pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.29866 · v1 · pith:3LGSGRZWnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 🧮 math.AP

Vorticity blow-up for the 2D incompressible non-homogeneous Euler equations with uniform C^{1,sqrt{frac{4}{3}}-1-varepsilon} force

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords non-homogeneous Euler equationsvorticity blow-upfinite-time singularityHölder continuous forceincompressible fluid dynamicsBoussinesq approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Solutions of the 2D non-homogeneous Euler equations can develop finite-time singularities with a force of limited spatial regularity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that solutions to the 2D incompressible non-homogeneous Euler equations can develop singularities in finite time. The force term is allowed to be continuous in time, Hölder continuous in space with exponent just below √(4/3)-1, and square-integrable in space. The result is obtained by adapting a blow-up construction previously used for the Boussinesq system. If correct, this indicates that the threshold for regularity of the force to guarantee smooth solutions is at least as low as this Hölder class.

Core claim

We establish the existence of solutions of the 2D incompressible non-homogeneous Euler equations with C^0_t C^{1,√(4/3)-1-ε}_x ∩ C^0_t L^2_x source terms that develop a singularity in finite time by adapting the Boussinesq blow-up construction.

What carries the argument

Adaptation of the Boussinesq blow-up construction to the non-homogeneous Euler equations, which preserves the finite-time singularity.

Load-bearing premise

The Boussinesq blow-up construction can be adapted to the non-homogeneous Euler equations without losing the finite-time singularity or the required regularity of the force.

What would settle it

Computation of the adapted solution fields to check if they satisfy the non-homogeneous Euler equations with the given force class and exhibit the predicted vorticity blow-up at a finite time.

read the original abstract

We establish the existence of solutions of the 2D incompressible non-homogeneous Euler equations with $C^{0}_{t}C^{1,\,\sqrt{\frac{4}{3}}-1-\varepsilon}_{x}\cap C^{0}_{t}L^{2}_{x}$ source terms that develop a singularity in finite time. In order to achieve this, we adapt the Boussinesq blow-up we set up in arXiv:2505.20988 to the non-homogeneous Euler setting. Furthermore, we bring the potential existence of two different types of singularities of the forced system to light.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to establish the existence of solutions to the 2D incompressible non-homogeneous Euler equations featuring source terms in the space C^0_t C^{1,√(4/3)-1-ε}_x ∩ C^0_t L^2_x that develop a finite-time singularity in the vorticity. The construction is obtained by adapting the Boussinesq blow-up previously constructed in arXiv:2505.20988, and the work additionally indicates the possible existence of two distinct singularity types for the forced system.

Significance. If the adaptation of the prior Boussinesq construction succeeds while preserving all required estimates, the result would supply a concrete example of finite-time vorticity blow-up for the non-homogeneous Euler system under a force of limited Hölder regularity. This would extend known singularity-formation results to a new equation and could illuminate mechanisms for two different blow-up scenarios. The manuscript's strength lies in its explicit attempt to transfer an existing construction rather than starting from scratch.

major comments (1)
  1. [Adaptation section (likely §3 or §4)] The central existence claim rests on the successful adaptation of the Boussinesq construction from arXiv:2505.20988. The manuscript asserts that this adaptation preserves both the finite-time singularity and the stated regularity of the force, yet provides no explicit verification or re-derivation of the key estimates (e.g., those controlling the force term in C^{1,√(4/3)-1-ε} and L^2) under the new transport and pressure terms of the non-homogeneous Euler system. This verification is load-bearing for the main theorem.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to 'two different types of singularities' but the main text should explicitly define and distinguish these types with reference to the constructed solutions.
  2. Notation for the force regularity class should be introduced once and used consistently; the intersection C^0_t C^{1,√(4/3)-1-ε}_x ∩ C^0_t L^2_x appears without prior definition in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central existence claim rests on the successful adaptation of the Boussinesq construction from arXiv:2505.20988. The manuscript asserts that this adaptation preserves both the finite-time singularity and the stated regularity of the force, yet provides no explicit verification or re-derivation of the key estimates (e.g., those controlling the force term in C^{1,√(4/3)-1-ε} and L^2) under the new transport and pressure terms of the non-homogeneous Euler system. This verification is load-bearing for the main theorem.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit verification of the estimates under the adapted system. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection that re-derives the bounds on the force term in C^{1,√(4/3)-1-ε} ∩ L^2, carefully accounting for the differences in the transport and pressure terms between the Boussinesq and non-homogeneous Euler equations. This will confirm preservation of the required regularity and support the finite-time singularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central blow-up construction adapted from overlapping-author prior work

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "In order to achieve this, we adapt the Boussinesq blow-up we set up in arXiv:2505.20988 to the non-homogeneous Euler setting."

    The finite-time vorticity blow-up (the central claim) is justified solely by reference to a prior construction whose authors overlap with the present paper; the adaptation step is asserted but the load-bearing singularity mechanism reduces to the cited self-work.

full rationale

The paper's existence result for finite-time singularity in the non-homogeneous Euler system is obtained by adapting the Boussinesq construction from arXiv:2505.20988 (overlapping authors). This self-citation is load-bearing for the singularity itself, though the adaptation to a new equation and force regularity supplies partial independent content. No internal self-definitional loops or fitted-input predictions are present in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the validity of the adaptation from the cited Boussinesq construction together with standard local existence theory for the Euler equations in the given function spaces; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Boussinesq blow-up construction from arXiv:2505.20988 remains valid after the indicated modifications to the non-homogeneous Euler system.
    The abstract states that the result is obtained by adapting that construction.
  • standard math Standard local well-posedness and continuation criteria apply to the non-homogeneous Euler equations with the given force class.
    Implicit in any finite-time blow-up existence argument for these PDEs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5658 in / 1407 out tokens · 35988 ms · 2026-06-29T06:26:22.978118+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Bae, W. Lee, J. Shin. A blow-up criterion for the inhomogeneous incompressible Euler equations. Nonlinear Anal., 196. (2020)

  2. [2]

    H. Bae, M. Lopes Filho, A. Mazzucato, H. Nussenzveig Lopes. Long-time existence for the 2D ideal Boussi- nesq and the 2D density-dependent Euler equations. arXiv preprint. (2025)

  3. [3]

    Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A

    H. Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A. Valli. On the Euler equations for nonhomogeneous fluids I. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 63. (1980)

  4. [4]

    Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A

    H. Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A. Valli. On the Euler equations for nonhomogeneous fluids II. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 73(2). (1980)

  5. [5]

    Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A

    H. Beir˜ ao da Veiga, A. Valli. Existence ofC∞ solutions of the Euler equations for nonhomogeneous fluids. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 5(2). (1980)

  6. [6]

    Bravin, F

    M. Bravin, F. Fanelli. Global existence for non-homogeneous incompressible inviscid fluids in presence of Ekman pumping. Commun. Contemp. Math. (2025)

  7. [7]

    Chae, S-K

    D. Chae, S-K. Kim, and H.-S. Nam. Local existence and blow-up criterion of H¨ older continuous solutions of the Boussinesq equations. Nagoya Math. J., 155:55–80, (1999)

  8. [8]

    Q. Chen, D. Wei, P. Zhang, Z. Zhang. Nonlinear inviscid damping for 2-D inhomogeneous incompressible Euler equations. Journal of the European Mathematical Society. (2025). DOI:10.4171/jems/1608

  9. [9]

    J. Chen. Asymptotically Self-Similar Blowup for 3D Incompressible Euler withC 1, 1 3 − Velocity I:C ∞ 1D Limiting Profiles. arXiv preprint. (2026)

  10. [10]

    J. Chen. Asymptotically Self-Similar Blowup for 3D Incompressible Euler withC 1, 1 3 − Velocity II: 3D Profiles, Blowup, and Limiting behavior. arXiv preprint. (2026)

  11. [11]

    R. Danchin. On the well-posedness of the incompressible density-dependent Euler equations in theL p framework. Journal of Differential Equations 248(8). (2010). DOI:10.1016/j.jde.2009.09.007

  12. [12]

    Danchin and F

    R. Danchin and F. Fanelli. The well-posedness issue for the density-dependent Euler equations in endpoint Besov spaces. J. Math. Pures Appl. (2011). DOI:10.1016/j.matpur.2011.04.005

  13. [13]

    F. Fanelli. Conservation of Geometric Structures for Non-Homogeneous Inviscid Incompressible Fluids. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 37(9). (2012). DOI:10.1080/03605302.2012.698343

  14. [14]

    F. Fanelli. Geometric blow-up criteria for the non-homogeneous incompressible Euler equations in 2D. (2025). arXiv preprint. To appear in JEMS

  15. [15]

    Fanelli, E

    F. Fanelli, E. Feireisl. Some remarks on steady solutions to the Euler system inR d. Appl. Math. Lett., 116. (2021)

  16. [16]

    C´ ordoba, A

    D. C´ ordoba, A. La´ ın-Sanclemente and L. Mart´ ınez-Zoroa. Finite-time singularity via multi-layer degenerate pendula for the 2D Boussinesq equation with uniformC 1, √ 4 3 −1−ε ∩L 2 force. Advances in Mathematics 480(A). (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2025.110480

  17. [17]

    C´ ordoba and L

    D. C´ ordoba and L. Mart´ ınez-Zoroa. Blow-up for the incompressible 3D-Euler equations with uniform C1, 1 2 −ϵ ∩L 2 force. arXiv preprint:2309.08495, (2023). To appear in Duke Mathematical Journal

  18. [18]

    C´ ordoba, L

    D. C´ ordoba, L. Mart´ ınez-Zoroa and F. Zheng. Finite time singularities to the 3D incompressible Euler equations for solutions inC ∞(R3 \0)∩C 1,α ∩L 2. Annals of PDE 11(19). (2025). 48

  19. [19]

    C´ ordoba, L

    D. C´ ordoba, L. Mart´ ınez-Zoroa and F. Zheng. Finite time blow-up for the hypodissipative Navier Stokes equations with a force inL 1 t C1,ϵ x ∩L ∞ t L2 x. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06776, (2024). To appear in ARMA

  20. [20]

    C´ ordoba and L

    D. C´ ordoba and L. Mart´ ınez-Zoroa. Finite time singularities of smooth solutions for the 2D incompressible porous media (IPM) equation with a smooth source. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22920, (2024)

  21. [21]

    T.M. Elgindi. Finite-time singularity formation forC 1,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations on R3. Ann. Math. (2) 194.3 (2021), pp. 647–727

  22. [22]

    Elgindi, T.-E

    T.M. Elgindi, T.-E. Ghoul and N. Masmoudi. On the Stability of Self-similar Blow-up forC 1,α Solutions to the Incompressible Euler Equations onR 3. Camb. J. Math. 9 (2021), no. 4, 1035–1075

  23. [23]

    Elgindi and Federico Pasqualotto

    T.M. Elgindi and F. Pasqualotto. From Instability to Singularity Formation in Incompressible Fluids. arXiv:2310.19780, (2023)

  24. [24]

    Elgindi and F

    T.M. Elgindi and F. Pasqualotto. Invertibility of a linearized Boussinesq flow: a symbolic approach. Com- munications in Mathematical Physics 406(261). (2025)

  25. [25]

    V. Giri, U. Koley. Non-uniqueness of H¨ older continuous solutions for Inhomogeneous Incompressible Euler flows. arXiv preprint. (2025)

  26. [26]

    Inversi, A

    M. Inversi, A. Violini. Inhomogeneous incompressible Euler with codimension 1 singular structures. arXiv preprint. (2024)

  27. [27]

    S. Itoh. On the Euler Equations of a Nonhomogeneous Ideal Incompressible Fluid. J. Korean Math. Soc. 32 (1). (1993)

  28. [28]

    S. Itoh, A. Tani. Solvability of nonstationary problems for nonhomogeneous incompressible fluids and the convergence with vanishing viscosity. Tokyo J. Math. 22 (1). (1999)

  29. [29]

    N. V. Krylov. Lectures on Elliptic and Parabolic Equations in H¨ older Spaces. American Mathematical Society, (1996)

  30. [30]

    A. Lunardi. Interpolation theory. Edizioni della Normale, (2018)

  31. [31]

    Majda and A.L

    A.J. Majda and A.L. Bertozzi. Vorticity and Incompressible Flow. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathemat- ics. Cambridge University Press, (2001)

  32. [32]

    J. E. Marsden. Well-posedness of the equations of a non-homogeneous perfect fluid. Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 1(3), 215-230. (1976)

  33. [33]

    Nirenberg

    L. Nirenberg. On elliptic partial differential equations. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. 3 (13): 125. (1959)

  34. [34]

    A. Pan. A Lagrangian Approach to the Inhomogeneous Incompressible Euler Equation. arXiv preprint. (2025)

  35. [35]

    Schr¨ oder, E

    J. Schr¨ oder, E. Wiedemann. On the Vanishing Viscosity Limit for the Inhomogeneous Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations on Bounded Domains. arXiv preprint. (2025)

  36. [36]

    F. Shao, D. Wei, P. Zhang, Z. Zhang. Self-similar blow-up solutions of incompressible Euler equations in Rd ,d≥3 withC 1,(1− 2 d)− velocity. arXiv preprint. (2026)

  37. [37]

    Shkoller

    S. Shkoller. Incompressible Euler Blowup at theC 1, 1 3 Threshold. arXiv preprint. (2026)

  38. [38]

    E. M. Stein. Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton University Press. (1970)

  39. [39]

    Valli, W

    A. Valli, W. Zajaczkowski. About the motion of nonhomogeneous ideal incompressible fluids. Nonlinear Anal. 12(1). (1988)

  40. [40]

    Wolibner

    W. Wolibner. Un th´ eor` eme d’existence du mouvement plan d’un fluide parfait, homog` ene, incompressible, pendant un temps infiniment long. Math. Z., 37. (1933)

  41. [41]

    Q. Zhao, W. Zhao. Traveling waves near shear flows for the inhomogeneous Euler equations with non- constant density. arXiv preprint. (2026)

  42. [42]

    Zhou, Z.P

    Y. Zhou, Z.P. Xin, J. Fan. Well-posedness for the density-dependent incompressible Euler equations in the critical Besov spaces. Sci. China Math. 40, 950-970. (2010). 49