pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31815 · v1 · pith:VDRI6TBAnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 💻 cs.DS · math.CO

Token sliding independent set reconfiguration on graphs with few P₄'s

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DS math.CO
keywords independent set reconfigurationtoken slidingP4-tidy graphs(q,q-4)-graphspolynomial time algorithmcographsgraph algorithmsreconfiguration problems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Token-sliding independent set reconfiguration admits polynomial-time algorithms on P4-tidy graphs and (q,q-4)-graphs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper gives polynomial-time algorithms for deciding reachability between two independent sets under the token-sliding rule on P4-tidy graphs and on (q,q-4)-graphs. Both classes generalize cographs by restricting the induced P4 subgraphs that can appear. The problem is PSPACE-hard on split graphs, planar graphs, and bounded-treewidth graphs, yet the new algorithms exploit the limited-P4 structure to decide reachability efficiently. A reader cares because these classes include many graphs that arise in applications where exact reconfiguration decisions must remain feasible.

Core claim

The authors show that the token-sliding independent set reconfiguration problem can be solved in polynomial time for every P4-tidy graph and every (q,q-4)-graph by using the structural decompositions available in these families to search for valid sequences of slides.

What carries the argument

Structural decompositions of P4-tidy graphs and (q,q-4)-graphs that support recursive or dynamic-programming search over independent-set configurations.

If this is right

  • Reachability under token slides is decidable in polynomial time for every graph in these two classes.
  • The same structural properties that make cographs tractable extend to these strictly larger families.
  • Any graph class properly containing P4-tidy graphs or (q,q-4)-graphs may still contain hard instances.
  • The algorithms provide explicit certificates of reachability or non-reachability when they terminate.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The presence of many induced P4s may be the feature that drives PSPACE-hardness in broader graph classes.
  • Similar decomposition techniques could be tested on other token-moving reconfiguration problems such as vertex cover or dominating set on the same graph families.
  • One could measure the practical running time of the algorithms on randomly generated graphs whose P4 density is controlled to lie just inside or outside the two classes.

Load-bearing premise

The input graphs belong to the P4-tidy or (q,q-4) classes and therefore possess the decompositions the algorithm requires.

What would settle it

A concrete P4-tidy graph together with two independent sets I and I' on which the algorithm reports no reconfiguration sequence exists, yet an explicit sequence of token slides transforming I into I' can be exhibited.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31815 by Lucia Busolini, Mario Valencia-Pabon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Possible quasi-starfishes of size two. From left to right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the INDEPENDENT SET RECONFIGURATION problem under the Token Sliding rule. Let $I$ be an independent set of a simple undirected graph $G$. Suppose that each vertex of $I$ has a token placed on it. The tokens are allowed to be moved, one at a time, by sliding along the edges of $G$, so that after each move, the vertices having tokens always form an independent set of $G$. The problem we deal is to decide if we can transform $I$ into $I'$ through a sequence of steps, each of which involves substituting a vertex in the current independent set with one of its neighbours to obtain another independent set. This problem of determining if one independent set of a graph "is reachable" from another independent set of it is known to be PSPACE-hard even for split graphs, planar graphs, and graphs of bounded treewidth. Polynomial time algorithms have been obtained for certain graph classes like trees, interval graphs, claw-free graphs, bipartite permutation graphs, block graphs, and cographs. We present a polynomial time algorithm for the problem on $P_4$-tidy graphs and $(q,q-4)$-graphs, both families of graphs generalizing cographs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript asserts the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm for the token-sliding independent set reconfiguration problem on P4-tidy graphs and (q,q-4)-graphs, both of which generalize cographs and admit cotree-like decompositions.

Significance. If the algorithm is correct, the result would modestly extend the known tractable cases for this PSPACE-hard problem by leveraging the bounded-P4 structural decompositions already established for these classes; however, the significance cannot be fully evaluated without a correctness argument or running-time analysis.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the claim that a polynomial-time algorithm exists is made without any proof sketch, running-time analysis, or correctness argument, so the soundness of the central claim cannot be assessed from the provided information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [—] Abstract: the claim that a polynomial-time algorithm exists is made without any proof sketch, running-time analysis, or correctness argument, so the soundness of the central claim cannot be assessed from the provided information.

    Authors: Abstracts are concise summaries and are not intended to contain full proofs, sketches, or analyses; those appear in the body of the manuscript. The full paper provides a detailed polynomial-time algorithm for token-sliding independent set reconfiguration on P4-tidy graphs and (q,q-4)-graphs. It leverages the known cotree-like decompositions for these classes, describes the algorithm explicitly, includes a correctness proof, and analyzes the running time. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in algorithmic claim

full rationale

The paper presents a polynomial-time algorithm for token-sliding independent set reconfiguration on P4-tidy graphs and (q,q-4)-graphs, extending known results for cographs via their structural decompositions. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-referential derivations appear; the result is an algorithmic existence claim relying on graph class properties rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction. No load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes are invoked in the provided abstract and context.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are identifiable from the abstract; the result rests on the standard definitions of the two graph classes and the token-sliding rule.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5750 in / 1081 out tokens · 46332 ms · 2026-07-01T02:33:17.038723+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Babel, S

    L. Babel, S. Olariu.On the structure of graphs with fewP 4s. Discrete Ap- plied Mathematics 84:1–13, 1998

  2. [2]

    Babel, S

    L. Babel, S. Olariu.On thep-connectedness of graphs—a survey. Discrete Applied Mathematics 95(1–3):11–33, 1999. 14

  3. [3]

    Belmonte, E

    R. Belmonte, E. J. Kim, M. Lampis, V. Mitsou, Y. Otachi, F. Sikora.Token slidong on split graphs. Theory Comput Syst 65:662–686, 2021

  4. [4]

    Bonamy, N

    M. Bonamy, N. Bousquet.Token sliding on chordal graphs. In proc. of WG 2017, volume 10520 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 127–139, 2017

  5. [5]

    Bonamy, N

    M. Bonamy, N. Bousquet, M. Heinrich, T. Ito, Y. Kobayashi, A. Mary, M. M¨ uhlenthaler, K. Wasa.The perfect matching reconfiguration problem. In proc. of MFCS 2019, volume 138 of LIPIcs, pages 80:1–80:14, 2019

  6. [6]

    P. S. Bonsma.Independent set reconfiguration in cographs and their gener- alizations. Journal of Graph Theory, 83(2):164–195, 2016

  7. [7]

    P. S. Bonsma, M. Kaminski, M. Wrochna.Reconfiguring independent sets in claw-free graphs. In proc. of SWAT 2014, volume 8503 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 86–97, 2014

  8. [8]

    Bousquet, A

    N. Bousquet, A. Joffard.TS-reconfiguration of dominating sets in circle and circular-arc graphs. In proc. of FCT 2021, volume 12867 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 114–134, 2021

  9. [9]

    Bousquet, A

    N. Bousquet, A. Mary, A. Parreau.Token jumping in minor-closed classes. In proc. of FCT 2017, volume 10472 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 136–149, 2017

  10. [10]

    Cereceda, J

    L. Cereceda, J. van den Heuvel, M. Johnson.Connectedness of the graph of vertex-colourings. Discrete Mathematics, 308(5-6):913–919, 2008

  11. [11]

    Corneil, H

    D. Corneil, H. Lerchs, L. Stewart Burlingham.Complement reducible graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics 3(3):163–174, 1981

  12. [12]

    E. D. Demaine, M. L. Demaine, E. Fox-Epstein, D. A. Hoang, T. Ito, H. Ono, Y. Otachi, R. Uehara, T. Yamada.Linear-time algorithm for sliding tokens on trees. Theor. Comput. Sci., 600:132–142, 2015

  13. [13]

    M. C. Francis, V. Prabhakaran. Token sliding independent set reconfigura- tion on block graphs. In proc. of FSTTCS 2025, Volume 360 of LIPIcs, pp. 31:1-31:19, 2025

  14. [14]

    Fox-Epstein, D

    E. Fox-Epstein, D. A. Hoang, Y. Otachi, R. Uehara.Sliding token on bipar- tite permutation graphs. In proc. of ISAAC 2015, volume 9472 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 237–247, 2015

  15. [15]

    Giakoumakis, F

    V. Giakoumakis, F. Roussel, H. Thuillier.OnP 4-tidy graphs. Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 1:17–41, 1997

  16. [16]

    R. A. Hearn, E. D. Demaine.PSPACE-completeness of sliding-block puzzles and other problems through the nondeterministic constraint logic model of computation. Theoretical Computer Science, 343(1-2):72–96, 2005

  17. [17]

    van den Heuvel.The complexity of change

    J. van den Heuvel.The complexity of change. Surveys in Combinatorics 2013, volume 409 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, pages 127–160, 2013. 15

  18. [18]

    C. T. Ho` ang.Perfect graphs. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, McGill University, 1985

  19. [19]

    T. Ito, E. D. Demaine, N. J.A. Harvey, Ch. H. Papadimitriou, M. Sideri, R. Uehara, Y. Uno.On the complexity of reconfiguration problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 412(12):1054–1065, 2011

  20. [20]

    T. Ito, M. Kaminski, H. Ono, A. Suzuki, R. Uehara, K. Yamanaka.On the parameterized complexity for token jumping on graphs. In proc. of TAMC 2014, volume 8402 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 341–351, 2014

  21. [21]

    T. Ito, M. Kaminski, H. Ono.Fixed-parameter tractability of token jumping on planar graphs. In proc. of ISAAC 2014, volume 8889 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 208–219, 2014

  22. [22]

    T. Ito, H. Nooka, X. Zhou.Reconfiguration of vertex covers in a graph. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 99-D(3):598–606, 2016

  23. [23]

    Jamison, S

    B. Jamison, S. Olariu.A new class of brittle graphs, Studies in Applied Mathematics 81:89–92, 1989

  24. [24]

    Jamison, S

    B. Jamison, S. Olariu.P4 -reducible graphs—a class of uniquely tree repre- sentable graphs. Studies in Applied Mathematics 81:79–87, 1989

  25. [25]

    Jamison, S

    B. Jamison, S. Olariu.On a unique tree representation for P4 -extendible graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics 34:151–164, 1991

  26. [26]

    Jamison, S

    B. Jamison, S. Olariu.p-components and the homogeneous decomposition of graphs. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 8:448–463, 1995

  27. [27]

    Kami´ nski, P

    M. Kami´ nski, P. Medvedev, M. Milaniˇ c.Complexity of independent set reconfigurability problems. Theor. Comput. Sci., 439:9–15, 2012

  28. [28]

    Lokshtanov, A

    D. Lokshtanov, A. E. Mouawad.The complexity of independent set recon- figuration on bipartite graphs. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG), 15(1):1–19, 2018

  29. [29]

    A. E. Mouawad, N. Nishimura, V. Raman, S. Siebertz.Vertex cover recon- figuration and beyond. Algorithms, 11(2):20, 2018

  30. [30]

    A. E. Mouawad, N. Nishimura, V. Raman, N. Simjour, A. Suzuki.On the parameterized complexity of reconfiguration problems. Algorithmica, 78(1):274–297, 2017

  31. [31]

    Nishimura.Introduction to reconfiguration

    N. Nishimura.Introduction to reconfiguration. Algorithms, 11(4):52, 2018

  32. [32]

    Solomon, Sh

    N. Solomon, Sh. Solomon.A generalized matching reconfiguration problem. In proc. of ITCS 2021, volume 185 of LIPIcs, pages 57:1–57:20, 2021

  33. [33]

    Wrochna.Reconfiguration in bounded bandwidth and tree-depth

    M. Wrochna.Reconfiguration in bounded bandwidth and tree-depth. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 93:1–10, 2018. 16