Attosecond shaping of high-current pulsed electron beams in a home-built 37-keV beamline

Marie Ouill\'e; Takashi Isoshima; Takuya Hosobata; Yoshiyuki Takizawa; Yuichi Tachibana; Yutaka Yamagata; Yuya Morimoto

arxiv: 2605.23253 · v1 · pith:UPCMO3PCnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Attosecond shaping of high-current pulsed electron beams in a home-built 37-keV beamline

Yuichi Tachibana , Marie Ouill\'e , Takuya Hosobata , Takashi Isoshima , Yoshiyuki Takizawa , Yutaka Yamagata , Yuya Morimoto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

keywords attosecond electron pulseselectron beam shapingstreaking spectrograms37-keV beamlinespace charge effectshigh-current pulsesmembrane interactionultrashort electron bunches

0 comments

The pith

Membranes shape sub-relativistic electron pulses to 1.3 fs FWHM in a 37-keV beamline.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a membrane-based method for attosecond shaping of pulsed electron beams that carry more than two electrons per pulse with negligible space charge. Optimizing the membrane positions reduces electron-light timing spreads to within a femtosecond across angles, which allows clear streaking spectrograms to be recorded. These spectrograms display net acceleration, deceleration, monochromatization, and energy broadening. Model comparison then gives the bunched pulse durations as 1.3 fs FWHM and 0.5 fs RMS. The same modulation also reshapes beams whose initial energy spread reaches 15 eV FWHM.

Core claim

Through comparison with models, the authors estimate the durations of the bunched electrons to be 1.3 fs (FWHM) and 0.5 fs (RMS). They further demonstrate that an attosecond modulation amplitude of 2 eV suffices to shape pulsed beams whose initial energy spread originates from space charge and reaches 15 eV FWHM. These results are obtained in a home-built 37-keV apparatus that supplies a relatively high current while keeping space-charge effects negligible.

What carries the argument

The optimized membrane arrangement that interacts the electron pulses with light to produce attosecond streaking while limiting delay spreads to within a femtosecond over wide incident angles.

If this is right

High-average-current electron pulses become usable for time-resolved imaging and photon generation.
Attosecond modulation remains effective on beams that carry large energy spreads from space charge.
The technique advances the generation of attosecond electron pulses that contain one or more electrons.
Streaking spectrograms clearly register net acceleration, deceleration, monochromatization, and energy broadening.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The low space-charge regime may permit higher repetition rates in downstream ultrafast diffraction or imaging setups.
The same membrane interaction could be tested at different beam energies to check scaling of the bunching effect.
Combining the demonstrated modulation with tighter initial energy selection might reach single-electron attosecond pulses.

Load-bearing premise

Optimizing the membrane arrangement reduces the spread of electron-light delays to within a femtosecond across a wide range of incident angles.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of an electron pulse duration exceeding 1.3 fs FWHM or absence of the predicted acceleration, deceleration, and modulation signatures in the streaking spectrograms would falsify the reported shaping.

read the original abstract

Ultrashort electron pulses with a high average current provide a powerful means of enhancing time-resolved imaging and photon generation. In this study, we report the attosecond shaping of sub-relativistic electron beams using membranes in a newly developed apparatus that delivers a relatively high current (>2 electrons per pulse on a sample) with negligible space-charge effects. Optimizing the membrane arrangement minimizes the spread of electron-light delays to within a femtosecond over a wide range of incident angles. This enables the recording of attosecond streaking spectrograms, where net acceleration and deceleration, as well as monochromatization and energy broadening, are clearly observed. Through comparison with models, we estimate the durations of the bunched electrons to be 1.3 fs (FWHM) and 0.5 fs (RMS). Furthermore, we demonstrate the attosecond modulation of pulsed beams with a large energy spread originating from space charge effects. A modulation amplitude of 2 eV is shown to be sufficient to shape a beam with an initial spread of 15 eV (FWHM). These results represent a significant step toward the generation of an attosecond pulse containing one or more electrons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They built a working 37-keV line that shapes electron pulses via membranes and reports 1.3 fs bunches at usable current, but the timing claims rest on model comparisons whose key assumption lacks shown validation.

read the letter

The main point is that this group has a home-built 37 keV electron beamline that uses membranes to shape pulses and claims attosecond durations while keeping average current above 2 electrons per pulse with little space charge. They optimize the membrane layout to cut electron-light delay spread to under a femtosecond across angles, then record streaking spectrograms that show clear acceleration, deceleration, and energy changes. Model fits give 1.3 fs FWHM and 0.5 fs RMS bunch lengths, and they show a 2 eV modulation can compress a 15 eV space-charge-broadened beam. The practical high-current part in a sub-relativistic setup is the piece that stands out from earlier attosecond electron work. The space-charge modulation demo also addresses a common limit in these sources. The soft spots sit in the quantitative claims. The durations come from unspecified model comparisons with no error bars, raw data, or exclusion rules mentioned. The membrane optimization is stated to keep delays within a femtosecond, yet the abstract gives no ray-trace numbers, calibration data, or measured residual jitter distribution. If that spread is a few fs instead, the reported bunch lengths become upper bounds rather than direct results, exactly as the stress-test note flags. Without those details the central timing assumption stays unverified on the evidence given. This work is for people building or using ultrafast electron sources who care about current and attosecond control in imaging or photon generation. A reader who needs concrete setup ideas or wants to test similar membrane shaping would get usable information from the experimental approach. It deserves peer review because the setup is new enough and the results are presented in a form that referees can check against data. The claims are testable once the methods and raw spectrograms are available.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of attosecond shaping of sub-relativistic (37 keV) electron beams in a home-built beamline delivering >2 electrons per pulse with negligible space-charge effects. By optimizing membrane arrangement to minimize electron-light delay spreads, the authors record streaking spectrograms showing net acceleration/deceleration and energy modulation. Through model comparisons, they estimate bunched electron durations of 1.3 fs (FWHM) and 0.5 fs (RMS). They further show that a 2 eV modulation amplitude suffices to shape beams with 15 eV initial energy spread arising from space charge.

Significance. If the reported durations are confirmed as true bunch lengths rather than upper bounds, the work would constitute a meaningful step toward high-current attosecond electron pulses for time-resolved imaging and photon generation. The demonstration of shaping despite large initial energy spreads is practically relevant.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract (membrane optimization paragraph): The central claim that membrane arrangement optimization confines electron-light delay spread to within 1 fs over a wide range of incident angles is load-bearing for interpreting the streaking spectrograms and the 0.5 fs RMS duration estimate. No explicit calculation, ray-trace validation, or measured calibration of the residual delay distribution is described. If the actual spread exceeds ~1 fs, both the duration values and the claim that 2 eV modulation suffices for a 15 eV initial spread become upper bounds rather than direct measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the constructive comment regarding the membrane optimization claim. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (membrane optimization paragraph): The central claim that membrane arrangement optimization confines electron-light delay spread to within 1 fs over a wide range of incident angles is load-bearing for interpreting the streaking spectrograms and the 0.5 fs RMS duration estimate. No explicit calculation, ray-trace validation, or measured calibration of the residual delay distribution is described. If the actual spread exceeds ~1 fs, both the duration values and the claim that 2 eV modulation suffices for a 15 eV initial spread become upper bounds rather than direct measurements.

Authors: We agree that an explicit calculation or ray-trace validation of the residual delay spread is necessary to fully support the central claim and the resulting duration estimates. The current manuscript relies on model comparisons for the 1.3 fs FWHM / 0.5 fs RMS values but does not present the supporting ray-tracing or analytical derivation of the delay distribution after optimization. In the revised manuscript we will add this validation (either as a methods paragraph with a supplementary figure or an expanded methods section) showing the simulated delay spread remains within 1 fs across the relevant angular range. This addition will clarify that the reported durations incorporate the optimized configuration and are not merely upper bounds. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental claims

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report on attosecond electron beam shaping via membrane-based streaking, with bunch durations estimated by direct comparison to models rather than any derivation chain. No equations appear that define a quantity in terms of itself, rename a fit as a prediction, or import uniqueness results via self-citation. The membrane-optimization statement is presented as an empirical design choice enabling the measurement, not as a self-referential premise that forces the reported 1.3 fs / 0.5 fs values. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on model comparison for pulse duration and the stated condition of negligible space-charge effects; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Space-charge effects remain negligible at the reported current level (>2 electrons per pulse).
Invoked to justify high-current operation without beam degradation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1199 out tokens · 28730 ms · 2026-05-25T02:47:15.880202+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

García de Abajo, F. J. et al. Roadmap for Quantum Nanophotonics with Free Electrons. ACS Photonics 12, 4760–4817 (2025)

work page 2025
[2]

Vanacore, G. M. et al. Attosecond coherent control of free -electron wave functions using semi - infinite light fields. Nat. Commun. 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

Feist, A. et al. Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015)

work page 2015
[4]

Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J. & Zewail, A. H. Photon -induced near -field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009)

work page 2009
[5]

Th., Baskin, J

Hassan, M. Th., Baskin, J. S., Liao, B. & Zewail, A. H. High -temporal-resolution electron microscopy for imaging ultrafast electron dynamics. Nat. Photonics 11, 425–430 (2017)

work page 2017
[6]

C., Koutenský, P., Moriová, K

Chirita Mihaila, M. C., Koutenský, P., Moriová, K. & Kozák, M. Light -based electron aberration corrector. Nat. Photonics 19, 1309–1314 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

Tsarev, M., Thurner, J. W. & Baum, P. Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free -electron matter waves. Nat. Phys. 19, 1350–1354 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

Schwartz, O. et al. Laser phase plate for transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 1016– 1020 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

García de Abajo, F. J. & Ropers, C. Spatiotemporal Electron Beam Focusing through Parallel Interactions with Shaped Optical Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246901 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

Upper Bound for the Quantum Coupling between Free Electrons and Photons

Zhao, Z. Upper Bound for the Quantum Coupling between Free Electrons and Photons. Phys. Rev. 9 Lett. 134, 043804 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

Xie, Z. et al. Maximal Quantum Interaction between Free Electrons and Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 043803 (2025)

work page 2025
[12]

Henke, J. -W. et al. Integrated photonics enables continuous -beam electron phase modulation. Nature 600, 653–658 (2021)

work page 2021
[13]

& Talebi, N

Ebel, S. & Talebi, N. Structured free-space optical fields for transverse and longitudinal control of electron matter waves. New J. Phys. 27, 054103 (2025)

work page 2025
[14]

T., van Elk, I

Kempers, S. T., van Elk, I. J. M., van Leeuwen, K. A. H. & Luiten, O. J. Coherent electron phase - space manipulation by combined elastic and inelastic light -electron scattering. New J. Phys. 26, 093026 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Diffraction and microscopy with attosecond electron pulse trains. Nat. Phys. 14, 252–256 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Single-Cycle Optical Control of Beam Electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 193202 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Attosecond control of electron beams at dielectric and absorbing membranes. Phys. Rev. A 97, 033815 (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

Priebe, K. E. et al. Attosecond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Photonics 11, 793–797 (2017)

work page 2017
[19]

& Hommelhoff, P

Kozák, M., Schönenberger, N. & Hommelhoff, P. Ponderomotive Generation and Detection of Attosecond Free-Electron Pulse Trains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 103203 (2018)

work page 2018
[20]

Black, D. S. et al. Net Acceleration and Direct Measurement of Attosecond Electron Pulses in a Silicon Dielectric Laser Accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 264802 (2019)

work page 2019
[21]

Schönenberger, N. et al. Generation and Characterization of Attosecond Microbunched Electron Pulse Trains via Dielectric Laser Acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 264803 (2019)

work page 2019
[22]

Sears, C. M. S. et al. Production and characterization of attosecond electron bunch trains. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams 11, 061301 (2008)

work page 2008
[23]

& Baum, P

Nabben, D., Kuttruff, J., Stolz, L., Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Attosecond electron microscopy of sub- cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

Gaida, J. H. et al. Attosecond electron microscopy by free -electron homodyne detection. Nat. Photonics 18, 509–515 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

Bucher, T. et al. Coherently amplified ultrafast imaging using a free -electron interferometer. Nat. Photonics 18, 809–815 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

& Zepf, M

Cousens, S., Reville, B., Dromey, B. & Zepf, M. Temporal Structure of Attosecond Pulses from Laser-Driven Coherent Synchrotron Emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 083901 (2016)

work page 2016
[27]

& Kaminer, I

Ruimy, R., Karnieli, A. & Kaminer, I. Free-electron quantum optics. Nat. Phys. 21, 193–200 (2025)

work page 2025
[28]

Ben Hayun, A. et al. Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons. Sci. Adv. 7, (2021)

work page 2021
[29]

& Gover, A

Pan, Y . & Gover, A. Spontaneous and stimulated radiative emission of modulated free -electron quantum wavepackets—semiclassical analysis. J. Phys. Commun. 2, 115026 (2018)

work page 2018
[30]

& Gover, A

Pan, Y . & Gover, A. Spontaneous and stimulated emissions of a preformed quantum free-electron wave function. Phys. Rev. A 99, 052107 (2019)

work page 2019
[31]

Meuret, S. et al. Photon Bunching in Cathodoluminescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 197401 (2015)

work page 2015
[32]

J., Joannopoulos, J

Rivera, N., Wong, L. J., Joannopoulos, J. D., Soljačić, M. & Kaminer, I. Light emission based on nanophotonic vacuum forces. Nat. Phys. 15, 1284–1289 (2019)

work page 2019
[33]

Chlouba, T. et al. Coherent nanophotonic electron accelerator. Nature 622, 476–480 (2023)

work page 2023
[34]

England, R. J. et al. Dielectric laser accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1337–1389 (2014)

work page 2014
[35]

S., Stockman, M

Yakovlev, V . S., Stockman, M. I., Krausz, F. & Baum, P. Atomic-scale diffractive imaging of sub- 10 cycle electron dynamics in condensed matter. Sci. Rep. 5, 14581 (2015)

work page 2015
[36]

& Golubev, N

Yuan, M. & Golubev, N. V . Attosecond diffraction imaging of electron dynamics in solids. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L022042 (2025)

work page 2025
[37]

Shao, H. -C. & Starace, A. F. Imaging coherent electronic motion in atoms by ultrafast electron diffraction. Phys. Rev. A 88, 062711 (2013)

work page 2013
[38]

& Santra, R

Dixit, G., Vendrell, O. & Santra, R. Imaging electronic quantum motion with light. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 11636–11640 (2012)

work page 2012
[39]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Field-Induced Rocking-Curve Effects in Attosecond Electron Diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 216902 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

& Madsen, L

Morimoto, Y . & Madsen, L. B. Scattering of ultrashort electron wave packets: optical theorem, differential phase contrast and angular asymmetries. New J. Phys. 26, 053012 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

& Madsen, L

Morimoto, Y ., Hommelhoff, P. & Madsen, L. B. Scattering -asymmetry control with ultrafast electron wave packet shaping. New J. Phys. 27, 103201 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

& Yariv, A

Gover, A. & Yariv, A. Free-Electron–Bound-Electron Resonant Interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 064801 (2020)

work page 2020
[43]

Plettner, T. et al. Visible-Laser Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons in a Semi -Infinite V acuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 134801 (2005)

work page 2005
[44]

Attosecond electron-beam technology: a review of recent progress

Morimoto, Y . Attosecond electron-beam technology: a review of recent progress. Microscopy 72, 2–17 (2023)

work page 2023
[45]

Kealhofer, C. et al. All-optical control and metrology of electron pulses. Science. 352, 429–433 (2016)

work page 2016
[46]

Zhang, D. et al. Segmented terahertz electron accelerator and manipulator (STEAM). Nat. Photonics 12, 336–342 (2018)

work page 2018
[47]

Yannai, M. et al. Lossless Monochromator in an Ultrafast Electron Microscope Using Near -Field THz Radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 145002 (2023). 11 Fig.1. Attosecond shaping experiment in a home -built electron beamline. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup . See the text for details. (b) Arrangement of foils on the x-z plane (green) to minimize the ...

work page 2023

[1] [1]

García de Abajo, F. J. et al. Roadmap for Quantum Nanophotonics with Free Electrons. ACS Photonics 12, 4760–4817 (2025)

work page 2025

[2] [2]

Vanacore, G. M. et al. Attosecond coherent control of free -electron wave functions using semi - infinite light fields. Nat. Commun. 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018

[3] [3]

Feist, A. et al. Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015)

work page 2015

[4] [4]

Barwick, B., Flannigan, D. J. & Zewail, A. H. Photon -induced near -field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009)

work page 2009

[5] [5]

Th., Baskin, J

Hassan, M. Th., Baskin, J. S., Liao, B. & Zewail, A. H. High -temporal-resolution electron microscopy for imaging ultrafast electron dynamics. Nat. Photonics 11, 425–430 (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [6]

C., Koutenský, P., Moriová, K

Chirita Mihaila, M. C., Koutenský, P., Moriová, K. & Kozák, M. Light -based electron aberration corrector. Nat. Photonics 19, 1309–1314 (2025)

work page 2025

[7] [7]

Tsarev, M., Thurner, J. W. & Baum, P. Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free -electron matter waves. Nat. Phys. 19, 1350–1354 (2023)

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Schwartz, O. et al. Laser phase plate for transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 16, 1016– 1020 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

García de Abajo, F. J. & Ropers, C. Spatiotemporal Electron Beam Focusing through Parallel Interactions with Shaped Optical Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246901 (2023)

work page 2023

[10] [10]

Upper Bound for the Quantum Coupling between Free Electrons and Photons

Zhao, Z. Upper Bound for the Quantum Coupling between Free Electrons and Photons. Phys. Rev. 9 Lett. 134, 043804 (2025)

work page 2025

[11] [11]

Xie, Z. et al. Maximal Quantum Interaction between Free Electrons and Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 043803 (2025)

work page 2025

[12] [12]

Henke, J. -W. et al. Integrated photonics enables continuous -beam electron phase modulation. Nature 600, 653–658 (2021)

work page 2021

[13] [13]

& Talebi, N

Ebel, S. & Talebi, N. Structured free-space optical fields for transverse and longitudinal control of electron matter waves. New J. Phys. 27, 054103 (2025)

work page 2025

[14] [14]

T., van Elk, I

Kempers, S. T., van Elk, I. J. M., van Leeuwen, K. A. H. & Luiten, O. J. Coherent electron phase - space manipulation by combined elastic and inelastic light -electron scattering. New J. Phys. 26, 093026 (2024)

work page 2024

[15] [15]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Diffraction and microscopy with attosecond electron pulse trains. Nat. Phys. 14, 252–256 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Single-Cycle Optical Control of Beam Electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 193202 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Attosecond control of electron beams at dielectric and absorbing membranes. Phys. Rev. A 97, 033815 (2018)

work page 2018

[18] [18]

Priebe, K. E. et al. Attosecond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Photonics 11, 793–797 (2017)

work page 2017

[19] [19]

& Hommelhoff, P

Kozák, M., Schönenberger, N. & Hommelhoff, P. Ponderomotive Generation and Detection of Attosecond Free-Electron Pulse Trains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 103203 (2018)

work page 2018

[20] [20]

Black, D. S. et al. Net Acceleration and Direct Measurement of Attosecond Electron Pulses in a Silicon Dielectric Laser Accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 264802 (2019)

work page 2019

[21] [21]

Schönenberger, N. et al. Generation and Characterization of Attosecond Microbunched Electron Pulse Trains via Dielectric Laser Acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 264803 (2019)

work page 2019

[22] [22]

Sears, C. M. S. et al. Production and characterization of attosecond electron bunch trains. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams 11, 061301 (2008)

work page 2008

[23] [23]

& Baum, P

Nabben, D., Kuttruff, J., Stolz, L., Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Attosecond electron microscopy of sub- cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023)

work page 2023

[24] [24]

Gaida, J. H. et al. Attosecond electron microscopy by free -electron homodyne detection. Nat. Photonics 18, 509–515 (2024)

work page 2024

[25] [25]

Bucher, T. et al. Coherently amplified ultrafast imaging using a free -electron interferometer. Nat. Photonics 18, 809–815 (2024)

work page 2024

[26] [26]

& Zepf, M

Cousens, S., Reville, B., Dromey, B. & Zepf, M. Temporal Structure of Attosecond Pulses from Laser-Driven Coherent Synchrotron Emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 083901 (2016)

work page 2016

[27] [27]

& Kaminer, I

Ruimy, R., Karnieli, A. & Kaminer, I. Free-electron quantum optics. Nat. Phys. 21, 193–200 (2025)

work page 2025

[28] [28]

Ben Hayun, A. et al. Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons. Sci. Adv. 7, (2021)

work page 2021

[29] [29]

& Gover, A

Pan, Y . & Gover, A. Spontaneous and stimulated radiative emission of modulated free -electron quantum wavepackets—semiclassical analysis. J. Phys. Commun. 2, 115026 (2018)

work page 2018

[30] [30]

& Gover, A

Pan, Y . & Gover, A. Spontaneous and stimulated emissions of a preformed quantum free-electron wave function. Phys. Rev. A 99, 052107 (2019)

work page 2019

[31] [31]

Meuret, S. et al. Photon Bunching in Cathodoluminescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 197401 (2015)

work page 2015

[32] [32]

J., Joannopoulos, J

Rivera, N., Wong, L. J., Joannopoulos, J. D., Soljačić, M. & Kaminer, I. Light emission based on nanophotonic vacuum forces. Nat. Phys. 15, 1284–1289 (2019)

work page 2019

[33] [33]

Chlouba, T. et al. Coherent nanophotonic electron accelerator. Nature 622, 476–480 (2023)

work page 2023

[34] [34]

England, R. J. et al. Dielectric laser accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1337–1389 (2014)

work page 2014

[35] [35]

S., Stockman, M

Yakovlev, V . S., Stockman, M. I., Krausz, F. & Baum, P. Atomic-scale diffractive imaging of sub- 10 cycle electron dynamics in condensed matter. Sci. Rep. 5, 14581 (2015)

work page 2015

[36] [36]

& Golubev, N

Yuan, M. & Golubev, N. V . Attosecond diffraction imaging of electron dynamics in solids. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L022042 (2025)

work page 2025

[37] [37]

Shao, H. -C. & Starace, A. F. Imaging coherent electronic motion in atoms by ultrafast electron diffraction. Phys. Rev. A 88, 062711 (2013)

work page 2013

[38] [38]

& Santra, R

Dixit, G., Vendrell, O. & Santra, R. Imaging electronic quantum motion with light. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 11636–11640 (2012)

work page 2012

[39] [39]

& Baum, P

Morimoto, Y . & Baum, P. Field-Induced Rocking-Curve Effects in Attosecond Electron Diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 216902 (2024)

work page 2024

[40] [40]

& Madsen, L

Morimoto, Y . & Madsen, L. B. Scattering of ultrashort electron wave packets: optical theorem, differential phase contrast and angular asymmetries. New J. Phys. 26, 053012 (2024)

work page 2024

[41] [41]

& Madsen, L

Morimoto, Y ., Hommelhoff, P. & Madsen, L. B. Scattering -asymmetry control with ultrafast electron wave packet shaping. New J. Phys. 27, 103201 (2025)

work page 2025

[42] [42]

& Yariv, A

Gover, A. & Yariv, A. Free-Electron–Bound-Electron Resonant Interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 064801 (2020)

work page 2020

[43] [43]

Plettner, T. et al. Visible-Laser Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons in a Semi -Infinite V acuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 134801 (2005)

work page 2005

[44] [44]

Attosecond electron-beam technology: a review of recent progress

Morimoto, Y . Attosecond electron-beam technology: a review of recent progress. Microscopy 72, 2–17 (2023)

work page 2023

[45] [45]

Kealhofer, C. et al. All-optical control and metrology of electron pulses. Science. 352, 429–433 (2016)

work page 2016

[46] [46]

Zhang, D. et al. Segmented terahertz electron accelerator and manipulator (STEAM). Nat. Photonics 12, 336–342 (2018)

work page 2018

[47] [47]

Yannai, M. et al. Lossless Monochromator in an Ultrafast Electron Microscope Using Near -Field THz Radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 145002 (2023). 11 Fig.1. Attosecond shaping experiment in a home -built electron beamline. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup . See the text for details. (b) Arrangement of foils on the x-z plane (green) to minimize the ...

work page 2023