic event-based recognition. Training configuration.For CIFAR-10/100 and CIFAR10- DVS we use AdamW, while LAMB is adopted for Gesture for stability; all models are trained with cosine schedules...

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Although gains are not uniform across benchmarks, our results show MoE can be incorporated into spiking models to enable modular, dynamic computation

    CONCLUSION We presentedSpikingMoE, integrating a spike-compatible Mixture-of-Experts into a spike-driven Transformer via an SDpromptfor context-dependent routing. Although gains are not uniform across benchmarks, our results show MoE can be incorporated into spiking models to enable modular, dynamic computation. This work is an initial step toward biologi...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models,

    Wolfgang Maass, “Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models,”Neural net- works, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1659–1671, 1997

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning,

    Mike Davies, Narayan Srinivasa, Tsung-Han Lin, Gau- tham Chinya, Yongqiang Cao, Sri Harsha Choday, Geor- gios Dimou, Prasad Joshi, Nabil Imam, Shweta Jain, et al., “Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning,”Ieee Micro, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 82–99, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Truenorth: Design and tool flow of a 65 mw 1 million neuron programmable neurosynaptic chip,

    Filipp Akopyan, Jun Sawada, Andrew Cassidy, Rodrigo Alvarez-Icaza, John Arthur, Paul Merolla, Nabil Imam, Yutaka Nakamura, Pallab Datta, Gi-Joon Nam, et al., “Truenorth: Design and tool flow of a 65 mw 1 million neuron programmable neurosynaptic chip,”IEEE trans- actions on computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 153...

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Towards spike-based machine intelligence with neuro- morphic computing,

    Kaushik Roy, Akhilesh Jaiswal, and Priyadarshini Panda, “Towards spike-based machine intelligence with neuro- morphic computing,”Nature, vol. 575, no. 7784, pp. 607–617, 2019

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Spik- former: When spiking neural network meets transformer,

    Zhaokun Zhou, Yuesheng Zhu, Chao He, Yaowei Wang, Shuicheng Yan, Yonghong Tian, and Li Yuan, “Spik- former: When spiking neural network meets transformer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.15425, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Spike-driven transformer,

    Man Yao, Jiakui Hu, Zhaokun Zhou, Li Yuan, Yonghong Tian, Bo Xu, and Guoqi Li, “Spike-driven transformer,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, pp. 64043–64058, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report

    Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al., “Deepseek-v3 tech- nical report,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    The llama 4 herd: The beginning of a new era of natively multimodal ai innovation,

    AI Meta, “The llama 4 herd: The beginning of a new era of natively multimodal ai innovation,”https://ai. meta. com/blog/llama-4-multimodal-intelligence/, checked on, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 2025, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Calip: Zero- shot enhancement of clip with parameter-free attention,

    Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Longtian Qiu, Xianzheng Ma, Xupeng Miao, Xuming He, and Bin Cui, “Calip: Zero- shot enhancement of clip with parameter-free attention,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial In- telligence, 2023, vol. 37, pp. 746–754

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Language-driven Semantic Segmentation

    Boyi Li, Kilian Q Weinberger, Serge Belongie, Vladlen Koltun, and René Ranftl, “Language-driven semantic segmentation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03546, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural lan- guage supervision,

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sas- try, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural lan- guage supervision,” inInternational conference on ma- chine learning. PmLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Groupvit: Semantic segmentation emerges from text su- pervision,

    Jiarui Xu, Shalini De Mello, Sifei Liu, Wonmin Byeon, Thomas Breuel, Jan Kautz, and Xiaolong Wang, “Groupvit: Semantic segmentation emerges from text su- pervision,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 18134–18144

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Prompt engineering for zero-shot and few-shot de- fect detection and classification using a visual-language pretrained model,

    Gunwoo Yong, Kahyun Jeon, Daeyoung Gil, and Ghang Lee, “Prompt engineering for zero-shot and few-shot de- fect detection and classification using a visual-language pretrained model,”Computer-Aided Civil and Infras- tructure Engineering, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1536–1554, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Texts as images in prompt tuning for multi-label image recognition,

    Zixian Guo, Bowen Dong, Zhilong Ji, Jinfeng Bai, Yiwen Guo, and Wangmeng Zuo, “Texts as images in prompt tuning for multi-label image recognition,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 2808–2817

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Denseclip: Language-guided dense prediction with context-aware prompting,

    Yongming Rao, Wenliang Zhao, Guangyi Chen, Yan- song Tang, Zheng Zhu, Guan Huang, Jie Zhou, and Ji- wen Lu, “Denseclip: Language-guided dense prediction with context-aware prompting,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 18082–18091

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Conditional prompt learning for vision- language models,

    Kaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu, “Conditional prompt learning for vision- language models,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 16816–16825

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Learning to prompt for vision-language models,

    Kaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu, “Learning to prompt for vision-language models,”International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 130, no. 9, pp. 2337–2348, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Differentiable spike: Rethinking gradient-descent for training spiking neural networks,

    Yuhang Li, Yufei Guo, Shanghang Zhang, Shikuang Deng, Yongqing Hai, and Shi Gu, “Differentiable spike: Rethinking gradient-descent for training spiking neural networks,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 23426–23439, 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Temporal efficient training of spiking neu- ral network via gradient re-weighting,

    Shikuang Deng, Yuhang Li, Shanghang Zhang, and Shi Gu, “Temporal efficient training of spiking neu- ral network via gradient re-weighting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11946, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022