pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21288 · v1 · pith:ZN7LGWUSnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

A broadband view of the thermal and non-thermal emission from the embedded massive star cluster RCW 38

Giada Peron , Andrea Bracco , Giovanni Morlino , Silvia Mantovanini , Elena Amato , Daniele Galli , Marco Padovani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords RCW 38gamma-ray emissionstar clustershadronic interactionscosmic raysacceleration efficiencystellar windsmulti-wavelength
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gamma-ray emission from RCW 38 arises from hadronic interactions with its molecular cloud, with electron-to-proton ratio below 0.001.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a multi-wavelength analysis of RCW 38 from MHz radio through GeV gamma rays, fitting an eight-parameter model via MCMC to separate thermal and non-thermal components. It concludes that the gamma-ray flux is produced by protons accelerated in stellar winds colliding with the host molecular cloud rather than by electrons. This yields firm upper limits on the electron-to-proton ratio of 10 to the minus 3 and a lower limit on acceleration efficiency of 1 percent. The derived values match those needed to explain the galactic cosmic-ray composition including the neon-22 anomaly. The findings position young massive star clusters as significant sources of cosmic-ray protons at least up to a few TeV.

Core claim

Our results support an interpretation in which the gamma-ray emission from RCW 38 is produced by hadronic interactions with the host molecular cloud. We derive robust constraints on the electron-to-proton ratio, with K_ep ≲ 10^{-3}, and on the acceleration efficiency, estimated to be ≳1%, consistent with the values required to explain the cosmic-ray composition, and in particular its 22Ne anomaly. These results strengthen the idea that stellar clusters play a significant role as contributors to cosmic-ray protons in our Galaxy at least up to energies of a few TeV.

What carries the argument

An eight-parameter model of thermal and non-thermal emission constrained solely by MCMC fitting to observed fluxes from radio to gamma-ray bands.

If this is right

  • Stellar-wind acceleration in clusters must operate with efficiency above 1 percent to match cosmic-ray composition data.
  • Young massive clusters supply a non-negligible fraction of galactic cosmic-ray protons up to a few TeV.
  • Next-generation ground-based gamma-ray telescopes can test whether the same mechanism extends to the cosmic-ray knee.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the same multi-wavelength fitting approach to other embedded clusters could identify additional hadronic gamma-ray sources.
  • The very low electron-to-proton ratio implies that cluster wind shocks preferentially accelerate protons over electrons.
  • If clusters are confirmed as TeV proton sources, they may account for part of the diffuse galactic gamma-ray background.

Load-bearing premise

The entire broadband spectrum can be described by one eight-parameter model without significant extra source components or physical processes.

What would settle it

A clear mismatch between the observed spectrum in any band and the predictions of the best-fit eight-parameter model, such as an extra radio component or a gamma-ray shape inconsistent with pion-decay emission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21288 by Andrea Bracco, Daniele Galli, Elena Amato, Giada Peron, Giovanni Morlino, Marco Padovani, Silvia Mantovanini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: RGB map of RCW 38 as detected by MWA within the GLEAM￾X survey (Mantovanini et al. 2025), in three different bands: 88 MHz (red), 114 MHz (green) and 155 MHz (blue). The grey contours repre￾sent emission unveiled by IRAS at 60 µm, while the white contours is the gamma-ray signal derived by Fermi-LAT above 1 GeV. In the latter case, the contours indicate significance level corresponding to a test￾statistics… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Energy-loss and acceleration timescales of electrons are com￾pared. The latter are calculated considering the diffusion coefficient in three different turbulence scenarios, Bohm, Kolmogorov, and Kraich￾nan, as indicated in the figure legend. The open circles indicate, for each case, the maximum energy, defined by the points at which the timescales intercept. The grey area indicates an epoch longer than the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In the top panel: the best-fit model for the broadband SED of RCW 38. Red points refer to the observations of the different instruments listed in the central inset, while the black upper limit indicates the level of the emission measured by Chandra, as explained in the text. The grey curve represent the sum of thermal and non-thermal components, listed in the figure legend, the grey area indicates the conf… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Corner plots for the fitted parameters in the model. of Lw ∼ 1038 erg s−1 was assumed. Other authors have instead obtained for RCW 38 a much larger value for the acceleration efficiency (Pandey et al. 2024), because they assumed a much shorter confinement time, dominated by diffusion with a Galac￾tic diffusion coefficient. We assumed throughout the text that ad￾vection dominates up to energies ∼ 1 TeV, but… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Electrons (orange) and protons (blue) spectral energy distribu￾tion (as a function of total energy of the particles) calculated including the terms of losses with the best-fit parameters listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: CTAO sensitivity of the Southern array compared with the SED of RCW 38 assuming different maximum energies of primary particles. The sensitivity is calculated for an exposure of 200 hours on-axis, using the prescription of Celli & Peron (2024), namely requiring a minimum 10 events per bin with a significance of 5σ over the background. The different golden curves represent the sensitivity for a point like s… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gamma-ray emission has now been detected from a variety of source classes in the Galaxy, including clusters of young massive stars. RCW 38, a very young embedded massive star cluster, is a case of particular interest: its gamma-ray emission detected up to hundreds of GeV, provided the first observational evidence of high-energy particle acceleration powered exclusively by stellar winds. In this work, we aim to characterize the emission mechanisms responsible for the gamma-ray flux in RCW 38 and to provide estimates of the acceleration efficiency, as well as the fraction of accelerated electrons compared to protons, $K_{ep}$. We present the most comprehensive multi-wavelength study of a single star cluster to date. Our analysis ranges from MHz radio observations obtained with the GLEAM-X survey from the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) to GeV gamma-ray data from Fermi-LAT, and includes GHz and THz measurements from Parkes, Planck, and IRAS. We model the thermal and non-thermal emission of RCW 38 using an eight-parameter model constrained by the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Our results support an interpretation in which the gamma-ray emission from RCW 38 is produced by hadronic interactions with the host molecular cloud. We derive robust constraints on the electron-to-proton ratio, with $K_{ep} \lesssim 10^{-3}$, and on the acceleration efficiency, estimated to be $\gtrsim$1%, consistent with the values required to explain the cosmic-ray composition, and in particular its $^{22}$Ne anomaly. These results strengthen the idea that stellar clusters play a significant role as contributors to cosmic-ray protons in our Galaxy at least up to energies of a few TeV. Future investigations with the next generation of ground-based detectors will determine whether they also play a relevant role at higher energies, particularly in the context of the cosmic-ray knee.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-wavelength analysis of the embedded massive star cluster RCW 38, combining radio data from MWA/GLEAM-X, Parkes, Planck, and IRAS with Fermi-LAT GeV gamma-ray observations. The authors fit an eight-parameter model to the broadband spectrum using MCMC and conclude that the gamma-ray emission arises from hadronic interactions with the host molecular cloud, deriving K_ep ≲ 10^{-3} and an acceleration efficiency ≳1%. They argue that stellar clusters powered by stellar winds contribute to Galactic cosmic rays up to a few TeV, consistent with cosmic-ray composition requirements including the ^{22}Ne anomaly.

Significance. If the single-model fit can be shown to be robust, the work would provide useful observational constraints on particle acceleration in young stellar clusters, reinforcing their potential role in the Galactic cosmic-ray budget at TeV energies and offering a possible explanation for observed composition anomalies.

major comments (1)
  1. The hadronic interpretation, K_ep upper limit, and efficiency lower limit are outputs of a single eight-parameter MCMC fit to the observed fluxes. The manuscript does not report fits to a purely leptonic gamma-ray model or multi-component alternatives, nor any model-comparison statistics (Bayes factors or evidence ratios). This is load-bearing for the central claim, as degeneracies among parameters such as magnetic-field strength, electron cutoff, and proton normalization could shift the inferred K_ep by more than the quoted bound.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the analysis constitutes 'the most comprehensive multi-wavelength study of a single star cluster to date'; a short sentence placing the data set in context with prior RCW 38 or similar-cluster studies would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. Below we provide a point-by-point response to the major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The hadronic interpretation, K_ep upper limit, and efficiency lower limit are outputs of a single eight-parameter MCMC fit to the observed fluxes. The manuscript does not report fits to a purely leptonic gamma-ray model or multi-component alternatives, nor any model-comparison statistics (Bayes factors or evidence ratios). This is load-bearing for the central claim, as degeneracies among parameters such as magnetic-field strength, electron cutoff, and proton normalization could shift the inferred K_ep by more than the quoted bound.

    Authors: The eight-parameter model incorporates both thermal and non-thermal components, with the non-thermal part including independent power-law normalizations and cutoffs for electrons and protons, as well as the magnetic field strength. The MCMC exploration of the parameter space accounts for the mentioned degeneracies, and the resulting posterior on K_ep remains below 10^{-3} across the credible regions. The radio observations from MWA/GLEAM-X, Parkes, and Planck tightly constrain the leptonic emission, making a dominant leptonic gamma-ray contribution incompatible with the data unless extreme parameter values are adopted. We acknowledge the value of reporting an explicit pure-leptonic fit for completeness. In the revised manuscript, we will include the results of such a fit, demonstrating that it fails to reproduce the gamma-ray spectrum without violating the radio constraints. Regarding model-comparison statistics, the posterior probability mass overwhelmingly favors the hadronic-dominated solutions, providing sufficient evidence for our claims without additional computation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

K_ep upper limit and acceleration efficiency are direct outputs of the single 8-parameter MCMC fit

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We model the thermal and non-thermal emission of RCW 38 using an eight-parameter model constrained by the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Our results support an interpretation in which the gamma-ray emission from RCW 38 is produced by hadronic interactions with the host molecular cloud. We derive robust constraints on the electron-to-proton ratio, with K_ep ≲ 10^{-3}, and on the acceleration efficiency, estimated to be ≳1%"

    K_ep and the acceleration efficiency are free parameters (or direct functions of them) inside the eight-parameter MCMC model; the quoted bounds are the posterior constraints obtained by fitting that model to the broadband data. The 'robust constraints' and 'support' for the hadronic scenario are therefore outputs of the same fit rather than independent derivations.

full rationale

The paper constructs an eight-parameter model that includes both hadronic and leptonic channels and fits it via MCMC to the radio-to-gamma-ray fluxes. The reported K_ep ≲ 10^{-3} and efficiency ≳1% are therefore posterior bounds on parameters internal to that model rather than independent predictions. No alternative (e.g., leptonic-only) models or Bayes-factor comparisons are described in the abstract, so the hadronic interpretation rests on the adequacy of this single model choice. This matches the 'fitted_input_called_prediction' pattern at a moderate level but does not rise to self-definitional equivalence or load-bearing self-citation; the central physical modeling remains externally falsifiable against the observed fluxes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard astrophysical emission modeling assumptions plus eight free parameters whose values are determined by fitting to the observed fluxes.

free parameters (1)
  • eight model parameters
    The paper states that an eight-parameter model is constrained by MCMC; these parameters are fitted to the multi-wavelength data and directly determine the reported K_ep and efficiency values.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gamma-ray emission in RCW 38 can be fully described by a combination of thermal free-free and non-thermal hadronic/leptonic components powered exclusively by stellar winds.
    Invoked when the authors interpret the gamma-ray flux as hadronic and attribute all acceleration to stellar winds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5903 in / 1423 out tokens · 28551 ms · 2026-06-26T13:46:28.865610+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

290 extracted references · 202 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Wind from a starburst galaxy nucleus. , keywords =

  2. [2]

    and Schlafly, Edward F

    Zucker, Catherine and Speagle, Joshua S. and Schlafly, Edward F. and Green, Gregory M. and Finkbeiner, Douglas P. and Goodman, Alyssa A. and Alves, João , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2388 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2388 2019

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    ALMA view of the Galactic super star cluster RCW 38 at 270 au resolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa115 , archivePrefix =. 1907.07358 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa115 1907

  4. [4]

    Theory of cosmic ray and gamma-ray production in the supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622

    Theory of cosmic ray and -ray production in the supernova remnant RX J0852.0-4622. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200809473 , archivePrefix =. 0906.5158 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200809473

  5. [5]

    Non-thermal high-energy emission from colliding winds of massive stars

    Nonthermal High-Energy Emission from Colliding Winds of Massive Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/503598 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0510701 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/503598

  6. [6]

    Saz Parkinson, P. M. and Xu, H. and Yu, P. L. H. and Salvetti, D. and Marelli, M. and Falcone, A. D. , number =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/8 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/8 2016

  7. [7]

    Seta, Masumichi and Hasegawa, Tetsuo and Dame, T. M. and Sakamoto, Seiichi and Oka, Tomoharu and Handa, Toshihiro and Hayashi, Masahiko and Morino, Jun‐Ichi and Sorai, Kazuo and Usuda, Kumiko S. , number =. 1998 , journal =. doi:10.1086/306141 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1086/306141 1998

  8. [8]

    and Jackson, James M

    Kolpak, Michal A. and Jackson, James M. and Bania, T. M. and Clemens, D. P. and Dickey, John M. , number =. 2003 , journal =. doi:10.1086/344752 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1086/344752 2003

  9. [9]

    and Bi, X

    Amenomori, M. and Bi, X. J. and Chen, D. and Cui, S. W. and. 2008 , journal =. doi:10.1086/529514 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1086/529514 2008

  10. [10]

    The CO-to-H2 Conversion Factor

    Bolatto, Alberto D. and Wolfire, Mark and Leroy, Adam K. , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 , issn =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 2013

  11. [11]

    2013 , booktitle =

    Ackermann, M and Ajello, M and Allafort, A and Baldini, L and Ballet, J and Barbiellini, G and Baring, M G and Bastieri, D and Bechtol, K and Bellazzini, R and Blandford, R D and Bloom, E D and Bonamente, E and Borgland, A W and Bottacini, E and Brandt, T J and Bregeon, J and Brigida, M and Bruel, P and Buehler, R and Busetto, G and Buson, S and Caliandro...

    2013

  12. [12]

    2008 , journal =

    Pohl, Martin and Englmaier, Peter and Bissantz, Nicolai , number =. 2008 , journal =. doi:10.1086/529004 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1086/529004 2008

  13. [13]

    VERITAS, Welcome to , url =

  14. [14]

    Array, Cherenkov Telescope , url =

  15. [15]

    - The High Energy Stereoscopic , url =

    System, H.E.S.S. - The High Energy Stereoscopic , url =

  16. [16]

    (SWGO), The Southern Wide-field Gamma-ray Observatory , url =

  17. [17]

    2019 , journal =

    Liu, Lei and Pang, Xiaoying , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab530a , keywords =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab530a 2019

  18. [18]

    2012 , journal =

    Ferrand, Gilles and Safi-Harb, Samar , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.004 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.004 2012

  19. [19]

    2019 , booktitle =

    Jardin-Blicq, Armelle and Marandon, Vincent and Brun, François , volume =. 2019 , booktitle =. doi:10.22323/1.358.0706 , issn =

    work page doi:10.22323/1.358.0706 2019

  20. [20]

    2008 , journal =

    I B. 2008 , journal =

    2008

  21. [21]

    Jones, L. R. and Smith, A. and Angelini, L. , number =. 1993 , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/265.3.631 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/265.3.631 1993

  22. [22]

    2008 , journal =

    RA Burger, TPJ Krüger, M Hitge, NE Engelbrecht , pages =. 2008 , journal =

    2008

  23. [23]

    2012 , journal =

    F Effenberger, H Fichtner, K Scherer, S Barra, J Kleimann, RD Strauss , pages =. 2012 , journal =

    2012

  24. [24]

    Potgieter, M. S. and Nndanganeni, R. R. , month =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.06.008 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.06.008 2013

  25. [25]

    2010 , journal =

    JF Drake, M Opher, M Swisdak, JN Chamoun , pages =. 2010 , journal =

    2010

  26. [26]

    Abdo, A. A. and Allen, B. and Aune, T. and Berley, D. and Blaufuss, E. and Casanova, S. and Chen, C. and Dingus, B. L. and Ellsworth, R. W. and Fleysher, L. and Fleysher, R. and Gonzalez, M. M. and Goodman, J. A. and Hoffman, C. M. and H"untemeyer, P. H. and Kolterman, B. E. and Lansdell, C. P. and Linnemann, J. T. and McEnery, J. E. and Mincer, A. I. and...

    work page doi:10.1086/592213 2008

  27. [27]

    and Bhattacharya, Dipen , number =

    Case, Gary L. and Bhattacharya, Dipen , number =. 1998 , journal =. doi:10.1086/306089 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1086/306089 1998

  28. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , volume =

    Akaike, Hirotugu , number =. 1974 , journal =. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 1974

  29. [29]

    Reid, M. J. and Dame, T. M. and Menten, K. M. and Brunthaler, A. , number =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/77 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/77 2016

  30. [30]

    2017 , journal =

    Popescu, C C and Yang, R and Tuffs, R J and Natale, G and Rushton, M and Aharonian, F , number =. 2017 , journal =

    2017

  31. [31]

    1972 , journal =

    Savage, Blair D and Jenkins, Edward B , pages =. 1972 , journal =

    1972

  32. [32]

    1977 , journal =

    McKee, CF and Ostriker, JP , pages =. 1977 , journal =

    1977

  33. [34]

    Rice, Thomas S and Goodman, Alyssa A and Bergin, Edwin A and Beaumont, Christopher and Dame, T M , arxivId =

  34. [35]

    2016 , journal =

    Rice, Thomas S and Goodman, Alyssa A and Bergin, Edwin A and Beaumont, Christopher and Dame, T M , volume =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/52 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/52 2016

  35. [36]

    and Aharonian, F

    Abramowski, A. and Aharonian, F. and Benkhali, F. Ait and Akhperjanian, A. G. and Anguner, E. O. and Backes, M. and Balzer, A. and Becherini, Y. and Tjus, J. Becker and Berge, D. and Bernhard, S. and Bernlohr, K. and Birsin, E. and Blackwell, R. and Bottcher, M. and Boisson, C. and Bolmont, J. and Bordas, P. and Bregeon, J. and Brun, F. and Brun, P. and B...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature17147 2016

  36. [37]

    and Alvarez, C

    Alfaro, R. and Alvarez, C. and. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.122001 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.122001 2017

  37. [38]

    and Abdou, Y

    Abbasi, R. and Abdou, Y. and Abu-Zayyad, T. and Ackermann, M. and Adams, J. and Aguilar, J. A. and Ahlers, M. and Altmann, D. and Andeen, K. and Auffenberg, J. and Bai, X. and Baker, M. and Barwick, S. W. and Baum, V. and Bay, R. and Bazo Alba, J. L. and Beattie, K. and Beatty, J. J. and Bechet, S. and Becker, J. K. and Becker, K. H. and Bell, M. and Bena...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.01.016 2013

  38. [39]

    and Barbarino, G

    Adriani, O. and Barbarino, G. C. and Bazilevskaya, G. A. and Bellotti, R. and Boezio, M. and Bogomolov, E. A. and Bonechi, L. and Bongi, M. and Bonvicini, V. and Bottai, S. and Bruno, A. and Cafagna, F. and Campana, D. and Carlson, P. and Casolino, M. and Castellini, G. and De Pascale, M. P. and De Rosa, G. and De Simone, N. and Di Felice, V. and Galper, ...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07942 2009

  39. [40]

    2009 , journal =

    O Adriani, GC Barbarino, GA Bazilevskaya , pages =. 2009 , journal =

    2009

  40. [41]

    1983 , journal =

    Li, Ti-Pei and Ma, Yu-Qian , pages =. 1983 , journal =

    1983

  41. [42]

    2013 , journal =

    Malkov, M A and Diamond, P H and Sagdeev, R Z and Aharonian, F A and Moskalenko, I V , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/73 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/73 2013

  42. [43]

    2013 , journal =

    Giacinti, G and Kachelrie. 2013 , journal =

    2013

  43. [44]

    2012 , journal =

    Nava, Lara and Gabici, Stefano , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts450 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts450 2012

  44. [45]

    2001 , journal =

    Fichtner, H , pages =. 2001 , journal =

    2001

  45. [46]

    and Norris, J

    Moiseev, A. and Norris, J. and Ormes, J. and Ritz, S. and Thompson, D. , month =. 1999 , booktitle =

    1999

  46. [47]

    doi:10.5194/astra-7-245-2011 , arxivId =

    2011 , author =. doi:10.5194/astra-7-245-2011 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.5194/astra-7-245-2011 2011

  47. [48]

    2011 , journal =

    P Bobik, MJ Boschini, C Consolandi , pages =. 2011 , journal =

    2011

  48. [49]

    2011 , journal =

    Popescu, C C and Tuffs, R J and Dopita, M A and Fischera, J and Kylafis, N D and Madore, B F , volume =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015217 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015217 2011

  49. [50]

    2019 , journal =

    Lallement, R and Babusiaux, C and Vergely, J L and Katz, D and Arenou, F and Valette, B and Hottier, C and Capitanio, L , pages =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834695 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834695 2019

  50. [51]

    2012 , journal =

    Huber, B and Farnier, C and Manalaysay, A and Straumann, U and Walter, R , pages =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219688 , keywords =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219688 2012

  51. [52]

    Webber, W. R. and McDonald, F. B. and Cummings, A. C. and Stone, E. C. and Heikkila, B. and Lal, N. , url =. 2012 , journal =

    2012

  52. [53]

    and Yamamoto, A

    Yoshida, T. and Yamamoto, A. and Mitchell, J. and Abe, K. and Fuke, H. and Haino, S. and Hams, T. and Ikeda, N. and Itazaki, A. and Izumi, K. and Lee, M. H. and Maeno, T. and Makida, Y. and Matsuda, S. and Matsumoto, H. and Moiseev, A. and Nishimura, J. and Nozaki, M. and Omiya, H. and Ormes, J. F. and Sasaki, M. and Seo, E. S. and Shikaze, Y. and Stephen...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.05.017 2004

  53. [54]

    , number =

    Haug, E. , number =. 1975 , journal =. doi:10.1515/zna-1975-0901 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1515/zna-1975-0901 1975

  54. [55]

    and Gould, Robert J

    Blumenthal, George R. and Gould, Robert J. , number =. 1970 , journal =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.237 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.42.237 1970

  55. [56]

    Kundu, M. R. and Velusamy, T. and Kundu, M. R. and Velusamy, T. , pages =. 1972 , journal =

    1972

  56. [57]

    2000 , journal =

    Aharonian, F A and Atoyan, A M , volume =. 2000 , journal =

    2000

  57. [58]

    2009 , booktitle =

    1⋆, S Gabici and Aharonian, F A and Casanova, S , pages =. 2009 , booktitle =

    2009

  58. [59]

    Dickman, R. L. and Snell, Ronald L. and Schloerb, F. Peter , month =. 1986 , journal =. doi:10.1086/164604 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1086/164604 1986

  59. [60]

    and Raucq, F

    De Becker, M. and Raucq, F. , month =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322074 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322074 2013

  60. [61]

    Shelton, R. L. and Kuntz, K. D. and Petre, R. , number =. 2004 , journal =. doi:10.1086/422352 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1086/422352 2004

  61. [62]

    2003 , journal =

    SES Ferreira, MS Potgieter, B Heber, H Fichtner , pages =. 2003 , journal =

    2003

  62. [63]

    2012 , journal =

    M Boezio, E Mocchiutti , pages =. 2012 , journal =

    2012

  63. [64]

    Rigby, A. J. and Moore, T. J.T. and Plume, R. and Eden, D. J. and Urquhart, J. S. and Thompson, M. A. and Mottram, J. C. and Brunt, C. M. and Butner, H. M. and Dempsey, J. T. and Gibson, S. J. and Hatchell, J. and Jenness, T. and Kuno, N. and Longmore, S. N. and Morgan, L. K. and Polychroni, D. and Thomas, H. and White, G. J. and Zhu, M. , number =. 2016 ...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2808 2016

  64. [65]

    and Hinton, J

    Funk, S. and Hinton, J. A. , month =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.018 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.018 2013

  65. [66]

    2007 , journal =

    AC Cummings, EC Stone , pages =. 2007 , journal =

    2007

  66. [67]

    2015 , journal =

    Green, D A , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1885 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1885 2015

  67. [68]

    and Paul, J

    Lebrun, F. and Paul, J. A. and Bignami, G. F. and Caraveo, P. A. and Buccheri, R. and Hermsen, W. and Wills, R. D. , pages =. 1982 , journal =

    1982

  68. [69]

    Bell, A. R. , month =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022 2013

  69. [70]

    doi:10.7529/ICRC2011/V06/1242 , arxivId =

    2010 , author =. doi:10.7529/ICRC2011/V06/1242 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.7529/icrc2011/v06/1242 2010

  70. [71]

    and Cummings, Alan C

    Stone, Edward C. and Cummings, Alan C. and Heikkila, Bryant C. and Lal, Nand , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0928-3 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0928-3 2019

  71. [72]

    1993 , journal =

    LF Burlaga, FB McDonald, NF Ness , pages =. 1993 , journal =

    1993

  72. [73]

    1999 , journal =

    HV Cane, G Wibberenz, IG Richardson, TT Rosenvinge , pages =. 1999 , journal =

    1999

  73. [74]

    and Gabici, S

    Morlino, G. and Gabici, S. , number =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv074 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv074 2015

  74. [75]

    Aartsen, M. G. and Ackermann, M. and Adams, J. and Aguilar, J. A. and Ahlers, M. and Ahrens, M. and Alispach, C. and Andeen, K. and Anderson, T. and Ansseau, I. and Anton, G. and Arg. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.082002 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.082002 2019

  75. [76]

    2018 , journal =

    Amato, Elena and Blasi, Pasquale , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2017.04.019 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2017.04.019 2018

  76. [77]

    , number =

    Atri, Dimitra and Melott, Adrian L. , number =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.03.001 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2013.03.001 2012

  77. [78]

    and Zwicky, F

    Baade, W. and Zwicky, F. , number =. 1934 , journal =. doi:10.1073/pnas.20.5.259 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.20.5.259 1934

  78. [79]

    2005 , journal =

    Fichtner, H , pages =. 2005 , journal =

    2005

  79. [80]

    Erlykin, A. D. and Wolfendale, A. W. , pages =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.12.003 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.12.003 2013

  80. [81]

    Bell, Antony and Schure, K. M. and Reville, B. and Giacinti, G. , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt179 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt179 2013

Showing first 80 references.