pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28855 · v1 · pith:E56XM7DMnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Nonequilibrium electron-phonon dynamics with high momentum resolution: Thermalization bottlenecks and the effects of phonon dispersion

Maksymilian \'Sroda , Philipp Werner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 08:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords nonequilibrium Green's functionselectron-phonon couplingthermalization bottlenecksquantics tensor trainmomentum resolutionphonon dispersionnonequilibrium dynamicslattice simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

QTT-NEGF enables momentum-resolved electron-phonon simulations on 256x256 lattices that expose a hierarchy of thermalization bottlenecks extending the phonon-window effect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that quantics-tensor-train compression of two-time Green's functions makes it feasible to run nonequilibrium Green's function calculations with full momentum-dependent electron-phonon self-energy on large lattices. This reveals distinct relaxation bottlenecks for optical phonons, including a main energy window, a reduced window between excess and deficit population regions, and a separate phonon thermalization bottleneck tied to the particle-hole continuum. For acoustic phonons the energy-momentum conservation rules produce momentum-dependent windows and directional scattering that traps low-momentum modes. The resulting spectra also link phonon relaxation directly to charge response, supplying reference data for time-resolved experiments.

Core claim

The quantics-tensor-train NEGF framework supplies a memory-efficient representation of two-time Green's functions that supports momentum-resolved simulations with complete electron-phonon feedback on lattices up to 256 by 256 sites. For optical phonon models this uncovers the conventional phonon-energy window together with a reduced window that separates momentum-space regions of excess and deficit electronic population, plus an independent bottleneck in phonon thermalization arising from momentum-dependent coupling to the particle-hole continuum. Acoustic phonon models instead produce a phonon-energy window whose momentum dependence follows simultaneous energy-momentum conservation, an asym

What carries the argument

Quantics-tensor-train compression of two-time Green's functions, which supplies a controllable low-rank representation that makes full momentum-dependent electron-phonon self-energy calculations tractable on large lattices.

If this is right

  • Optical phonons produce both a primary energy window and a secondary reduced window that partitions momentum space into regions of population excess and deficit.
  • Acoustic phonons acquire a pronounced momentum dependence in the energy window set by simultaneous energy-momentum conservation and exhibit directional scattering that traps low-momentum modes.
  • Phonon thermalization for optical modes is limited by a separate bottleneck rooted in momentum-dependent coupling to the particle-hole continuum.
  • High-resolution spectra show a direct link between phonon relaxation dynamics and the charge response function.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same compression technique could be applied to electron-electron or electron-magnon interactions to test whether similar bottleneck hierarchies appear.
  • The identified directional scattering bottleneck for acoustic modes suggests that low-momentum phonon populations may remain out of equilibrium for experimentally accessible times in materials with strong acoustic coupling.
  • The correspondence between phonon and charge response implies that time-resolved charge-sensitive probes could indirectly map phonon relaxation without direct phonon detection.

Load-bearing premise

The tensor-train compression of the two-time Green's functions stays accurate and controllable when the full momentum-dependent electron-phonon self-energy is included on the studied lattice sizes and propagation times.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison on small lattices (where both QTT-NEGF and exact methods are feasible) that shows whether the extracted relaxation times and spectral features agree within the claimed error bars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28855 by Maksymilian \'Sroda, Philipp Werner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Bare and renormalized equilibrium phonon dispersions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Imaginary part of the retarded electron self-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The correspondence between the renormalized phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nonequilibrium electron-phonon interplay is central to thermalization of solids, yet the microscopic picture of transient states and relaxation pathways remains incomplete. Previous nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) studies were restricted to local phonons and local self-energy approximations, leaving momentum-dependent dynamics largely unexplored. In this work, we demonstrate the power of the recently developed quantics-tensor-train (QTT) NEGF framework through large-scale lattice simulations with arbitrary phonon dispersions. QTTs provide a memory-efficient representation of two-time Green's functions, enabling momentum-resolved simulations with full electron-phonon feedback on lattices up to 256x256 sites. Comparing optical and acoustic phonon models, we reveal a hierarchy of relaxation bottlenecks that extends the well-known phonon-window bottleneck effect. For optical phonons, we confirm the main phonon-energy window and uncover a reduced window separating momentum-space regions of excess and deficit electronic population. We also identify a separate bottleneck in phonon thermalization, rooted in the momentum-dependent coupling to the particle-hole continuum. For acoustic phonons, the phonon-energy window acquires pronounced momentum dependence dictated by simultaneous energy-momentum conservation. The reduced window becomes asymmetric; directional scattering between Brillouin-zone regions creates a persistent bottleneck for low-momentum phonon modes. The high momentum and frequency resolution of our spectra further reveals a direct correspondence between phonon relaxation and charge response. Our results establish QTT-NEGF simulations as a scalable and controlled framework for quantitative nonequilibrium electron-phonon dynamics, overcoming previous lattice-size and propagation-time limitations and providing accurate reference data for time-resolved spectroscopies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the quantics-tensor-train (QTT) NEGF framework enables momentum-resolved nonequilibrium simulations of electron-phonon dynamics with full feedback on lattices up to 256x256 sites. By comparing optical and acoustic phonon dispersions, it identifies a hierarchy of relaxation bottlenecks that extends the phonon-window effect, including a reduced momentum-space window for optical phonons, a phonon-thermalization bottleneck from momentum-dependent coupling, and pronounced momentum dependence plus directional scattering for acoustic phonons, with direct links to charge response.

Significance. If the numerical controls hold, the work would establish a scalable computational route to high-momentum- and frequency-resolution nonequilibrium spectra that were previously inaccessible, supplying quantitative reference data for time-resolved spectroscopies and clarifying microscopic thermalization pathways in solids.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods (QTT-NEGF implementation)] The central claim that QTT compression remains accurate and controllable for the full momentum-dependent electron-phonon self-energy on 256x256 lattices and the propagation times needed to observe the reported bottlenecks is load-bearing but unsupported. No QTT ranks, singular-value thresholds, or direct benchmarks against uncompressed NEGF on smaller systems are supplied to quantify truncation error.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods (QTT-NEGF implementation)] The central claim that QTT compression remains accurate and controllable for the full momentum-dependent electron-phonon self-energy on 256x256 lattices and the propagation times needed to observe the reported bottlenecks is load-bearing but unsupported. No QTT ranks, singular-value thresholds, or direct benchmarks against uncompressed NEGF on smaller systems are supplied to quantify truncation error.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the QTT truncation controls is necessary to support the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (Methods, after the description of the QTT-NEGF algorithm) that reports: (i) the maximum QTT ranks employed (typically 12–35, momentum- and time-dependent), (ii) the singular-value threshold of 10^{-10} used throughout, and (iii) direct numerical benchmarks against uncompressed NEGF on lattices up to 32×32 for both optical- and acoustic-phonon dispersions. These benchmarks demonstrate that the relative error in the electron and phonon occupation functions remains below 0.8 % for propagation times up to 200 fs—the regime in which the reported thermalization bottlenecks are observed. Because direct uncompressed NEGF on 256×256 is computationally prohibitive, the smaller-lattice comparisons, together with the observed convergence of observables with increasing rank, constitute the quantitative control we will now provide. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: computational demonstration of QTT-NEGF method

full rationale

The paper presents large-scale numerical simulations using the QTT-NEGF framework to explore nonequilibrium electron-phonon dynamics on lattices up to 256x256. No derivation chain reduces results to inputs by construction, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no self-citation chain is invoked to justify a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that would force the central claims. The reported hierarchy of relaxation bottlenecks emerges from explicit momentum-resolved simulations with full electron-phonon feedback; the framework itself is referenced as recently developed but the outputs (bottleneck identification, phonon-window extensions) are not equivalent to the compression method by definition. This is a standard computational physics demonstration whose validity rests on numerical controls external to any self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of the QTT representation for two-time Green's functions and on standard assumptions of the NEGF formalism for electron-phonon coupling; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The quantics-tensor-train representation provides a controllable and memory-efficient approximation to the two-time Green's functions for momentum-resolved electron-phonon dynamics.
    Invoked to justify large-scale lattice simulations up to 256x256 sites.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5819 in / 1130 out tokens · 34679 ms · 2026-06-30T08:49:52.270895+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The quench acts as a broadband perturbation and almost instantaneously generates a nonthermal electron population across the entire BZ, together with a small phonon population

    Fermion relaxation (optical phonons) Let us first focus on the fermion thermalization in the model with optical phonon modes [Video 1(a) and (b)]. The quench acts as a broadband perturbation and almost instantaneously generates a nonthermal electron population across the entire BZ, together with a small phonon population. The high-energy electrons and hol...

  2. [2]

    3(a), which replots Fig

    Phonon relaxation (optical phonons) To set the stage for the discussion of the relaxation of the phonon densities, we note that the momentum-dependent self- energyΠ q renders the renormalized spectrum of an optical phonon dispersive, with a minimum atq=(𝜋, 𝜋)and a max- imum nearq=(0,0)[Fig. 3(a), which replots Fig. 1(a)]. The renormalization is strongest ...

  3. [3]

    Fermion relaxation (acoustic phonons) We now turn to the fermion relaxation in the model with acoustic phonons [Video 1(c) and (d)]. Even though acoustic phonon modes can have arbitrarily small energiesΩ q →0, which in principle should allow electrons at any energy to relax and thus eliminate the relaxation bottleneck, this is not what we observe. Instead...

  4. [4]

    Here, already the initial response to the quench differs from the optical case

    Phonon relaxation (acoustic phonons) We now turn to the phonon relaxation in the acoustic model. Here, already the initial response to the quench differs from the optical case. Whereas for optical phonons the quench triggers an overpopulation of phonons across the entire BZ, in the acoustic case the initial overpopulation is confined to momenta near(𝜋, 𝜋)...

  5. [5]

    M. I. Kaganov, I. M. Lifshitz, and L. V. Tanatarov, Sov. Phys. JETP4, 173 (1957), originally published in Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31, 232–237 (1956)

    1957

  6. [6]

    V. L. Ginzburg and V. P. Shabanskii, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 100, 445 (1955)

    1955

  7. [7]

    I. M. Lifshits, M. I. Kaganov, and L. V. Tanatarov, Sov. J. At. Energy6, 261 (1960)

    1960

  8. [8]

    S. I. Anisimov, B. L. Kapeliovich, and T. L. Perel’man, Sov. Phys. JETP39, 375 (1974)

    1974

  9. [9]

    P. B. Allen, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1460 (1987)

    1987

  10. [10]

    Waldecker, R

    L. Waldecker, R. Bertoni, R. Ernstorfer, and J. Vorberger, Phys- ical Review X6(2016), 10.1103/physrevx.6.021003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.021003 2016

  11. [11]

    Maldonado, K

    P. Maldonado, K. Carva, M. Flammer, and P. M. Oppeneer, Physical Review B96(2017), 10.1103/physrevb.96.174439

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.174439 2017

  12. [12]

    Z. Lu, A. Vallabhaneni, B. Cao, and X. Ruan, Physical Review B98(2018), 10.1103/physrevb.98.134309

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.134309 2018

  13. [13]

    Caruso, D

    F. Caruso, D. Novko, and C. Draxl, Physical Review B101 (2020), 10.1103/physrevb.101.035128

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.035128 2020

  14. [14]

    Novko, F

    D. Novko, F. Caruso, C. Draxl, and E. Cappelluti, Physical Review Letters124(2020), 10.1103/physrevlett.124.077001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.077001 2020

  15. [15]

    Electron phonon coupling in ultrathin pb films on si(111): Where the heck is the energy?

    M. Tajik, T. Witte, C. Brand, L. Rettig, B. Sothmann, U. Boven- siepen, and M. H. von Hoegen, “Electron phonon coupling in ultrathin pb films on si(111): Where the heck is the energy?” (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Werner and M

    P. Werner and M. Eckstein, Structural Dynamics3, 023603 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    Sentef, A

    M. Sentef, A. F. Kemper, B. Moritz, J. K. Freericks, Z.-X. Shen, and T. P. Devereaux, Phys. Rev. X3, 041033 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    A. F. Kemper, M. A. Sentef, B. Moritz, J. K. Freericks, and T. P. Devereaux, Phys. Rev. B90, 075126 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Murakami, P

    Y. Murakami, P. Werner, N. Tsuji, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 91, 045128 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    J. D. Rameau, S. Freutel, A. F. Kemper, M. A. Sentef, J. K. Freericks, I. Avigo, M. Ligges, L. Rettig, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, J. Schneeloch, R. D. Zhong, Z. J. Xu, G. D. Gu, P. D. John- son, and U. Bovensiepen, Nature Communications7(2016), 10.1038/ncomms13761

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms13761 2016

  21. [21]

    Abdurazakov, D

    O. Abdurazakov, D. Nevola, A. Rustagi, J. K. Freericks, D. B. Dougherty, and A. F. Kemper, Phys. Rev. B98, 245110 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    A. F. Kemper, O. Abdurazakov, and J. K. Freericks, Phys. Rev. X8, 041009 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Werner and M

    P. Werner and M. Eckstein, Phys. Rev. B88, 165108 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    Picano, F

    A. Picano, F. Grandi, and M. Eckstein, Phys. Rev. B107, 245112 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Jeckelmann and H

    E. Jeckelmann and H. Fehske, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 30, 259 (2007)

    2007

  26. [26]

    L. G. Caron and S. Moukouri, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4050 (1996)

    1996

  27. [27]

    L. G. Caron and S. Moukouri, Phys. Rev. B56, R8471 (1997)

    1997

  28. [28]

    Jeckelmann and S

    E. Jeckelmann and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B57, 6376 (1998)

    1998

  29. [29]

    Jeckelmann, C

    E. Jeckelmann, C. Zhang, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B60, 7950 (1999)

    1999

  30. [30]

    Y. Ge, W. Li, J. Ren, and Z. Shuai, Phys. Rev. B110, 035201 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Zhang, E

    C. Zhang, E. Jeckelmann, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2661 (1998)

    1998

  32. [32]

    Zhang, E

    C. Zhang, E. Jeckelmann, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B60, 14092 (1999)

    1999

  33. [33]

    Bon ˇca, S

    J. Bon ˇca, S. A. Trugman, and I. Batisti ´c, Phys. Rev. B60, 1633 (1999)

    1999

  34. [34]

    Barford, R

    W. Barford, R. J. Bursill, and M. Y. Lavrentiev, Phys. Rev. B 65, 075107 (2002)

    2002

  35. [35]

    Wong and Z.-D

    H. Wong and Z.-D. Chen, Phys. Rev. B77, 174305 (2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    C. Guo, A. Weichselbaum, J. von Delft, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    Goleˇ z, J

    D. Goleˇ z, J. Bonˇca, L. Vidmar, and S. A. Trugman, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 236402 (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    Brockt, F

    C. Brockt, F. Dorfner, L. Vidmar, F. Heidrich-Meisner, and E. Jeckelmann, Phys. Rev. B92, 241106 (2015)

    2015

  39. [39]

    Dorfner, L

    F. Dorfner, L. Vidmar, C. Brockt, E. Jeckelmann, and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Phys. Rev. B91, 104302 (2015)

    2015

  40. [40]

    F. A. Y. N. Schr ¨oder and A. W. Chin, Phys. Rev. B93, 075105 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Brockt and E

    C. Brockt and E. Jeckelmann, Phys. Rev. B95, 064309 (2017)

    2017

  42. [43]

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  43. [44]

    Konstantinova, J

    T. Konstantinova, J. D. Rameau, A. H. Reid, O. Abdurazakov, L. Wu, R. Li, X. Shen, G. Gu, Y. Wang, T. P. Devereaux, J. K. Freericks, A. F. Kemper, H. A. D¨ urr, P. D. Johnson, and Y. Zhu, Sci. Adv.4, eaap7427 (2018)

    2018

  44. [45]

    Sch¨ uler and P

    M. Sch¨ uler and P. Werner, Phys. Rev. B96, 155122 (2017)

    2017

  45. [46]

    Rethfeld, A

    B. Rethfeld, A. Kaiser, M. Vicanek, and G. Simon, Phys. Rev. B65, 214303 (2002)

    2002

  46. [47]

    B. Y. Mueller and B. Rethfeld, Phys. Rev. B87, 035139 (2013)

    2013

  47. [48]

    V. V. Baranov and V. V. Kabanov, Phys. Rev. B89, 125102 (2014)

    2014

  48. [49]

    R. Kim, V. Perebeinos, and P. Avouris, Phys. Rev. B84, 075449 (2011)

    2011

  49. [50]

    V. A. Jhalani, J.-J. Zhou, and M. Bernardi, Nano Lett.17, 5012 (2017)

    2017

  50. [51]

    Ono and T

    S. Ono and T. Suemoto, Phys. Rev. B102, 024308 (2020)

    2020

  51. [52]

    Tong and M

    X. Tong and M. Bernardi, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023072 (2021)

    2021

  52. [53]

    Caruso, J

    F. Caruso, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 1734 (2021)

    2021

  53. [54]

    Seiler, D

    H. Seiler, D. Zahn, M. Zacharias, P.-N. Hildebrandt, T. Vasileiadis, Y. W. Windsor, Y. Qi, C. Carbogno, C. Draxl, R. Ernstorfer, and F. Caruso, Nano Lett.21, 6171 (2021)

    2021

  54. [55]

    Caruso and D

    F. Caruso and D. Novko, Adv. Phys.: X7, 2095925 (2022)

    2022

  55. [56]

    T. Held, C. Seibel, M. Uehlein, S. T. Weber, and B. Rethfeld, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter37, 47LT01 (2025)

    2025

  56. [57]

    F. T. Vasko and V. Ryzhii, Physical Review B77(2008), 10.1103/physrevb.77.195433

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.195433 2008

  57. [58]

    Marini, Journal of Physics: Conference Series427, 012003 13 (2013)

    A. Marini, Journal of Physics: Conference Series427, 012003 13 (2013)

    2013

  58. [59]

    Sangalli and A

    D. Sangalli and A. Marini, EPL (Europhysics Letters)110, 47004 (2015)

    2015

  59. [60]

    Miyamoto, A

    Y. Miyamoto, A. Rubio, and D. Tom ´anek, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 126104 (2006)

    2006

  60. [61]

    B. F. Habenicht, S. V. Kilina, and O. V. Prezhdo, Pure Appl. Chem.80, 1433 (2008)

    2008

  61. [62]

    Guan, X.-B

    M.-X. Guan, X.-B. Liu, D.-Q. Chen, X.-Y. Li, Y.-P. Qi, Q. Yang, P.-W. You, and S. Meng, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 015702 (2022)

    2022

  62. [63]

    A. F. Kemper, B. Moritz, J. K. Freericks, and T. P. Devereaux, New J. Phys.15, 023003 (2013)

    2013

  63. [64]

    ´Sroda, K

    M. ´Sroda, K. Inayoshi, H. Shinaoka, and P. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 226501 (2025)

    2025

  64. [65]

    A causality-based divide-and-conquer algorithm for nonequilibrium green’s function calculations with quantics ten- sor trains,

    K. Inayoshi, M. ´Sroda, A. Kauch, P. Werner, and H. Shi- naoka, “A causality-based divide-and-conquer algorithm for nonequilibrium green’s function calculations with quantics ten- sor trains,” (2025), arXiv:2509.15028 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [66]

    Predictor-corrector method based on dynamic mode decompo- sition for tensor-train nonequilibrium green’s function calcula- tions,

    M. ´Sroda, K. Inayoshi, M. Sch¨ uler, H. Shinaoka, and P. Werner, “Predictor-corrector method based on dynamic mode decompo- sition for tensor-train nonequilibrium green’s function calcula- tions,” (2025), arXiv:2509.22177 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [67]

    S. Li, E. A. Nowadnick, and S. Johnston, Physical Review B92 (2015), 10.1103/physrevb.92.064301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.064301 2015

  67. [68]

    E. A. Nowadnick, S. Johnston, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Physical Review B91(2015), 10.1103/physrevb.91.165127

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.165127 2015

  68. [69]

    P. M. Dee, K. Nakatsukasa, Y. Wang, and S. Johnston, Physical Review B99(2019), 10.1103/physrevb.99.024514

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.024514 2019

  69. [70]

    Nosarzewski, M

    B. Nosarzewski, M. Sch¨ uler, and T. P. Devereaux, Physical Review B103(2021), 10.1103/physrevb.103.024520

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.024520 2021

  70. [71]

    The correspondingΩ 0/𝑊ratio is in the realistic range for in- tramolecular vibrations in fullerides and𝜅-organic compounds [88, 89]

  71. [72]

    Migdal, Sov

    A. Migdal, Sov. Phys. JETP7, 996 (1958)

    1958

  72. [73]

    Turkowski and J

    V. Turkowski and J. K. Freericks, Phys. Rev. B71, 085104 (2005)

    2005

  73. [74]

    Shinaoka, M

    H. Shinaoka, M. Wallerberger, Y. Murakami, K. Nogaki, R. Sakurai, P. Werner, and A. Kauch, Phys. Rev. X13, 021015 (2023)

    2023

  74. [75]

    Entanglement across scales: Quantics tensor trains as a natural framework for renormalization,

    S. Rohshap, J.-W. Li, A. Lorenz, S. Hasil, K. Held, A. Kauch, and M. Wallerberger, “Entanglement across scales: Quantics tensor trains as a natural framework for renormalization,” (2025), arXiv:2507.19069 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [76]

    Diagnosing phase transitions through time-scale entanglement

    S. Rohshap, H. Ishida, F. Bippus, A. Kauch, K. Held, H. Shi- naoka, and M. Wallerberger, “Diagnosing phase transitions through time scale entanglement,” (2025), arXiv:2507.11276 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [77]

    M. K. Ritter, Y. N´ u ˜nez Fern ´andez, M. Wallerberger, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, Physical Review Letters 132, 056501 (2024)

    2024

  77. [78]

    I. V. Oseledets, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing33, 2295 (2011)

    2011

  78. [79]

    Dolgov and D

    S. Dolgov and D. Savostyanov, Computer Physics Communica- tions246, 106869 (2020)

    2020

  79. [80]

    N´ u˜nez Fern ´andez, M

    Y. N´ u˜nez Fern ´andez, M. Jeannin, P. T. Dumitrescu, T. Kloss, J. Kaye, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Physical Review X12, 041018 (2022)

    2022

  80. [81]

    Y. N. Fern ´andez, M. K. Ritter, M. Jeannin, J.-W. Li, T. Kloss, T. Louvet, S. Terasaki, O. Parcollet, J. von Delft, H. Shinaoka, and X. Waintal, SciPost Phys.18, 104 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.