Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 97 references

Evidence of Supernova Between Formation of Stellar Populations in a Globular Cluster

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read M92's second-population stars show higher iron abundances than its first-population stars.

desk verdict M92 shows a small Fe offset between its two populations from differential analysis, but the result needs checks against analysis systematics before the SN-retention claim lands. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.29435 v1 pith:ZXXIGLIE submitted 2026-06-28 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Evan N. Kirby , Roman Gerasimov , Alice Cai , Benjamin Coco , Pranav Nalamwar , Lauren Henderson This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords globularclustersM92multiplestellarpopulationschemicalabundancessupernovaenrichmentironabundancesodiumenhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that in globular cluster M92, stars with elevated sodium (the second population) have measurably higher iron abundances than stars with low sodium (the first population). The result rests on a line-by-line differential abundance analysis of stars spanning only a narrow temperature range. This iron increase implies the cluster retained at least some material from core-collapse supernovae that exploded after the first population had finished forming. A reader would care because the finding supplies a concrete lower bound on the time separating the two populations and indicates that at least one globular cluster experienced limited conventional chemical evolution.

What carries the argument

Differential line-by-line abundance analysis that compares Fe, Na, and Al in stars of similar effective temperature across the two populations.

What would settle it

An independent abundance analysis of the same or similar stars that finds no statistically significant iron difference between the sodium-rich and sodium-poor groups would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A differential line-by-line spectroscopic analysis shows that second-population stars in M92 are separated from first-population stars in Na, Al, and Fe abundances, with the second population having higher Fe. The rise in Fe abundance indicates that M92 retained supernova ejecta from explosions occurring after the first population finished forming, thereby providing a lower limit on the time delay between the two populations.

Load-bearing premise

The observed iron difference arises from retained supernova material rather than from systematic errors in the abundance measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • M92 retained at least some supernova ejecta.
  • Those supernovae exploded after the first population had finished forming.
  • The time interval between the two populations has a measurable lower limit.
  • Globular clusters can retain supernova products and therefore experience a limited form of conventional chemical evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other globular clusters may exhibit similar small iron differences if examined with the same differential method.
  • Retention of ejecta implies that the cluster's gravitational potential or gas content allowed temporary holding of supernova material.
  • Formation models for multiple populations may need to include a delayed supernova contribution phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a differential line-by-line abundance analysis of stars in globular cluster M92 reveals higher [Fe/H] in second-population (Na-enhanced) stars than in first-population stars. The two populations are separated in Na, Al, and Fe; the Fe rise is interpreted as evidence that M92 retained supernova ejecta after first-population formation, supplying a lower limit on the time delay between populations.

Significance. If the reported Fe offset is astrophysical, the result would be significant: it would indicate that at least some globular clusters can retain supernova products, contrary to the prevailing view that they experience no conventional chemical evolution. This would constrain the formation timescale of multiple populations and the retention efficiency of early supernova ejecta.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim requires that the [Fe/H] difference between Na-poor and Na-rich stars is not produced by residual systematics in the differential analysis. The abstract supplies no sample sizes, line lists, microturbulence or gravity error budgets, or robustness tests (alternative line lists, model grids, or NLTE corrections), so it is impossible to assess whether an offset of the size needed for the supernova-retention interpretation survives those choices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. The major comment concerns the abstract's omission of methodological details needed to evaluate potential systematics in the reported [Fe/H] offset. We respond below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim requires that the [Fe/H] difference between Na-poor and Na-rich stars is not produced by residual systematics in the differential analysis. The abstract supplies no sample sizes, line lists, microturbulence or gravity error budgets, or robustness tests (alternative line lists, model grids, or NLTE corrections), so it is impossible to assess whether an offset of the size needed for the supernova-retention interpretation survives those choices.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the abstract is brief and omits these specifics. The manuscript employs a differential line-by-line analysis restricted to stars spanning a narrow effective-temperature range precisely to suppress temperature-dependent systematics. The full text details the line list, the separation of populations in Na, Al, and Fe, and the error contributions from microturbulence and surface gravity. Robustness against model-grid and line-list choices is addressed in the analysis section. We will revise the abstract to state the sample size, note the differential approach and narrow Teff range, and indicate that the Fe offset persists under the tested variations. This change will allow readers to better evaluate the supernova-retention interpretation without altering the manuscript's conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Direct observational abundance measurement; no derivation reduces to inputs

full rationale

The paper reports an empirical result from differential line-by-line spectral analysis: [Fe/H] is higher in Na-rich second-population stars than in first-population stars of M92. This is a direct measurement from observed spectra, not a model prediction, fitted parameter, or derivation whose output equals its input by construction. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are invoked to generate the central abundance offset; the claim stands or falls on the data reduction choices. The interpretive statement about supernova retention is a consequence of the measurement, not a circular step that forces the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms are stated in the provided text.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Differential line-by-line stellar abundance analysis yields unbiased relative Fe abundances across the two populations
    The central claim rests on this standard technique in stellar spectroscopy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence of Supernova Between Formation of Stellar Populations in a Globular Cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXXIGLIE

@misc{pith2026260629435,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence of Supernova Between Formation of Stellar Populations in a Globular Cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXXIGLIE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.29435}
}
read the original abstract

Globular clusters do not undergo conventional chemical evolution driven by supernova enrichment. Instead, they exhibit unique abundance patterns of the light elements, which cannot be fully explained by any of the proposed enrichment mechanisms. "Normal" stars of low sodium abundances comprise the first population of cluster stars, and "enriched" stars of high sodium abundances, which are found only in globular clusters, comprise the second population. Here we show from a differential line-by-line analysis of stars that span a small range of effective temperature that the globular cluster M92 has higher Fe abundances in second-population (sodium-enhanced) stars than first-population stars. The two populations are well separated in Na, Al, and Fe abundances. The rise in Fe abundance between the first and second stellar populations suggests that M92 was able to retain at least some supernova ejecta, all of which exploded after the first population finished forming. This result provides a lower limit for the time delay between populations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A&A Rv27, 8 (2019)

    Gratton, R.et al.What is a globular cluster? An observational perspective. A&A Rv27, 8 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    & Lardo, C

    Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. Multiple Stellar Populations in Globular Clusters. ARA&A56, 83–136 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Carretta, E.et al.Properties of stellar generations in globular clusters and relations with global parameters.A&A516, A55 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    & Harris, W

    Bailin, J. & Harris, W. E. Stochastic Self-Enrichment, Pre-Enrichment, and the Formation of Globular Clusters.ApJ695, 1082–1093 (2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    A Model for Clumpy Self-enrichment in Globular Clusters.ApJ863, 99 (2018)

    Bailin, J. A Model for Clumpy Self-enrichment in Globular Clusters.ApJ863, 99 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Cohen, J. G. No Heavy-element Dispersion in the Globular Cluster M92.ApJL 740, L38 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    & Strader, J

    Willman, B. & Strader, J. ”Galaxy,” Defined.AJ144, 76 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    P.et al.The Hubble Space Telescope UV Legacy Survey of Galactic globular clusters - IX

    Milone, A. P.et al.The Hubble Space Telescope UV Legacy Survey of Galactic globular clusters - IX. The Atlas of multiple stellar populations.MNRAS464, 3636–3656 (2017)

    2017

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Carretta, E.et al.Na-O anticorrelation and HB. VII. The chemical composition of first and second-generation stars in 15 globular clusters from GIRAFFE spectra. A&A505, 117–138 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Johnson, C. I. & Pilachowski, C. A. Chemical Abundances for 855 Giants in the Globular Cluster Omega Centauri (NGC 5139).ApJ722, 1373–1410 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    I.et al.A Chemical Composition Survey of the Iron-complex Globular Cluster NGC 6273 (M19).ApJ836, 168 (2017)

    Johnson, C. I.et al.A Chemical Composition Survey of the Iron-complex Globular Cluster NGC 6273 (M19).ApJ836, 168 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Yong, D.et al.High precision differential abundance measurements in globular clusters: chemical inhomogeneities in NGC 6752.MNRAS434, 3542–3565 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    McKenzie, M.et al.The complex stellar system M 22: confirming abundance variations with high precision differential measurements.MNRAS516, 3515– 3531 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Metallicity spreads and multiple elemental dispersions in the globular clusters NGC 288 and NGC 362

    Monty, S.et al.Peeking beneath the precision floor - I. Metallicity spreads and multiple elemental dispersions in the globular clusters NGC 288 and NGC 362. MNRAS518, 965–986 (2023). 32

    2023

  7. [15]

    & Gratton, R

    Ventura, P., D’Antona, F., Mazzitelli, I. & Gratton, R. Predictions for Self- Pollution in Globular Cluster Stars.ApJL550, L65–L69 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    & Ekstr¨ om, S

    Decressin, T., Meynet, G., Charbonnel, C., Prantzos, N. & Ekstr¨ om, S. Fast rotat- ing massive stars and the origin of the abundance patterns in galactic globular clusters.A&A464, 1029–1044 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    Gieles, M., Padoan, P., Charbonnel, C., Vink, J. S. & Ram´ ırez-Galeano, L. Glob- ular cluster formation from inertial inflows: accreting extremely massive stars as the origin of abundance anomalies.MNRAS(2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    & Meynet, G

    Chantereau, W., Charbonnel, C. & Meynet, G. Evolution of long-lived globular cluster stars. III. Effect of the initial helium spread on the position of stars in a synthetic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.A&A592, A111 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Sneden, C.et al.Star-To-Star Abundance Variations Among Bright Giants in the Metal-Poor Globular Cluster M15.AJ114, 1964 (1997)

    1964

  12. [20]

    Roederer, I. U. & Sneden, C. Heavy-element Dispersion in the Metal-poor Globular Cluster M92.AJ142, 22 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Roederer, I. U. Primordial r-process Dispersion in Metal-poor Globular Clusters. ApJL732, L17 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    N., Ji, A

    Kirby, E. N., Ji, A. P. & Kovalev, M. r-process Abundance Patterns in the Globular Cluster M92.ApJ958, 45 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Cabrera Garcia, J.et al.Abundances of Neutron-capture Elements in 62 Stars in the Globular Cluster Messier 15.ApJ967, 101 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Bandyopadhyay, A.et al.Probing Abundance Variations Among Multi- ple Stellar Populations in the Metal-poor Globular Cluster NGC 2298 Using Gemini-South/GHOST.AJ170, 37 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    E., Gerasimov, R

    Henderson, L. E., Gerasimov, R. & Kirby, E. N. Population-Dependent r-process Scatter in the Globular Cluster M15.ApJL, in pressarXiv:2509.16840 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Nalamwar, P., Kirby, E. N. & Cai, A. r-process Abundance Dispersion in the Globular Cluster M5 Using Keck Archival Data.ApJ990, 132 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Carretta, E.et al.NGC 362: another globular cluster with a split red giant branch.A&A557, A138 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    A Comparative Study between M30 and M92: M92 is a Merger Remnant with a Large Helium Enhancement.ApJ961, 227 (2024)

    Lee, J.-W. A Comparative Study between M30 and M92: M92 is a Merger Remnant with a Large Helium Enhancement.ApJ961, 227 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A.G.A., Prusti, T. & et al. Gaia data release 3. summary of the content and survey properties.A&A(2022). URL 33 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    S.et al.Crawford, D

    Vogt, S. S.et al.Crawford, D. L. & Craine, E. R. (eds)HIRES: the high-resolution echelle spectrometer on the Keck 10-m Telescope. (eds Crawford, D. L. & Craine, E. R.)Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII, Vol. 2198 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Confe...

    1994

  23. [31]

    & Massari, D

    Mucciarelli, A., Bellazzini, M. & Massari, D. Exploiting the Gaia EDR3 photometry to derive stellar temperatures.A&A653, A90 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    A., Denissenkov, P

    VandenBerg, D. A., Denissenkov, P. A. & Catelan, M. Constraints on the Distance Moduli, Helium and Metal Abundances, and Ages of Globular Clusters from their RR Lyrae and Non-variable Horizontal-branch Stars. I. M3, M15, and M92.ApJ 827, 2 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams.A&A616, A10 (2018)

    Gaia Collaborationet al.Gaia Data Release 2. Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams.A&A616, A10 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    First stellar parameters from Apsis.A&A 616, A8 (2018)

    Andrae, R.et al.Gaia Data Release 2. First stellar parameters from Apsis.A&A 616, A8 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    & Asplund, M

    Ram´ ırez, I., Mel´ endez, J. & Asplund, M. Accurate abundance patterns of solar twins and analogs. Does the anomalous solar chemical composition come from planet formation?A&A508, L17–L20 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    & Hoppe, R

    Bergemann, M. & Hoppe, R. 3D Non-LTE radiation transfer: theory and appli- cations to stars, exoplanets, and kilonovae.Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, acceptedarXiv:2511.04254 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Masseron, T.et al.Homogeneous analysis of globular clusters from the APOGEE survey with the BACCHUS code. I. The northern clusters.A&A622, A191 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    & Charbonnel, C

    Prantzos, N. & Charbonnel, C. On the self-enrichment scenario of galactic globular clusters: constraints on the IMF.A&A458, 135–149 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Murray, S. D. & Lin, D. N. C. On the Origin of Metal Homogeneities in Globular Clusters.ApJ357, 105 (1990)

    1990

  32. [40]

    Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Baumgardt, H. & Gieles, M. Mass-loss rates and the mass evolution of star clusters.MNRAS409, 305–328 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Krause, M.et al.Superbubble dynamics in globular cluster infancy. I. How do globular clusters first lose their cold gas?A&A546, L5 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Gieles, M., Heggie, D. C. & Zhao, H. The life cycle of star clusters in a tidal field. MNRAS413, 2509–2524 (2011). 34

    2011

  35. [43]

    Origlia, L.et al.Spectroscopy Unveils the Complex Nature of Terzan 5.ApJL 726, L20 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Massari, D.et al.Ceci N’est Pas a Globular Cluster: The Metallicity Distribution of the Stellar System Terzan 5.ApJ795, 22 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    F.et al.Chemical Abundances along the 1G Sequence of the Chromosome Maps: The Globular Cluster NGC 3201.ApJ887, 91 (2019)

    Marino, A. F.et al.Chemical Abundances along the 1G Sequence of the Chromosome Maps: The Globular Cluster NGC 3201.ApJ887, 91 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    & Bastian, N

    Lardo, C., Salaris, M., Cassisi, S. & Bastian, N. Confirmation of a metallicity spread amongst first population stars in globular clusters.A&A662, A117 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Lardo, C.et al.High-precision abundances of first-population stars in NGC 2808: confirmation of a metallicity spread.A&A669, A19 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    V.et al.Constraining the original composition of the gas forming first-generation stars in globular clusters.MNRAS513, 735–751 (2022)

    Legnardi, M. V.et al.Constraining the original composition of the gas forming first-generation stars in globular clusters.MNRAS513, 735–751 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    V.et al.The original composition of the gas forming first-generation stars in clusters: Insights from HST and JWST.A&A687, A160 (2024)

    Legnardi, M. V.et al.The original composition of the gas forming first-generation stars in clusters: Insights from HST and JWST.A&A687, A160 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Latour, M.et al.A stellar census in globular clusters with MUSE: Metallicity spread and dispersion among first-population stars.A&A694, A248 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    R., Vink, J

    Higgins, E. R., Vink, J. S., Hirschi, R., Laird, A. M. & Sabhahit, G. N. Stellar wind yields of very massive stars.MNRAS526, 534–547 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Norris, J. E. & Da Costa, G. S. The Giant Branch of omega Centauri. IV. Abundance Patterns Based on Echelle Spectra of 40 Red Giants.ApJ447, 680 (1995)

    1995

  45. [53]

    & Lattanzio, J

    Karakas, A. & Lattanzio, J. C. Stellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars.PASA24, 103–117 (2007)

    2007

  46. [54]

    & McMillan, S

    D’Ercole, A., D’Antona, F., Ventura, P., Vesperini, E. & McMillan, S. L. W. Abundance patterns of multiple populations in globular clusters: a chemical evolution model based on yields from AGB ejecta.MNRAS407, 854–869 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    Karakas, A. I. & Lattanzio, J. C. The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars.PASA31, e030 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    L.et al.Super and massive AGB stars - III

    Doherty, C. L.et al.Super and massive AGB stars - III. Nucleosynthesis in metal- poor and very metal-poor stars - Z = 0.001 and 0.0001.MNRAS441, 582–598 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Mucciarelli, A.et al.Lithium abundance in the globular cluster M4: from the turn-off to the red giant branch bump.MNRAS412, 81–94 (2011). 35

    2011

  50. [58]

    Cameron, A. G. W. & Fowler, W. A. Lithium and the s-PROCESS in Red-Giant Stars.ApJ164, 111 (1971)

    1971

  51. [59]

    & Korn, A

    Nordlander, T., Gruyters, P., Richard, O. & Korn, A. J. Atomic diffusion and mixing in old stars - VIII. Chemical abundance variations in the globular cluster M4 (NGC 6121).MNRAS527, 12120–12139 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Travaglio, C.et al.Galactic Evolution of Sr, Y, And Zr: A Multiplicity of Nucleosynthetic Processes.ApJ601, 864–884 (2004)

    2004

  53. [61]

    Lattimer, J. M. & Schramm, D. N. Black-Hole-Neutron-Star Collisions.ApJL 192, L145 (1974)

    1974

  54. [62]

    & Thielemann, F.-K

    Nishimura, N., Takiwaki, T. & Thielemann, F.-K. The r-process Nucleosynthesis in the Various Jet-like Explosions of Magnetorotational Core-collapse Supernovae. ApJ810, 109 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    & Chieffi, A

    Prantzos, N., Abia, C., Cristallo, S., Limongi, M. & Chieffi, A. Chemical evolution with rotating massive star yields II. A new assessment of the solar s- and r-process components.MNRAS491, 1832–1850 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Fr¨ ohlich, C.et al.Neutrino-Induced Nucleosynthesis of A¿64 Nuclei: Theνp Process.PhRvL96, 142502 (2006)

    2006

  57. [65]

    N., Duggan, G., Ramirez-Ruiz, E

    Kirby, E. N., Duggan, G., Ramirez-Ruiz, E. & Macias, P. The Stars in M15 Were Born with the r-process.ApJL891, L13 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    F.et al.The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).AJ131, 1163–1183 (2006)

    Skrutskie, M. F.et al.The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).AJ131, 1163–1183 (2006)

    2006

  59. [67]

    MAKEE: MAuna Kea Echelle Extraction

    Barlow, T. MAKEE: MAuna Kea Echelle Extraction. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2407.001 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    P.et al.The Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S 5): Chemical Abundances of Seven Stellar Streams.AJ160, 181 (2020)

    Ji, A. P.et al.The Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S 5): Chemical Abundances of Seven Stellar Streams.AJ160, 181 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    A.Carbon and Nitrogen Abundances in Metal-Poor Stars.Ph.D

    Sneden, C. A.Carbon and Nitrogen Abundances in Metal-Poor Stars.Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas Austin. (1973)

    1973

  62. [70]

    Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J. & Gallino, R. Neutron-capture elements in the early galaxy.ARA&A46, 241–288 (2008)

    2008

  63. [71]

    M.et al.Linemake: An Atomic and Molecular Line List Generator

    Placco, V. M.et al.Linemake: An Atomic and Molecular Line List Generator. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society5, 92 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    M.et al.linemake: Line list generator

    Placco, V. M.et al.linemake: Line list generator. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.027 (2021). ascl:2104.027. 36

    2021

  65. [73]

    Lind, K.et al.Tracing the evolution of NGC 6397 through the chemical composition of its stellar populations.A&A527, A148 (2011)

    2011

  66. [74]

    Osorio, Y.et al.Mg line formation in late-type stellar atmospheres. I. The model atom.A&A579, A53 (2015)

    2015

  67. [75]

    Lind, K.et al.Non-LTE abundance corrections for late-type stars from 2000 ˚A to 3µm. I. Na, Mg, and Al.A&A665, A33 (2022)

    2000

  68. [76]

    ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid.ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid

    Kurucz, R. ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid.ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 13. Cam- bridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1993.13(1993)

    1993

  69. [77]

    Kirby, E. N. Grids of ATLAS9 Model Atmospheres and MOOG Synthetic Spectra.PASP123, 531–535 (2011)

    2011

  70. [78]

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J. & Scott, P. The Chemical Composition of the Sun.ARA&A47, 481–522 (2009)

    2009

  71. [79]

    MPFIT: Robust non-linear least squares curve fitting (2012)

    Markwardt, C. MPFIT: Robust non-linear least squares curve fitting (2012). Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1208.019

    2012

  72. [80]

    Five Groups of Red Giants with Distinct Chemical Composition in the Globular Cluster NGC 2808.ApJ810, 148 (2015)

    Carretta, E. Five Groups of Red Giants with Distinct Chemical Composition in the Globular Cluster NGC 2808.ApJ810, 148 (2015)

    2015

  73. [81]

    M., Gerasimov, R

    Larkin, M. M., Gerasimov, R. & Burgasser, A. J. Characterization of Population III Stars with Stellar Atmosphere and Evolutionary Modeling and Predictions of their Observability with the JWST.AJ165, 2 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    & Yong, D

    Mel´ endez, J., Asplund, M., Gustafsson, B. & Yong, D. The Peculiar Solar Com- position and Its Possible Relation to Planet Formation.ApJL704, L66–L70 (2009)

    2009

  75. [83]

    Ram´ ırez, I.et al.The Solar Twin Planet Search. I. Fundamental parameters of the stellar sample.A&A572, A48 (2014)

    2014

  76. [84]

    N., Guhathakurta, P., Bolte, M., Sneden, C

    Kirby, E. N., Guhathakurta, P., Bolte, M., Sneden, C. & Geha, M. C. Multi- element Abundance Measurements from Medium-resolution Spectra. I. The Sculptor Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy.ApJ705, 328–346 (2009)

    2009

  77. [85]

    W., Lang, D

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: The MCMC Hammer.PASP125, 306 (2013)

    2013

  78. [86]

    & Iliadis, C

    Prantzos, N., Charbonnel, C. & Iliadis, C. Revisiting nucleosynthesis in globular clusters. The case of NGC 2808 and the role of He and K.A&A608, A28 (2017)

    2017

  79. [87]

    Ventura, P.et al.Super-AGB-AGB Evolution and the Chemical Inventory in NGC 2419.ApJL761, L30 (2012). 37

    2012

  80. [88]

    U.et al.The R-Process Alliance: 2MASS J22132050–5137385, the Star with the Highest-known r-process Enhancement at [Eu/Fe] = +2.45.ApJ 971, 158 (2024)

    Roederer, I. U.et al.The R-Process Alliance: 2MASS J22132050–5137385, the Star with the Highest-known r-process Enhancement at [Eu/Fe] = +2.45.ApJ 971, 158 (2024)

    2024

  81. [89]

    P.et al.The Hubble Space Telescope UV legacy survey of galactic globular clusters - XVI

    Milone, A. P.et al.The Hubble Space Telescope UV legacy survey of galactic globular clusters - XVI. The helium abundance of multiple populations.MNRAS 481, 5098–5122 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Dupree, A. K. & Avrett, E. H. Direct Evaluation of the Helium Abundances in Omega Centauri.ApJL773, L28 (2013)

    2013

  83. [91]

    Milone, A. P. Helium and multiple populations in the massive globular cluster NGC 6266 (M 62).MNRAS446, 1672–1684 (2015)

    2015

  84. [92]

    Valcarce, A. A. R., Catelan, M., Alonso-Garc´ ıa, J., Contreras Ramos, R. & Alves, S. Level of helium enhancement among M3’s horizontal branch stars.A&A589, A126 (2016)

    2016

  85. [93]

    Zennaro, M.et al.Four stellar populations and extreme helium variation in the massive outer-halo globular cluster NGC 2419.MNRAS487, 3239–3251 (2019)

    2019

  86. [94]

    Kurucz, R. L. & Avrett, E. H. Solar Spectrum Synthesis. I. A Sample Atlas from 224 to 300 nm.SAO Special Report391(1981)

    1981

  87. [95]

    & Gehren, T

    Baumueller, D., Butler, K. & Gehren, T. Sodium in the Sun and in metal-poor stars.A&A338, 637–650 (1998)

    1998

  88. [96]

    Lind, K., Asplund, M., Barklem, P. S. & Belyaev, A. K. Non-LTE calculations for neutral Na in late-type stars using improved atomic data.A&A528, A103 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    Sobeck, J. S.et al.The Abundances of Neutron-capture Species in the Very Metal-poor Globular Cluster M15: A Uniform Analysis of Red Giant Branch and Red Horizontal Branch Stars.AJ141, 175 (2011). 38

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.