pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29800 · v1 · pith:3C4VJKGDnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Harnessing Toroidal Neutral Flows to Enhance Divertor Particle Exhaust

M. Moscheni , A. Herrmann , J.D. Lore , M. Kryjak , C. Soika , R. Kembleton , S. Lazerson , K. Revel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 04:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords toroidal neutral flowsdivertor particle exhaustDSMC simulationstokamak divertorsneutral windback-flow reductionplasma detachmentpumping performance
0
0 comments X

The pith

A toroidally oriented pump inlet reduces back-flow by up to 33 percent for helium by capturing plasma-imprinted neutral flows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a toroidally oriented pump inlet can passively harness the ordered toroidal motion of neutrals in a detached divertor to reduce back-flow and raise partial pressures in the exhaust duct. This would matter because improved exhaust performance could lower the effective pumping speed required for a given throughput and ease hardware demands in fusion devices. Evidence is drawn from prior experiments and edge simulations showing a multi-species toroidal neutral wind, which is then isolated in two-dimensional DSMC calculations of the private-flux region and tested in proof-of-principle inlet simulations. The calculations recover kilometre-per-second neutral velocities aligned toroidally that persist across slip-to-transitional flow regimes.

Core claim

A toroidally oriented pump inlet reduces back-flow by up to 20 percent for deuterium and up to 33 percent for helium at 10 percent concentration relative to a traditional poloidal arrangement. Partial pressures in the toroidal exhaust path increase by factors of 1.78 plus or minus 0.04 for deuterium and 2.00 plus or minus 0.05 for helium across the simulation database, implying a reduction in the required effective pumping speed for fixed throughput.

What carries the argument

The toroidally oriented pump inlet that captures the ordered toroidal neutral wind imprinted by the plasma in the private-flux region.

If this is right

  • For fixed throughput the required effective pumping speed decreases, lowering corresponding hardware demands.
  • Partial pressures are enhanced across a range of conditions for both deuterium and helium.
  • Explicit retention of toroidal neutral momentum becomes necessary in divertor and sub-divertor modeling.
  • Dedicated studies of neutral aerodynamics are motivated, including in stellarators where analogous directional imprinting is expected.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the back-flow reductions persist in full three-dimensional geometries, the approach could be retrofitted to current devices to test exhaust improvements without new power sources.
  • The larger relative benefit for helium suggests targeted gains for ash removal in reactor-relevant mixtures.
  • Optimization of inlet geometry using the same DSMC framework could further increase the pressure-enhancement factors beyond the reported averages.

Load-bearing premise

The toroidal neutral wind identified in the idealized private-flux simulations will remain sufficiently ordered and capturable once a real pump inlet is introduced into an actual divertor geometry that includes magnetic fields, wall interactions, and three-dimensional effects.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison in an existing tokamak of measured back-flow rates and duct pressures for toroidal versus poloidal pump inlets at comparable throughputs would directly test the predicted reductions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29800 by A. Herrmann, C. Soika, J.D. Lore, K. Revel, M. Kryjak, M. Moscheni, R. Kembleton, S. Lazerson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simplified schematic of toroidal neutral flow generation in the divertor (not to scale). Isotropic, pseudo-random neutral thermal motion carries a pressure pθ, tapped by the traditional, poloidal arrangement of pump inlets. However, ordered plasma momentum—primarily aligned with the magnetic field—is transferred to neutrals through charge exchange (CX), recombination (RC) and elastic collisions (EL). A tor… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SOLPS-ITER simulation for ITER of Lore et al. [107]—neon-seeded, detached at 3% separatrix impurity concentration. From top to bottom: atomic-equivalent deuterium, neon and helium. Source rates: ΓD = 1.95 × 1023 D s−1 puff and 1022 D s−1 unburnt core fuelling; ΓZ = 1021 Ne s−1 neon seeding; 1020 He s−1 helium production rate. From left to right: degree of toroidality (DoT); toroidal speed; normalised toroi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Trends of toroidal neutral-wind quantities with increasing neon seeding in the ITER of Lore et al. [107] (“triangle series”), space-averaged around strike points within the private-flux region (appendix A). The simulation depicted in figure 2 is asterisked. The toroidal particle flux is here reported non-normalised. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of the private-flux-region-like domain of the physics proof-of-principle simulations. Associ￾ated boundary conditions and main details are annotated. Only dashed boundaries can be crossed by the particles. bodies the key departure from conventional DSMC approaches, where neutrals are typically injected with stationary Maxwellian distributions (zero bulk velocity) [125, 162, 132, 126]. Instead, pl… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Vertical profiles of the toroidal neutral speed of atomic-equivalent deuterium in the SOLPS-ITER simulation of figure 2b. The spatial average is computed over r ∈ [4.28, 4.46] m and r ∈ [5.27, 5.52] m for the in￾ner and outer target regions, respectively, i.e. above the divertor reflectors [2]. Different extents reflect the vary￾ing separatrix-to-wall distance. The fitting procedure used is described in ap… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Neutral density (a), magnitude of the toroidal velocity |Vϕ| (b), and temperature (c) aver￾aged within the first 2 cm into the private flux region (PFR) for atomic-equivalent deuterium. The underly￾ing SOLPS-ITER simulations (grey curves) are those of Lore et al. [107]. These include the triangle series (fig￾ure 3) and diamond series (figure B.1). The abscissa represents the distance along the legs, from t… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic of the domain of the exhaust proof-of-principle simulations. Associated boundary conditions and main details are annotated. Only dashed/open boundaries can be crossed by the particles. The reference sampling locations are in magenta. be evaluated as: fback = Γback Γin (8) for a pump inlet crossed by an incoming (Γin) and a back-flowing (Γback) particle flux. This metric therefore quantifies how m… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: SPARTA results: baseline simulation of physics proof-of-principle (section 5.3), with V BC ϕ = ±5 km s−1 , ⟨n⟩ ≃ 1020 m−3 , and ⟨p⟩ ≃ 9 Pa. (a) Degree of toroidality DoT(r, z). (b) Toroidal velocity field Vϕ(r, z). Streamlines of the poloidal velocity field are shown in black. reported in the following. These bear SI units, ⟨T⟩ is in [eV], the rescaling constant implicitly embeds the dimensional adjustment… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SPARTA results from the same simulation in figure 8. (a) Vertical velocity profiles averaged in the outer private-flux region and illustrative fit (appendix H). The shape is reminiscent of figures 1.10 of [184] and 7.4 of [202] in transitional conditions. (b) Macroscopic toroidal velocities obtained via the actual slice-wise fit, as a function of r ∈ [0.250, 0.325] m. (c) Corresponding toroidal wind decay … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Regression results across the physics proof-of-principle database for the main average quantities: (a) degree of toroidality, |DoT|; (b) toroidal wind decay length in the private flux region, λPFR; (c) toroidal speed, |Vϕ|; (d) toroidal speed along the divertor separatrix legs, |V SEP ϕ |. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation from the space-average procedure. Horizontal error bars quantify the u… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: SPARTA results: baseline simulation of exhaust proof-of-principle (section 5.4) in the toroidal plane, with ϕ being the straightened toroidal coordinate. Upstream divertor-average are approximately: 9 Pa, 1.6 × 1020 m−3 , and 2.0 km s−1 for deuterium pressure, density, and velocity magnitude (left); and 1.3 Pa, 0.2×1020 m−3 , and 1.8 km s−1 for helium at 10% concentration (right). Iso-lines are overlaid t… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Pressure-gain regressions for (a) deuterium and (b) helium across the exhaust proof-of-principle database. The colouring represents the species-specific average density throughout the divertor domain, up￾stream of the inlets. The baseline simulation in figure 11 is starred. negative exponents remain small in absolute value compared with the dominant positive dependence on ⟨|Vϕ|⟩, which instead captures th… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: SOLPS-ITER simulations of Moscheni et al. [104] in DTT. Left: degree of toroidality of molecular deuterium with baseline plasma-neutral interaction set (no neutral-neutral collisions). Centre: same as left, but without elastic collisions between deuterium ions and molecules. Right: neon degree of toroidality, generated only by neon recombination and fast surface reflection. This property opens a practical… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Illustrative placement (grey) of the TFP in an ITER-like environment. The top-most inlet surface lies 3 cm below the strike point (zˆ = 0), above the diver￾tor target reflectors [2]. Overlaid are the average vertical velocity profiles of the atomic-equivalent deuterium at increasing degree of detachment for the simulations in figure 3. the toroidal neutral speed and flux are maximal— without imposing a co… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In 1991 Reiter et al. (1991 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 33 1579) considered the onerous exhaust requirements of ITER, and wrote: "The vacuum pumping problem of a fusion reactor will probably require some novel solution". Here we show that a toroidally oriented pump inlet can passively exploit intrinsic neutral flows to reduce back-flow, raise duct pressure, and ultimately improve particle-exhaust performance. Drawing on previous experimental observations and SOLPS-ITER edge-plasma simulations, we consolidate the evidence for a plasma-imprinted, multi-species toroidal neutral "wind" in detached tokamak divertors. We isolate the underlying mechanism in a prototypical divertor private-flux region using a database of two-dimensional direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) calculations. The ordered neutral motion is recovered with a strong toroidal alignment, kilometre-per-second velocities, and persistence up to several centimetres across slip-to-transitional rarefied regimes (Kn=0.02$-$2). We then assess the consequences of capturing this ordered motion using a second database of idealised proof-of-principle DSMC simulations. Compared to the traditional poloidal arrangement, a toroidally oriented pump inlet reduces back-flow by up to 20% for deuterium and up to 33% for helium at 10% concentration. Partial pressures in the toroidal exhaust path are enhanced across the database, nominally by a factor of 1.78$\pm$0.04 for deuterium and 2.00$\pm$0.05 for helium. For fixed throughput, this implies a reduction in the required effective pumping speed and corresponding hardware. More broadly, these results motivate explicit retention of toroidal neutral momentum in divertor and sub-divertor modelling, and dedicated studies of neutral aerodynamics, including in stellarators, where an analogous directional imprinting is expected to occur.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper argues that a toroidally oriented pump inlet can passively exploit an intrinsic toroidal neutral 'wind' (km/s velocities, strong alignment, persisting several cm at Kn=0.02-2) in the private-flux region of detached divertors. Using two 2D DSMC databases—one isolating the mechanism from SOLPS-ITER and experiment, the other testing idealized toroidal vs. poloidal inlets—it reports up to 20% (D) / 33% (He at 10%) back-flow reduction and partial-pressure enhancements of 1.78±0.04 (D) / 2.00±0.05 (He), implying lower required pumping speed for fixed throughput.

Significance. If the ordered toroidal flow survives realistic 3D perturbations, the result offers a passive, geometry-based route to improved divertor exhaust without added hardware, directly relevant to ITER-class devices. It also supplies a concrete motivation for retaining toroidal neutral momentum in edge modeling and for neutral-aerodynamics studies in stellarators.

major comments (2)
  1. [proof-of-principle DSMC database and abstract mechanism-isolation paragraph] The central performance claims (back-flow reductions of 20-33% and pressure-enhancement factors 1.78-2.00) rest on idealized 2D proof-of-principle DSMC runs. No 3D test case, sensitivity study to magnetic-field drifts, wall scattering, or inlet-induced disruption of the toroidal wind is reported, leaving the extrapolation from mechanism isolation to actual exhaust performance unverified.
  2. [DSMC methods and results sections] The quantitative results are presented with error estimates (±0.04, ±0.05) but the manuscript provides no tabulated convergence metrics, Knudsen-number grid, or boundary-condition details for the second DSMC database; without these it is impossible to assess whether the reported gains are robust to numerical or modeling choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and methods] Notation for the two DSMC databases is introduced only in the abstract; a dedicated nomenclature table or explicit section labels would improve traceability.
  2. [introduction] The citation to Reiter et al. (1991) is appropriate but the manuscript does not discuss how the present toroidal-wind mechanism relates to or extends that earlier vacuum-pumping discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and recommendation of major revision. We respond point-by-point to the two major comments, clarifying the proof-of-principle nature of the 2D DSMC study while committing to improvements in documentation and limitations discussion.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [proof-of-principle DSMC database and abstract mechanism-isolation paragraph] The central performance claims (back-flow reductions of 20-33% and pressure-enhancement factors 1.78-2.00) rest on idealized 2D proof-of-principle DSMC runs. No 3D test case, sensitivity study to magnetic-field drifts, wall scattering, or inlet-induced disruption of the toroidal wind is reported, leaving the extrapolation from mechanism isolation to actual exhaust performance unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the reported performance metrics derive from idealized 2D DSMC simulations intended to isolate the toroidal neutral wind mechanism in a prototypical private-flux region. No 3D cases or sensitivity studies to drifts, wall scattering, or inlet disruption are included. We will revise the manuscript by adding an explicit limitations paragraph in the discussion that outlines these assumptions and the need for future 3D work to verify extrapolation to realistic exhaust performance. This addresses the concern on scope without changing the core 2D results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [DSMC methods and results sections] The quantitative results are presented with error estimates (±0.04, ±0.05) but the manuscript provides no tabulated convergence metrics, Knudsen-number grid, or boundary-condition details for the second DSMC database; without these it is impossible to assess whether the reported gains are robust to numerical or modeling choices.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The second DSMC database is insufficiently documented. We will revise the Methods and Results sections to add: tabulated convergence metrics, the Knudsen-number grid used across the database, and complete boundary-condition specifications for the toroidal versus poloidal inlet configurations. These additions will allow independent assessment of numerical robustness for the back-flow and partial-pressure results. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full 3D DSMC test cases with sensitivity to magnetic-field drifts, wall scattering, and inlet-induced disruption of the toroidal wind, which require substantial new computational effort outside the current proof-of-principle scope.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; performance metrics are independent DSMC outputs

full rationale

The paper isolates the toroidal neutral flow mechanism in one 2D DSMC database and evaluates toroidal vs. poloidal inlet performance in a second, separate idealized DSMC database. Reported back-flow reductions (up to 20-33%) and pressure-enhancement factors (1.78±0.04 and 2.00±0.05) are direct simulation outputs, not quantities obtained by fitting, redefinition, or self-citation chains. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems reduce the central claims to the inputs by construction; external citations (Reiter 1991, SOLPS-ITER) supply supporting context but do not bear the load of the reported gains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review reveals one domain assumption (existence of plasma-imprinted toroidal neutral wind) drawn from prior literature; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A plasma-imprinted, multi-species toroidal neutral wind exists in detached tokamak divertors and persists across slip-to-transitional regimes
    Consolidated from previous experimental observations and SOLPS-ITER simulations (abstract opening paragraph)

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5902 in / 1415 out tokens · 75296 ms · 2026-06-30T04:17:37.831711+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

267 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The European roadmap towards fusion electricity,

    A. Donné, “The European roadmap towards fusion electricity,”Philosoph- ical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 377, p. 2141, 2019. [Online]. 39 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 [m] 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15z [m] D pressure 0 5 10 15 20 p [Pa] (a) 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 [m] 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15z [m] D velocity magnitude 0 1 2 3 4 5 |Vz + V | [km/s] (b) 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4...

    2019

  2. [2]

    Physics basis for the first ITER tung- sten divertor,

    R. Pitts, X. Bonnin, F. Escourbiac, H. Frerichs, J. Gunn, T. Hirai, A. Kukushkin, E. Kaveeva, M. Miller, D. Moulton, V. Rozhansky, I. Senichenkov, E. Sytova, O. Schmitz, P. Stangeby, G. De Tem- merman, I. Veselova, and S. Wiesen, “Physics basis for the first ITER tung- sten divertor,”Nuclear Materials and En- ergy, vol. 20, p. 100696, 2019. [Online]. Avai...

    2019

  3. [3]

    Stangeby,The Plasma Boundary of Mag- netic Fusion Devices, ser

    P. Stangeby,The Plasma Boundary of Mag- netic Fusion Devices, ser. Series in Plasma Physics and Fluid Dynamics. Taylor & Fran- cis, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://books. google.co.uk/books?id=qOliQgAACAAJ

    2000

  4. [4]

    Militello,Boundary Plasma Physics: An Accessible Guide to Transport, Detachment, and Divertor Design, 1st ed., ser

    F. Militello,Boundary Plasma Physics: An Accessible Guide to Transport, Detachment, and Divertor Design, 1st ed., ser. Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics. Springer Cham, 2022, vol. 123. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-031-17339-4

    2022

  5. [5]

    Physics of ultimate detachment of a tokamak divertor plasma,

    S. I. Krasheninnikov and A. S. Kukushkin, “Physics of ultimate detachment of a tokamak divertor plasma,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 83, no. 5, p. 155830501, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/ journals/journal-of-plasma-physics/article/ physics-of-ultimate-detachment-of-a-tokamak-divertor-plasma/ B1A927D0F8DD3BB9C19A436C25C6FF31

    2017

  6. [6]

    A review of radiative detachment studies in tokamak advanced magnetic divertor configurations,

    V. A. Soukhanovskii, “A review of radiative detachment studies in tokamak advanced magnetic divertor configurations,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 59, no. 6, p. 064005, apr 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aa6959

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aa6959 2017

  7. [7]

    Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO,

    A. Kallenbach, M. Bernert, R. Dux, L. Cas- ali, T. Eich, L. Giannone, A. Herrmann, R. McDermott, A. Mlynek, H. W. Müller, F. Reimold, J. Schweinzer, M. Sertoli, G. Tardini, W. Treutterer, E. Viezzer, R. Wenninger, M. Wischmeier, and the ASDEX Upgrade Team, “Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO,”Plasma Physics a...

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/55/12/124041 2013

  8. [8]

    Divertor of the European DEMO: Engineering and technologies for power exhaust,

    J. You, G. Mazzone, E. Visca, H. Greu- ner, M. Fursdon, Y. Addab, C. Bachmann, T. Barrett, U. Bonavolontà, B. Böswirth, F. Castrovinci, C. Carelli, D. Coccorese, R. Coppola, F. Crescenzi, G. Di Gironimo, P. Di Maio, G. Di Mambro, F. Domptail, D. Dongiovanni, G. Dose, D. Flammini, L. Forest, P. Frosi, F. Gallay, B. Ghidersa, C. Harrington, K. Hunger, V. Im...

    2022

  9. [9]

    Summary of the 3rd IAEA technical meeting on divertor concepts,

    M. Barbarino, A. Leonard, N. N. Asakura, M. Jakubowski, M. Kobayashi, B. Lipschutz, R. Neu, L. Wang, and M. Wischmeier, “Summary of the 3rd IAEA technical meeting on divertor concepts,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 60, no. 9, p. 097001, jul 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab9a0c

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab9a0c 2020

  10. [10]

    Plasma physics and technology aspects of the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle for fusion energy: Summary of a tech- nical meeting,

    International Atomic Energy Agency, “Plasma physics and technology aspects of the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle for fusion energy: Summary of a tech- nical meeting,” International Atomic En- ergy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, Tech. Rep. IAEA-TECDOC-2049, 2024. [On- line]. Available: https://www-pub.iaea.org/ MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE-2049web.pdf

    2049

  11. [11]

    On the Relationship Between Plasma and Tritium Fuel Cycle Through Matter Injection and Particle Exhaust,

    S. Meschini and M. Moscheni, “On the Relationship Between Plasma and Tritium Fuel Cycle Through Matter Injection and Particle Exhaust,” 2026, submitted to Nuclear Fusion. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv. org/abs/2606.28043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Multi-machine scaling laws for fuel and impurity puffing rates sufficient for detachment access: a systematic review of magnetic confinement fusion devices,

    M. Moscheni, A. Herrmann, R. Kembleton, M. Kryjak, S. Lazerson, F. Levi, M. Siccinio, P. Staniec, T. Giegerich, C. Tantos, and t. G. Fusion Team, “Multi-machine scaling laws for fuel and impurity puffing rates sufficient for detachment access: a systematic review of magnetic confinement fusion devices,” Nuclear Fusion, vol. 66, no. 2, p. 026008, dec

  13. [13]

    Available: https://doi.org/10

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1088/1741-4326/ae287c

  14. [14]

    Full time-dependent SOLPS-ITER simulation of the SPARC tokamak: actuator design for particle and divertor condition control,

    J.-S. Park, J. D. Lore, M. Reinke, A. Q. Kuang, S. De Pascuale, and A. Creely, “Full time-dependent SOLPS-ITER simulation of the SPARC tokamak: actuator design for particle and divertor condition control,” Nuclear Fusion, vol. 64, no. 7, p. 076036, jun

  15. [15]

    Available: https://doi.org/10

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1088/1741-4326/ad4f9d

  16. [16]

    Helium removal from tokamaks,

    D.Reiter, H.Kever, G.H.Wolf, M.Baelmans, R. Behrisch, and R. Schneider, “Helium removal from tokamaks,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 33, no. 13, p. 1579, nov 1991. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/33/13/008

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/33/13/008 1991

  17. [17]

    Exper- imental divertor physics,

    C. S. Pitcher and P. C. Stangeby, “Exper- imental divertor physics,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 39, no. 6, p. 779, jun 1997. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/39/6/001

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/39/6/001 1997

  18. [18]

    Power and particle exhaust for the ARC fusion power plant,

    T. H. Eich, T. A. J. Body, T. P. Looby, S. B. Ballinger, A. J. Creely, J. C. Hillesheim, P. B. Snyder, N. T. Howard, R. Masline, M. R. K. Wigramet al., “Power and particle exhaust for the ARC fusion power plant,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 92, no. 3, p. E66, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/ journals/journal-of-plasma-physics/...

    2026

  19. [19]

    Measurement of Natural Plasma Flow along the Field Lines in the Scrape-Off Layer on the JT-60U Divertor Tokamak,

    N. Asakura, S. Sakurai, M. Shimada, Y. Koide, N. Hosogane, and K. Itami, “Measurement of Natural Plasma Flow along the Field Lines in the Scrape-Off Layer on the JT-60U Divertor Tokamak,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 84, pp. 3093–3096, Apr 2000. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.84.3093

    2000

  20. [20]

    Effects of divertor geometry on tokamak plasmas,

    A. Loarte, “Effects of divertor geometry on tokamak plasmas,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 43, no. 6, p. R183, jun 2001. [Online]. Available: https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/43/6/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/43/6/201 2001

  21. [21]

    Chapter 4: Power and particle control,

    A. Loarte, B. Lipschultz, A. Kukushkin, G. Matthews, P. Stangeby, N. Asakura, 41 G. Counsell, G. Federici, A. Kallen- bach, K. Krieger, A. Mahdavi, V. Phil- ipps, D. Reiter, J. Roth, J. Strachan, D. Whyte, R. Doerner, T. Eich, W. Fun- damenski, A. Herrmann, M. Fenstermacher, P. Ghendrih, M. Groth, A. Kirschner, S. Konoshima, B. LaBombard, P. Lang, A. Leon...

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/s04 2007

  22. [22]

    The role of divertor pumping in plasma detachment and particle exhaust in a closed divertor,

    C. Sang, P. Stangeby, H. Guo, and D. Wang, “The role of divertor pumping in plasma detachment and particle exhaust in a closed divertor,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 61, no. 1, p. 016022, nov 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abc356

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abc356 2020

  23. [23]

    Simulations of divertor designs that spatially separate power and particle exhaust using mid-leg divertor particle pumping,

    J. Yu, R. Wilcox, R. Maurizio, A. Holm, S. Allen, W. Choi, M. Fenstermacher, M. Groth, A. Leonard, A. McLean, F. Scotti, and M. Shafer, “Simulations of divertor designs that spatially separate power and particle exhaust using mid-leg divertor particle pumping,”Nuclear Materials and Energy, vol. 41, p. 101826, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.science...

    2024

  24. [24]

    Simula- tion study of effective pumping speed of divertor pumping system for CFETR with COMSOL Multiphysics,

    H. Bi, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, Z. Chen, Z. Yu, J. Yuan, and G. Zuo, “Simula- tion study of effective pumping speed of divertor pumping system for CFETR with COMSOL Multiphysics,”Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 194, p. 113916, 2023. [On- line]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0920379623004982

    2023

  25. [25]

    Mod- eling a divertor with mid-leg pumping for high-power H-mode scenarios in DIII-D con- sidering E x B drift flows,

    A. Holm, R. S. Wilcox, J. H. Yu, T. D. Ro- gnlien, M. E. Rensink, F. Scotti, R. Maurizio, S. L. Allen, W. Choi, A. W. Leonard, M. W. Shafer, M. Groth, and A. McLean, “Mod- eling a divertor with mid-leg pumping for high-power H-mode scenarios in DIII-D con- sidering E x B drift flows,”Nuclear Materials and Energy, vol. 41, p. 101782, 2024. [On- line]. Avai...

    2024

  26. [26]

    Divertor closure effects on the TCV boundary plasma,

    O. Février, H. Reimerdes, C. Theiler, D. Brida, C. Colandrea, H. De Oliveira, B. Duval, D. Galassi, S. Gorno, S. Henderson, M. Komm, B. Labit, B. Linehan, L. Mar- tinelli, A. Perek, H. Raj, U. Sheikh, C. Tsui, and M. Wensing, “Divertor closure effects on the TCV boundary plasma,”Nuclear Materi- als and Energy, vol. 27, p. 100977, 2021. [On- line]. Availab...

    2021

  27. [27]

    SOLPS analysis of neutral baffling for the design of a new diverter in DIII-D,

    C. Sang, H. Guo, P. Stangeby, L. Lao, and T. Taylor, “SOLPS analysis of neutral baffling for the design of a new diverter in DIII-D,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 57, no. 5, p. 056043, apr 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa6548

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aa6548 2017

  28. [28]

    Overview of the TCV tokamak experimental pro- gramme,

    H. Reimerdes, M. Agostini, E. Alessi, S. Al- berti, Y. Andrebe, H. Arnichand, J. Balbin, F. Bagnato, M. Baquero-Ruiz, M. Bern- ert, W. Bin, P. Blanchard, T. Blanken, J. Boedo, D. Brida, S. Brunner, C. Bogar, O. Bogar, T. Bolzonella, F. Bombarda, F. Bouquey, C. Bowman, D. Brunetti, J. Buermans, H. Bufferand, L. Calacci, Y. Camenen, S. Carli, D. Carnevale, ...

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac369b 2022

  29. [29]

    Effect of the dome on divertor per- formance in ITER,

    A. Kukushkin, H. Pacher, V. Kotov, D. Reiter, D. Coster, and G. Pacher, “Effect of the dome on divertor per- formance in ITER,”Journal of Nuc- lear Materials, vol. 363-365, pp. 308–313, 2007, plasma-Surface Interactions-17. [On- line]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0022311507000633

    2007

  30. [30]

    Isolating the impacts of divertor closure on fueling and detachment with simpli- fied SOLPS-ITER simulations of MAST- U,

    C. Cowley, D. Moulton, and B. Lipschultz, “Isolating the impacts of divertor closure on fueling and detachment with simpli- fied SOLPS-ITER simulations of MAST- U,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 022508, 02 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0271055

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0271055 2026

  31. [31]

    Dependence of neutral pressure on detachment in the small angle slot divertor at DIII-D,

    M. Shafer, B. Covele, J. Canik, L. Casali, H. Guo, A. Leonard, J. Lore, A. McLean, A. Moser, P. Stangeby, D. Taussig, H. Wang, and J. Watkins, “Dependence of neutral pressure on detachment in the small angle slot divertor at DIII-D,”Nuclear Materials and Energy, vol. 19, pp. 487–492, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/articl...

    2019

  32. [32]

    Diver- tor plasma conditions and neutral dynamics in horizontal and vertical divertor config- urations in jet-ilw low confinement mode plasmas,

    M. Groth, S. Brezinsek, P. Belo, M. Brix, G. Calabro, A. Chankin, M. Clever, J. Coenen, G. Corrigan, P. Drewelow, C. Guillemaut, D. Harting, A. Huber, S. Jach- mich, A. Järvinen, U. Kruezi, K. Lawson, M. Lehnen, C. Maggi, C. Marchetto, S.Marsen, F.Maviglia, A.Meigs, D.Moulton, C. Silva, M. Stamp, and S. Wiesen, “Diver- tor plasma conditions and neutral dy...

    2015

  33. [33]

    Neutral pathways and heat flux widths in vertical- and horizontal-target EDGE2D-EIRENE simula- tions of JET,

    D. Moulton, G. Corrigan, J. Harrison, B. Lipschultz, and J. Contributors, “Neutral pathways and heat flux widths in vertical- and horizontal-target EDGE2D-EIRENE simula- tions of JET,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 58, no. 9, p. 096029, jul 2018. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aacf0f

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aacf0f 2018

  34. [34]

    Physics conclusions in support of ITER W divertor monoblock shaping,

    R. Pitts, S. Bardin, B. Bazylev, M. van den Berg, P. Bunting, S. Carpentier-Chouchana, J. Coenen, Y. Corre, R. Dejarnac, F. Escour- biac, J. Gaspar, J. Gunn, T. Hirai, S.-H. Hong, J. Horacek, D. Iglesias, M. Komm, K. Krieger, C. Lasnier, G. Matthews, T. Morgan, S. Panayotis, S. Pestchanyi, A. Podolnik, R. Nygren, D. Rudakov, G. De Temmerman, P. Vondracek,...

    2017

  35. [35]

    A 43 Software Package for Plasma-Facing Com- ponent Analysis and Design: The Heat Flux Engineering Analysis Toolkit (HEAT),

    T. Looby, M. Reinke, A. Wingen, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, T. Gray, D. Donovan, E. Un- terberg, J. Klabacha, and M. Messineo, “A 43 Software Package for Plasma-Facing Com- ponent Analysis and Design: The Heat Flux Engineering Analysis Toolkit (HEAT),” Fusion Science and Technology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 10–27, 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.108...

    work page doi:10.1080/15361055.2021.1951532 2022

  36. [36]

    First island divertor experiments on the W7-AS stellarator,

    P. Grigull, K. McCormick, J. Baldzuhn, R. Burhenn, R. Brakel, H. Ehmler, Y. Feng, F. Gadelmeier, L. Giannone, D. Hartmann, D. Hildebrandt, M. Hirsch, R. Jaenicke, J.Kisslinger, J.Knauer, R.König, G.Kühner, H. Laqua, D. Naujoks, H. Niedermeyer, N. Ramasubramanian, N. Rust, F. Sardei, F.Wagner, A.Weller, U.Wenzel, andtheW7- AS Team, “First island divertor e...

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/43/12a/313 2001

  37. [37]

    Divertor concept for the W7-X stellarator and mode of operation,

    H. Renner, J. Boscary, H. Greuner, H. Grote, F. W. Hoffmann, J. Kiss- linger, E. Strumberger, and B. Mendelevitch, “Divertor concept for the W7-X stellarator and mode of operation,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 44, no. 6, p. 1005, may 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/44/6/325

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/44/6/325 2002

  38. [38]

    Performance of Wendelstein 7-X stellarator plasmas during the first divertor operation phase,

    R. C. Wolf, A. Alonso, S. Äkäslompolo, J. Baldzuhn, M. Beurskens, C. D. Beidler, C. Biedermann, H.-S. Bosch, S. Bozhen- kov, R. Brakel, H. Braune, S. Brezinsek, K.-J. Brunner, H. Damm, A. Dinklage, P. Drewelow, F. Effenberg, Y. Feng, O. Ford, G. Fuchert, Y. Gao, J. Geiger, O. Grulke, N. Harder, D. Hartmann, P. Helander, B. Heinemann, M. Hirsch, U. Höfel, ...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5098761 2019

  39. [39]

    Understanding detachment of the W7-X island divertor,

    Y. Feng, M. Jakubowski, R. König, M. Kry- chowiak, M. Otte, F. Reimold, D. Re- iter, O. Schmitz, D. Zhang, C. Beidler, C. Biedermann, S. Bozhenkov, K. Brunner, A. Dinklage, P. Drewelow, F. Effenberg, M. Endler, G. Fuchert, Y. Gao, J. Gei- ger, K. Hammond, P. Helander, C. Killer, J. Knauer, T. Kremeyer, E. Pasch, L. Rudis- chhauser, G. Schlisio, T. Sunn Pe...

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac0772 2021

  40. [40]

    The Large Helical Device (LHD) helical di- vertor,

    N. Ohyabu, T. Watanabe, H. Ji, H. Akao, T. Ono, T. Kawamura, K. Yamazaki, K. Akaishi, N. Inoue, A. Komori, Y. Kubota, N. Noda, A. Sagara, H. Suzuki, O. Mo- tojima, M. Fujiwara, and A. Iiyoshi, “The Large Helical Device (LHD) helical di- vertor,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 387, mar 1994. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/34/3/I07

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/34/3/i07 1994

  41. [41]

    HSX as an example of a resilient non-resonant divertor,

    A. Bader, A. H. Boozer, C. C. Hegna, S. A. Lazerson, and J. C. Schmitt, “HSX as an example of a resilient non-resonant divertor,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 032506, 03 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978494

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4978494 2017

  42. [42]

    Minimum magnetic curvature for resilient divertors using compact toroidal hybrid geometry,

    A. Bader, C. C. Hegna, M. Cianciosa, and G. J. Hartwell, “Minimum magnetic curvature for resilient divertors using compact toroidal hybrid geometry,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 60, no. 5, p. 054003, mar 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aab1ea

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aab1ea 2018

  43. [43]

    Explorationofnon-resonantdivertorfeatures on the Compact Toroidal Hybrid,

    K. Garcia, A. Bader, H. Frerichs, G. Hartwell, J. Schmitt, N. Allen, and O. Schmitz, “Explorationofnon-resonantdivertorfeatures on the Compact Toroidal Hybrid,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 63, no. 12, p. 126043, oct 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1741-4326/ad0160

    2023

  44. [44]

    Resilient stellarator divertor characteristics in the 44 helically symmetric experiment,

    K. A. Garcia, A. Bader, D. Boeyaert, A. H. Boozer, H. Frerichs, M. J. Gerard, A. Punjabi, and O. Schmitz, “Resilient stellarator divertor characteristics in the 44 helically symmetric experiment,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 67, no. 3, p. 035011, feb 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/adb179

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/adb179 2025

  45. [45]

    Three-dimensional simulation of H-mode plasmas with localized divertor impurity injection on Alcator C- Mod using the edge transport code EMC3- EIRENE,

    J. D. Lore, M. L. Reinke, D. Brunner, B. LaBombard, B. Lipschultz, J. Terry, R. A. Pitts, and Y. Feng, “Three-dimensional simulation of H-mode plasmas with localized divertor impurity injection on Alcator C- Mod using the edge transport code EMC3- EIRENE,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 22, no. 5, p. 056106, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4919393

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4919393 2015

  46. [46]

    EMC3-EIRENE model- ing of toroidally-localized divertor gas injection experiments on Alcator C- Mod,

    J. Lore, M. Reinke, B. LaBombard, B. Lipschultz, R. Churchill, R. Pitts, and Y. Feng, “EMC3-EIRENE model- ing of toroidally-localized divertor gas injection experiments on Alcator C- Mod,”Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 463, pp. 515–518, 2015, pLASMA- SURFACE INTERACTIONS 21. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0022...

    2015

  47. [47]

    EMC3-EIRENE simulations of edge plasma and impurity transportbytoroidallylocalizedargonseeding on CFETR X-divertor,

    T. Xie, H. Li, W. Zhang, R. Ding, L. Wang, Y. Luo, and D. Wang, “EMC3-EIRENE simulations of edge plasma and impurity transportbytoroidallylocalizedargonseeding on CFETR X-divertor,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 65, no. 2, p. 026006, dec 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1741-4326/ad9bc9

    2024

  48. [48]

    Can detached divertor plasmas be explained as self-sustained gas targets?

    P. Stangeby, “Can detached divertor plasmas be explained as self-sustained gas targets?” Nuclear Fusion, vol. 33, no. 11, p. 1695, nov

  49. [49]

    Available: https://doi.org/10

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1088/0029-5515/33/11/I10

  50. [50]

    Data and extended diffusion theories for neutral particle transport in tokamak divertors,

    W. M. Stacey, E. W. Thomas, and T. M. Evans, “Data and extended diffusion theories for neutral particle transport in tokamak divertors,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 3740–3756, 10 1995. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871074

    work page doi:10.1063/1.871074 1995

  51. [51]

    Divertor plasma de- tachment: Present status of understanding,

    S. I. Krasheninnikov, “Divertor plasma de- tachment: Present status of understanding,” Contributions to Plasma Physics, vol. 36, no. 2-3, pp. 293–303, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1002/ctpp.2150360236

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.2150360236 1996

  52. [52]

    Sim- ulation of dense recombining divertor plas- mas with a navier–stokes neutral transport model,

    D. A. Knoll, P. R. McHugh, S. I. Krasheninnikov, and D. J. Sigmar, “Sim- ulation of dense recombining divertor plas- mas with a navier–stokes neutral transport model,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 293–303, 01 1996. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871855

    work page doi:10.1063/1.871855 1996

  53. [53]

    Effect of 3D shear flow and 3D neutral turbulence on the propagation of a heat front towards the divertor plate in the gas blanket regime

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala, and J. Morrison, “Effect of 3D shear flow and 3D neutral turbulence on the propagation of a heat front towards the divertor plate in the gas blanket regime.” University of Texas, Austin, TX (United States), 12 1996. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/489374

    1996

  54. [54]

    K–ϵ compressible 3D neutral fluid turbulence modelling of the effect of toroidal cavities on flame-front propagation in the gas-blanket regime for tokamak divertors,

    G. Vahala, L. Vahala, J. Morrison, S. Krasheninnikov, and D. Sigmar, “K–ϵ compressible 3D neutral fluid turbulence modelling of the effect of toroidal cavities on flame-front propagation in the gas-blanket regime for tokamak divertors,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 155–173, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

    1997

  55. [55]

    Computational study of ITER- like dissipative divertor plasmas in the collisional limit,

    D. Knoll, “Computational study of ITER- like dissipative divertor plasmas in the collisional limit,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 133, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/38/1/312

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/38/1/312 1998

  56. [56]

    The role of friction in SOL pressure balance in Alcator C-Mod,

    C. Pitcher, J. Goetz, B. LaBombard, B. Lipschultz, J. Weaver, and B. Welch, “The role of friction in SOL pressure balance in Alcator C-Mod,”Journal of Nuclear Mater- ials, vol. 266-269, pp. 1009–1014, 1999. [On- line]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0022311598008502

    1999

  57. [57]

    High confinement dissip- ative divertor operation on alcator c-mod,

    J. A. Goetz, B. LaBombard, B. Lipschultz, C. S. Pitcher, J. L. Terry, C. Boswell, S. Gangadhara, D. Pappas, J. Weaver, B. Welch, R. L. Boivin, P. Bonoli, C. Fiore, R. Granetz, M. Greenwald, A. Hubbard, I. Hutchinson, J. Irby, E. Marmar, D. Mosses- sian, M. Porkolab, J. Rice, W. L. Rowan, G. Schilling, J. Snipes, Y. Takase, S. Wolfe, and S. Wukitch, “High ...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.873447 1906

  58. [58]

    Neutral atom temperature and flow measurements in the edge region of the Alcator C-mod tokamak,

    B. L. Welch, J. L. Weaver, H. R. Griem, W. A. Noonan, J. Terry, B. Lipschultz, and 45 C. S. Pitcher, “Neutral atom temperature and flow measurements in the edge region of the Alcator C-mod tokamak,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1253–1262, 04 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1355025

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1355025 2001

  59. [59]

    Transport in the toka- mak - reactor edge plasma with strong collisionality,

    V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva, I. Baranovsky, and R. Pitts, “Transport in the toka- mak - reactor edge plasma with strong collisionality,”Nuclear Materials and En- ergy, vol. 33, p. 101316, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2352179122001971

    2022

  60. [60]

    The GBS code for the self- consistent simulation of plasma turbulence and kinetic neutral dynamics in the toka- mak boundary,

    M. Giacomin, P. Ricci, A. Coroado, G. Fourestey, D. Galassi, E. Lanti, D. Mancini, N. Richart, L. Stenger, and N. Varini, “The GBS code for the self- consistent simulation of plasma turbulence and kinetic neutral dynamics in the toka- mak boundary,”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 463, p. 111294, 2022. [On- line]. Available: https://www.sciencedirec...

    2022

  61. [61]

    Doppler coherence imaging of divertor and SOL flows in ASDEX upgrade and Wendelstein 7-X,

    D. Gradic, O. P. Ford, A. Burckhart, F. Effenberg, H. Frerichs, R. König, T. Lunt, V. Perseo, R. C. Wolf, A. U. Team, W. .-X. Team, and E. M. team, “Doppler coherence imaging of divertor and SOL flows in ASDEX upgrade and Wendelstein 7-X,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 60, no. 8, p.084007, jun2018.[Online].Available: https: //dx.doi.org/10.108...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aac4d2

  62. [62]

    Investigation of conventional and Super-X divertor configurations of MAST Upgrade using scrape-off layer plasma simula- tion,

    E. Havlíčková, W. Fundamenski, M. Wischmeier, G. Fishpool, and A. W. Morris, “Investigation of conventional and Super-X divertor configurations of MAST Upgrade using scrape-off layer plasma simula- tion,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 56, no. 7, p. 075008, may 2014. [On- line]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0741-3335/56/7/075008

    2014

  63. [63]

    Efficacy of passive-limiter pumping of neutral particles,

    D. O. Overskei, “Efficacy of passive-limiter pumping of neutral particles,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 46, pp. 177–181, Jan 1981. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.46.177

    1981

  64. [65]

    Pump plenum pressure dependence on divertor plasma parameters and magnetic geometry in the DIII-D tokamak,

    R. Maingi, J. Watkins, M. Mahdavi, and L. Owen, “Pump plenum pressure dependence on divertor plasma parameters and magnetic geometry in the DIII-D tokamak,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 39, no. 9, p. 1187, sep 1999. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/0029-5515/39/9/311

    1999

  65. [66]

    Power and particle exhaust for the Infinity Two fusion pilot plant,

    A. Bader, A. Ayilaran, J. Canik, A. De, W. Guttenfelder, C. Hegna, M. Knilans, A. Malkus, T. Pedersen, P. Sinha, and et al., “Power and particle exhaust for the Infinity Two fusion pilot plant,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 91, no. 2, p. E67, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/ journals/journal-of-plasma-physics/article/ power-and...

    2025

  66. [67]

    Experimental investigation of transport phenomena in the scrape-off layer and divertor,

    B. Labombard, J. Goetz, I. Hutchin- son, D. Jablonski, J. Kesner, C. Kurz, B. Lipschultz, G. McCracken, A. Niem- czewski, J. Terry, A. Allen, R. Boivin, F. Bombarda, P. Bonoli, C. Christensen, C. Fiore, D. Garnier, S. Golovato, R. Granetz, M. Greenwald, S. Horne, A. Hubbard, J. Irby, D. Lo, D. Lumma, E. Marmar, M. May, A. Mazurenko, R. Nachtrieb, H. Ohkaw...

    1997

  67. [68]

    Divertor Physics Research on Alcator C-Mod,

    B. Lipschultz, B. LaBombard, J. L. Terry, C. Boswell, and I. H. H. and, “Divertor Physics Research on Alcator C-Mod,”Fusion Science and Technology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 369–389, 2007. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.13182/FST07-A1428

    work page doi:10.13182/fst07-a1428 2007

  68. [69]

    Divertor ‘death-ray’ explained: An artifact of a Langmuir 46 probe operating at negative bias in a high-recycling divertor,

    D. Brunner, M. Umansky, B. LaBom- bard, and T. Rognlien, “Divertor ‘death-ray’ explained: An artifact of a Langmuir 46 probe operating at negative bias in a high-recycling divertor,”Journal of Nuc- lear Materials, vol. 438, pp. S1196–S1199, 2013, proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Plasma-Surface Interactions in Controlled Fusion Devices. ...

    2013

  69. [70]

    Flare: field line analysis and reconstruction for 3d boundary plasma modeling,

    H. Frerichs, “Flare: field line analysis and reconstruction for 3d boundary plasma modeling,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 64, no. 10, p. 106034, sep 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad7303

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad7303 2024

  70. [71]

    The physics of turbulence localised to the tokamak divertor volume,

    N. Walkden, F. Riva, J. Harrison, and et al., “The physics of turbulence localised to the tokamak divertor volume,”Commun Phys, vol. 5, no. 139, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00906-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00906-2 2022

  71. [72]

    Edge plasma turbulence simulations in detached regimes with the SOLEDGE3X code,

    V. Quadri, P. Tamain, Y. Marandet, H. Buf- ferand, N. Rivals, G. Ciraolo, G. Falchetto, R. Düll, S. Sureshkumar, N. Varadara- jan, H. Yang, H. Reimerdes, D. Oliveira, and D. Mancini, “Edge plasma turbulence simulations in detached regimes with the SOLEDGE3X code,”Nuclear Materials and Energy, vol. 41, p. 101756, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scie...

    2024

  72. [73]

    Val- idation of edge turbulence codes against the TCV-X21 diverted L-mode reference case,

    D. Oliveira, T. Body, D. Galassi, C. Theiler, E. Laribi, P. Tamain, A. Stegmeir, M. Gi- acomin, W. Zholobenko, P. Ricci, H. Buf- ferand, J. Boedo, G. Ciraolo, C. Colandrea, D. Coster, H. de Oliveira, G. Fourestey, S. Gorno, F. Imbeaux, F. Jenko, V. Naulin, N. Offeddu, H. Reimerdes, E. Serre, C. Tsui, N. Varini, N. Vianello, M. Wiesenberger, C. Wüthrich, a...

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac4cde 2022

  73. [74]

    Modelling of impurity flow in the tokamak scrape-off layer,

    J. Neuhauser, W. Schneider, R. Wunderlich, and K. Lackner, “Modelling of impurity flow in the tokamak scrape-off layer,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 39, jan 1984. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/0029-5515/24/1/004

    1984

  74. [75]

    Kinetic effects and reversal flows in the tokamak edge plasma,

    S. Krasheninnikov, T. Soboleva, O. Batischev, G. Zmievskaya, V. Levchenko, P. Ovchenkov, Y. Sigov, and I. Silaev, “Kinetic effects and reversal flows in the tokamak edge plasma,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 196-198, pp. 899–903, 1992, plasma-Surface Interac- tions in Controlled Fusion Devices. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ sci...

    1992

  75. [76]

    SOLPS-ITER modelling of helium transport, recycling and pumping at the ASDEX Upgrade toka- mak,

    A. Zito, O. Pan, M. Wischmeier, A. Kapp- atou, A. Kallenbach, S. Makarov, M. Bernert, M. Cavedon, D. Reiter, U. Stroth, and the ASDEX Upgrade Team, “SOLPS-ITER modelling of helium transport, recycling and pumping at the ASDEX Upgrade toka- mak,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 65, no. 4, p. 046022, mar 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/adbe90

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/adbe90 2025

  76. [77]

    Minimum Ionic Kinetic Energy for a Stable Sheath,

    D. Bohm, “Minimum Ionic Kinetic Energy for a Stable Sheath,” inThe Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields, A. Guthrie and R. K. Wakerling, Eds. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1949, pp. 77–86. [Online]. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/ 1372257544375629953

    1949

  77. [78]

    Plasma–wall transition in an oblique magnetic field,

    R. Chodura, “Plasma–wall transition in an oblique magnetic field,”The Physics of Fluids, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1628– 1633, 09 1982. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.863955

    work page doi:10.1063/1.863955 1982

  78. [79]

    The Bohm criterion and sheath formation,

    K. U. Riemann, “The Bohm criterion and sheath formation,”Journal of Physics D, vol. 24, pp. 493–518, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:14086781

    1991

  79. [80]

    The bohm–chodura plasma sheath criterion,

    P. C. Stangeby, “The bohm–chodura plasma sheath criterion,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 702–706, 03 1995. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871483

    work page doi:10.1063/1.871483 1995

  80. [81]

    Simple models for the radial and poloidal E ×B drifts in the scrape-off layer of a divertor tokamak: Effects on in/out asymmetries,

    P. Stangeby and A. Chankin, “Simple models for the radial and poloidal E ×B drifts in the scrape-off layer of a divertor tokamak: Effects on in/out asymmetries,”Nuclear Fusion, vol. 36, no. 7, p. 839, jul 1996. [Online]. Available: https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/36/7/I02

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/36/7/i02 1996

Showing first 80 references.