pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.14338 · v2 · pith:KSCC2MSRnew · submitted 2026-06-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Mass-imbalanced two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixtures with boson-fermion pairing

Cristiano Luigi Kosman Chiarappa , Pietro Bovini , Pierbiagio Pieri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 04:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords Bose-Fermi mixturetwo dimensionsmass imbalanceboson-fermion pairingT-matrixmomentum distributioncondensate fractionTan's contact
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mass imbalance enables observation of a finite-momentum peak in the boson momentum distribution of two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixtures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixtures with tunable attraction at zero temperature using a diagrammatic T-matrix approach. It calculates thermodynamic quantities such as chemical potentials, condensate density, and the boson momentum distribution for varying densities, mass ratios, and coupling strengths. The analysis confirms recovery of perturbative results in the weak-coupling limit and shows that the condensate fraction remains nearly universal across mass imbalances, with improved accuracy for heavier bosons. Mass imbalance is identified as a key parameter that alters the bosonic momentum distribution in a way that makes a distinctive peak at finite momentum observable in experiments.

Core claim

Using a diagrammatic T-matrix formalism, the authors demonstrate that in mass-imbalanced two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixtures at zero temperature, the condensate fraction exhibits near-universal behavior that becomes more pronounced for large boson-to-fermion mass ratios, while the mass imbalance qualitatively modifies the boson momentum distribution to produce a peak at finite momentum that can be experimentally accessed.

What carries the argument

The diagrammatic T-matrix approach, which accounts for boson-fermion pairing and is shown to match second-order perturbation theory in the weak-coupling regime.

If this is right

  • The condensate fraction is nearly universal for different mass ratios and approaches universality more closely when the boson mass is large.
  • The formalism recovers the correct second-order perturbative expansion for chemical potentials.
  • Mass imbalance serves as an additional control parameter affecting the bosonic momentum distribution.
  • Several thermodynamic quantities including Tan's contact can be studied as functions of the parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experiments could tune the mass ratio to enhance visibility of pairing signatures in momentum distributions.
  • The results may extend to understanding pairing in other low-dimensional quantum mixtures.
  • If validated, this suggests mass imbalance as a general tool for probing fermionic pairing effects on bosonic distributions.

Load-bearing premise

The T-matrix approach remains valid and captures the essential pairing physics at zero temperature in two dimensions.

What would settle it

A measurement of the boson momentum distribution in a mass-imbalanced 2D Bose-Fermi mixture that lacks a peak at finite momentum would contradict the prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.14338 by Cristiano Luigi Kosman Chiarappa, Pierbiagio Pieri, Pietro Bovini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams for the particle-particle ladder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Feynman’s diagrams for the many-body [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Feynman diagrams for: (a) the fermion self-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents the evolution of the mixture’s chemi￾cal potentials from weak to strong coupling (−4 ≤ g ≤ 4) for the selected case x = 1. Note that for the boson chemical potential, we report the quantity µB + ϵ0, to subtract the leading strong-coupling contribution given by −ϵ0/EF = −e 2g (γm + 1)/γm. One can see that changing the mass ratio significantly modifies the quantitative values of the chemical poten￾t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: from weak to strong coupling for several values of the mass ratios. In the strong-coupling limit, one can obtain the following asymptotic behavior CBF 4m2 rE2 F ∼ x γm + 1 γm ϵ0 EF = x  γm + 1 γm 2 e 2g . (25) This scaling follows from the fact that, in the strong￾coupling limit, the T-matrix reduces to the molecular propagator multiplied by a factor proportional to ϵ0. Thus, the integral of the T-matrix… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Boson momentum distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: illustrates the dependence of the bosonic mo￾mentum distribution nB(k) on the boson concentration x in the low-momentum region near the peak (when present) discussed in the previous Section. We report the same two BF coupling values considered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the condensate fraction as a function of the BF coupling g for several values of boson concen￾trations and mass ratios. The overall behavior is quali￾tatively similar to that obtained for equal masses [32], with a monotonic decrease of the condensate fraction as the BF attraction increases, the absence of a critical coupling past which the condensate vanishes identically, and a near-universal depende… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Square of the hybridization energy ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Dispersions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Feynman diagrams yielding the perturbative contributions to the boson chemical potential at first and second order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Feynman diagrams yielding the perturbative contributions to the fermion self-energy at first and second order in 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. (a): Fermion chemical potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze a two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixture at zero temperature in the presence of a tunable Bose-Fermi attraction. We adopt a diagrammatic T-matrix approach and study the behavior of several thermodynamic quantities for the two species as functions of density, mass ratio, and coupling strength. These include the chemical potentials, the boson momentum distribution function, the condensate density, and Tan's contact parameter. We analytically demonstrate that the present T-matrix formalism recovers the correct second-order perturbative expansion of the chemical potentials in the weak-coupling regime, and test it numerically. The near-universal behavior of the condensate fraction already found in prior work for the mass-balanced case is confirmed for different masses and becomes even more accurate when the boson mass is large. The mass imbalance emerges as an additional control parameter that qualitatively affects the bosonic momentum distribution. In particular, we found that it can be used to allow for the experimental observation of a peculiar peak in the boson momentum distribution at finite momentum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes mass-imbalanced two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixtures at zero temperature with tunable boson-fermion attraction using a diagrammatic T-matrix approach. It computes chemical potentials, the boson momentum distribution, condensate density, and Tan's contact as functions of density, mass ratio, and coupling strength. The T-matrix formalism is shown analytically to recover the second-order perturbative expansion for the chemical potentials (with numerical tests), the near-universal condensate fraction is confirmed and found to improve for large boson mass, and mass imbalance is identified as a control parameter that produces a peak in the boson momentum distribution at finite momentum.

Significance. If the T-matrix results for the momentum distribution hold, the work provides a concrete experimental handle (mass ratio) on a qualitative feature in n_b(k) that extends prior mass-balanced studies. The explicit analytic recovery of the perturbative limit for chemical potentials is a clear methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results section on boson momentum distribution (and abstract)] The central qualitative claim—that mass imbalance produces an observable peak in the boson momentum distribution at finite k—rests on the T-matrix ladder resummation. While chemical potentials are verified against second-order perturbation theory, the momentum distribution is a higher-order quantity; the manuscript does not report an independent benchmark (QMC, functional RG, or exact diagonalization) for n_b(k) itself. This leaves open whether the peak is physical or an artifact of the truncation, which is known to omit vertex corrections and particle-hole channels in 2D.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method section] Notation for the T-matrix equations and self-energies should be cross-referenced explicitly to the mass-balanced limit to facilitate comparison with prior work.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the momentum-distribution plots should state the precise mass ratios and coupling values used, rather than referring only to 'different masses'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, the positive assessment of its significance, and for identifying the need to qualify the results on the boson momentum distribution. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section on boson momentum distribution (and abstract)] The central qualitative claim—that mass imbalance produces an observable peak in the boson momentum distribution at finite k—rests on the T-matrix ladder resummation. While chemical potentials are verified against second-order perturbation theory, the momentum distribution is a higher-order quantity; the manuscript does not report an independent benchmark (QMC, functional RG, or exact diagonalization) for n_b(k) itself. This leaves open whether the peak is physical or an artifact of the truncation, which is known to omit vertex corrections and particle-hole channels in 2D.

    Authors: We agree that the lack of an independent benchmark for n_b(k) constitutes a genuine limitation of the present T-matrix study. While the formalism recovers the second-order perturbative result for the chemical potentials (both analytically and numerically), the momentum distribution is indeed a higher-order observable, and no QMC, functional RG, or exact-diagonalization comparison is available for the mass-imbalanced 2D case. The ladder approximation is standard for pairing problems in Bose-Fermi mixtures, yet it omits vertex corrections and particle-hole channels. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of these approximations in the results section, qualify the claim about the finite-momentum peak as a prediction within the T-matrix framework, and note that its experimental observability remains to be confirmed by more advanced methods. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent benchmark (QMC, functional RG or exact diagonalization) for the boson momentum distribution n_b(k)

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard T-matrix applied to new regime with explicit perturbative validation

full rationale

The derivation relies on the established diagrammatic T-matrix ladder summation at T=0, which is solved self-consistently for the self-energies and propagators. The paper explicitly demonstrates analytic recovery of the second-order perturbative expansion for chemical potentials in the weak-coupling limit and confirms this numerically, providing an external benchmark independent of the target observables. The boson momentum distribution is obtained directly from the dressed propagators without any fitting, renaming, or reduction to prior self-citations. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs presented as predictions, or load-bearing uniqueness theorems appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no specific information on free parameters, axioms or invented entities used in the calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5704 in / 848 out tokens · 26506 ms · 2026-06-27T04:56:20.685100+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Hamiltonian In the presence of a broad Feshbach resonance tuning the strength of the BF attractive interaction, the (grand- canonical) Hamiltonian is given by 3 Γ(P,Ω) B,p 1, ω1 B,p 1, ω1 F,p 2, ω2 F,p 2, ω2 = B,p 1, ω1 B,p 1, ω1 F,p 2, ω2 F,p 2, ω2 + p, ω B F Γ(P,Ω) B,p 1, ω1 B,p 1, ω1 F,p 2, ω2 F,p 2, ω2 FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams for the particle-particl...

  2. [2]

    and the Supplemental Material of [102]. One can define an effective BF dimensionless coupling parameterg= ln [1/(k FaBF)] using the Fermi momentum kF = √4πnF of a free Fermi gas with densityn F, in analogy with 2D fermionic systems. With the above definition ofg, one can express the BF binding energy in units of the Fermi energyE F = k2 F/(2mF) asϵ 0/EF =...

  3. [3]

    We found it convenient to work with theT= 0 limit of the Matsubara formalism, that is, we work with imaginary frequencies iΩ

    Many bodyT-matrix The first building block of our diagrammatic theory is the particle-particle ladderΓ, which corresponds to the many-bodyT-matrix in the absence of a condensate, and is represented diagrammatically in Figure 1. We found it convenient to work with theT= 0 limit of the Matsubara formalism, that is, we work with imaginary frequencies iΩ. The...

  4. [4]

    3(a), corresponding to the convolu- tion of the particle-particle ladderΓ(P,Ω) or the many- bodyT-matrixT(P,Ω) with a condensate density or a free boson propagator, respectively

    Boson and fermion self-energies The fermion self-energy is made of two contributions, represented in Fig. 3(a), corresponding to the convolu- tion of the particle-particle ladderΓ(P,Ω) or the many- bodyT-matrixT(P,Ω) with a condensate density or a free boson propagator, respectively. The reason for us- ingΓ(P,Ω) rather thanT(P,Ω) in the fist diagram of Fi...

  5. [5]

    Green’s functions, momentum distributions and densities The dressed fermion Green’s functionG F(k, ω) and dressed Green’s functionG ′ B(k, ω) for non-condensed bosons are obtained by inserting the (irreducible) dia- grams shown in Fig. 3 in Dyson’s equations GF(k, ω)−1 =G 0 F(k, ω)−1 −Σ F(k, ω) (12) G′ B(k, ω)−1 =G 0 B(k, ω)−1 −Σ B(k, ω) + Σ2 12 iω+ξ B k ...

  6. [6]

    TheΓ-matrix By expandingT 2(P,Ω) in powers of 1/g, it is easy to identify the following perturbative orders of theΓ-matrix 11 ˜Σ B(0,0) = lim ω→0+ Γ(P,Ω) F,P,Ω−ω 0, ω B 0, ω B + Γ(P,Ω) F P,Ω 0, ω B Γ(P,Ω) 0, ω B F,P,Ω−ω FIG. 13. Feynman diagrams yielding the perturbative contributions to the boson chemical potential at first and second order in 1/g, arisi...

  7. [7]

    The boson chemical potential According to Hugenholtz-Pines theorem (18), in the absence of BB interactions, the integral that determines the boson chemical potential is ΣB(0,0) = Z d2PdΩ (2π)3 T(P,Ω)G 0 F(P,Ω) eiΩ0+ .(A4) We define the momentaP T± as the solutions of the equa- tions P= lim Ω→0+ p 2mF [µF ±n 0|Γ(P,Ω)|] (A5) respectively.P T+ represents the...

  8. [8]

    According to the Eq

    The fermion chemical potential Let us now adapt the arguments developed for the bo- son chemical potential to the fermion case. According to the Eq. (16), the integral that determines the fermion density reads nF = Z d2kdω (2π)3 G0 F(k, ω) 1−G 0 F(k, ω)ΣF(k, ω)eiω0+ .(A11) We define the momentak ± as the solutions to the equa- tions k= q 2mF [µF ± |Σmax F...

  9. [9]

    Numerical check Finally, we provide a numerical check of the results for the chemical potentials obtained by the full numerical solution of the set of equations (16)-(18) against their weak-coupling benchmarks. Fig. 15(a) shows that, in the weak coupling regimeg≲−2, the numerical results forµ F approach the asymptotic form given by (22). To isolate the hi...

  10. [10]

    Powell, S

    S. Powell, S. Sachdev, and H. P. B¨ uchler, Depletion of the Bose-Einstein condensate in Bose-Fermi mixtures, Phys. Rev. B72, 024534 (2005)

    2005

  11. [11]

    D. B. M. Dickerscheid, D. van Oosten, E. J. Tillema, and H. T. C. Stoof, Quantum Phases in a Resonantly Interacting Boson-Fermion Mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230404 (2005)

    2005

  12. [12]

    Storozhenko, P

    A. Storozhenko, P. Schuck, T. Suzuki, H. Yabu, and J. Dukelsky, Boson-fermion pairing in a boson-fermion environment, Phys. Rev. A71, 063617 (2005)

    2005

  13. [13]

    A. V. Avdeenkov, D. C. E. Bortolotti, and J. L. Bohn, Stability of fermionic Feshbach molecules in a Bose- Fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. A74, 012709 (2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    Pollet, M

    L. Pollet, M. Troyer, K. Van Houcke, and S. M. A. Rombouts, Phase Diagram of Bose-Fermi Mixtures in One-Dimensional Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 190402 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    R¨ othel and A

    S. R¨ othel and A. Pelster, Density and stability in ul- tracold dilute boson-fermion mixtures, The European Physical Journal B59, 343 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    Barillier-Pertuisel, S

    X. Barillier-Pertuisel, S. Pittel, L. Pollet, and P. Schuck, Boson-fermion pairing in Bose-Fermi mixtures on one- dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A77, 012115 (2008)

    2008

  17. [17]

    Pollet, C

    L. Pollet, C. Kollath, U. Schollw¨ ock, and M. Troyer, Mixture of bosonic and spin-polarized fermionic atoms in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A77, 023608 (2008)

    2008

  18. [18]

    D. C. E. Bortolotti, A. V. Avdeenkov, and J. L. Bohn, Generalized mean-field approach to a resonant Bose- Fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. A78, 063612 (2008)

    2008

  19. [19]

    F. M. Marchetti, C. J. M. Mathy, D. A. Huse, and M. M. Parish, Phase separation and collapse in Bose- Fermi mixtures with a Feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. B78, 134517 (2008). 15

    2008

  20. [20]

    Watanabe, T

    T. Watanabe, T. Suzuki, and P. Schuck, Bose-Fermi pair correlations in attractively interacting Bose-Fermi atomic mixtures, Phys. Rev. A78, 033601 (2008)

    2008

  21. [21]

    Fratini and P

    E. Fratini and P. Pieri, Pairing and condensation in a resonant Bose-Fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. A81, 051605 (2010)

    2010

  22. [22]

    Z.-Q. Yu, S. Zhang, and H. Zhai, Stability condition of a strongly interacting boson-fermion mixture across an interspecies Feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. A83, 041603 (2011)

    2011

  23. [23]

    Song and F

    J.-L. Song and F. Zhou, Anomalous dimers in quantum mixtures near broad resonances: Pauli blocking, Fermi surface dynamics, and implications, Phys. Rev. A84, 013601 (2011)

    2011

  24. [24]

    Ludwig, S

    D. Ludwig, S. Floerchinger, S. Moroz, and C. Wet- terich, Quantum phase transition in Bose-Fermi mix- tures, Phys. Rev. A84, 033629 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    Fratini and P

    E. Fratini and P. Pieri, Mass imbalance effect in res- onant Bose-Fermi mixtures, Phys. Rev. A85, 063618 (2012)

    2012

  26. [26]

    Anders, P

    P. Anders, P. Werner, M. Troyer, M. Sigrist, and L. Pol- let, From the Cooper Problem to Canted Supersolids in Bose-Fermi Mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 206401 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    Bertaina, E

    G. Bertaina, E. Fratini, S. Giorgini, and P. Pieri, Quan- tum Monte Carlo Study of a Resonant Bose-Fermi Mix- ture, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 115303 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Fratini and P

    E. Fratini and P. Pieri, Single-particle spectral functions in the normal phase of a strongly attractive Bose-Fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. A88, 013627 (2013)

    2013

  29. [29]

    T. Sogo, P. Schuck, and M. Urban, Bose-Fermi pairs in a mixture and the Luttinger theorem within a Nozi` eres- Schmitt-Rink-like approach, Phys. Rev. A88, 023613 (2013)

    2013

  30. [30]

    Guidini, G

    A. Guidini, G. Bertaina, E. Fratini, and P. Pieri, Bose- Fermi mixtures in the molecular limit, Phys. Rev. A89, 023634 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    Guidini, G

    A. Guidini, G. Bertaina, D. E. Galli, and P. Pieri, Con- densed phase of Bose-Fermi mixtures with a pairing in- teraction, Phys. Rev. A91, 023603 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Bertaina, A

    G. Bertaina, A. Guidini, and P. Pieri, Quantum Monte Carlo study of the indirect Pauli exclusion effect in Bose- Fermi mixtures, The European Physical Journal Special Topics224, 497 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    Kharga, D

    D. Kharga, D. Inotani, R. Hanai, and Y. Ohashi, Single- Particle Properties of a Strongly Interacting Bose–Fermi Mixture Above the BEC Phase Transition Temperature, Journal of Low Temperature Physics187, 661 (2017)

    2017

  34. [34]

    Manabe, D

    K. Manabe, D. Inotani, and Y. Ohashi, Single-particle properties of a strongly interacting Bose-Fermi mixture with mass and population imbalance, Phys. Rev. A100, 063609 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    Manabe and Y

    K. Manabe and Y. Ohashi, Thermodynamic Stability and Effects of Bose–Bose Repulsion in an Ultracold Bose–Fermi Mixture with Strong Hetero-Pairing Fluc- tuations, Journal of Low Temperature Physics201, 65 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Manabe and Y

    K. Manabe and Y. Ohashi, Thermodynamic stability, compressibility matrices, and effects of mediated inter- actions in a strongly interacting Bose-Fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. A103, 063317 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    von Milczewski, F

    J. von Milczewski, F. Rose, and R. Schmidt, Functional- renormalization-group approach to strongly coupled Bose-Fermi mixtures in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013317 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Guo and H

    Y. Guo and H. Tajima, Medium-induced bosonic clus- ters in a Bose-Fermi mixture: Toward simulating cluster formations in neutron-rich matter, Phys. Rev. A109, 013319 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    X. Shen, N. Davidson, G. M. Bruun, M. Sun, and Z. Wu, Strongly Interacting Bose-Fermi Mixtures: Mediated Interaction, Phase Diagram, and Sound Propagation, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 033401 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Pastukhov, Strongly interacting Bose-Fermi mixtures in 4−ϵdimensions, Annals of Physics468, 169745 (2024)

    V. Pastukhov, Strongly interacting Bose-Fermi mixtures in 4−ϵdimensions, Annals of Physics468, 169745 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Pisani, P

    L. Pisani, P. Bovini, F. Pavan, and P. Pieri, Boson- fermion pairing and condensation in two-dimensional Bose-Fermi mixtures, SciPost Phys.18, 076 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Gualerzi, L

    C. Gualerzi, L. Pisani, and P. Pieri, Mechanical stability of resonant Bose-Fermi mixtures, SciPost Phys.19, 039 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Foster, O

    S. Foster, O. Bleu, J. Levinsen, and M. M. Parish, Quantum droplets in a resonant Bose-Fermi mixture, arXiv:2601.12777

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Pe’er, B. Neyenhuis, J. J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. S. Juli- enne, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, A High Phase-Space-Density Gas of Polar Molecules, Science322, 231 (2008)

    2008

  45. [45]

    C.-H. Wu, I. Santiago, J. W. Park, P. Ahmadi, and M. W. Zwierlein, Strongly interacting isotopic Bose- Fermi mixture immersed in a Fermi sea, Phys. Rev. A 84, 011601 (2011)

    2011

  46. [46]

    C.-H. Wu, J. W. Park, P. Ahmadi, S. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Ultracold Fermionic Feshbach Molecules of 23Na 40K, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 085301 (2012)

    2012

  47. [47]

    J. W. Park, C.-H. Wu, I. Santiago, T. G. Tiecke, S. Will, P. Ahmadi, and M. W. Zwierlein, Quantum degener- ate Bose-Fermi mixture of chemically different atomic species with widely tunable interactions, Phys. Rev. A 85, 051602 (2012)

    2012

  48. [48]

    M.-S. Heo, T. T. Wang, C. A. Christensen, T. M. Rva- chov, D. A. Cotta, J.-H. Choi, Y.-R. Lee, and W. Ket- terle, Formation of ultracold fermionic NaLi Feshbach molecules, Phys. Rev. A86, 021602 (2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    T. D. Cumby, R. A. Shewmon, M.-G. Hu, J. D. Per- reault, and D. S. Jin, Feshbach-molecule formation in a Bose-Fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. A87, 012703 (2013)

    2013

  50. [50]

    R. S. Bloom, M.-G. Hu, T. D. Cumby, and D. S. Jin, Tests of Universal Three-Body Physics in an Ultra- cold Bose-Fermi Mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 105301 (2013)

    2013

  51. [51]

    V. D. Vaidya, J. Tiamsuphat, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto, Degenerate Bose-Fermi mixtures of rubidium and ytterbium, Phys. Rev. A92, 043604 (2015)

    2015

  52. [52]

    Ferrier-Barbut, M

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, M. Delehaye, S. Laurent, A. T. Grier, M. Pierce, B. S. Rem, F. Chevy, and C. Salomon, A mix- ture of Bose and Fermi superfluids, Science345, 1035 (2014)

    2014

  53. [53]

    Delehaye, S

    M. Delehaye, S. Laurent, I. Ferrier-Barbut, S. Jin, F. Chevy, and C. Salomon, Critical Velocity and Dis- sipation of an Ultracold Bose-Fermi Counterflow, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 265303 (2015)

    2015

  54. [54]

    M.-G. Hu, M. J. Van de Graaff, D. Kedar, J. P. Cor- son, E. A. Cornell, and D. S. Jin, Bose Polarons in the Strongly Interacting Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 055301 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    Wu, X.-C

    Y.-P. Wu, X.-C. Yao, H.-Z. Chen, X.-P. Liu, X.-Q. 16 Wang, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, A quantum degen- erate Bose–Fermi mixture of 41K and 6Li, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 094001 (2017)

    2017

  56. [56]

    R. Roy, A. Green, R. Bowler, and S. Gupta, Two- Element Mixture of Bose and Fermi Superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 055301 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    B. J. DeSalvo, K. Patel, J. Johansen, and C. Chin, Ob- servation of a Degenerate Fermi Gas Trapped by a Bose- Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 233401 (2017)

    2017

  58. [58]

    Trautmann, P

    A. Trautmann, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Durastante, C. Politi, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Dipolar Quan- tum Mixtures of Erbium and Dysprosium Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 213601 (2018)

    2018

  59. [59]

    R. S. Lous, I. Fritsche, M. Jag, F. Lehmann, E. Kir- ilov, B. Huang, and R. Grimm, Probing the Interface of a Phase-Separated State in a Repulsive Bose-Fermi Mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 243403 (2018)

    2018

  60. [60]

    B. J. DeSalvo, K. Patel, G. Cai, and C. Chin, Observa- tion of fermion-mediated interactions between bosonic atoms, Nature568, 61 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    L. D. Marco, G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J. P. Covey, and J. Ye, A degenerate Fermi gas of polar molecules, Science363, 853 (2019)

    2019

  62. [62]

    Z. Z. Yan, Y. Ni, C. Robens, and M. W. Zwierlein, Bose polarons near quantum criticality, Science368, 190 (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    Ye, L.-Y

    Z.-X. Ye, L.-Y. Xie, Z. Guo, X.-B. Ma, G.-R. Wang, L. You, and M. K. Tey, Double-degenerate Bose-Fermi mixture of strontium and lithium, Phys. Rev. A102, 033307 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    H. Edri, B. Raz, N. Matzliah, N. Davidson, and R. Oz- eri, Observation of Spin-Spin Fermion-Mediated Inter- actions between Ultracold Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 163401 (2020)

    2020

  65. [65]

    Fritsche, C

    I. Fritsche, C. Baroni, E. Dobler, E. Kirilov, B. Huang, R. Grimm, G. M. Bruun, and P. Massignan, Stability and breakdown of Fermi polarons in a strongly inter- acting Fermi-Bose mixture, Phys. Rev. A103, 053314 (2021)

    2021

  66. [66]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Karman, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave-shielded polar molecules to quantum degen- eracy, Nature607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Suppression of Unitary Three- Body Loss in a Degenerate Bose-Fermi Mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 153401 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Duda, X.-Y

    M. Duda, X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, J. von Milczewski, R. Schmidt, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Tran- sition from a polaronic condensate to a degenerate Fermi gas of heteronuclear molecules, Nature Physics19, 720 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Patel, G

    K. Patel, G. Cai, H. Ando, and C. Chin, Sound Propa- gation in a Bose-Fermi Mixture: From Weak to Strong Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 083003 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Baroni, B

    C. Baroni, B. Huang, I. Fritsche, E. Dobler, G. Anich, E. Kirilov, R. Grimm, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, P. Massignan, and G. M. Bruun, Mediated interactions between Fermi polarons and the role of impurity quan- tum statistics, Nature Physics20, 68 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    Z. Z. Yan, Y. Ni, A. Chuang, P. E. Dolgirev, K. Seetharam, E. Demler, C. Robens, and M. Zwier- lein, Collective flow of fermionic impurities immersed in a Bose–Einstein condensate, Nature Physics20, 1395 (2024)

    2024

  72. [72]

    A. Y. Chuang, H. Q. Bui, A. Christianen, Y. Zhang, Y. Ni, D. Ahmed-Braun, C. Robens, and M. Zwier- lein, Observation of a Halo Trimer in an Ultracold Bose- Fermi Mixture, Phys. Rev. X15, 021098 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    De Martino, F

    A. De Martino, F. Kiesel, J. Auch, K. Karpov, and C. Gross, Dissipationless tune-out trapping for a lanthanide–alkali-metal quantum gas mixture, Phys. Rev. A112, L051304 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    H. Ando, G. Cai, C. Chin, and T. Enss, Me- diated interactions in mixtures of ultracold atoms, arXiv:2511.09745

    arXiv

  75. [75]

    Huang, I

    B. Huang, I. Fritsche, R. S. Lous, C. Baroni, J. T. M. Walraven, E. Kirilov, and R. Grimm, Breathing mode of a Bose-Einstein condensate repulsively interacting with a fermionic reservoir, Phys. Rev. A99, 041602 (2019)

    2019

  76. [76]

    Schmidt, M

    R. Schmidt, M. Knap, D. A. Ivanov, J.-S. You, M. Cetina, and E. Demler, Universal many-body re- sponse of heavy impurities coupled to a Fermi sea: a re- view of recent progress, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 024401 (2018)

    2018

  77. [77]

    Scazza, M

    F. Scazza, M. Zaccanti, P. Massignan, M. M. Parish, and J. Levinsen, Repulsive Fermi and Bose Polarons in Quantum Gases, Atoms10, 55 (2022)

    2022

  78. [78]

    Massignan, M

    P. Massignan, M. Zaccanti, and G. M. Bruun, Polarons, dressed molecules and itinerant ferromagnetism in ul- tracold Fermi gases, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 034401 (2014)

    2014

  79. [79]

    Wu, X.-C

    Y.-P. Wu, X.-C. Yao, X.-P. Liu, X.-Q. Wang, Y.-X. Wang, H.-Z. Chen, Y. Deng, Y.-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Coupled dipole oscillations of a mass-imbalanced Bose-Fermi superfluid mixture, Phys. Rev. B97, 020506 (2018)

    2018

  80. [80]

    J. J. Kinnunen, Z. Wu, and G. M. Bruun, Inducedp- Wave Pairing in Bose-Fermi Mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 253402 (2018)

    2018

Showing first 80 references.