pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31189 · v1 · pith:XBHUUXFYnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Probing IMF Variations in High-Redshift Early-Type Galaxies with SHARP

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords initial mass functionearly-type galaxieshigh-redshift galaxiesE-ELTIMF variationsstellar populationsgalaxy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

The SHARP spectrograph on the E-ELT will enable spatially resolved spectroscopy of IMF-sensitive features in high-redshift early-type galaxies up to z~3.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes that the SHARP spectrograph on the E-ELT can be used to study the stellar initial mass function in early-type galaxies at redshifts up to 3. Local observations indicate bottom-heavy IMFs in galaxy centers, while chemical enrichment points to top-heavy IMFs in the early universe. A time-evolving IMF could explain both sets of data. SHARP's superior resolution and sensitivity compared to existing facilities would make such measurements possible for the first time.

Core claim

The SHARP spectrograph on the E-ELT, with unprecedented spatial resolution and sensitivity compared to facilities such as JWST, and broader spectral coverage than other E-ELT instruments, will enable spatially resolved spectroscopy of IMF-sensitive features in high-redshift ETGs up to z~3, providing unique insights into the origin of the non-universal IMF in massive galaxies.

What carries the argument

SHARP spectrograph on the E-ELT for spatially resolved spectroscopy of IMF-sensitive features

Load-bearing premise

The tension between bottom-heavy IMF in local ETGs and the requirement for top-heavy IMF from chemical enrichment is best explained by a time-evolving IMF.

What would settle it

If SHARP observations show no evidence of IMF differences at high redshift compared to local values, the time-evolving IMF hypothesis would be challenged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31189 by A. Gallazzi, A. Gargiulo, A. Vazdekis, C. Tortora, F. Ditrani, F. Fontanot, F. La Barbera, G. De Lucia, M. Longhetti, P. Franzetti, P. Saracco, S. Zibetti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The stellar IMF is shown for different parametriza￾tions: the Kroupa IMF (black); a Kroupa-like bimodal IMF, obtained for Γb = 1.3 (blue dashed line; shifted slightly upwards for clarity); a low-mass tapered bottom-heavy bimodal IMF (red), with Γb = 3.3, representative of the central regions of massive ETGs at 𝑧 ∼ 0; and a double-component IMF (green), used here only for illustrative purposes (see Sec. 3.2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: IMF–𝜎 relation from LB13. The plotted quantity is Γb , the logarithmic slope of the bimodal IMF at 𝑚 ≳ 0.6 M⊙; the IMF is smoothly tapered towards lower stellar masses. Increasing Γb increases the dwarf-to-giant ratio and the contribution of low-mass stars. Galaxies with low velocity dispersion exhibit Kroupa-like IMFs, whereas systems with high 𝜎 show increasingly bottom-heavy IMFs. The data points repres… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Observed wavelength as a function of redshift for var￾ious spectral features: those sensitive to age (green), metallicity and abundance ratios (blue), and the IMF (red), as indicated in the top-right of the plot (see text for details). Grey vertical bands indicate regions affected by strong telluric absorption, where spectral features cannot be reliably measured. Dashed horizontal lines mark the redshifts … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Redshift evolution of the r-band stellar mass-to￾light ratio (M⋆∕Lr ) for the different IMF parametrizations as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Surface brightness profile of a typical compact galaxy at redshift z ∼ 1.2, adopting structural parameters from Gargiulo et al. (2012). The dotted line shows a Sérsic profile with index n = 2.2, an effective radius of 100 mas (indicated by the dashed red vertical line), and a total H￾band magnitude of 20.9 mag. The points represent the profile integrated over SHARP–NEXUS pixels of size 35 mas/px. At 𝑅 = 𝑅𝑒… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The stellar initial mass function (IMF), which describes the distribution of stellar masses at birth, is a fundamental ingredient in shaping galaxy evolution. Recent observations indicate that the IMF varies between galaxies, depending on their mass, morphology, and stellar content. In local early-type galaxies (ETGs), spectroscopy, dynamics, and lensing reveal bottom-heavy IMFs in dense central regions, with radial gradients toward a Milky Way-like distribution in the outskirts. Yet, the chemical enrichment of massive ETGs implies a dominant role of massive stars during their early formation phases. These findings can be reconciled if the IMF evolves over cosmic time -- initially more top-heavy to enable rapid enrichment, and later dominated by long-lived, low-mass stars. Directly measuring the IMF at z>1 is therefore essential to test such time-dependent IMF scenarios, including variations in the dwarf-to-giant and stellar mass-to-light ratios. To date, no direct observational confirmation of these IMF variations -- or of their physical origin -- has been obtained. The SHARP spectrograph on the E-ELT, with unprecedented spatial resolution and sensitivity compared to facilities such as JWST, and broader spectral coverage than other E-ELT instruments, will enable spatially resolved spectroscopy of IMF-sensitive features in high-redshift ETGs up to z~3, providing unique insights into the origin of the non-universal IMF in massive galaxies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a forward-looking science case arguing that the SHARP spectrograph on the E-ELT will enable spatially resolved spectroscopy of IMF-sensitive features in high-redshift early-type galaxies (ETGs) up to z~3. It motivates this by noting the tension between bottom-heavy IMFs observed locally in ETGs and the top-heavy star formation implied by chemical enrichment, suggesting that a time-evolving IMF could reconcile the observations, and positions SHARP's resolution, sensitivity, and spectral coverage as uniquely suited to test this scenario compared to JWST and other E-ELT instruments.

Significance. If the claimed capabilities hold, the work identifies a clear observational path to directly constrain IMF evolution at cosmic epochs when massive ETGs assembled, addressing a key open question in galaxy formation. The emphasis on spatially resolved high-z spectroscopy is a strength, as it targets radial gradients and time dependence that local studies cannot access. No machine-checked proofs or reproducible code are present, as expected for a science case, but the falsifiable prediction of measurable IMF variations at z>1 is explicitly framed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that SHARP 'will enable spatially resolved spectroscopy of IMF-sensitive features in high-redshift ETGs up to z~3' is load-bearing but unsupported by any quantitative estimates of required exposure times, achievable S/N on IMF-sensitive lines (e.g., Na I, Ca II, or TiO features), or resolution requirements at z~3; without such analysis the feasibility assertion cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (motivation paragraph): The premise that the local bottom-heavy vs. chemical-enrichment tension is best resolved by a time-evolving IMF is presented as the scenario to test, yet no quantitative comparison is made to alternative explanations (e.g., systematics in local dynamical/lensing IMF measurements or variations in star-formation efficiency), which weakens the justification for why SHARP observations would uniquely discriminate among models.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The manuscript would benefit from explicit references to the specific IMF-sensitive spectral features and wavelength ranges that SHARP's broader coverage would access, to clarify the advantage over other E-ELT instruments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the presentation of our science case. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that SHARP 'will enable spatially resolved spectroscopy of IMF-sensitive features in high-redshift ETGs up to z~3' is load-bearing but unsupported by any quantitative estimates of required exposure times, achievable S/N on IMF-sensitive lines (e.g., Na I, Ca II, or TiO features), or resolution requirements at z~3; without such analysis the feasibility assertion cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's central claim would be strengthened by quantitative support. The manuscript is a forward-looking science case relying on SHARP's advertised specifications, but it does not include explicit exposure time, S/N, or resolution calculations. In the revised version we will add these estimates (e.g., for Na I, Ca II, and TiO features at z~3) in a dedicated subsection or appendix, and we will update the abstract to reference the new analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (motivation paragraph): The premise that the local bottom-heavy vs. chemical-enrichment tension is best resolved by a time-evolving IMF is presented as the scenario to test, yet no quantitative comparison is made to alternative explanations (e.g., systematics in local dynamical/lensing IMF measurements or variations in star-formation efficiency), which weakens the justification for why SHARP observations would uniquely discriminate among models.

    Authors: The manuscript uses the local IMF–enrichment tension to motivate testing time-dependent IMF evolution. We acknowledge that a more explicit discussion of alternatives would provide better context. In revision we will expand the motivation section to include a concise comparison with alternatives such as systematics in local dynamical or lensing measurements and variations in star-formation efficiency, and we will note how spatially resolved high-z spectroscopy can help discriminate among these possibilities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward-looking science case with no derivation chain

full rationale

The document is a prospective science case for the SHARP instrument on E-ELT, outlining expected capabilities for high-redshift IMF measurements. It contains no equations, parameter fits, predictions derived from internal data, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to inputs by construction. The abstract and framing motivate observations by referencing existing literature tensions (local bottom-heavy IMF vs. chemical enrichment) but assert no new derivations or uniqueness theorems; the central claim is instrumental enablement up to z~3, which stands independently of any internal reduction. This matches the default expectation of non-circularity for non-analytical papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the document is an observational proposal without quantitative modeling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5834 in / 1180 out tokens · 58825 ms · 2026-07-01T05:01:38.802115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Smith, R

    Alton, P. D., Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1594

  2. [2]

    D., Smith, R

    Alton, P. D., Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4464

  3. [3]

    W., Treu, T., Bolton, A

    Auger, M. W., Treu, T., Bolton, A. S., et al., 2010, ApJ, 724, 511 Barnabé, M., Czoske, O., Koopmans, L. V. E., et al., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2215

  4. [4]

    Barro, G., et al., 2013, ApJ, 765, 104

  5. [5]

    Belli, S., et al., 2017, ApJ, 834, 30

  6. [6]

    Bensby, T., et al., 2017, A&A, 605, A89 Calura F., Menci N., 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1347 Calura F., Gilli R., Vignali C., Pozzi F., Pipino A., Matteucci F., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 2765

  7. [7]

    Cappellari, M., et al., 2012, Nature, 484, 485

  8. [8]

    Cappellari, M., et al., 2013, MNRAS, 432, 1862

  9. [9]

    J., 1986, ApJ, 311, 637

    Carter, D., Visvanathan, N., Pickles, A. J., 1986, ApJ, 311, 637

  10. [10]

    J., Gorgas, J., Vazdekis, A., et al., 2003, MNRAS, 339, L12 Chabriér, G., Hennebelle, P., Charlot, S., 2014, A&A, 577, A123

    Cenarro, A. J., Gorgas, J., Vazdekis, A., et al., 2003, MNRAS, 339, L12 Chabriér, G., Hennebelle, P., Charlot, S., 2014, A&A, 577, A123

  11. [11]

    M., et al., 2023, MNRAS, 526, 4004

    Cheng, C. M., et al., 2023, MNRAS, 526, 4004

  12. [12]

    Chon, S., Hosokawa, T., Omukai, K., Schneider, R., 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2453

  13. [13]

    G., 1978, ApJ, 221, 788

    Cohen, J. G., 1978, ApJ, 221, 788

  14. [14]

    J., Abraham, R

    Damjanov, I., McCarthy, P. J., Abraham, R. G., et al., 2009, ApJ, 695, 101 Davé, R. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1470

  15. [15]

    Dekel, A., Burkert, A., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1870

  16. [16]

    R., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 5612

    Delisle, S., Hardy, E., 1992, AJ, 103, 711 Domínguez Sánchez, H., Bernardi, M., Brownstein, J. R., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 5612

  17. [17]

    Dong, H., Olsen, K., Lauer, T., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5379

  18. [18]

    A., Mendel, J

    Dutton, A. A., Mendel, J. T., Simard, L., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 33

  19. [19]

    Eftekhari, E., Vazdekis, A., La Barbera, F., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 2190 Eftekhari,E.,LaBarbera,F.,Vazdekis,A.,etal.,2022a,MNRAS,512,378

  20. [20]

    M., French, H

    Faber, S. M., French, H. B., 1980, ApJ, 235, 405

  21. [21]

    A., 2024, MNRAS, 531, 267

    Walker, S. A., 2024, MNRAS, 531, 267

  22. [22]

    Ferreras, I., Saha, P., Williams, L. L. R., 2005, ApJ, 623, 5

  23. [23]

    Ferreras, I., Saha, P., Burles, S., 2008, MNRAS, 383, 857

  24. [24]

    Ferreras, I., Saha, P., Leier, D., et al., 2010, MNRAS, 409, L30

  25. [25]

    Ferreras, I., et al., 2013, MNRAS, 429, L15 Ferreras,I.,Weidner,C.,Vazdekis,A.,LaBarbera,F.,2015,MNRAS,448, 82

  26. [26]

    Fontanot, F., La Barbera, F., De Lucia, G., Pasquali, A., Vazdekis, A., 2018b, MNRAS, 479, 5678 Fontanot,F.,LaBarbera,F.,DeLucia,G.,Pasquali,A.,Vazdekis,A.,2024, A&A, 686, A302

  27. [27]

    Fontanot, F., De Lucia, G., Xie, L., Zibetti, S., La Barbera, F., Cantarella, S., Hirschmann, M., Charlot, S., Bruzual, G., 2026, A&A, submitted (arXiv:2603.22405)

  28. [28]

    Forrest, B., et al., 2022, ApJ, 927, 123

  29. [29]

    A., Persson, S

    Frogel, J. A., Persson, S. E., Aaronson, M., Matthews, K., 1978, ApJ, 220, 75

  30. [30]

    A., Persson, S

    Frogel, J. A., Persson, S. E., Cohen, J. G., 1980, ApJ, 240, 785 Gall C., Andersen A. C., Hjorth J., 2011, A&A, 528, A13

  31. [31]

    R., Pasquali, A., Zibetti, S., La Barbera, F., 2021, MNRAS, 502, 4457 Gargiulo,A.,Saracco,P.,Longhetti,M.,LaBarbera,F.,Tamburri,S.,2012, MNRAS, 425, 2698

    Gallazzi, A. R., Pasquali, A., Zibetti, S., La Barbera, F., 2021, MNRAS, 502, 4457 Gargiulo,A.,Saracco,P.,Longhetti,M.,LaBarbera,F.,Tamburri,S.,2012, MNRAS, 425, 2698

  32. [32]

    Gargiulo, A., Saracco, P., Longhetti, M., Tamburri, S., Lonoce, I., Ciocca, F., 2015, A&A, 573, 110

  33. [33]

    Gibson, B. K. & Matteucci, F. 1997, MNRAS, 291, L8

  34. [34]

    Gunawardhana, M. L. P., Hopkins, A. M., Sharp, R. G., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1647

  35. [35]

    Hardy, E., Couture, J., 1988, ApJ, 325, 29

  36. [36]

    & Grudić, M

    Hennebelle, P. & Grudić, M. Y. 2024, ARAA, 62, 63

  37. [37]

    Hopkins, P. F. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 170

  38. [38]

    M., 2018, PASA, 35, 39 Jeřábková, T., et al., 2018, A&A, 620, 39

    Hopkins, A. M., 2018, PASA, 35, 39 Jeřábková, T., et al., 2018, A&A, 620, 39

  39. [39]

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 La Barbera, F., Ferreras, I., Vazdekis, A., et al., 2013, MNRAS, 433, 3017 La Barbera, F., Ferreras, I., Vazdekis, A., 2015, MNRAS, 449, L137 La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., Ferreras, I., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1468 La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., Ferreras, I., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3597 La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., Fe...

  40. [40]

    Larson, R. B. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 569

  41. [41]

    Lecureur, A., Hill, V., Zoccali, M., et al., 2007, A&A, 465, 799

  42. [42]

    Leier, D., Ferreras, I., Saha, P., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3677

  43. [43]

    Maksymowicz-Maciata, M., Spiniello, C., Martín-Navarro, I., et al., 2024, MNRAS, 531, 2864

  44. [44]

    Maraston, C., 2005, MNRAS, 362, 799 Maraston,C.,Strömbäck,G.,Thomas,D.,etal.,2020,MNRAS,496,2962

  45. [45]

    Marks, M., Kroupa, P., Dabringhausen, J., & Pawlowski, M. S. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 2246 Mármol-Queraltó,E.,Sánchez-Blázquez,P.,Vazdekis,A.,etal.,2009,ApJ, 706, 212 Martín-Navarro, I., La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., et al., 2015a, MNRAS, 447, 1033 Martín-Navarro, I., La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., et al., 2015b, ApJ, 806, L31 Martín-Navarro, I., La Barbera, F., ...

  46. [46]

    1994, A&A, 288, 57

    Matteucci, F. 1994, A&A, 288, 57

  47. [47]

    Muzzin, A., et al., 2013, ApJ, 777, 18

  48. [48]

    & Davé, R

    Narayanan, D. & Davé, R. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2892 Navarro-González, J., Ricciardelli, E., Quilis, V., Vazdekis, A., 2013, MNRAS, 436, 3507 F. La Barbera et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 10 of 12 The stellar IMF atz>1with SHARP

  49. [49]

    B., Ellis, R

    Newman, A. B., Ellis, R. S., Andreon, S., et al., 2014, ApJ, 788, 51

  50. [50]

    B., Smith, R

    Newman, A. B., Smith, R. J., Conroy, C., Villaume, A., van Dokkum, P., 2017, ApJ, 845, 157

  51. [51]

    P., Naab, T., et al., 2010, ApJ, 725, 2312

    Oser, L., Ostriker, J. P., Naab, T., et al., 2010, ApJ, 725, 2312

  52. [52]

    L., Vincenzo, F., Lacchin, E

    Palla, M., Calura, F., Matteucci, F., Fan, X. L., Vincenzo, F., Lacchin, E. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2355

  53. [53]

    W., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 3954P

    Parikh, T., Treu, T., Auger, M. W., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 3954P

  54. [54]

    P., Thi, W.-F., Miniati, F., Viti, S., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1705

    Papadopoulos, P. P., Thi, W.-F., Miniati, F., Viti, S., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1705

  55. [55]

    W., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3456

    Rock, B., Treu, T., Auger, M. W., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3456

  56. [56]

    P., Ivison, R

    Romano, D., Matteucci, F., Zhang, Z.-Y., Papadopoulos, P. P., Ivison, R. J. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 401

  57. [57]

    Rubin, K. H. R., Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W., et al., 2025, ApJ, 981, 31

  58. [58]

    Saracco, P., Longhetti, M., Gargiulo, A., et al., 2020, ApJ, 905, 40

  59. [59]

    Sarzi, M., Spiniello, C., La Barbera, F., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4084S Schaerer,D.,Guibert,J.,Marques-Chaves,R.,Martins,F.,2025,A&A,693, 15

  60. [60]

    & Krumholz, M

    Sharda, P. & Krumholz, M. R. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 1959

  61. [61]

    Schiavon, R., Barbuy, B., Rossi, S. C. F., et al., 1997, ApJ, 479, 902

  62. [62]

    Slob, M., et al., 2025, A&A, 702, 110

  63. [63]

    J., Lucey, J

    Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., 2013, MNRASL, 434, 1964

  64. [64]

    Smith, R. J. 2014, MNRAS, 443, L69

  65. [65]

    J., Lucey, J

    Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., Conroy, C., 2015, MNRASL, 449, 3441

  66. [66]

    J., Lucey, J

    Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., Conroy, C., et al., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2006

  67. [67]

    J., 2020, ARA&A, 58, 577

    Smith, R. J., 2020, ARA&A, 58, 577

  68. [68]

    Spiniello, C., Trager, S., Koopmans, L., et al., 2012, ApJ, 753, L32

  69. [69]

    Spiniello, C., Trager, S., Koopmans, L., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1483

  70. [70]

    Spiniello, C., La Barbera, F., Tortora, C., et al., 2021, A&A, 645, A99

  71. [71]

    Spiniello, C., Saracco, P., La Barbera, F., et al., 2024, MNRAS, 527, 8793

  72. [72]

    J., 1971, ApJ, 164, 200

    Spinrad, H., Taylor, B. J., 1971, ApJ, 164, 200

  73. [73]

    Thomas, J., et al., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 545

  74. [74]

    J., Napolitano, N

    Tortora, C., Romanowsky, A. J., Napolitano, N. R., et al., 2013, ApJ, 765, 8

  75. [75]

    W., Koopmans, L., et al., 2010, ApJ, 709, 1195

    Treu, T., Auger, M. W., Koopmans, L., et al., 2010, ApJ, 709, 1195

  76. [76]

    G., et al., 2008, ApJ, 677, L5 van Dokkum, P

    Trujillo, I., et al., MNRAS, 373, L36 Trujillo,I.,Cenarro,A.J.,deLorenzo-Cáceres,A.,etal.,2009,ApJL,692, L118 van Dokkum, P. G., et al., 2008, ApJ, 677, L5 van Dokkum, P. G., Conroy, C., 2010, Nature, 468, 940 van Dokkum, P. G., Conroy, C., 2011, ApJ, 735, 13 van Dokkum, P., Conroy, C., Villaume, A., et al., 2015, ApJ, 813, 23 van Dokkum, P., Conroy, C., ...

  77. [77]

    F., Beckman, J

    Vazdekis, A., Casuso, E., Peletier, R. F., Beckman, J. E., 1996, ApJS, 106, 307

  78. [78]

    F., Beckman, J

    Vazdekis, A., Peletier, R. F., Beckman, J. E., Casuso, E., 1997, ApJS, 111, 203

  79. [79]

    J., Gorgas, J., Cardiel, N., Peletier, R

    Vazdekis, A., Cenarro, A. J., Gorgas, J., Cardiel, N., Peletier, R. F., 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1317

  80. [80]

    Vazdekis, A., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Falcón-Barroso, J., et al., 2010, MN- RAS, 404, 1639

Showing first 80 references.