pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31312 · v1 · pith:XLQ57QIBnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Dissecting the Obscured Core of GN20: an Active Galactic Nucleus Outshone by Young Stars

M. Hamed , L. Colina , P. G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez , J. \'Alvarez M\'arquez , A. Crespo G\'omez , L. A. Boogaard , A. Bik , H. \"Ubler
show 12 more authors
S. E. I. Bosman A. Alonso-Herrero M. Perna S. Arribas L. Ulivi M. Annunziatella L. Costantin A. Labiano C.-L. Liao C. Prieto-Jim\'enez P. van der Werf F. Walter
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords GN20active galactic nucleistar formationspectral energy distributionJWSThigh-redshift galaxiesdusty star-forming galaxiesblack hole growth
0
0 comments X

The pith

The nuclear core of GN20 requires a 34 percent AGN fraction to fit its mid-infrared excess while the full galaxy shows only 9 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs spatially resolved SED fitting on GN20, a luminous dusty star-forming galaxy at redshift above 4, using JWST NIRCam, MIRI, NIRSpec, HST, and millimeter data. It separates a nuclear aperture of about 1 kiloparsec from the full 9.9 kiloparsec galaxy to decompose the energy contributions from stars and AGN. The integrated SED is dominated by stellar-heated dust with only marginal AGN input. The nuclear region instead needs a substantial AGN component to explain the mid-infrared excess at rest-frame 2.5 to 3.6 micrometers from torus dust. This shows how a buried AGN can be outshone by young stars on larger scales and still align with existing upper limits.

Core claim

Spatially resolved spectral energy distribution decomposition shows that the nuclear core of GN20 requires an AGN fraction of 0.34 plus or minus 0.05 to account for the mid-infrared excess at rest-frame 2.5 to 3.6 micrometers characteristic of AGN-heated torus dust. The AGN supplies about 34 percent of the nuclear infrared luminosity but only about 9 percent of the total integrated luminosity. The integrated SED is dominated by stellar-heated dust with an AGN fraction of 0.09 plus or minus 0.02.

What carries the argument

Spatially resolved Bayesian SED fitting with CIGALE applied separately to the nuclear aperture (radius 0.14 arcsec) and the full galaxy aperture (radius 1.4 arcsec), using 42 NIRSpec wavelength bins plus MIRI data to isolate the mid-infrared excess.

If this is right

  • The AGN contribution remains weak in galaxy-wide diagnostics and matches existing Spitzer spectroscopy upper limits.
  • The inferred black hole mass places GN20 on the local black hole to bulge mass relation when accreting at the Eddington limit.
  • At sub-Eddington accretion rates the black hole appears overmassive relative to the bulge.
  • Black hole assembly occurred early and rapidly alongside the dominant starburst phase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High angular resolution infrared data may be required to detect similar buried AGNs in other high-redshift dusty galaxies where star formation dominates global measurements.
  • The same nuclear versus integrated decomposition approach could be applied to additional luminous dusty star-forming systems to measure how common obscured AGN activity is during peak cosmic star formation.
  • If the AGN fraction varies with aperture size in other objects, integrated surveys may systematically underestimate the role of black holes at early epochs.

Load-bearing premise

The mid-infrared excess seen in the nuclear aperture comes from dust heated by an AGN torus rather than from hot stellar dust or other dust arrangements.

What would settle it

Mid-infrared spectroscopy of the nuclear region that detects no AGN torus emission features while still showing the excess would indicate the excess arises from non-AGN sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31312 by A. Alonso-Herrero, A. Bik, A. Crespo G\'omez, A. Labiano, C.-L. Liao, C. Prieto-Jim\'enez, F. Walter, H. \"Ubler, J. \'Alvarez M\'arquez, L. A. Boogaard, L. Colina, L. Costantin, L. Ulivi, M. Annunziatella, M. Hamed, M. Perna, P. G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez, P. van der Werf, S. Arribas, S. E. I. Bosman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: JWST/NIRSpec IFU PRISM binned channel maps of GN20 at three representative observed wavelengths sampling the rest-frame UV (∼0.20 µm), optical (∼0.51 µm), and NIR (∼0.90 µm). All maps are shown in units of nJy. The solid cyan circle indicates the nuclear aperture used for core photometry (r = 0.14′′), adopted for all bands PSF-matched to the F770W resolution (NIRCam, MIRI F560W, MIRI F770W, and NIRSpec). T… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: NIRSpec continuum fluxes with NIRCam (circles) and MIRI (di￾amonds) broadband photometry for GN20. The red and blue lines show the NIRSpec pseudo-continuum extracted within the core (r=0.14′′) and integrated (r=1.4′′) apertures, with shaded regions indicating the ±1σ uncertainty. The core spectrum is shown only at wavelengths where it is detected (λ ≳ 2.3 µm), at shorter wavelengths, 3σ upper limits from b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spectral energy distributions of GN20. Left: Nuclear core (r = 0.14′′ ∼ 1 kpc physical at z = 4.055). Right: Integrated aperture (r = 1.4 ′′ , encompassing the entire galaxy). Observed photometry from HST (purple circles), JWST NIRCam (orange squares), JWST MIRI (red diamonds), JWST NIRSpec IFU continuum (blue dots), NOEMA 1.1 mm (brown pentagon), and PdBI 880 µm (teal hexagon). Upper limits shown as downw… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: compares the GN20 SEDs (the core and the in￾tegrated) with the two components (E and W) of SPT0311-58 (Álvarez-Márquez et al. 2023) at z = 6.9 and with GNz7q (Fu￾jimoto et al. 2022; Fei et al. 2026) at z = 7.189. After nor￾malizing at rest-frame 250 µm, where AGN dust emission is negligible, all of these SEDs except the GN20 integrated aper￾ture show a MIR excess relative to the cold-dust component. In GN2… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the relative contributions of star formation and AGN activity to the total energy budget of GN20, one of the most luminous dusty star-forming galaxies known at $z>4$, through spatially resolved spectral energy distribution decomposition. We perform Bayesian SED fitting with CIGALE on two spatially distinct apertures: the nuclear core (r=0.14", $\sim$1kpc physical) and the full galaxy (r=1.4", 9.9 kpc), combining JWST/NIRCam and MIRI broadband imaging, JWST/NIRSpec PRISM IFU pseudo-continuum photometry spanning 42 wavelength bins across rest-frame $0.12$--$1.05\mu$m, and archival HST and millimeter interferometry data from NOEMA and PdBI. The integrated SED is dominated by stellar-heated dust, with only a marginal AGN contribution at galaxy-wide scales ($f_\mathrm{AGN}^\mathrm{int}=0.09\pm0.02$). The nuclear core, however, requires a significant AGN component ($f_\mathrm{AGN}=0.34\pm0.05$) to account for a mid-infrared excess at rest-frame $\sim$2.5--3.6$\mu$m characteristic of AGN-heated torus dust. The AGN accounts for $\sim34\%$ of the nuclear infrared luminosity but only $\sim9\%$ of the total integrated $L_\mathrm{IR}$, explaining its weak signature in integrated diagnostics and its consistency with existing upper limits from Spitzer spectroscopy. The inferred black hole mass places GN20 within the local $M_\mathrm{BH}$--$M_\mathrm{bulge}$ relation at the Eddington limit, and in the overmassive regime at sub-Eddington accretion rates, suggesting early and rapid black hole assembly concurrent with the dominant starburst. GN20 exemplifies a class of systems where nuclear-scale SED decomposition, enabled by the angular resolution and infrared sensitivity of JWST, is the only means to uncover a buried AGN overwhelmed by galaxy-wide star formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses JWST/NIRCam, MIRI, NIRSpec PRISM IFU (42 pseudo-continuum bins), HST, and millimeter interferometry data to perform Bayesian CIGALE SED fitting on two apertures of GN20 (z>4): a nuclear core (r=0.14", ~1 kpc) and the full galaxy (r=1.4"). It reports that the integrated SED is star-formation dominated (f_AGN^int=0.09±0.02) while the nuclear aperture requires f_AGN=0.34±0.05 to fit a mid-IR excess at rest-frame 2.5–3.6 μm, attributing ~34% of nuclear L_IR (but only ~9% of total L_IR) to an AGN torus; this places the inferred BH on the local M_BH–M_bulge relation at Eddington or in the overmassive regime at sub-Eddington rates.

Significance. If the nuclear AGN attribution is robust, the result shows that JWST-enabled nuclear-scale decomposition can reveal buried AGNs in high-redshift dusty starbursts that are invisible to integrated diagnostics, with direct implications for concurrent BH and stellar-mass assembly at z>4.

major comments (2)
  1. [CIGALE modeling of the nuclear (r=0.14") aperture] The central claim that the nuclear core requires f_AGN=0.34±0.05 rests on the assertion that SKIRTOR/Fritz et al. torus templates are needed to reproduce the 2.5–3.6 μm excess. The manuscript does not report fits with alternative dust geometries (e.g., clumpy starburst dust, modified extinction curves, or hot stellar dust continua from the young obscured starburst still present in the r=0.14" aperture) that could absorb the same excess without an AGN component. Because the nuclear aperture is still dominated by a dust-obscured starburst, this test is load-bearing for the reported AGN fraction and its interpretation as torus-heated dust.
  2. [Abstract and SED-fitting methods] The abstract and methods description provide no information on the priors adopted for f_AGN, the specific dust templates and parameter grids used, or any robustness checks (e.g., fits with AGN module disabled, alternative AGN libraries, or varying aperture definitions). These omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported 0.34±0.05 value is uniquely required by the data or sensitive to modeling choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the AGN accounts for ~34% of nuclear infrared luminosity but only ~9% of total integrated L_IR; the text should explicitly define how these percentages are computed from the CIGALE output (e.g., which luminosity integrals and which wavelength range).
  2. [Introduction or methods] The manuscript should state the physical scale corresponding to the r=0.14" and r=1.4" apertures at the redshift of GN20 for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. Their comments highlight important aspects of the modeling that require clarification and additional tests. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [CIGALE modeling of the nuclear (r=0.14") aperture] The central claim that the nuclear core requires f_AGN=0.34±0.05 rests on the assertion that SKIRTOR/Fritz et al. torus templates are needed to reproduce the 2.5–3.6 μm excess. The manuscript does not report fits with alternative dust geometries (e.g., clumpy starburst dust, modified extinction curves, or hot stellar dust continua from the young obscured starburst still present in the r=0.14" aperture) that could absorb the same excess without an AGN component. Because the nuclear aperture is still dominated by a dust-obscured starburst, this test is load-bearing for the reported AGN fraction and its interpretation as torus-heated dust.

    Authors: We agree that explicit tests with alternative dust geometries are necessary to confirm that the mid-IR excess at rest-frame 2.5–3.6 μm cannot be reproduced without an AGN torus component. Although the SKIRTOR and Fritz et al. templates are the standard AGN modules in CIGALE and the wavelength range of the excess aligns with hot torus dust rather than typical starburst emission, the manuscript does not currently include these comparisons. In the revised version we will add fits with the AGN module disabled, clumpy starburst dust models, modified extinction curves, and hot stellar dust continua to demonstrate that none of these alternatives adequately reproduce the nuclear SED. This will directly address the load-bearing nature of the test. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and SED-fitting methods] The abstract and methods description provide no information on the priors adopted for f_AGN, the specific dust templates and parameter grids used, or any robustness checks (e.g., fits with AGN module disabled, alternative AGN libraries, or varying aperture definitions). These omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported 0.34±0.05 value is uniquely required by the data or sensitive to modeling choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current methods section lacks sufficient detail on the CIGALE configuration. The analysis employs standard SKIRTOR torus templates with a uniform prior on f_AGN between 0 and 1, together with the default dust and stellar parameter grids in CIGALE, but these specifics and any robustness tests are not explicitly documented. In the revised manuscript we will expand the methods section to list the exact priors, templates, and grids, and we will add a dedicated robustness subsection reporting fits with the AGN module disabled, alternative AGN libraries, and varied aperture definitions. These additions will allow readers to evaluate the sensitivity of the reported f_AGN value. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard CIGALE SED fit on external multi-wavelength data

full rationale

The paper's central result (nuclear f_AGN = 0.34) is obtained by running the public CIGALE Bayesian fitter on JWST NIRSpec bins + MIRI photometry plus ancillary data, treating AGN fraction as a free parameter with standard SKIRTOR/Fritz torus templates. No step reduces the reported fraction to a quantity defined by the authors' own prior equations, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the attribution, and no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the observational inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of CIGALE's AGN and stellar dust templates and the assumption that the chosen apertures isolate distinct physical components.

free parameters (1)
  • f_AGN
    AGN fraction parameter fitted separately for nuclear and integrated apertures to match the mid-IR excess.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption CIGALE SED models with standard AGN torus and stellar-heated dust components accurately separate contributions in high-z dusty galaxies
    Invoked when performing the Bayesian fits on the nuclear and full-galaxy photometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6044 in / 1302 out tokens · 37898 ms · 2026-07-01T05:01:21.620256+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    L., Georgakakis, A., et al

    Aird, J., Coil, A. L., Georgakakis, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 1892

    2015

  2. [2]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 224

    Alberts, S., Lyu, J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 224

    2024

  3. [3]

    M., Bauer, F

    Alexander, D. M., Bauer, F. E., Chapman, S. C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 736

    2005

  4. [4]

    M., Brandt, W

    Alexander, D. M., Brandt, W. N., Smail, I., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1968

    2008

  5. [5]

    H., & Rigopoulou, D

    Alonso-Herrero, A., Pereira-Santaella, M., Rieke, G. H., & Rigopoulou, D. 2012, ApJ, 744, 2

    2012

  6. [6]

    G., Alexander, D

    Alonso-Herrero, A., Pérez-González, P. G., Alexander, D. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 167 Álvarez-Márquez, J., Crespo Gómez, A., Colina, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A105

    2006

  7. [7]

    2007, ApJ, 656, 148

    Armus, L., Charmandaris, V ., Bernard-Salas, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 148

    2007

  8. [8]

    2024, A&A, 688, A146

    Arribas, S., Perna, M., Rodríguez Del Pino, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A146

    2024

  9. [9]

    E., Bridge, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Bridge, J. S., Trump, J. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 37

    2023

  10. [10]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5 Barquín-González, L., Mateos, S., Carrera, F. J., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A159

    1981

  11. [11]

    A., Weibel, A., et al

    Barrufet, L., Oesch, P. A., Weibel, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 449

    2023

  12. [12]

    2024, A&A, 686, A3

    Bik, A., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A3

    2024

  13. [13]

    2025, A&A, 694, C1

    Bik, A., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, C1

    2025

  14. [14]

    W., Kneib, J.-P., Ivison, R

    Blain, A. W., Kneib, J.-P., Ivison, R. J., & Smail, I. 1999, ApJ, 512, L87

    1999

  15. [15]

    2023, ApJ, 942, L36 Böker, T., Arribas, S., Lützgendorf, N., et al

    Bohn, T., Inami, H., Diaz-Santos, T., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, L36 Böker, T., Arribas, S., Lützgendorf, N., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A82

    2023

  16. [16]

    A stellar bar hidden in an extreme gas-rich disk galaxy at z=4.055

    Boogaard, L. A., Costantin, L., Tepper-García, T., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.15273

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y ., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103

    2019

  18. [18]

    & Charlot, S

    Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

    2003

  19. [19]

    2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413

    Burgarella, D., Buat, V ., & Iglesias-Páramo, J. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413

    2005

  20. [20]

    2001, PASP, 113, 1449

    Calzetti, D. 2001, PASP, 113, 1449

    2001

  21. [21]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

    2000

  22. [22]

    L., Daddi, E., Riechers, D., et al

    Carilli, C. L., Daddi, E., Riechers, D., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 1407

    2010

  23. [23]

    L., Hodge, J., Walter, F., et al

    Carilli, C. L., Hodge, J., Walter, F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, L33

    2011

  24. [24]

    M., Scoville, N

    Casey, C. M., Scoville, N. Z., Sanders, D. B., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 95

    2014

  25. [25]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    2003

  26. [26]

    C., Blain, A

    Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Smail, I., & Ivison, R. J. 2005, ApJ, 622, 772

    2005

  27. [27]

    & Fall, S

    Charlot, S. & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718

    2000

  28. [28]

    2015, A&A, 576, A10

    Ciesla, L., Charmandaris, V ., Georgakakis, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A10

    2015

  29. [29]

    2023, A&A, 673, L6

    Colina, L., Crespo Gómez, A., Álvarez-Márquez, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L6

    2023

  30. [30]

    2015, A&A, 582, A63 Crespo Gómez, A., Colina, L., Álvarez-Márquez, J., et al

    Cresci, G., Marconi, A., Zibetti, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A63 Crespo Gómez, A., Colina, L., Álvarez-Márquez, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A325

    2015

  31. [31]

    2009, ApJ, 694, 1517

    Daddi, E., Dannerbauer, H., Stern, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1517

    2009

  32. [32]

    2007, ApJ, 670, 156 D’Agostino, J

    Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Morrison, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 156 D’Agostino, J. J., Kewley, L. J., Groves, B. A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, L38 D’Amato, Q., Gilli, R., Vignali, C., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A37

    2007

  33. [33]

    2025, A&A, 704, A313 D’Eugenio, F., Pérez-González, P

    Delvecchio, I., Daddi, E., Magnelli, B., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A313 D’Eugenio, F., Pérez-González, P. G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, Nature Astron- omy, 8, 1443

    2025

  34. [34]

    L., Koekemoer, A

    Donley, J. L., Koekemoer, A. M., Brusa, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, 142

    2012

  35. [35]

    T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al

    Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 172 Dudzeviˇci¯ut˙e, U., Smail, I., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3828

    2014

  36. [36]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12325

    Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., Brammer, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.12325

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al

    Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al. 2017, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 53, 385

    2017

  38. [38]

    2018, A&A, 620, A152

    Franco, M., Elbaz, D., Béthermin, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A152

    2018

  39. [39]

    2006, MNRAS, 366, 767

    Fritz, J., Franceschini, A., & Hatziminaoglou, E. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 767

    2006

  40. [40]

    B., Watson, D., et al

    Fujimoto, S., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2022, Nature, 604, 261

    2022

  41. [41]

    C., Koekemoer, A

    Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, L93 González-Martín, O., Díaz-González, D. J., Martínez-Paredes, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2158

    2004

  42. [42]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

    2024

  43. [43]

    2020, A&A, 643, A8

    Gruppioni, C., Béthermin, M., Loiacono, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A8

    2020

  44. [44]

    2013, MNRAS, 432, 23

    Gruppioni, C., Pozzi, F., Rodighiero, G., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 23

    2013

  45. [45]

    2021, A&A, 646, A127

    Hamed, M., Ciesla, L., Béthermin, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A127

    2021

  46. [46]

    G., Annunziatella, M., et al

    Hamed, M., Pérez-González, P. G., Annunziatella, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15963

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    2023, ApJS, 265, 5

    Harikane, Y ., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 5

    2023

  48. [48]

    C., Mullaney, J

    Hickox, R. C., Mullaney, J. R., Alexander, D. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 782, 9

    2014

  49. [49]

    A., Carilli, C

    Hodge, J. A., Carilli, C. L., Walter, F., Daddi, E., & Riechers, D. 2013, ApJ, 776, 22

    2013

  50. [50]

    A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al

    Hodge, J. A., Riechers, D., Decarli, R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, L18

    2015

  51. [51]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., & Kereš, D. 2008, ApJS, 175, 356

    2008

  52. [52]

    H., Serjeant, S., Dunlop, J., et al

    Hughes, D. H., Serjeant, S., Dunlop, J., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 241

    1998

  53. [53]

    2022, A&A, 661, A80

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80

    2022

  54. [54]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055

    2003

  55. [55]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121

    2001

  56. [56]

    2017, ApJ, 849, 111

    Kirkpatrick, A., Alberts, S., Pope, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 111

    2017

  57. [57]

    2015, ApJ, 814, 9

    Kirkpatrick, A., Pope, A., Sajina, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 9

    2015

  58. [58]

    2025, A&A, 695, A201

    Kolupuri, S., Decarli, R., Neri, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A201

    2025

  59. [59]

    Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511 Labbé, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266

    2013

  60. [60]

    J., Sajina, A., et al

    Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., Sajina, A., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 166

    2004

  61. [61]

    S., Nandra, K., Pope, A., & Scott, D

    Laird, E. S., Nandra, K., Pope, A., & Scott, D. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 2763

    2010

  62. [62]

    D., Conroy, C., & van Dokkum, P

    Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & van Dokkum, P. 2018, ApJ, 854, 62

    2018

  63. [63]

    2018, ApJ, 853, 172

    Liu, D., Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 172

    2018

  64. [64]

    N., Xue, Y

    Luo, B., Brandt, W. N., Xue, Y . Q., et al. 2017, ApJS, 228, 2

    2017

  65. [65]

    H., et al

    Lyu, J., Alberts, S., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 229

    2024

  66. [66]

    & Dickinson, M

    Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415

    2014

  67. [67]

    E., Daddi, E., Béthermin, M., et al

    Magdis, G. E., Daddi, E., Béthermin, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 6

    2012

  68. [68]

    2013, A&A, 553, A132

    Magnelli, B., Popesso, P., Berta, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A132

    2013

  69. [69]

    2024, A&A, 691, A145

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145

    2024

  70. [70]

    A., Perna, M., Willott, C

    Marshall, M. A., Perna, M., Willott, C. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A191

    2023

  71. [71]

    J., et al

    Mateos, S., Alonso-Herrero, A., Carrera, F. J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3271

    2012

  72. [72]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129 Menéndez-Delmestre, K., Blain, A. W., Smail, I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 667

    2024

  73. [73]

    2009, A&A, 507, 1793 Article number, page 11 of 12 A&A proofs:manuscript no

    Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1793 Article number, page 11 of 12 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda Östlin, G., Pérez-González, P. G., Melinder, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A57

    2009

  74. [74]

    2023, ApJ, 957, L3 Pérez-González, P

    Pacucci, F., Nguyen, B., Carniani, S., Maiolino, R., & Fan, X. 2023, ApJ, 957, L3 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Annunziatella, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, L16 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4 Pérez-González, P. G., Rieke, G. H., Egami, E., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 82 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., ...

    2023

  75. [75]

    2005, MNRAS, 358, 149

    Pope, A., Borys, C., Scott, D., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 149

    2005

  76. [76]

    2006, MNRAS, 370, 1185

    Pope, A., Scott, D., Dickinson, M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1185

    2006

  77. [77]

    2017, ApJ, 838, L18

    Puglisi, A., Daddi, E., Renzini, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, L18

    2017

  78. [78]

    A., Kriek, M., Shapley, A

    Reddy, N. A., Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 259

    2015

  79. [79]

    T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L

    Richards, G. T., Lacy, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 166, 470

    2006

  80. [80]

    A., Pope, A., Daddi, E., et al

    Riechers, D. A., Pope, A., Daddi, E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 31

    2014

Showing first 80 references.