pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24454 · v1 · pith:DWBCFPKUnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 💻 cs.HC

Optimizing Visual Analytics Workflows: From Theory to Practice

Philip Beaucamp , Alfie Abdul-Rahman , Rita Borgo , Wolfgang Jentner , Saiful Khan , Yiwen Xing , David Ebert , Min Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords visual analyticsworkflow optimizationaction researchcase studiesinformation theorytrade-off analysishuman-machine processes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Case studies show that an information-theoretic methodology for optimizing visual analytics workflows is feasible in practice, with obstacles addressed by a proposed roadmap.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how to move an existing ontology for analyzing trade-offs between human-centric and machine-centric processes in visual analytics from theory to practice. It uses action research across case studies in different domains, with participants of varying experience, to test hypotheses about applying the methodology. The resulting analysis identifies practical strengths and feasibility while noting obstacles to wider use. A roadmap is presented to remove those obstacles and support better integration of visualization, interaction, statistics, and algorithms.

Core claim

The theory-based methodology for optimizing VA workflows demonstrates strengths and feasibility through case studies, with obstacles that can be addressed by the proposed roadmap.

What carries the argument

Action research method applied to case studies that test hypotheses about using the ontology for information-theoretic trade-off analysis in VA workflows.

If this is right

  • The methodology enables systematic reasoning about trade-offs when building integrated VA workflows.
  • Researchers can apply the approach across application domains regardless of their specific background knowledge.
  • Obstacles identified in the studies can be removed using the outlined roadmap for broader adoption.
  • Human-centric and machine-centric processes can complement each other more effectively once the methodology is in routine use.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same action-research approach could be used to test the methodology in additional domains not covered by the original case studies.
  • If the roadmap succeeds, the ontology could become a standard reference for designing new VA tools that balance visualization and computation.
  • Long-term tracking of workflow performance before and after applying the methodology would provide direct measures of optimization gains.

Load-bearing premise

The selected case studies across domains and with researchers of varying backgrounds provide representative evidence sufficient to evaluate broad practicality and to identify generalizable obstacles.

What would settle it

A new set of case studies conducted after following the roadmap that still encounter persistent, unaddressed obstacles to applying the methodology would show the approach is not broadly deployable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24454 by Alfie Abdul-Rahman, David Ebert, Min Chen, Philip Beaucamp, Rita Borgo, Saiful Khan, Wolfgang Jentner, Yiwen Xing.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The workflows for optimizing VA workflows in seven case studies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The main workflow for optimizing VA workflows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The additional comparison workflow for optimizing VA workflows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A roadmap for developing software to assist VIS researchers and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CS#1 ML4Finance: An updated Workflow for Optimizing Workflows (WF4OWF) for the ML4Finance case. Note that this extended version includes a potential development component, explicitly marked as speculative and based solely on a co-author’s suggestion, which is not present in the main-text version in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: CS#2 SimilarityDetection: An updated workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the SimilarityDetection case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: CS#3 BookTrade: The design iterations of BookTracker. ventional ML workflows is that developers continually repeat the same data-wrangling tasks from scratch. From an information-theoretic per￾spective, this represents excessively low alphabet compression (AC) across all three abstract components: interaction (I), algorithm (A), and statistics (S), because no shared, compressed representation of prior tran… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: CS#3 BookTrade: A workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the BookTrade case. Note that in the main text, several branches of this workflow are combined into a single iteration in the interest of brevity. The decomposed version is depicted here. E CASE STUDY 5 - MULTI-DIMENSIONAL PATTERN EXPLO￾RATION (SUBSPACEANALYSIS) This case study provides a post-hoc analysis of Chen’s and Ebert’s methodology [1… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: CS#3 BookTrade: An updated workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the BookTrade case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: CS#4 DataVirualization: An updated workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the DataVirtualization case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: CS#5 SubspaceAnalysis: An updated workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the SubspaceAnalysis case. common narrative structures, overlay methods, and correspondence patterns [20]. Hao et al. [20] utilize output constraints, chain-of-thought reasoning, and dynamic few-shot prompting to detect subjects, trend patterns, and numerical values and connect them to tabular data [20], resulting in automate… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: CS#6 Prompts4LLMs: A workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the Prompts4LLMs case. Note that this version provides an alternative interpretation compared to the concise version in the main text in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: CS#6 Prompts4LLMs: An updated workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the Prompts4LLMs case. densely packed radial axes and introduce overlapping or visual clutter (Vis-High-Ct, Vis-High-PD). To address this symptom, we introduced an angular relaxation algorithm that enforces a minimum spacing be￾tween neighboring axes while maintaining key spatial reference points (Vis-Low-PD). These reference poi… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: CS#7 GlacierMovement: Traditional visualisations of glacier￾front change: (a) time series of 10 calving glaciers; (b) color-coded glyphs showing relative frontal position over time, and sea surface tem￾perature; (c) novel design: radial view of glacier-front change: area plot of 199 calving glaciers over 10 years, on a false-color Landsat image of Greenland [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: CS#7 GlacierMovement: An updated workflow for optimizing workflows (WF4OWF) for the GlacierMovement case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The principle of visual analytics (VA) is to provide integrated workflows where human-centric processes (e.g., visualization and interaction) and machine-centric processes (e.g., statistics and algorithms) complement each other. To implement this principle in practice, it is necessary to reason about the trade-offs among different processes and make optimal use of them in a workflow. Building on an existing ontology of the methodology for analyzing such trade-offs information-theoretically and for optimizing VA workflows systematically, we investigate ways to transform this methodology from theory to practice. In particular, we adopted the action research method. Through case studies in different application domains, VA researchers with different background knowledge and experiences offered their answers to several hypotheses about using the methodology in practice and proposed ways forward. In this paper, we present our collective analysis, the strengths and feasibility of this theory-based methodology, as well as the obstacles to its broad deployment in practice. To address these challenges, we outline a roadmap to remove such obstacles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that an existing information-theoretic ontology for analyzing trade-offs in visual analytics workflows can be transitioned from theory to practice via action research. Case studies conducted in different application domains with VA researchers of varying backgrounds and experiences are used to test several hypotheses, identify strengths and feasibility, surface obstacles to broad deployment, and outline a roadmap for addressing those obstacles.

Significance. If the case-study evidence is representative, the work would provide a concrete bridge between abstract optimization frameworks and deployable VA practice, with explicit attention to human factors and workflow integration that is currently underrepresented in the literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods description of case studies] The central claim that the case studies demonstrate generalizable strengths, feasibility, and obstacles rests on the representativeness of the participant pool and domains. The manuscript provides no selection criteria, sample size, domain coverage statistics, or protocol for assessing generalizability (see the description of the action-research method and collective analysis).
  2. [Results / collective analysis section] Without explicit reporting of how the 'several hypotheses' were operationalized, measured, or falsified in each case study, it is not possible to evaluate whether the reported obstacles are load-bearing or merely anecdotal (see the section presenting collective analysis of answers to hypotheses).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract references an 'existing ontology' but does not cite its prior publication or clarify the degree of author overlap, which affects assessment of novelty.
  2. [Introduction / background] Notation for the information-theoretic quantities (e.g., trade-off measures) is not introduced in the provided summary, making it difficult to connect the practical findings back to the theoretical claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for these constructive comments, which highlight opportunities to strengthen the methodological transparency of our action research study. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Methods description of case studies] The central claim that the case studies demonstrate generalizable strengths, feasibility, and obstacles rests on the representativeness of the participant pool and domains. The manuscript provides no selection criteria, sample size, domain coverage statistics, or protocol for assessing generalizability (see the description of the action-research method and collective analysis).

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit reporting of these elements. While action research emphasizes contextual depth and practical insights over statistical representativeness, we will revise the methods section to describe the participant selection process (based on domain relevance, availability, and diversity of backgrounds), report the exact sample size and domains covered, and outline the protocol used in the collective analysis to evaluate transferability of findings. These additions will better ground the claims about strengths, feasibility, and obstacles. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / collective analysis section] Without explicit reporting of how the 'several hypotheses' were operationalized, measured, or falsified in each case study, it is not possible to evaluate whether the reported obstacles are load-bearing or merely anecdotal (see the section presenting collective analysis of answers to hypotheses).

    Authors: The hypotheses were explored through qualitative responses collected via discussions and workshops in each case study, with the collective analysis identifying recurring themes across participants. We acknowledge that the current description does not detail the operationalization steps. We will revise the collective analysis section to explicitly describe how each hypothesis was formulated and posed, the data collection approach, and the thematic synthesis process used to assess responses, thereby clarifying the evidential basis for the reported obstacles. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper applies action research and case studies to assess the practicality of a pre-existing ontology for VA workflow optimization. The new empirical content (case studies across domains) is independent of the cited ontology. No mathematical derivations, self-definitional constructs, fitted inputs presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to prior inputs by construction are present. The reference to the ontology functions as standard background rather than a circular foundation for the reported strengths, feasibility, or roadmap.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no extractable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated assumption that action-research case studies are sufficient evidence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5720 in / 927 out tokens · 24320 ms · 2026-06-25T22:55:50.770984+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Yenpure, S

    A. Abdul-Rahman, J. Lein, K. Coles, E. Maguire, M. Meyer, M. Wynne et al. Rule-based visual mappings – with a case study on poetry visualization. Computer Graphics Forum, 32(3pt4):381–390, 2013. doi: 10.1111/cgf. 12125 7

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf 2013

  2. [2]

    Abdul-Rahman, G

    A. Abdul-Rahman, G. Roe, M. Olsen, C. Gladstone, R. Whaling, N. Cronk et al. Constructive visual analytics for text similarity detection.Computer Graphics Forum, 36(1):237–248, 2017. doi: 10.1111/cgf.12798 3, 12, 13

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.12798 2017

  3. [3]

    Akbaba, L

    D. Akbaba, L. Klein, and M. Meyer. Entanglements for visualization: Changing research outcomes through feminist theory.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31:1279–1289, 1 2025. doi: 10. 1109/TVCG.2024.3456171 2

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Akbaba, D

    D. Akbaba, D. Lange, M. Correll, A. Lex, and M. Meyer. Troubling col- laboration: Matters of care for visualization design study. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15. ACM, 4 2023. doi: 10.1145/3544548.3581168 2

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581168 2023

  5. [5]

    Araújo, J

    T. Araújo, J. Alves, B. Marques, P. Dias, B. S. Meiguins, and B. S. San- tos. A focus group study on visualization-based reinforcement learning interpretability. InProc. 29th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV), pp. 326–331, 2025. 2

    2025

  6. [6]

    B. Bach, E. Freeman, A. Abdul-Rahman, C. Turkay, S. Khan, Y . Fan et al. Dashboard design patterns.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(1):342–352, 2023. 2, 3, 20

    2023

  7. [7]

    Borgo, K

    R. Borgo, K. Proctor, M. Chen, H. Jänicke, T. Murray, and I. Thornton. Evaluating the impact of task demands and block resolution on the effec- tiveness of pixel-based visualization.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):963–972, 2010. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010. 150 12, 19

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2010 2010

  8. [8]

    C. CERL. Material Evidence in Incunabula. https://data.cerl.org/ mei/_search, 2015. Accessed: 2025-06-30. 13

    2015

  9. [9]

    M. Chen. Is information loss good or bad? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miCMxfe4jsA, 2022. BCS Oxfordshire. 7

    2022

  10. [10]

    M. Chen. IV AS: Improving Visual Analytics Systems. https://sites.google.com/view/ivas/home, last accessed: March 2026. 1, 2, 3, 12, 20

    2026

  11. [11]

    M. Chen, A. Abdul-Rahman, D. Silver, and M. Sbert. A bounded mea- sure for estimating the benefit of visualization (part ii): case studies and empirical evaluation.Entropy, 24(2):#282, 37 pages, 2022. 2

    2022

  12. [12]

    Chen and D

    M. Chen and D. Ebert. How to reject a vis paper, or not?IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 45(6):101–111, 2025. 1

    2025

  13. [13]

    Chen and D

    M. Chen and D. S. Ebert. An ontological framework for supporting the design and evaluation of visual analytics systems.Computer Graphics Forum, 38(3):131–144, 2019. 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, 18, 19, 20

    2019

  14. [14]

    Chen and A

    M. Chen and A. Golan. What may visualization processes optimize?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(12):2619–2632,

  15. [15]

    Chen and H

    M. Chen and H. Jänicke. An information-theoretic framework for visu- alization.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):1206–1215, 2010. 2

    2010

  16. [16]

    Chen and M

    M. Chen and M. Sbert. A bounded measure for estimating the benefit of visualization (part i): Theoretical discourse and conceptual evaluation. Entropy, 24:#228, 25 pages, 1 2022. doi: 10.3390/e24020228 2

    work page doi:10.3390/e24020228 2022

  17. [17]

    doi:10.1109/TVCG

    A. Diehl, A. Abdul-Rahman, B. Bach, M. El-Assady, M. Kraus, R. S. Laramee et al. An analysis of the interplay and mutual benefits of grounded theory and visualization.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31:5462–5479, 9 2025. doi: 10.1109/TVCG. 2024.3452985 2

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg 2025

  18. [18]

    Drocourt, R

    Y . Drocourt, R. Borgo, K. Scharrer, T. Murray, S. I. Bevan, and M. Chen. Temporal visualization of boundary-based geo-information using radial projection.Computer Graphics Forum, 30(3):981–990, 2011. doi: 10. 1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01947.x 3, 19

    arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    K. W. Hall, A. J. Bradley, U. Hinrichs, S. Huron, J. Wood, C. Collins et al. Design by immersion: A transdisciplinary approach to problem- driven visualizations.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26:109–118, 1 2020. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934790 2

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934790 2020

  20. [20]

    J. Hao, M. Yang, Q. Shi, Y . Jiang, G. Zhang, and W. Zeng. Finflier: Automating graphical overlays for financial visualizations with knowledge- grounding large language model.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31:6353–6369, 9 2025. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024. 3514138 3, 12, 17, 18

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024 2025

  21. [21]

    G. R. Hayes. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 18(3), art. no. 15, 20 pages, Aug. 2011. doi: 10.1145/1993060.1993065 2

    work page doi:10.1145/1993060.1993065 2011

  22. [22]

    Hsieh, A

    H.-P. Hsieh, A. Zavatsky, and M. Chen. Multi-criteria decision analysis for aiding glyph design.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(10):6705–6718, 2025. 9

    2025

  23. [23]

    Hullman and N

    J. Hullman and N. Diakopoulos. Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2231–2240, 2011. 2

    2011

  24. [24]

    Jentner, G

    W. Jentner, G. Lindholz, H. Hauptmann, M. El-Assady, K.-L. Ma, and D. Keim. Visual analytics of co-occurrences to discover subspaces in structured data.ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst., 13(2), art. no. 10, 49 pages, June 2023. doi: 10.1145/3579031 3, 12, 16

    work page doi:10.1145/3579031 2023

  25. [25]

    Y . Jin, T. J. A. de Jong, M. Tennekes, and M. Chen. Radial Icicle Tree (RIT): Node separation and area constancy.IEEE Transactions on Vi- sualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1):251–261, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 4, 20

    2024

  26. [26]

    Kandel, A

    S. Kandel, A. Paepcke, J. M. Hellerstein, and J. Heer. Enterprise data analysis and visualization: An interview study.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18:2917–2926, 12 2012. doi: 10. 1109/TVCG.2012.219 2

    2012

  27. [27]

    D. A. Keim, G. L. Andrienko, C. G. J. Fekete, J. Kohlhammer, and G. Melançon. Visual analytics: Definition, process, and challenges. In Information Visualization - Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives, pp. 154–175. Springer, 2008. 1

    2008

  28. [28]

    S. Khan, J. Chakraborty, P. Beaucamp, N. Bhujel, and M. Chen. Data Virtualization for Machine Learning. InInternational Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 69–84. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025. 3, 12, 14

    2025

  29. [29]

    H. Lam, E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. Empirical studies in information visualization: Seven scenarios.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18:1520–1536, 9 2012. doi: 10. 1109/TVCG.2011.279 2

    2012

  30. [30]

    Larman.Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager’s Guide

    C. Larman.Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager’s Guide. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003. 1

    2003

  31. [31]

    K. Lewin. Action research and minority problems.Journal of Social Issues, 2(4):34–46, 1946. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x 2

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x 1946

  32. [32]

    R. C. Martin.Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices. Pearson, 2014. 1

    2014

  33. [33]

    McCurdy, J

    N. McCurdy, J. Dykes, and M. Meyer. Action design research and visu- alization design. InProceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors on Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, BELIV ’16, pp. 10–18. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA,

  34. [34]

    doi: 10.1145/2993901.2993916 2

    work page doi:10.1145/2993901.2993916

  35. [35]

    McNiff.Action Research: Principles and Practice

    J. McNiff.Action Research: Principles and Practice. Routledge, 3rd ed.,

  36. [36]

    Meyer and J

    M. Meyer and J. Dykes. Criteria for rigor in visualization design study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, pp. 1–1,

  37. [37]

    doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934539 2

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934539 2019

  38. [38]

    Moretti.Distant Reading

    F. Moretti.Distant Reading. Verso Books, London, 2013. 7

    2013

  39. [39]

    T. Munzner. A nested model for visualization design and validation.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15:921–928, 2009. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2009.111 1, 2, 3, 6

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2009.111 2009

  40. [40]

    Reason and H

    P. Reason and H. Bradbury, eds.Handbook of Action Research: Participa- tive Inquiry and Practice. Sage, London, 2001. 1, 2

    2001

  41. [41]

    Rydow, R

    E. Rydow, R. Borgo, H. Fang, T. Torsney-Weir, B. Swallow, T. Porphyre et al. Development and evaluation of two approaches of visual sensitivity analysis to support epidemiological modelling.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(1):1255–1265, 2023. 2, 3, 20

    2023

  42. [42]

    Saner and M

    A. Saner and M. Chen. Music similarity detection through comparative imagery data.Applied Sciences, 15(14):#7706 (25 pages), 2025. 2

    2025

  43. [43]

    Sedlmair, M

    M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2431–2440, 2012. 1, 2

    2012

  44. [44]

    M. K. Sein, O. Henfridsson, S. Purao, M. Rossi, and R. Lindgren. Action design research.Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1):37– 56, 03 2011. doi: 10.2307/23043488 2

    work page doi:10.2307/23043488 2011

  45. [45]

    J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook.Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 2005. 1

    2005

  46. [46]

    P. C. Wong and J. Thomas. Visual analytics.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(5):20–21, 2004. 1

    2004

  47. [47]

    Y . Xing, C. Dondi, R. Borgo, and A. Abdul-Rahman. Visualizing histor- ical book trade data: An iterative design study with close collaboration with domain experts.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1):540–550, 2024. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326923 3, 7, 12, 13

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3326923 2024

  48. [48]

    F. Yan, Y . Wang, X. Yue, K.-K. Wong, K. Mao, R. Zhang et al. FundSelec- tor: A visual analysis system for mutual fund selection.Visual Informatics, 9(4):100258, 12 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.visinf.2025.100258 3, 6, 12

    work page doi:10.1016/j.visinf.2025.100258 2025

  49. [49]

    F. Yan, Y . Wang, X. Yue, K.-K. Wong, K. Mao, R. Zhang et al. Visual anal- ysis approach for mutual fund selection.Frontiers of Computer Science, 19:195604, 5 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11704-024-40742-x 3, 6, 12

    work page doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40742-x 2025

  50. [50]

    Ye and M

    Z. Ye and M. Chen. Visualizing ensemble predictions of music mood. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(1):864– 874, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 4, 20

    2023

  51. [51]

    Zhang, B

    J. Zhang, B. Ahlbrand, A. Malik, J. Chae, Z. Min, S. Ko et al. A visual analytics framework for microblog data analysis at multiple scales of aggregation.Computer Graphics Forum, 35(3):441–450, 2016. 1, 2, 3, 20

    2016

  52. [52]

    Zhang, C

    J. Zhang, C. Surakitbanharn, N. Elmqvist, R. Maciejewski, Z. Qian, and D. S. Ebert. TopoText: Context-preserving text data exploration across multiple spatial scales. InProc. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Montreal QC, 2018. Paper No. 37. 1, 2, 3

    2018

  53. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    Y . Zhang, Y . Sun, J. D. Gaggiano, N. Kumar, C. Andris, and A. G. Parker. Visualization design practices in a crisis: Behind the scenes with covid-19 dashboard creators.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, pp. 1–11, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209493 2

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3209493 2022

  54. [54]

    the car drives this road and then that one

    J. Zhao, A. Malik, H. Xu, G. Wang, J. Zhang, C. Surakitbanharn et al. Metricsvis: A visual analytics framework for performance evaluation of law enforcement officers. InProc. IEEE Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security. Waltham, MA, 2017. 1, 2, 3, 20 APPENDICES Optimizing Visual Analytics Workflows: From Theory to Practice P. Beaucamp1, A. Abdul-...

    2017