On the Probability a Weighted Bernoulli Sum Exceeds Its Mean
Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 05:13 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
For weights summing to 1, a weighted sum of i.i.d. Bernoulli(p) trials satisfies P[X ≥ E[X]] ≥ p whenever p ≤ 1/3.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Let w1 to wm be positive reals summing to 1 and let v1 to vm be independent Bernoulli(p) random variables. Let X be the weighted sum sum wi vi. The paper conjectures that P(X ≥ E[X]) ≥ p for every p between 0 and 1/3 inclusive. It further observes that a suitable form of the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture is sufficient to prove the probability lower bound when p is small enough.
What carries the argument
The link between the probability inequality and a version of the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture, which is used to prove the bound for small p.
If this is right
- The conjectured bound holds for all sufficiently small p.
- If the invoked MMS statement is true, then the probability inequality holds for all p ≤ 1/3.
- The result applies uniformly to any choice of positive weights summing to one.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The bound might extend to p larger than 1/3 for some weights, though this is not addressed.
- Similar inequalities could be studied for other distributions beyond Bernoulli.
- Numerical checks for moderate p could provide supporting evidence or counterexamples.
Load-bearing premise
The version of the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture invoked holds in the needed form for the small-p regime.
What would settle it
A counterexample consisting of specific weights summing to 1 and a value of p at most 1/3 where the probability P[X ≥ E[X]] falls below p would disprove the conjecture.
read the original abstract
Let $w_1, \dots, w_m$ be positive real weights whose sum is $1$, and let $v_1, \dots, v_m$ be i.i.d. Bernoulli$(p)$ random variables. If we let $X=\sum_{i=1}^m w_i v_i$, then we conjecture that for all $0\leq p\leq 1/3$ we have \[\mathbb{P}\big[X\geq \mathbb{E}[X]\big]\geq p.\] In this short note, we observe a connection of this conjecture with a version of the Manickam-Mikl\'os-Singhi conjecture, which allows one to prove it for sufficiently small values of $p$.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript conjectures that for positive weights w_1 to w_m summing to 1 and X the corresponding weighted sum of i.i.d. Bernoulli(p) random variables, P(X ≥ E[X]) ≥ p holds for all 0 ≤ p ≤ 1/3. It further observes that a connection to a version of the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture yields a proof of the bound for all sufficiently small p.
Significance. If established, the conjectured bound would give a uniform, parameter-free lower bound on the probability that a weighted Bernoulli sum meets or exceeds its mean, with potential implications for concentration and extremal problems in probability. The explicit link to the MMS conjecture is a constructive observation that correctly reduces the small-p regime to an existing combinatorial statement; this partial result is presented as conditional rather than unconditional.
major comments (1)
- [the paragraph discussing the connection to the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture] The abstract and the note on the MMS connection assert that the link 'allows one to prove' the bound for sufficiently small p, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit derivation nor the precise form of the MMS conjecture invoked. This is load-bearing for the partial result claimed in the abstract, as the reader cannot verify the reduction from the given text alone.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting this point about the presentation of the MMS connection. We address the major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The abstract and the note on the MMS connection assert that the link 'allows one to prove' the bound for sufficiently small p, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit derivation nor the precise form of the MMS conjecture invoked. This is load-bearing for the partial result claimed in the abstract, as the reader cannot verify the reduction from the given text alone.
Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not currently supply the explicit derivation or the precise statement of the version of the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture invoked. The reduction is therefore not verifiable from the text as written. In the revised version we will add a self-contained paragraph (or short section) that states the relevant form of the MMS conjecture and outlines the steps by which it yields the claimed bound for all sufficiently small p. This change will make the partial result fully checkable while preserving the note's brevity and focus. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity identified
full rationale
The paper states a probability conjecture for all p ≤ 1/3 and observes that a version of the external Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture implies the bound only for sufficiently small p. No equations or steps reduce the target probability bound to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The partial result is explicitly conditional on an independent combinatorial conjecture whose authors do not overlap with the present paper, and the full statement remains open. This satisfies the criteria for a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption A version of the Manickam-Miklós-Singhi conjecture holds and applies to prove the probability bound for sufficiently small p
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Bier and N
T. Bier and N. Manickam,The first distribution invariant of the Johnson-scheme,SEAMS Bull. Math.11(1987), 61–68
1987
-
[2]
Manickam and D
N. Manickam and D. Mikl´ os,On the number of nonnegative partial sums of a nonnegative sum, InColloq. Math. Soc. Janos Bolyai52(1987), 385–392
1987
-
[3]
Manickam and N
N. Manickam and N. M. Singhi,First distribution invariants and EKR theorems,J. Combin. Theory Ser. A48(1988), 91–103
1988
-
[4]
N. Alon, Y. Emek, M. Feldman, and M. Tennenholtz,Adversarial leakage in games,SIAM J. Discrete Math.27(2013), 363–385
2013
-
[5]
N. Alon, P. Frankl, H. Huang, V. R¨ odl, A. Ruci´ nski, and B. Sudakov,Large matchings in uniform hypergraphs and the conjectures of Erd˝ os and Samuels,J. Combin. Theory Ser. A119(2012), 1200–1215
2012
-
[6]
N. Alon, H. Huang, and B. Sudakov,Nonnegative k-sums, fractional covers, and probability of small deviations,J. Combin. Theory Ser. B,102(2012), 784–796
2012
-
[7]
Cs´ oka,Limits of some combinatorial problems,Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics,49(2015), 577–581
E. Cs´ oka,Limits of some combinatorial problems,Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics,49(2015), 577–581
2015
-
[8]
Alfonso Fernandez, MathStackExchange question,Convex Combinations of Low Probability Bernoulli Variables, https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/265163/convex-combinations-of-low-probability-bernoulli-variables
-
[9]
Fokkink, L
R. Fokkink, L. Meester, C. Pelekis,Optimizing stakes in simultaneous bets,ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.20 (2023), 153–165
2023
-
[10]
Tyomkyn,An improved bound for the Manickam–Mikl´ os–Singhi conjecture,European J
M. Tyomkyn,An improved bound for the Manickam–Mikl´ os–Singhi conjecture,European J. Combin.33(2012), 27–32
2012
-
[11]
Greenberg and M
S. Greenberg and M. Mohri,Tight lower bound on the probability of a binomial exceeding its expectation,Statistics & Probability Letters86(2014), 91–98
2014
-
[12]
Pelekis and J
C. Pelekis and J. Ramon,A lower bound on the probability that a binomial random variable is exceeding its mean, Statistics & Probability Letters119(2016), 305–309
2016
-
[13]
Doerr,An elementary analysis of the probability that a binomial random variable exceeds its expectation,Statistics & Probability Letters139(2018), 67–74
B. Doerr,An elementary analysis of the probability that a binomial random variable exceeds its expectation,Statistics & Probability Letters139(2018), 67–74
2018
-
[14]
Pokrovskiy,A linear bound on the Manickam–Mikl´ os–Singhi conjecture,J
A. Pokrovskiy,A linear bound on the Manickam–Mikl´ os–Singhi conjecture,J. Combin. Theory Ser. A133(2015), 280–306
2015
-
[15]
S. M. Samuels,On a Chebyshev-type inequality for sums of independent random variables,Ann. Math. Statist.37(1966), 248–259
1966
-
[16]
S. M. Samuels,More on a Chebyshev-type inequality for sums of independent random variables, Purdue Stat. Dept. Mimeo. Series no.155(1968)
1968
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.