pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13090 · v1 · pith:HBAF45ETnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Field line slippage rate signatures in nonlinear force-free field extrapolations

Sage Stanish , David MacTaggart This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords field line slippage ratenonlinear force-free fieldsmagnetic reconnectionquasi-separatrix layerssolar active regionsfield-aligned twistcoronal magnetic fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

In NLFFF extrapolations the resistivity-induced slippage rate is governed by cross-field gradients of field-aligned twist.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the field line slippage rate measures the instantaneous deviation of magnetic field lines from ideal evolution due to non-ideal terms in Ohm's law. For nonlinear force-free fields this rate is controlled by cross-field gradients of the field-aligned twist, directly tying current structure to reconnection signatures. A scaling estimate shows that the squashing factor Q amplifies slippage only when it produces small transverse length scales; large Q by itself does not ensure significant reconnection. Application to a sequence of extrapolations for active region 11158 during its X2.2 flare reveals enhanced reconnection signatures tied to distinct evolutionary phases, positioning the slippage rate as a physics-weighted complement to QSL analysis.

Core claim

For NLFFFs, the resistivity-induced slippage rate is governed by cross-field gradients of the field-aligned twist, thus establishing a clear connection between current structure and reconnection signatures. By deriving a scaling estimate, we demonstrate that strong magnetic squashing amplifies slippage only insofar as it produces small transverse length scales; large values of Q alone do not guarantee significant reconnection.

What carries the argument

The field line slippage rate, computed from non-ideal terms in Ohm's law, serving as a physics-weighted proxy for three-dimensional reconnection.

If this is right

  • Reconnection sites in coronal models can be located by mapping cross-field gradients of field-aligned twist within current-carrying regions.
  • QSL analysis using the squashing factor must be supplemented by slippage-rate maps to separate geometric favorability from physically significant reconnection.
  • Sequences of NLFFF extrapolations can track time-evolving reconnection activity linked to flare phases in active regions.
  • The slippage rate supplies a direct link between observed current structure and the locations where non-ideal evolution is active.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same twist-gradient relation could be tested in time-dependent MHD simulations to check whether the NLFFF assumption alters the scaling.
  • Overlaying slippage-rate maps on observed flare ribbons or EUV brightenings might reveal which geometric QSLs actually participate in energy release.
  • If the relation holds, twist-gradient maps could be computed from routine vector magnetograms to flag reconnection-prone volumes before flares occur.

Load-bearing premise

The NLFFF extrapolations accurately capture the cross-field gradients of twist that control the slippage rate, without significant contamination from the force-free assumption or the resistivity model.

What would settle it

A direct computation in an NLFFF model where regions of large cross-field twist gradients show no corresponding slippage rate, or where high slippage occurs without such gradients, would falsify the claimed governance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13090 by David MacTaggart, Sage Stanish.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A profile of the slippage and dissipation rates in the low corona across the polarity inversion line at 𝑥 = 133 Mm. |𝚺𝐷 | 𝐵𝑧 𝑥 𝑦 (a) 15/02/2011 at 01:00 UT |𝚺𝐷 | 𝐵𝑧 𝑥 𝑦 (b) 15/02/2011 at 02:48 UT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Field line extrapolations before and after the X2.2 flare. Field lines are traced from the same locations in (a) and (b), and are rendered with |𝚺𝐷 |. The units of the line-of-sight magnetic field component 𝐵𝑧 are Gauss. In relation to the timescale of Figure 1b, (a) corresponds to 420 min and (b) to 528 min. (a) Line-of-sight magnetogram with the location of the winding signature indicated by a red circle… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Details relating to the location and structure of the magnetic winding signature on 15/02/2011 at 02:48 UT. MNRAS 000, 1–10 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Maps of AIA 1600 Å reveal the flare ribbons; (a) near the start of the flare and (b) in the post-flare relaxation phase. Corresponding field line extrapolations, traced from the ribbon locations at 𝑧 = 0 are shown in (c) and (d). Field lines are rendered with |𝚺|. There is a 1-minute difference between AIA and HMI data. principled framework for interpreting agreements and discrepancies between them. Applyi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Maps in the (𝑦, 𝑧)-plane of quantities related to reconnection proxies. Slices are taken at 𝑥 = 130 Mm on 15/02/2011 at 01:36 UT. The resolution for the squashing factor calculation is 10002 . Facilities Council (STFC) grant (ST/Y001672/1) and a Personal Fel￾lowship from the Royal Society of Edinburgh (ID: 4282). Results were obtained using the ARCHIE-WeSt High Performance Computer (www.archie-west.ac.uk) … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic reconnection plays a central role in solar flares and coronal mass ejections. Identifying where reconnection is physically active within coronal magnetic field models is a key part of magnetic field analysis. We investigate the field line slippage rate as a physics-weighted proxy for three-dimensional reconnection in nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) extrapolations. The slippage rate measures the instantaneous deviation of magnetic field lines from ideal evolution, due to non-ideal terms in Ohm's law, providing a direct link between magnetic geometry and reconnection physics. For NLFFFs, we show that the resistivity-induced slippage rate is governed by cross-field gradients of the field-aligned twist, thus establishing a clear connection between current structure and reconnection signatures. We further examine its relationship to the squashing factor $Q$, used to identify quasi-separatrix layers (QSLs). By deriving a scaling estimate, we demonstrate that strong magnetic squashing amplifies slippage only insofar as it produces small transverse length scales; large values of $Q$ alone do not guarantee significant reconnection. We apply this framework to a sequence of NLFFF extrapolations of NOAA active region 11158 spanning the X2.2 flare of 15 February 2011. The slippage rate reveals enhanced reconnection signatures associated with distinct phases of the active region's evolution. In comparison with the squashing factor, we show that the field line slippage rate provides a physics-weighted complement to QSL analysis, distinguishing between regions that are geometrically favourable for reconnection and those where reconnection is physically significant.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives that in nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) extrapolations the resistivity-induced field line slippage rate is governed by cross-field gradients of the field-aligned twist. It presents a scaling estimate showing that the squashing factor Q amplifies the slippage rate only when it corresponds to sufficiently small transverse length scales. The framework is applied to a time series of NLFFF models of NOAA AR 11158 around the 15 February 2011 X2.2 flare, identifying enhanced reconnection signatures across distinct evolutionary phases and arguing that the slippage rate supplies a physics-weighted complement to QSL analysis.

Significance. If the derivation is rigorous and the NLFFF fields preserve the controlling gradients, the work supplies a direct physical proxy linking current structure to reconnection activity in coronal extrapolations. The scaling clarifies why large Q alone is insufficient for significant reconnection. The application to AR 11158 demonstrates utility for flare analysis. Credit is due for the explicit derivation and the scaling estimate that avoids over-interpreting geometric QSL diagnostics.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (derivation of slippage rate): the central relation between resistivity-induced slippage and cross-field twist gradients is derived under the force-free assumption, but the manuscript does not quantify how the NLFFF optimization (minimization of ∫|J×B|^2 and |∇·B|^2 subject to photospheric boundaries) distorts or smooths those perpendicular gradients relative to a non-force-free field; this directly affects whether the proxy remains valid for the AR 11158 models.
  2. [§5] §5 (application to AR 11158): the reported enhancements in slippage rate during pre-flare, impulsive, and decay phases are presented without sensitivity tests to the resistivity model or to variations in the NLFFF boundary conditions and regularization; without such tests it is unclear whether the differences from Q are physically meaningful or arise from extrapolation artifacts.
  3. [Scaling estimate] Scaling estimate (near Eq. relating slippage to Q): the estimate is derived but not validated against an analytic reconnection solution or an MHD simulation with known reconnection rate; this leaves the regime of applicability and any proportionality constants untested, which is load-bearing for the claim that large Q does not guarantee significant reconnection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures 5-7] Figure captions for the AR 11158 maps do not state the exact resistivity value or the normalization used for the slippage rate, hindering direct comparison with other studies.
  2. [§2] The notation for field-aligned twist is introduced without an explicit reference to its relation to the force-free parameter α = (∇×B)·B / B², which would aid readers familiar with standard NLFFF literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each of the major comments below and indicate the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (derivation of slippage rate): the central relation between resistivity-induced slippage and cross-field twist gradients is derived under the force-free assumption, but the manuscript does not quantify how the NLFFF optimization (minimization of ∫|J×B|^2 and |∇·B|^2 subject to photospheric boundaries) distorts or smooths those perpendicular gradients relative to a non-force-free field; this directly affects whether the proxy remains valid for the AR 11158 models.

    Authors: The derivation is performed within the force-free framework, and since the NLFFF models are constructed to satisfy the force-free condition to a high degree, the relation holds for the extrapolated fields. The optimization does involve regularization that can affect small-scale gradients, but this is a general limitation of NLFFF methods rather than specific to our proxy. We will revise §3 to include a discussion of this point and note that the proxy is applicable to the extent that the NLFFF solution accurately represents the coronal field. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5 (application to AR 11158): the reported enhancements in slippage rate during pre-flare, impulsive, and decay phases are presented without sensitivity tests to the resistivity model or to variations in the NLFFF boundary conditions and regularization; without such tests it is unclear whether the differences from Q are physically meaningful or arise from extrapolation artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that additional sensitivity tests would be beneficial. In the revised version, we will perform and report tests using different resistivity values and alternative NLFFF extrapolations with varied boundary conditions to confirm the robustness of the identified enhancements in slippage rate. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Scaling estimate (near Eq. relating slippage to Q): the estimate is derived but not validated against an analytic reconnection solution or an MHD simulation with known reconnection rate; this leaves the regime of applicability and any proportionality constants untested, which is load-bearing for the claim that large Q does not guarantee significant reconnection.

    Authors: The scaling estimate is derived from the slippage rate expression and the definition of Q, providing an analytic insight into the role of transverse scales. While direct validation against specific reconnection solutions is not included in the current work, the estimate is general and does not rely on untested assumptions beyond the derivations. We will add a statement clarifying the analytic nature of the estimate and suggesting numerical validation as future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of slippage rate from twist gradients is mathematically independent

full rationale

The central derivation states that the resistivity-induced slippage rate in NLFFFs is governed by cross-field gradients of field-aligned twist. This follows directly from the non-ideal Ohm's law and the definition of field-line slippage without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The subsequent scaling with Q is an estimate derived from transverse length scales, not a renaming or tautology. Application to AR 11158 uses the extrapolated fields as input but does not redefine or fit the slippage rate to match observed reconnection; the result remains a general relation applied to model output. No step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes the NLFFF assumption and a resistivity model without stating their limitations or providing independent checks. No free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The coronal magnetic field can be represented by a nonlinear force-free extrapolation that satisfies the force-free condition everywhere.
    Stated implicitly by the choice of NLFFF models as the input data.
  • domain assumption Resistivity is the dominant non-ideal term that produces field-line slippage in the corona.
    The abstract focuses exclusively on the resistivity-induced slippage rate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5797 in / 1479 out tokens · 17276 ms · 2026-06-27T06:05:01.711544+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Living Reviews in Solar Physics , year =

    Wiegelmann, Thomas and Sakurai, Takashi , title =. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , year =. doi:10.1007/s41116-020-00027-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-020-00027-4

  2. [2]

    Wheatland, M. S. and Sturrock, P. A. and Roumeliotis, G. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =

  3. [3]

    , title =

    Wiegelmann, T. , title =. Solar Physics , year =

  4. [4]

    and Magara, T

    Inoue, S. and Magara, T. and Pandey, V. S. et al. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =

  5. [5]

    and Boulmezaoud, T

    Amari, T. and Boulmezaoud, T. Z. and Aly, J. J. , title =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , year =

  6. [6]

    and Kliem, B

    Valori, G. and Kliem, B. and Keppens, R. , title =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066708 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066708

  7. [7]

    and Li, Z

    Yan, Y. and Li, Z. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1086/498673 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/498673

  8. [8]

    and Veronig, Astrid M

    Jarolim, Robert and Thalmann, Julia K. and Veronig, Astrid M. and Podladchikova, Tatiana , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02030-9 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02030-9

  9. [9]

    Priest, E. R. and Bungey, T. N. and Titov, V. S. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1086/303530 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/303530

  10. [10]

    Longcope, D. W. , title =. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , year =. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-7 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-7 2005

  11. [11]

    and Wang, H

    Guo, J. and Wang, H. and Wang, J. and Zhu, X. and Dai, X. and Huang, X. and He, H. and Yan, Y. and Zhao, H. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0aed , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0aed

  12. [12]

    Priest, E. R. and D. Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection without null points , journal =. 1995 , volume =

    1995

  13. [13]

    Titov, V. S. and D. Quasi-separatrix layers: Refined theory and its application to solar flares , journal =. 1999 , volume =

    1999

  14. [14]

    Titov, V. S. and Hornig, G. and D. Theory of magnetic connectivity in the solar corona , journal =. 2002 , volume =. doi:10.1029/2001JA000278 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1029/2001ja000278 2002

  15. [15]

    Aulanier, G. and D. Equilibrium and dynamical properties of QSLs , journal =. 2005 , volume =

    2005

  16. [16]

    Titov, V. S. and Forbes, T. G. and Priest, E. R. and Mikic, Z. and Linker, J. A. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =

  17. [17]

    Janvier, M. and D. From coronal QSLs to flare ribbons , journal =. 2013 , volume =

    2013

  18. [18]

    Quasi-separatrix layers in solar flares: I

    D. Quasi-separatrix layers in solar flares: I. Method , journal =. 1996 , volume =

    1996

  19. [19]

    and Pariat, E

    Masson, S. and Pariat, E. and Aulanier, G. and Schrijver, C. J. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/559 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/559

  20. [20]

    and van Ballegooijen, Adriaan A

    Savcheva, Antonia and Green, Lucie M. and van Ballegooijen, Adriaan A. and DeLuca, Edward E. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/105 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/2/105

  21. [21]

    and Prior, Chris , title =

    Berger, Mitchell A. and Prior, Chris , title =. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , year =. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/26/005 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/26/005

  22. [22]

    Solar Physics , year =

    MacTaggart, David , title =. Solar Physics , year =. doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02462-8 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02462-8

  23. [23]

    , title =

    Eyink, Gregory L. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/137 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/137

  24. [24]

    and Guo, Ruilong , title =

    Li, Ting and Priest, Eric R. and Guo, Ruilong , title =. Proceedings of the Royal Society A , year =. doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0949 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0949 2020

  25. [25]

    I., & Priest, E

    Pontin, David I. and Priest, Eric R. , title =. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , year =. doi:10.1007/s41116-022-00032-9 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-022-00032-9

  26. [26]

    Axford, W. I. , title =. Magnetic Reconnection in Space and Laboratory Plasmas , editor =. 1984 , doi =

    1984

  27. [27]

    B., Wilkins, C

    Aslanyan, Valentin and Scott, Roger B. and Wilkins, Chloe P. and Meyer, Karen A. and Pontin, David I. and Yeates, Anthony R. , title =. Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad55ca , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad55ca

  28. [28]

    Titov, V. S. and D. Basic topology of twisted magnetic configurations in solar flares , journal =. 1999 , volume =

    1999

  29. [29]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    Franci, Luca and Papini, Emanuele and Micera, Alfredo and Lapenta, Giovanni and Hellinger, Petr and Del Sarto, Daniele and Burgess, David and Landi, Simone , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7da6 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7da6

  30. [30]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , year =

    Stanish, Sage and MacTaggart, David , title =. Journal of Plasma Physics , year =. doi:10.1017/S0022377825000261 , publisher =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377825000261

  31. [31]

    Physics of Plasmas , year =

    Agarwal, Satyam and Bhattacharyya, Ramit , title =. Physics of Plasmas , year =. doi:10.1063/5.0206697 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0206697

  32. [32]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A , year =

    Prior, Christopher and MacTaggart, David , title =. Proceedings of the Royal Society A , year =

  33. [33]

    Slip-Running Reconnection in Quasi-Separatrix Layers , journal =

    Aulanier, Guillaume and Pariat, Etienne and D. Slip-Running Reconnection in Quasi-Separatrix Layers , journal =. 2006 , volume =

    2006

  34. [34]

    Slipping Magnetic Reconnection during an

    Dud. Slipping Magnetic Reconnection during an. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  35. [35]

    Observation of Super-Alfv

    L. Observation of Super-Alfv. Nature Astronomy , year =

  36. [36]

    Extending the Concept of Separatrices to Quasi-Separatrix Layers for Magnetic Reconnection , journal =

    D. Extending the Concept of Separatrices to Quasi-Separatrix Layers for Magnetic Reconnection , journal =. 2006 , volume =

    2006

  37. [37]

    Titov, V. S. and Priest, E. R. and D. Conditions for the Appearance of ``Bald Patches'' at the Solar Surface , journal =. 1993 , volume =

    1993

  38. [38]

    The Astrophysical Journal , year =

    Zhao, Jie and Li, Hui and Pariat, Etienne and Schmieder, Brigitte and Guo, Yang and Wiegelmann, Thomas , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  39. [39]

    and Longcope, Dana W

    Tarr, Lucas A. and Longcope, Dana W. and Millhouse, Margaret , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  40. [40]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year =

    Song, Qiao and Zhang, Jun and Yang, Shuhong and Liu, Yang , title =. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year =

  41. [41]

    and Aulanier, Guillaume and Title, Alan M

    Schrijver, Carolus J. and Aulanier, Guillaume and Title, Alan M. and Pariat, Etienne and Delann. A Characteristic Magnetic Field Pattern Associated with All Major Solar Flares , journal =. 2011 , volume =

    2011

  42. [42]

    and Lynch, Benjamin J

    Kazachenko, Maria D. and Lynch, Benjamin J. and Welsch, Brian T. and Sun, Xudong , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  43. [43]

    Aslam, O. P. M. and MacTaggart, David and Williams, Tom and Fletcher, Lyndsay and Romano, Paolo , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =

  44. [44]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =

    Duan, Aiying and Jiang, Chaowei and Feng, Xuesheng , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year =

  45. [45]

    Bobra, M. G. and Sun, X. and Hoeksema, J. T. and Turmon, M. and Liu, Y. and Hayashi, K. and Barnes, G. and Leka, K. D. , title =. Solar Physics , year =

  46. [46]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

    Wang, Haimin and Liu, Chang and Deng, Na and Wang, Huaning , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

  47. [47]

    Todd and Liu, Yang and Wiegelmann, Thomas and Hayashi, Keiji and Chen, Qiang and Thalmann, Julia , title =

    Sun, Xudong and Hoeksema, J. Todd and Liu, Yang and Wiegelmann, Thomas and Hayashi, Keiji and Chen, Qiang and Thalmann, Julia , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =

  48. [48]

    Todd and Liu, Yang and Kazachenko, Maria and Fisher, George H

    Sun, Xudong and Hoeksema, J. Todd and Liu, Yang and Kazachenko, Maria and Fisher, George H. and Welsch, Brian T. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

  49. [49]

    and Inhester, Bernd , title =

    Wiegelmann, Thomas and Thalmann, Julia K. and Inhester, Bernd , title =. Solar Physics , year =

  50. [50]

    Electric Currents in Flare Ribbons: Observations and Three-dimensional Standard Model , journal =

    Janvier, Miho and Aulanier, Guillaume and Pariat, Etienne and D. Electric Currents in Flare Ribbons: Observations and Three-dimensional Standard Model , journal =. 2014 , volume =

    2014

  51. [51]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

    Liu, Chang and Deng, Na and Liu, Rui and Wang, Haimin , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

  52. [52]

    and Title, Alan M

    Lemen, James R. and Title, Alan M. and Akin, David J. and Boerner, Paul F. and Chou, Catherine and Drake, Jerry F. and Duncan, Dexter W. and Edwards, Christopher G. and Friedlaender, Frank M. and Heyman, Gary F. and Hurlburt, Neal E. and Katz, Noah L. and Kushner, Gary D. and Levay, Michael and Lindgren, Russell W. and Mathur, Dnyanesh P. and McFeaters, E...

  53. [53]

    and Dennis, B

    Fletcher, L. and Dennis, B. R. and Hudson, H. S. and Krucker, S. and Phillips, K. and Veronig, A. and Battaglia, M. and Bone, L. and Caspi, A. and Chen, Q. and Gallagher, P. and Grigis, P. T. and Ji, H. and Liu, W. and Milligan, R. O. and Temmer, M. , title =. Space Science Reviews , year =

  54. [54]

    , title =

    Newcomb, William A. , title =. Annals of Physics , volume =. 1958 , doi =

    1958

  55. [55]

    MacTaggart, David and Williams, Thomas and Aslam, O. P. M. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  56. [56]

    and Schindler, K

    Hornig, G. and Schindler, K. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 1996 , doi =

    1996

  57. [57]

    1954 , series =

    Clifford Truesdell , title =. 1954 , series =

    1954

  58. [58]

    2006 , isbn =

    Karl Schindler , title =. 2006 , isbn =

    2006

  59. [59]

    ApJ , fjournal=

    Fournier, Paul , title=. ApJ , fjournal=

  60. [60]

    An important paper , journal=

  61. [61]

    Another Unreal Paper , journal=

  62. [62]

    A Last Unreal Paper , journal=