pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25060 · v1 · pith:MM4MML4Jnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Impact of non-equilibrium radiation in a high-enthalpy inductively coupled plasma wind tunnel

Sanjeev Kumar , Sung Min Jo , Alessandro Munaf\`o , Marco Panesi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords inductively coupled plasmaradiative coolingnon-equilibrium radiationplasma wind tunnelatmospheric entrymagnetohydrodynamicsspectral radiative transportoptically thin regime
0
0 comments X

The pith

Radiative losses reach up to 32% of input power at atmospheric pressure in nitrogen plasmas inside high-enthalpy ICP wind tunnels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a simulation framework that couples a magnetohydrodynamic plasma model with a spectral radiative transport solver to quantify non-equilibrium radiation effects in the Plasmatron X facility. Simulations span nitrogen and air plasmas at pressures from 1 to 101 kPa and powers from 100 to 350 kW. Radiation contributes negligibly at low pressure but becomes a major energy sink at higher pressures. At atmospheric pressure the losses reach approximately 32% of input power for nitrogen and 22% for air, producing clear drops in core temperatures. The work shows that the torch remains mostly optically thin even at the highest conditions examined.

Core claim

The authors establish that radiative losses account for up to 32% of input power for nitrogen plasmas and 22% for air plasmas at atmospheric pressure, causing substantial reductions in core plasma temperatures, while the facility operates predominantly in an optically thin regime across the full range of pressures and powers considered.

What carries the argument

A loosely coupled multi-physics framework that self-consistently couples a magnetohydrodynamic plasma solver with a spectral radiative transport solver to compute radiative cooling without relying on optically thin or empirical approximations.

If this is right

  • Pressure-power maps of radiative loss fraction provide direct guidance for when radiation must be included in facility modeling.
  • Nitrogen plasmas exhibit systematically higher radiative losses than air plasmas because of greater concentrations of radiatively active species and higher electron densities.
  • Core temperatures are substantially lower once radiation is accounted for, altering predicted heat fluxes to test articles.
  • The optically thin regime holds even at the highest power and pressure, so simplified radiation models remain usable under most operating conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Comparable radiative loss fractions are likely in other ICP or arc-heated facilities once they reach similar pressure and power-density levels.
  • Incorporating radiation feedback into flow-field predictions could change inferred enthalpy and velocity distributions in the test section.
  • Extending the same framework to time-dependent or fully coupled simulations would test whether radiative cooling alters the stability of the inductive discharge.

Load-bearing premise

The loosely coupled MHD-plus-radiative-transport model produces quantitatively accurate fractions of radiative loss without requiring full two-way coupling or direct experimental validation at the Plasmatron X conditions.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of core plasma temperature or total radiated power in the Plasmatron X at 101 kPa and 350 kW, compared against the simulation results with and without the radiation module.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25060 by Alessandro Munaf\`o, Marco Panesi, Sanjeev Kumar, Sung Min Jo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Flowchart of the coupling framework used in this work. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Geometry of the Plasmatron X torch [57]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Torch mesh (with nozzle) for the hegel and flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: EM solver mesh. The mesh domain highlighted in green overlaps with the plasma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plasma field inside the Plasmatron X torch. (a) Top: heavy-species temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of the electromagnetic quantities inside the torch. (a) Joule heating, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radial temperature profiles obtained using the NLTE and LTE simulations. (a) x [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: LTE and NLTE radial profiles of Joule heating and Lorentz force at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radiative heat loss and Joule heating distribution normalized by corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Radiative heat loss and Joule heating distribution normalized by corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of electron mole-fraction Xe and electro-vibrational temperature Tve in the torch for air plasma. (a) 1 kPa case, and (b) 30 kPa case, both at a fixed operating power of 200 kW (with η = 50%) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Total radiative heat loss in the ICP torch as a percent of input power at a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Electron number density distribution at 30 kPa, and 200 kW (with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Radial profiles of heavy-species temperature for nitrogen plasma at a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Radial profiles of electro-vibrational temperature for nitrogen plasma at a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Radial profiles of heavy-species temperature for air plasma at a fixed operating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Radial profiles of electro-vibrational temperature for air plasma at a fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Total radiative heat loss in the ICP torch as a percent of input power : (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Decomposition of the total radiative heat loss in the ICP torch as a percent of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Radiative heat loss distribution in the torch for air plasma. Top: without self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-power inductively coupled plasma (ICP) wind tunnels are widely used to reproduce high-enthalpy environments relevant to atmospheric entry and hypersonic testing. Despite their importance, radiative heat transfer in ICP facilities is commonly neglected or modeled using simplified optically thin assumptions, and the impact of non-equilibrium radiation on plasma dynamics remains poorly quantified. In this work, a loosely coupled, multi-physics framework is developed to systematically investigate radiative cooling effects in the 350 kW Plasmatron X facility at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The approach self-consistently couples a magnetohydrodynamic plasma framework with a spectral radiative transport solver, eliminating the need for optically thin or empirical models. Simulations are performed for nitrogen and air plasmas over a wide range of operating pressures (1-101 kPa) and powers (100-350 kW). The results reveal a strong pressure dependence of radiative losses, with radiation contributing negligibly at low pressures, but becoming a dominant energy sink at elevated pressures. At atmospheric pressure, radiative losses account for up to approximately 32% and 22% of the input power for nitrogen and air plasmas, respectively, leading to substantial reductions in core plasma temperatures. Nitrogen plasmas consistently exhibit higher radiative losses than air as a result of increased concentrations of radiatively active species and higher electron number densities. Pressure-power maps of radiative heat loss relative to input power are constructed to quantify combined operating effects and to provide guidance for facility operation and modeling fidelity. Finally, an assessment of self-absorption demonstrates that the Plasmatron X torch operates predominantly in an optically thin regime, even at the highest power and pressure conditions considered.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a loosely coupled multi-physics framework that combines an MHD plasma solver with a spectral radiative transport solver to quantify non-equilibrium radiative cooling in the 350 kW Plasmatron X ICP wind tunnel. Simulations for nitrogen and air plasmas across 1–101 kPa and 100–350 kW show negligible radiative losses at low pressure but up to ~32 % (N₂) and ~22 % (air) of input power at atmospheric pressure, producing substantial core-temperature reductions; the facility is reported to remain optically thin even at the highest conditions, and pressure–power maps are provided for operational guidance.

Significance. If the quantitative loss fractions prove accurate, the work supplies concrete, facility-specific guidance on when radiation must be retained in high-enthalpy ICP modeling and quantifies the N₂–air difference arising from radiatively active species and electron density; the pressure–power maps would be directly useful for both experiment design and code validation in atmospheric-entry testing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results: the central quantitative claims (radiative losses = 32 % N₂ / 22 % air of input power at 101 kPa) are obtained from a single-pass, loosely coupled MHD + spectral RT calculation without iteration of the radiative sink back into the plasma state. Because radiative cooling lowers temperature and therefore emission, the reported fractions are sensitive to this missing feedback; no convergence test with respect to coupling iterations is shown.
  2. [Results / Methods] Results / Methods: no mesh-convergence data, grid-resolution study, or uncertainty quantification is supplied for the loss percentages, and no direct comparison to experimental temperature or power-balance measurements for Plasmatron X conditions is presented to anchor the numerical values.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Reconcile the abstract phrasing “self-consistently couples” with the body description of a “loosely coupled” single-pass procedure.
  2. [Methods] Specify the spectral discretization (number of lines/bands, wavelength grid) and the atomic/molecular databases employed in the radiative transport solver.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript describing the loosely coupled MHD-radiative framework for the Plasmatron X facility. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results: the central quantitative claims (radiative losses = 32 % N₂ / 22 % air of input power at 101 kPa) are obtained from a single-pass, loosely coupled MHD + spectral RT calculation without iteration of the radiative sink back into the plasma state. Because radiative cooling lowers temperature and therefore emission, the reported fractions are sensitive to this missing feedback; no convergence test with respect to coupling iterations is shown.

    Authors: We agree that the reported loss fractions are obtained from a single-pass, loosely coupled calculation in which the radiative sink is not fed back into the MHD solution. This is an inherent feature of the current framework, and the referee correctly notes that the absence of iteration means the values (particularly at 101 kPa) represent an upper-bound estimate, since radiative cooling would lower temperature and emission. The optically thin regime identified in the work mitigates some of the feedback on transport properties, but does not eliminate the temperature effect. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly state this limitation, quantify its expected direction, and indicate that iterative coupling remains a topic for subsequent study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results / Methods] Results / Methods: no mesh-convergence data, grid-resolution study, or uncertainty quantification is supplied for the loss percentages, and no direct comparison to experimental temperature or power-balance measurements for Plasmatron X conditions is presented to anchor the numerical values.

    Authors: A dedicated mesh-convergence study and uncertainty quantification for the radiative loss percentages were not included in the original submission. The computational grids were chosen on the basis of prior validation of the MHD solver for similar ICP configurations, with resolution sufficient to capture core temperature and velocity profiles. We will add a grid-convergence appendix in the revised manuscript that reports changes in temperature, power balance, and radiative loss fraction under successive refinements. With respect to experimental anchoring, detailed temperature and power-balance measurements matching the exact simulated pressures and powers are not available in the published literature for Plasmatron X. The present work is therefore positioned as a modeling study to inform facility operation and future validation experiments; we will make this scope explicit in the revised text. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct numerical solution of governing equations

full rationale

The paper computes radiative loss fractions (32% N2, 22% air at 101 kPa) as direct outputs of a loosely coupled MHD + spectral RT simulation across parameter sweeps. No equations or steps reduce predictions to fitted parameters by construction, no self-definitional loops appear, and no load-bearing self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatzes. The derivation chain consists of standard physical models solved numerically; reported percentages are simulation results, not tautological renamings or forced fits. This is the expected non-finding for a computational physics study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are stated. The framework rests on standard MHD and radiative-transfer equations.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetohydrodynamic equations coupled to spectral radiative transport accurately describe the non-equilibrium plasma state in the facility
    This is the modeling premise of the loosely coupled framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5837 in / 1253 out tokens · 39600 ms · 2026-06-29T23:47:27.724784+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Thermal plasmas: Fundamentals and Applications,

    Boulos, M., “Thermal plasmas: Fundamentals and Applications,”Plenum, Vol. 1, 1994, pp. 163. 25

    1994

  2. [2]

    Flow and temperature fields in the fire-ball of an inductively coupled plasma,

    Boulos, M. I., “Flow and temperature fields in the fire-ball of an inductively coupled plasma,”IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., Vol. 4, No. 1, 1976, pp. 28–39

    1976

  3. [3]

    Parametric study of the flow and temperature fields in an inductively coupled rf plasma torch,

    Mostaghimi, J., Proulx, P., and Boulos, M. I., “Parametric study of the flow and temperature fields in an inductively coupled rf plasma torch,”Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., Vol. 4, No. 3, 1984, pp. 199–217

    1984

  4. [4]

    An analysis of the computer modeling of the flow and temperature fields in an inductively coupled plasma,

    Mostaghimi, J., Proulx, P., and Boulos, M. I., “An analysis of the computer modeling of the flow and temperature fields in an inductively coupled plasma,”Numer. Heat Transf., Vol. 8, No. 2, 1985, pp. 187–201

    1985

  5. [5]

    Heating of powders in an rf inductively coupled plasma under dense loading conditions,

    Proulx, P., Mostaghimi, J., and Boulos, M. I., “Heating of powders in an rf inductively coupled plasma under dense loading conditions,”Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., Vol. 7, 1987, pp. 29–52

    1987

  6. [6]

    Effect of frequency on local thermodynamic equilibrium conditions in an inductively coupled argon plasma at atmospheric pressure,

    Mostaghimi, J. and Boulos, M. I., “Effect of frequency on local thermodynamic equilibrium conditions in an inductively coupled argon plasma at atmospheric pressure,”J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 68, No. 6, 1990, pp. 2643–2648

    1990

  7. [7]

    Modeling of RF plasma torch with a metallic tube inserted for reactant injection,

    Chen, X. and Pfender, E., “Modeling of RF plasma torch with a metallic tube inserted for reactant injection,”Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., Vol. 11, No. 1, 1991, pp. 103–128

    1991

  8. [8]

    Efficient computational model for inductive plasma flows,

    Abeele, D. V. and Degrez, G., “Efficient computational model for inductive plasma flows,”AIAA J., Vol. 38, No. 2, 2000, pp. 234–242

    2000

  9. [9]

    Simulation of subsonic and supersonic flows in inductive plasmatrons,

    Utyuzhnikov, S., Konyukhov, A., Rudenko, D., Vasil’evskii, S., Kolesnikov, A., and Chazot, O., “Simulation of subsonic and supersonic flows in inductive plasmatrons,”AIAA J., Vol. 42, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1871–1877

    2004

  10. [10]

    Nonequilibrium hypersonic aerothermodynamics,

    Park, C., “Nonequilibrium hypersonic aerothermodynamics,” 1989

    1989

  11. [11]

    Review of chemical-kinetic problems of future NASA missions. I-Earth entries,

    Park, C., “Review of chemical-kinetic problems of future NASA missions. I-Earth entries,”J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., Vol. 7, No. 3, 1993, pp. 385–398

    1993

  12. [12]

    Chemical-kinetic parameters of hyperbolic earth entry,

    Park, C., Jaffe, R. L., and Partridge, H., “Chemical-kinetic parameters of hyperbolic earth entry,”J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., Vol. 15, No. 1, 2001, pp. 76–90

    2001

  13. [13]

    A two-temperature model of the inductively coupled rf plasma,

    Mostaghimi, J., Proulx, P., and Boulos, M. I., “A two-temperature model of the inductively coupled rf plasma,”J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 61, No. 5, 1987, pp. 1753–1760

    1987

  14. [14]

    Two-dimensional electromagnetic field effects in induction plasma modeling,

    Mostaghimi, J. and Boulos, M. I., “Two-dimensional electromagnetic field effects in induction plasma modeling,”Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., Vol. 9, No. 1, 1989, pp. 25–44

    1989

  15. [15]

    Modeling of non-equilibrium argon–oxygen induction plasmas under atmospheric pressure,

    Atsuchi, N., Shigeta, M., and Watanabe, T., “Modeling of non-equilibrium argon–oxygen induction plasmas under atmospheric pressure,”Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., Vol. 49, No. 5-6, 2006, pp. 1073– 1082

    2006

  16. [16]

    Analysis of chemical nonequilibrium and elemental demixing in plasmatron facility,

    Panesi, M., Rini, P., Degrez, G., and Chazot, O., “Analysis of chemical nonequilibrium and elemental demixing in plasmatron facility,”J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., Vol. 21, No. 1, 2007, pp. 57–66

    2007

  17. [17]

    Analysis of non-equilibrium phenomena in inductively coupled plasma generators,

    Zhang, W., Lani, A., and Panesi, M., “Analysis of non-equilibrium phenomena in inductively coupled plasma generators,”Phys. Plasmas, Vol. 23, No. 7, 2016, pp. 073512

    2016

  18. [18]

    Investigation of non-equilibrium phenomena in nitrogen RF inductively coupled plasma discharges: a state-to-state approach,

    Kumar, S., Munaf` o, A., Jo, S. M., and Panesi, M., “Investigation of non-equilibrium phenomena in nitrogen RF inductively coupled plasma discharges: a state-to-state approach,”J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., Vol. 58, No. 2, 2024, pp. 025204

    2024

  19. [19]

    Numerical analysis of three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic effects in an inductively coupled plasma wind tunnel,

    Kumar, S., Munaf` o, A., Bodony, D. J., and Panesi, M., “Numerical analysis of three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic effects in an inductively coupled plasma wind tunnel,”J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., Vol. 58, No. 34, 2025, pp. 345208

    2025

  20. [20]

    Flow and temperature fields in the fire-ball of an inductively coupled plasma,

    Boulos, M., “Flow and temperature fields in the fire-ball of an inductively coupled plasma,”IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., Vol. 4, No. 1, 1976, pp. 28–39

    1976

  21. [21]

    Temperature profiles and energy balances for an inductively coupled plasma torch,

    Miller, R. C. and Ayen, R. J., “Temperature profiles and energy balances for an inductively coupled plasma torch,”J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 40, No. 13, 1969, pp. 5260–5273

    1969

  22. [22]

    G.,Nonequilibrium behavior in a flowing, atmospheric pressure plasma, Stanford University, 1991

    Owano, T. G.,Nonequilibrium behavior in a flowing, atmospheric pressure plasma, Stanford University, 1991

    1991

  23. [23]

    Measurement of emission and absorption of radiation by an argon plasma,

    Evans, D. L. and Tankin, R., “Measurement of emission and absorption of radiation by an argon plasma,” Phys. Fluids, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1967, pp. 1137–1144

    1967

  24. [24]

    Measurements of the radiation source strength in argon at 26 temperatures between 5000 and 10 000 K,

    Owano, T., Gordon, M., and Kruger, C., “Measurements of the radiation source strength in argon at 26 temperatures between 5000 and 10 000 K,”Phys. Fluids B, Vol. 2, No. 12, 1990, pp. 3184–3190

    1990

  25. [25]

    A fitting formula for radiative cooling based on non-local thermodynamic equilibrium population from weakly-ionized air plasma,

    Ogino, Y., Nagano, A., Ishihara, T., and Ohnishi, N., “A fitting formula for radiative cooling based on non-local thermodynamic equilibrium population from weakly-ionized air plasma,”J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., Vol. 454, IOP Publishing, 2013, p. 012080

    2013

  26. [26]

    Physics and technology of low- temperature plasma,

    Dresvin, S. V., Donskoi, A. V., God’dfarb, V., and Klubnikin, V., “Physics and technology of low- temperature plasma,” 1972

    1972

  27. [27]

    Experimental investigation of transport properties of low-temperature plasma by means of electric arc,

    Asinovsky, E., Kirillin, A., Pakhomov, E., and Shabashov, V., “Experimental investigation of transport properties of low-temperature plasma by means of electric arc,”Proc. IEEE, Vol. 59, No. 4, 1971, pp. 592–601

    1971

  28. [28]

    Air transport coefficients from electric arc measurements,

    Devoto, R., Bauder, U., Cailleteau, J., and Shires, E., “Air transport coefficients from electric arc measurements,”Phys. Fluids, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1978, pp. 552–558

    1978

  29. [29]

    Direct coupling of the NEQAIR radiation and DPLR CFD codes,

    Palmer, G. E., White, T., and Pace, A., “Direct coupling of the NEQAIR radiation and DPLR CFD codes,”J. Spacecr. Rockets, Vol. 48, No. 5, 2011, pp. 836–845

    2011

  30. [30]

    Flow-radiation coupling in CO 2 hypersonic wakes using reduced-order non-Boltzmann models,

    Sahai, A., Johnston, C. O., Lopez, B., and Panesi, M., “Flow-radiation coupling in CO 2 hypersonic wakes using reduced-order non-Boltzmann models,”Phys. Rev. Fluids, Vol. 4, No. 9, 2019, pp. 093401

    2019

  31. [31]

    Radiation coupling with the fun3d unstructured-grid cfd code,

    Wood, W., “Radiation coupling with the fun3d unstructured-grid cfd code,”AIAA Paper 2012-2741

    2012

  32. [32]

    Multi-Fidelity Modeling Framework for Radiative Transfer in Hypersonic Atmospheric Entry,

    Jo, S. M., Kumar, S., Le Maout, V., Munaf` o, A., and Panesi, M., “Multi-Fidelity Modeling Framework for Radiative Transfer in Hypersonic Atmospheric Entry,”AIAA Paper 2023-1730

    2023

  33. [33]

    Radiative viscous-shock-layer analysis of Fire, Apollo, and PAET flight data,

    Balakrishnan, A., Park, C., and Green, M., “Radiative viscous-shock-layer analysis of Fire, Apollo, and PAET flight data,”AIAA Paper 1985-1064

    1985

  34. [34]

    Comparison of coupled radiative flow solutions with project fire II flight data,

    Olynick, D. R., Henline, W., Chambers, L. H., and Candler, G., “Comparison of coupled radiative flow solutions with project fire II flight data,”J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., Vol. 9, No. 4, 1995, pp. 586–594

    1995

  35. [35]

    Development of a nonequilibrium radiative heating prediction method for coupled flowfield solutions,

    Hartung, L. C., “Development of a nonequilibrium radiative heating prediction method for coupled flowfield solutions,”J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., Vol. 6, No. 4, 1992, pp. 618–625

    1992

  36. [36]

    Electronic-state-resolved analysis of high-enthalpy air plasma flows,

    Jo, S. M., Kwon, O. J., and Kim, J. G., “Electronic-state-resolved analysis of high-enthalpy air plasma flows,”Phys. Rev. E, Vol. 100, No. 3, 2019, pp. 033203

    2019

  37. [37]

    Examination of Coupled Continnum Fluid Dynamics and Radiation in Hypersonic Simulations,

    Feldick, A., Modest, M., Levin, D., Gnoffo, P., and Johnston, C., “Examination of Coupled Continnum Fluid Dynamics and Radiation in Hypersonic Simulations,”AIAA Paper 2009-475

    2009

  38. [38]

    Fire II flight experiment analysis by means of a collisional-radiative model,

    Panesi, M., Magin, T., Bourdon, A., Bultel, A., and Chazot, O., “Fire II flight experiment analysis by means of a collisional-radiative model,”J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., Vol. 23, No. 2, 2009, pp. 236– 248

    2009

  39. [39]

    Thermodynamic and transport properties for inductive plasma modeling,

    Bottin, B., Abeele, D. V., Carbonaro, M., Degrez, G., and Sarma, G. S., “Thermodynamic and transport properties for inductive plasma modeling,”J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., Vol. 13, No. 3, 1999, pp. 343– 350

    1999

  40. [40]

    A computational model for nanosecond pulse laser-plasma interactions,

    Munaf` o, A., Alberti, A., Pantano, C., Freund, J. B., and Panesi, M., “A computational model for nanosecond pulse laser-plasma interactions,”J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 406, 2020, pp. 109190

    2020

  41. [41]

    and Kruger, C

    Mitchner, M. and Kruger, C. H.,Partially Ionized Gases, John Wiley & Sons, 1973

    1973

  42. [42]

    A.,Conservation equations and physical models for hypersonic air flows in thermal and chemical nonequilibrium, Vol

    Gnoffo, P. A.,Conservation equations and physical models for hypersonic air flows in thermal and chemical nonequilibrium, Vol. 2867, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1989

    1989

  43. [43]

    Plato: A High-Fidelity Library for Multicomponent Gases and Plasmas,

    Munaf` o, A. and Panesi, M., “Plato: A High-Fidelity Library for Multicomponent Gases and Plasmas,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., 2025, pp. 1–21

    2025

  44. [44]

    Multi-group reductions of LTE air plasma radiative transfer in cylindrical geometries,

    Scoggins, J. B., Magin, T., Wray, A. A., and Mansour, N., “Multi-group reductions of LTE air plasma radiative transfer in cylindrical geometries,”AIAA Paper 2013-3142

    2013

  45. [45]

    Stagnation-point heating of Fire II with a non-Boltzmann radiation model,

    Jo, S. M., Kwon, O. J., and Kim, J. G., “Stagnation-point heating of Fire II with a non-Boltzmann radiation model,”Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., Vol. 153, 2020, pp. 119566

    2020

  46. [46]

    Temperature determination in a shock tube using hydroxyl radical A-X band emission,

    Jo, S. M., Shim, H., Park, G., Kwon, O. J., and Kim, J. G., “Temperature determination in a shock tube using hydroxyl radical A-X band emission,”Phys. Fluids, Vol. 31, No. 2, 02 2019, 026109

    2019

  47. [47]

    Advanced methods for calculating radiation transport in ablation-product contaminated boundary layers,

    Nicolet, W. E., “Advanced methods for calculating radiation transport in ablation-product contaminated boundary layers,” Tech. rep., CR-1656, NASA, 1970. 27

    1970

  48. [48]

    Optical diagnostics and radiative emission of air plasmas,

    Laux, C. O., “Optical diagnostics and radiative emission of air plasmas,” Tech. rep., Report T-288, Stanford, CA, 1993

    1993

  49. [49]

    Y.,Radiation Code SPRADIAN07 and its Application, Ph.D

    Hyun, S. Y.,Radiation Code SPRADIAN07 and its Application, Ph.D. thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 2009

    2009

  50. [50]

    Contributions of diatomic molecular electronic systems to heated air radiation,

    Chauveau, S., Perrin, M.-Y., Rivi` ere, P., and Soufiani, A., “Contributions of diatomic molecular electronic systems to heated air radiation,”J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, Vol. 72, No. 4, 2002, pp. 503–530

    2002

  51. [51]

    Franck–Condon Factors, r-Centroids, Electronic Transition Moments, and Einstein Coefficients for Many Nitrogen and Oxygen Band Systems,

    Gilmore, F. R., Laher, R. R., and Espy, P. J., “Franck–Condon Factors, r-Centroids, Electronic Transition Moments, and Einstein Coefficients for Many Nitrogen and Oxygen Band Systems,”J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol. 21, No. 5, 09 1992, pp. 1005–1107

    1992

  52. [52]

    Finite-volume method for radiation heat transfer,

    Chai, J. and Patankar, S., “Finite-volume method for radiation heat transfer,”Advances in Numer. Heat Transf., CRC Press, 2018, pp. 109–141

    2018

  53. [53]

    Solution of radiative heat transfer in 2-D geometries by a modified finite-volume method based on a cell vertex scheme using unstructured triangular meshes,

    Asllanaj, F., Feldheim, V., and Lybaert, P., “Solution of radiative heat transfer in 2-D geometries by a modified finite-volume method based on a cell vertex scheme using unstructured triangular meshes,” Numer. Heat Transf., Part B: Fundamentals, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2007, pp. 97–119

    2007

  54. [54]

    A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems,

    SAAD, Y., “A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems,”SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput, Vol. 7, 1985, pp. 417–424

    1985

  55. [55]

    Hegel: a high-fidelity flexible software for hypersonics and plasma simulations,

    Munaf` o, A., Kumar, S., Jo, S. M., and Panesi, M., “Hegel: a high-fidelity flexible software for hypersonics and plasma simulations,”AIAA Paper 2024-0449

    2024

  56. [56]

    Self-consistent magneto- hydrodynamic modeling of ICP discharges,

    Kumar, S., Munaf` o, A., Le Maout, V., Mansour, N., and Panesi, M., “Self-consistent magneto- hydrodynamic modeling of ICP discharges,”AIAA Paper 2022-1619

    2022

  57. [57]

    Modeling instrumented test articles for Plasmatron X aerothermal environment,

    Oruganti, S., Kumar, S., Le Maout, V., Capponi, L., Munaf` o, A., Bodony, D. J., Panesi, M., Panerai, F., Mansour, N., and Fraile Izquierdo, S., “Modeling instrumented test articles for Plasmatron X aerothermal environment,”AIAA Paper 2023-3327

    2023

  58. [58]

    Lateral skin effect in a flat conductor,

    Belevitch, V., “Lateral skin effect in a flat conductor,”Philips tech Rev, Vol. 32, No. 6, 1971, pp. 221–231

    1971

  59. [59]

    Demonstration of the lateral AC skin effect using a pickup coil,

    Blackwell, A. E., Rotunno, A. P., and Aubin, S., “Demonstration of the lateral AC skin effect using a pickup coil,”Am. J. Phys., Vol. 88, No. 8, 2020, pp. 676–684

    2020

  60. [60]

    The inductively coupled RF (radio frequency) plasma,

    Boulos, M. I., “The inductively coupled RF (radio frequency) plasma,”Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 57, No. 9, 1985, pp. 1321–1352

    1985

  61. [61]

    The induction arc: a state of the art review,

    Eckert, H. U., “The induction arc: a state of the art review,”High Temp. Sci., Vol. 6, 1974, pp. 99–133

    1974

  62. [62]

    V.,An Efficient Computational Model for Inductively Coupled Air Plasma Flows Under Thermal and Chemical Non-Equilibrium, Ph.D

    Abeele, D. V.,An Efficient Computational Model for Inductively Coupled Air Plasma Flows Under Thermal and Chemical Non-Equilibrium, Ph.D. thesis, Univesit´ e Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium, 2000

    2000

  63. [63]

    Radiative energy loss in a two-temperature argon plasma,

    Wilbers, A., Beulens, J., and Schram, D., “Radiative energy loss in a two-temperature argon plasma,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf., Vol. 46, No. 5, 1991, pp. 385–392

    1991

  64. [64]

    Comparative analysis of reduced-order spectral models and grouping strategies for non-equilibrium radiation,

    Sahai, A., Johnston, C. O., Lopez, B., and Panesi, M., “Comparative analysis of reduced-order spectral models and grouping strategies for non-equilibrium radiation,”J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf., Vol. 242, 2020, pp. 106752

    2020