pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28265 · v1 · pith:4ZAF5JVQnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🧮 math.SG

Some geometric perspectives on Contact Hamiltonian Dynamics

Javier P\'erez \'Alvarez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 01:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.SG
keywords contact geometryHamiltonian dynamicsdissipative systemsReeb vector fieldgeometric mechanicsintegrabilityreductionquantization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Contact Hamiltonian geometry encodes dissipation through the contact structure and Reeb vector field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents contact Hamiltonian geometry as a framework for dissipative and non-conservative systems. It begins with the symplectic cover of a contact manifold to relate contact dynamics to symplectic ones and shows dissipation encoded geometrically via the contact structure and Reeb vector field. Classical constructions such as integrability, Hamilton-Jacobi theory, symmetries, and reduction are adapted to the contact setting, with emphasis on contact reduction, Dirac structures, and constrained systems. The work surveys applications in thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, field theories, optimal control, and economic models, plus emerging ideas in geometric quantization and generalized geometry.

Core claim

Contact Hamiltonian geometry serves as a natural framework for dissipative and non-conservative dynamics, with dissipation encoded through the contact structure and the Reeb vector field; starting from the symplectic cover, the structural relation to symplectic dynamics is clarified and classical geometric mechanics constructions are adapted to this contact setting.

What carries the argument

The contact structure on a manifold together with its Reeb vector field, which geometrically encodes dissipation in the dynamics via the symplectic cover.

If this is right

  • Integrability and Hamilton-Jacobi theory extend directly to contact systems.
  • Symmetries and reduction, including contact reduction and Dirac structures, apply to constrained dissipative systems.
  • Geometric quantization approaches become available for contact manifolds.
  • Generalized geometry offers a unifying view connecting contact, symplectic, and related frameworks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of systems with friction or energy loss could treat dissipation as intrinsic to the geometry rather than an external addition.
  • The framework might yield new geometric methods for optimization in economic or control models with built-in dissipation.
  • Stability results from KAM theory could be tested in contact versions to see how dissipation alters long-term behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The adaptations of integrability, Hamilton-Jacobi theory, symmetries, and reduction from the symplectic to the contact setting are valid and useful.

What would settle it

A specific dissipative system in which the adapted contact reduction or Hamilton-Jacobi procedure produces dynamics inconsistent with the known non-conservative behavior would challenge the framework.

read the original abstract

This article presents a unified overview of contact Hamiltonian geometry as a natural framework for the description of dissipative and non-conservative systems. Starting from the symplectic cover of a contact manifold, we clarify the structural relation between contact and symplectic dynamics and show how dissipation is geometrically encoded through the contact structure and the Reeb vector field. Following the introduction, which provides a guided overview of the subject through key references, a dedicated section illustrates the scope of the theory through applications ranging from thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, and integrable and KAM systems to field theories, quantum and Lie systems, optimal control, control theory, and economic models, where dissipation, constraints, and optimization play a central role. The subsequent sections review and adapt classical constructions of geometric mechanics, such as integrability, Hamilton--Jacobi theory, symmetries, and reduction, to the contact setting. Particular emphasis is placed on recent developments in contact reduction, Dirac structures, and constrained systems. The article also surveys emerging approaches to the geometric quantization of contact manifolds and discusses how ideas from generalized geometry provide a unifying perspective for symplectic, contact, and related frameworks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey presenting contact Hamiltonian geometry as a unifying framework for dissipative and non-conservative dynamical systems. It begins with the symplectic cover of a contact manifold to relate contact and symplectic dynamics, encodes dissipation via the contact structure and Reeb vector field, surveys applications across thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, integrable/KAM systems, field theories, quantum and Lie systems, optimal control, and economic models, and reviews adaptations of classical geometric mechanics constructions (integrability, Hamilton-Jacobi theory, symmetries, reduction, Dirac structures, constrained systems, and geometric quantization) to the contact setting, with emphasis on recent developments and generalized geometry perspectives.

Significance. As a coherent synthesis of existing literature, the survey could serve as a useful reference point for the geometric mechanics community by organizing disparate applications and constructions under a single geometric perspective; its value would be realized if the reviewed adaptations remain faithful to the cited sources and clearly delineate how the contact/Reeb encoding of dissipation extends or modifies the symplectic case.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction refer to 'a dedicated section' on applications and 'subsequent sections' on adaptations; explicit section numbering or a roadmap paragraph at the end of the introduction would improve navigability for readers.
  2. [Geometric quantization section] In the discussion of geometric quantization of contact manifolds, a brief explicit contrast with the symplectic quantization procedure (e.g., via the prequantum line bundle or polarization) would clarify the differences without requiring new results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its potential value as a reference for the geometric mechanics community, and recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; survey of existing literature

full rationale

The paper is explicitly framed as a unified overview and survey of contact Hamiltonian geometry, reviewing and adapting prior constructions (integrability, Hamilton-Jacobi theory, symmetries, reduction, Dirac structures) from the literature rather than presenting new derivations, predictions, or first-principles results. The central perspective that dissipation is encoded via the contact structure and Reeb field is supported by cited applications across fields, with no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or unverified self-citations. The work is self-contained as a review and does not require any internal chain to hold for its accuracy.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the content rests on standard mathematical axioms from prior literature in symplectic and contact geometry; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard axioms of contact manifolds and symplectic geometry
    The paper builds on established differential geometry from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5712 in / 1026 out tokens · 41823 ms · 2026-06-29T01:28:32.014476+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Abraham and J

    R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden:Foundations of Mechanics, AMS Chelsea Publishing, 1978

    1978

  2. [2]

    Albert:Le théorème de réduction de Marsden-Weinstein en géométrie cosymplectique et de contact, J

    C. Albert:Le théorème de réduction de Marsden-Weinstein en géométrie cosymplectique et de contact, J. Geom. Phys.6no.4, 627–649 (1989)

    1989

  3. [3]

    V. I. Arnold:Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer- Verlag 1999

    1999

  4. [4]

    V. I. Arnold and A.B. Givental:Symplectic geometry, Encycl. Math. Sci.4, 1–136 (1990)

    1990

  5. [5]

    Azuaje:Lie integrability by quadratures for symplectic, cosymplec- tic, contact and cocontact Hamiltonian systems, Rep

    R. Azuaje:Lie integrability by quadratures for symplectic, cosymplec- tic, contact and cocontact Hamiltonian systems, Rep. Math. Phys.,93, 1-26 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard and M. Talon:Introduction to classical in- tegrable systems, Camb. Monogr. Math. Phys., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003. 56

    2003

  7. [7]

    Balseiro, J

    P. Balseiro, J. C. Marrero, D. Martín de Diego and E. Padrón:A unified framework for mechanics: Hamilton–Jacobi equation and ap- plications, Nonlinearity23no. 8, 1887–1918 (2010)

    1918

  8. [8]

    Banyaga and D

    A. Banyaga and D. Houenou:A brief introduction to symplectic and contact manifolds, Nankai Tracts Math. 15, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2017

    2017

  9. [9]

    Barbero-Liñán and M

    M. Barbero-Liñán and M. C. Muñoz-Lecanda:Geometric approach to Pontryagin’s maximum principle, Acta Appl. Math.108, 429–485 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    Bates and J

    L. Bates and J. Śniatycki:Nonholonomic reduction, Rep. Math. Phys. 32, 99–115 (1993)

    1993

  11. [11]

    Blair:Riemannian geometry of contact and symplectic manifolds, Progr

    D.E. Blair:Riemannian geometry of contact and symplectic manifolds, Progr. Math. 203, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2002

    2002

  12. [12]

    Bloch, P.E

    A.M. Bloch, P.E. Crouch:Representations of Dirac structures on vec- tor spaces and nonlinear L-C circuits: in Differential Geometry and Control (Boulder, CO, 1997), Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl.23, 21–36 (1999)

    1997

  13. [13]

    C. P. Boyer and K. Galicki:A note on toric contact geometry, J. Geom. Phys.35no. 4, 288–298 (2000)

    2000

  14. [14]

    Bravetti:Contact Hamiltonian dynamics: the concept and its use, Entropy19no.10, 535 (2017)

    A. Bravetti:Contact Hamiltonian dynamics: the concept and its use, Entropy19no.10, 535 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    Bravetti:Contact geometry and thermodynamics, Int

    A. Bravetti:Contact geometry and thermodynamics, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.16, 1940003 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Bravetti, H

    A. Bravetti, H. Cruz and D. Tapias:Contact Hamiltonian mechanics, Ann. Physics376, 17–39 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    Bravetti, M

    A. Bravetti, M. Á. García-Ariza, and D. Tapias:Thermodynamic en- tropy as a Noether invariant from contact geometry,Entropy25no.7, 1082 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Bravetti, C

    A. Bravetti, C. Jackman and D. Sloan:Scaling symmetries, contact reduction and Poincaré’s dream, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 56, 435203 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Bravetti, C.S

    A. Bravetti, C.S. Lopez-Monsalvo and F. Nettel:Contact symmetries and Hamiltonian thermodynamics, Ann. Physics361, 377–400 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Bravetti and D

    A. Bravetti and D. Tapias:Liouville’s theorem and the canonical mea- sure for nonconservative systems from contact geometry, J. Phys. A 48, 245001 (2015). 57

    2015

  21. [21]

    Bravetti and D

    A. Bravetti and D. Tapias:Thermostat algorithm for generating target ensembles, Phys. Rev. E93no. 2, 022139 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    A. J. Bruce, K. Grabowska and J. Grabowski:Remarks on contact and Jacobi geometry, Sigma Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 13, 059 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Burbulla:Contact Dirac structures, arXiv:1105.1643 (2011)

    J. Burbulla:Contact Dirac structures, arXiv:1105.1643 (2011)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    Bursztyn, G

    H. Bursztyn, G. Cavalcanti and M. Gualtieri:Reduction of Courant algebroids and generalized complex structures, Adv. Math.211, 726– 765 (2007)

    2007

  25. [25]

    Bursztyn and M

    H. Bursztyn and M. Crainic:Dirac structures, moment maps and quasi-Poisson manifolds. arXiv:math/0310445 (2004)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    R. C. Calleja, A. Celletti and R. de la Llave:Construction of response functions in forced strongly dissipative systems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.33no. 10, 4411–4433 (2013)

    2013

  27. [27]

    Cannarsa, W

    P. Cannarsa, W. Cheng, K. Wang and J. Yan:Herglotz’ general- ized variational principle and contact type Hamilton-Jacobi equations, Springer INdAM Ser., 32, 2019

    2019

  28. [28]

    Cantrijn, M

    F. Cantrijn, M. de León, J. C. Marrero and D. M. de Diego:Reduc- tion of nonholonomic mechanical systems with symmetries, Rep. Math. Phys.42no. 1-2, 25-45 (1998)

    1998

  29. [29]

    Cardona:Poisson algebras of smooth functions associated to Dirac structures,ArXiv:1207.7123 [math-SG] (2012)

    A. Cardona:Poisson algebras of smooth functions associated to Dirac structures,ArXiv:1207.7123 [math-SG] (2012)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    Cardona:Contact structures as Dirac structures and their associ- ated Poisson algebras.Lobachevskii J

    A. Cardona:Contact structures as Dirac structures and their associ- ated Poisson algebras.Lobachevskii J. Math.37no. 1, 50–63. (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    Cariñena and J

    J.F. Cariñena and J. de Lucas:Lie systems: theory, generalisations, and applications,Dissertationes Math. 479, Inst. Math. Polish Acad. Sci., Warsaw, 2011

    2011

  32. [32]

    J. F. Cariñena, X. Gràcia, G. Marmo, E. Martínez, M.C. Muñoz- Lecanda and N. Román-Roy:Geometric Hamilton-Jacobi theory, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.3no.7-8, 1417–1458 (2006)

    2006

  33. [33]

    Cariñena, A

    J.F. Cariñena, A. Ibort, G. Marmo and G. Morandi:Geometry from dynamics, classical and quantum, Springer, Dordrecht, 2015

    2015

  34. [34]

    Celletti and R

    A. Celletti and R. de la Llave:KAM theory for conformally symplectic systems.Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst.35no. 7, 1992–2027 (2015). 58

    1992

  35. [35]

    Ciaglia, H

    F.M. Ciaglia, H. Cruz and G. Marmo:Contact manifolds and dissipa- tion, classical and quantum, Ann. Physics398, 159–179 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    L. J. Colombo, M. de León, M. E. Eyrea Irazú and A. López-Gordón: Geometric formulation of combined conservative-dissipative mechanics via contact Hamiltonian dynamics: symmetries, reduction, and varia- tional integrators,arXiv:2512.12156

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    Cordoni, L

    F. Cordoni, L. Di Persio and R. Muradore:Stochastic port- Hamiltonian systems, J. Nonlinear Sci.32, 91 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    J., Dirac manifolds: Trans

    Courant, T. J., Dirac manifolds: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 319 (1990), no. 2, 631–661

    1990

  39. [39]

    T. J. Courant and A. Weinstein:Beyond Poisson structures:J. Dif- ferential Geom.312, 501–511 (1990)

    1990

  40. [40]

    Crampin:Tangent bundle geometry for Lagrangian dynamics, J

    M. Crampin:Tangent bundle geometry for Lagrangian dynamics, J. Phys. A16, 3755–3772 (1983)

    1983

  41. [41]

    Cushman, D

    R. Cushman, D. Kemppainen, J. Śniatycki, and L. Bates:Geometry of nonholonomic constraints, Rep. Math. Phys.36no. 2-3, 275–286 (1995)

    1995

  42. [42]

    Control Optim

    M.DalsmoandA.J.vanderSchaft: Onrepresentationsandintegrabil- ity of mathematical structures in energy-conserving physical systems, SIAM J. Control Optim. 37 (1999), no. 1, 54–91

    1999

  43. [43]

    de Gosson:Symplectic geometry and quantum mechanics, Oper

    M. de Gosson:Symplectic geometry and quantum mechanics, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 166, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2006

    2006

  44. [44]

    de León and M

    M. de León and M. Lainz:Contact Hamiltonian systems, J. Math. Phys.60, 102902 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    de León and M

    M. de León and M. Lainz:A review on contact Hamiltonian and La- grangian systems, Rev. Acad. Canaria Cienc.31, 1–46 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    de León and M

    M. de León and M. Lainz:Singular Lagrangians and Precontact Hamil- tonian Systems, Int.J.Geom.MethodsMod.Phys.16, 1950158(2019)

    2019

  47. [47]

    de León and M

    M. de León and M. Lainz:Infinitesimal symmetries in contact Hamil- tonian systems, J. Geom. Phys.153, 103651 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    de León and C

    M. de León and C. Sardón:Cosymplectic and contact structures for time-dependent and dissipative Hamiltonian systems, J.Phys.A:Math. Theor.50, 255205 (2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    de León, J

    M. de León, J. Gaset, X. Gràcia, M. C. Muñoz-Lecanda and X. Rivas: Time-dependent contact mechanics, Monatsh. Math.199, 1–35 (2022). 59

    2022

  50. [50]

    de León and R

    M. de León and R. Izquierdo-López:A review on coisotropic reduction in Symplectic, Cosymplectic, Contact and Co-contact Hamiltonian sys- tems, arXiv:2308.07637

    arXiv

  51. [51]

    de León, M

    M. de León, M. Lainz, A. López-Gordón and X. Rivas:Hamilton– Jacobi theory and integrability for autonomous and non-autonomous contact systems, J. Geom. Phys.187, 104787 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    de León, M

    M. de León, M. Lainz and Á. Muñiz-Brea:The Hamilton–Jacobi theory for contact Hamiltonian systems, Mathematics9, 1993 (2021)

    1993

  53. [53]

    de León, M

    M. de León, M. Lainz, M. Muñoz-Lecanda:Optimal control, contact dynamics and Herglotz variational problem,J. Nonlinear Sci.33, Paper No. 9 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    de León, J

    M. de León, J. C. Marrero and D. M. de Diego:Mechanical systems with nonlinear constraints, Int. J. Theor. Phys.36, 979–995 (1997)

    1997

  55. [55]

    de León, D

    M. de León, D. Martín de Diego and M. Vaquero:Hamilton-Jacobi theory. Symmetries and Coisotropic Reduction,J. Math. Pures Appl. 107, 591–614 (2017)

    2017

  56. [56]

    de León and P

    M. de León and P. R. Rodrigues:Methods of Differential Geometry in Analytical Mechanics,Mathematical Studies 158, North-Holland, 1989

    1989

  57. [57]

    de Lucas, X

    J. de Lucas, X. Rivas, S. Vilariño and B. M. Zawora: Marsden–Meyer– Weinstein reduction for k-contact field theories. arXiv:2505.05462

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    Seok Do and Y

    H. Seok Do and Y. G. Oh:Thermodynamic reduction of contact dy- namics, arXiv:2412.19319 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Echeverría-Enríquez, M

    A. Echeverría-Enríquez, M. C. Muñoz-Lecanda, N. Román-Roy and C. Victoria-Monge:Mathematical foundations of geometric quantization. Extracta Math.,13no.2, 135–238 (1998)

    1998

  60. [60]

    O. Esen, M. de León and C. Sardón:A Hamilton–Jacobi theory for implicit differential systems, J. Math. Phys.59, no. 02 022902 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    O. Esen, M. de León and C. Sardón:A Hamilton–Jacobi formalism for higher order implicit Lagrangians, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53no. 7, 075204 (2020)

    2020

  62. [62]

    O. Esen, M. de León, M. Lainz, C. Sardón and M. Zając:Reviewing the geometric Hamilton–Jacobi theory concerning Jacobi and Leibniz identities, J. Phys. A55, 295201 (2022). 60

    2022

  63. [63]

    O. Esen, M. Lainz, M. de León and C. Sardón:Implicit contact dynam- ics and Hamilton–Jacobi theory, Differential Geom.Appl.90, 102053 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    O. Esen, C. Sardón and M. Zając:A discrete Hamilton–Jacobi theory for contact Hamiltonian dynamics, Math.12, 2342 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    Eberard, A.J

    D. Eberard, A.J. van der Schaft and B. Maschke:An extension of Hamiltonian systems to the thermodynamic phase space: towards a geometry of non-reversible processes, Rep. Math. Phys.60, 175–198 (2007)

    2007

  66. [66]

    Eliashberg:Classification of overtwisted contact structures on 3- manifolds, Invent

    Y. Eliashberg:Classification of overtwisted contact structures on 3- manifolds, Invent. Math.98, 623–637 (1989)

    1989

  67. [67]

    Eslami Rad:Symplectic and contact geometry—a concise introduc- tion, Lat

    A. Eslami Rad:Symplectic and contact geometry—a concise introduc- tion, Lat. Amer. Math. Ser. UFSCar Subser., Springer, Cham, 2024

    2024

  68. [68]

    Feng:Contact algorithms for contact dynamical systems, J

    K. Feng:Contact algorithms for contact dynamical systems, J. Com- put. Math.16, 1–14 (1998)

    1998

  69. [69]

    Fitzpatrick:An equivariant index formula in contact geometry, Math

    S. Fitzpatrick:An equivariant index formula in contact geometry, Math. Res. Lett.16, 547–562 (2009)

    2009

  70. [70]

    Fitzpatrick:On the geometric quantization of contact manifolds, J

    S. Fitzpatrick:On the geometric quantization of contact manifolds, J. Geom. Phys.61, 2384–2399 (2011)

    2011

  71. [71]

    Gabbiani and S.J

    F. Gabbiani and S.J. Cox:Mathematics for Neuroscientists, Academic Press, 2022

    2022

  72. [72]

    C. R. Galley:Classical mechanics of nonconservative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 174301 (2013)

    2013

  73. [73]

    J. M. García-Mauriño:Momentum mapping and reduction in contact Hamiltonian systems, arXiv:2208.10924 (2022)

    arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Gaset, A

    J. Gaset, A. López-Gordón and X. Rivas:Symmetries, conservation and dissipation in time-dependent contact systems, Fortschr. Phys.71, 2300048 (2023)

    2023

  75. [75]

    Gaset, X

    J. Gaset, X. Gràcia, M. Muñoz-Lecanda, X. Rivas and N. Román-Roy: A contact geometry framework for field theories with dissipation, Ann. Physics414, 168092 (2020)

    2020

  76. [76]

    Gaset, X

    J. Gaset, X. Gràcia, M. Muñoz-Lecanda, X. Rivas and Román-Roy: New contributions to the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian contact for- malisms for dissipative mechanical systems and their symmetries, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.17, 2050090 (2020). 61

    2020

  77. [77]

    Gaset, X

    J. Gaset, X. Gràcia, M. Muñoz-Lecanda, X. Rivas and N. Román-Roy: Ak−contact Lagrangian formulation for nonconservative field theories. Rep. Math. Phys.87, 347–368 (2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    Gay-Balmaz and H

    F. Gay-Balmaz and H. Yoshimura:Dirac structures in nonequilibrium thermodynamics, J. Math. Phys.59, 012701 (2018)

    2018

  79. [79]

    Geiges:An Introduction to Contact Topology, Cambridge Stud

    H. Geiges:An Introduction to Contact Topology, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 109, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008

    2008

  80. [80]

    Godbillon:Géométrie différentielle et mécanique analytique, Her- mann, Paris, 1969

    C. Godbillon:Géométrie différentielle et mécanique analytique, Her- mann, Paris, 1969

    1969

Showing first 80 references.