On the Performance of DCF in Full Duplex WLANs with Hidden Terminals
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:05 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Full duplex WLANs achieve only small saturation throughput gains over half duplex under DCF even with hidden terminals.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper establishes that, under the DCF regime, FD technology exhibits an exiguous performance improvement, in terms of saturation throughput, when compared with its half duplex counterpart, in WLANs with hidden terminals. The analysis is based on performance modelling of the CSMA/CA protocol.
What carries the argument
A Markov-chain based analytical model of the CSMA/CA backoff process extended to full-duplex transmission with hidden terminals.
If this is right
- The standard DCF must be altered to allow more simultaneous access if full-duplex benefits are to be realized.
- Hidden terminals do not create opportunities for substantial concurrent transmissions under current DCF rules.
- Saturation throughput in full-duplex setups remains close to half-duplex levels despite theoretical doubling potential.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Future MAC protocols could incorporate explicit full-duplex signaling to increase simultaneous transmissions.
- Network planners might prioritize other capacity-enhancing techniques over full-duplex hardware in environments using standard DCF.
- Extending the model to non-saturation traffic could reveal different behaviors.
Load-bearing premise
The analytical performance model correctly captures the interaction of CSMA/CA back-off, collision avoidance, and simultaneous transmission feasibility when hidden terminals are present.
What would settle it
Empirical measurements or detailed simulations of a full-duplex WLAN using DCF with hidden terminals that demonstrate saturation throughput substantially higher than the equivalent half-duplex network would falsify the claim of only exiguous improvement.
Figures
read the original abstract
Full Duplex (FD) technology is considered as one of the next big leap in the evolution of modern WLANs. Allowing a node to simultaneously transmit a data frame while in receive mode, can theoretically double the system throughput. However, several requirements must be fulfilled in order for FD operation to manifest. One obvious prerequisite is that the Medium Access Control (MAC) mechanism must allow two nodes to access the shared medium simultaneously. In modern WLANs the standard MAC layer mechanism is the Distributed Coordination Function (DCF), which is specifically designed to avoid such situations. FD communications may also take place when the physical placement of the communicating parts involves the existence of hidden terminals which, in standard Half Duplex (HD) communications, imposes a significant problem. This paper investigates the performance of the Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) protocol, which constitutes the basis of the DCF mechanism, in FD WLANs with hidden terminals, and compares it with the standard HD case. Our analysis is based on performance modelling. Results indicate that, under the DCF regime, FD technology exhibits an exiguous performance improvement, in terms of saturation throughput, when compared with its half duplex counterpart.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper develops an analytical performance model for CSMA/CA (the basis of DCF) in full-duplex WLANs that include hidden terminals. It compares saturation throughput under FD operation to the standard half-duplex case and concludes that FD yields only an exiguous improvement.
Significance. If the model holds, the result would indicate that the theoretical doubling of throughput from FD is largely unrealized under DCF with hidden terminals, which is relevant for assessing FD's practical value in Wi-Fi evolution. The absence of free parameters in the derivation (per the axiom ledger) is a positive attribute that strengthens the analysis if the state transitions and collision modeling are correctly specified.
minor comments (1)
- The abstract states the modeling result but supplies no equations, assumptions, or validation steps, which limits immediate assessment of the central claim.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for reviewing our manuscript. The provided report contains no specific major comments, only a summary of our analytical finding that full-duplex DCF yields only marginal saturation throughput gains relative to half-duplex under hidden terminals. We have no points to rebut or revise on that basis.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity identified
full rationale
The available manuscript text consists of the abstract and high-level description of a performance modeling analysis for CSMA/CA under FD with hidden terminals. No equations, state-transition diagrams, throughput expressions, or self-citations are supplied that would allow any load-bearing prediction to be shown as reducing to a fitted parameter or prior result by construction. The central claim of exiguous FD improvement is presented as the output of an independent analytical model whose internal steps cannot be inspected for circularity from the given material; therefore the derivation is treated as self-contained.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M. S. Simet al, ”Nonlinear self-interference cancellation for full-duplex radios: from link-level and system-level performance perspectives,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 158–167, Sept. 2017
work page 2017
-
[2]
J. I. Choi, M. Jain, K. Srinivasan, P. Levis, and S. Katti, ”Achieving single channel, full duplex wireless communication,” inProc. ACM MOBICOM ’10, 2010, pp. 1–12
work page 2010
-
[3]
D. Bharadia, E. McMilin and S. Katti, ”Full duplex radios,”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 43, no. 4 pp. 375– 386, 2013
work page 2013
-
[4]
D. Lopez-Perez, A. Garcia-Rodriguez, L. Galati-Giordano, M. Kasslin and K. Doppler, ”IEEE 802.11be — Extremely High Throughput: The Next Generation of Wi-Fi Technology Beyond 802.11ax,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 113–119, Sept. 2019
work page 2019
- [5]
-
[6]
M. R. Amin, M. S. Hossain and M. Atiquzzaman, ”In-Band Full Duplex Wireless LANs: Medium Access Control Protocols, Design Issues and Their Challenges,”Information, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 216, Apr. 2020
work page 2020
-
[7]
Gan et al., ”Full Duplex for Next Generation of 802.11,” inProc
M. Gan et al., ”Full Duplex for Next Generation of 802.11,” inProc. IEEE PIMRC 2019 (PIMRC Workshops), 2019, pp. 1-6
work page 2019
-
[8]
A. K. Gupta and T. G. Venkatesh, ”Design and analysis of IEEE 802.11 based full duplex WLAN MAC protocol,”Computer Networks, V olume 210, 108933, June 2022
work page 2022
-
[9]
Per- formance analysis of CSMA/CA based medium access in full duplex wireless communications,
R. Doost-Mohammady, M. Y . Naderi, and K. R. Chowdhury, “Per- formance analysis of CSMA/CA based medium access in full duplex wireless communications,”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1457–1470, June 2016
work page 2016
-
[10]
Performance of the full-duplex MAC protocol in non-saturated conditions,
K. Lee and J. Yoo, “Performance of the full-duplex MAC protocol in non-saturated conditions,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1827–1830, Aug 2017
work page 2017
-
[11]
M. Murad and A. Eltawil, ”Performance Analysis and Enhancements for In-Band Full-Duplex Wireless Local Area Networks,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 111636 - 111652, June 2020
work page 2020
-
[12]
E. W. Weisstein, ”Circle-Circle Intersection.” From MathWorld– A Wolfram Web Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Circle- CircleIntersection.html (accessed May 9, 2022)
work page 2022
-
[13]
G. Bianchi, ”Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coor- dination function,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 535–547, March 2000
work page 2000
-
[14]
Liuet al, ”The Hidden Cost of Hidden Terminals,” inProc
F. Liuet al, ”The Hidden Cost of Hidden Terminals,” inProc. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2010, pp. 1-6
work page 2010
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.