pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01053 · v1 · pith:T7G5TQ4Inew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Bridging the gap between SLSNe and SE-SNe. Multi-wavelength analysis of the SLSN-Ib SN 2024jlc

A. Simongini , F. Acero , M. Imbrogno , J. L. Wise , J. Sollerman , S. Schulze , N. Paul M. Kuin , T. X. Chen
show 10 more authors
C. Fremling A. Gangopadhyay M. M. Kasliwal R. R. Laher Z. McGrath D. A. Perley J. N. Purdum N. Rehemtulla R. M. Rich R. Riddle
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 07:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords super-luminous supernovaestripped-envelope supernovaeSN 2024jlcmulti-wavelength analysisgamma-ray emissionmagnetar spin-downcircumstellar interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

SN 2024jlc bridges super-luminous supernovae to stripped-envelope events via its powering mechanism.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports a ten-order-of-magnitude multi-wavelength study of the nearby Type I super-luminous supernova SN 2024jlc. The event is slow-evolving and helium-rich, with one of the lowest peak luminosities recorded for this class and a light curve that matches both circumstellar-interaction and magnetar spin-down models that include a contribution from nickel-56 decay. No X-ray excess appears, but a marginal gamma-ray signal at roughly 3.6 sigma yields an efficiency ratio of 0.38 that the authors interpret as evidence for a central engine. From these data the authors conclude that SN 2024jlc and other SLSN-Ib objects form a sparsely populated bridge between super-luminous and classical stripped-envelope supernovae, with the main distinction lying in the energy source rather than in the progenitor or explosion physics.

Core claim

Our analysis suggests that SN 2024jlc could bridge the gap between SLSNe and classical stripped-envelope supernovae. While still poorly populated, this bridge could consist of all SLSN-Ib supernovae, with the key difference residing in the powering mechanism.

What carries the argument

Multi-wavelength light-curve modeling that simultaneously accommodates circumstellar interaction and magnetar spin-down plus nickel decay, together with a marginal Fermi-LAT gamma-ray signal whose efficiency ratio supports a central-engine interpretation.

If this is right

  • SLSN-Ib events may form a continuous sequence connecting the two supernova classes.
  • The primary distinction between the classes is the dominant energy source rather than differences in progenitor structure.
  • The marginal gamma-ray efficiency of 0.38 is consistent with a central-engine contribution similar to that inferred for SN 2017egm.
  • Upper limits on soft and hard X-ray flux constrain any non-thermal emission from the same central engine.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Discovery of more SLSN-Ib events with comparable multi-wavelength coverage would test whether the bridge population is larger than currently observed.
  • Systematic comparison of gamma-ray upper limits across the SLSN-Ib sample could quantify how often a central engine is required.
  • If the powering mechanism alone accounts for the luminosity gap, then hydrodynamic models that vary only the energy-injection channel should reproduce the observed range of peak magnitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The light-curve shapes are compatible with both interaction and central-engine models and the marginal gamma-ray hint reliably signals a central engine that distinguishes the powering mechanism.

What would settle it

A firm non-detection of gamma rays from additional SLSN-Ib events or a statistical sample showing that their light curves cannot be reproduced by central-engine models would undermine the proposed bridge.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01053 by A. Gangopadhyay, A. Simongini, C. Fremling, D. A. Perley, F. Acero, J. L. Wise, J. N. Purdum, J. Sollerman, M. Imbrogno, M. M. Kasliwal, N. Paul M. Kuin, N. Rehemtulla, R. M. Rich, R. Riddle, R. R. Laher, S. Schulze, T. X. Chen, Z. McGrath.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Detection of SN 2024jlc on ZTF g-band images. (Left): target image from 28 May, 2024; (middle): deep pre-explosion reference image; (right): difference image post-explosion. Population Synthesis (FSPS) code (Conroy et al. 2009) to generate the underlying physical model and python-fsps (Foreman-Mackey et al. 2014) to interface with python. We assume a parametric star-formation history of the form t × exp (−… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fermi-LAT γ-ray light-curve of SN 2024jlc between April 2024 and April 2026 showing both the γ-ray energy flux and the TS in every monthly time bins. Upper-limits at a 95% confidence level are given for time bins with significance TS<2. The time integration windows discussed in Sect. 6.2 are also represented, each representing a differ￾ent set of parameters: model-independent (time window 1), CSM+ 56Ni mod… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Top panel): bolometric luminosity; (central panel): photospheric radius; (bottom panel): photospheric temperature. The vertical dashed line at t0 + 100 identifies the separation between the first fit (all filters) and the second fit (only griz filters). the total radiated energy during the entire duration of the light curve is E = 1.34 × 1050 erg. The temperature rises to its peak of TBB = 8806 ± 269 K du… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Main panel: best fit of SN 2024jlc light curves (filled points, off￾set for clarity), using the csmni (solid color lines) and slsnni (dashed black lines) models from MOSFiT. Lower panels: normalized residuals for the two models expressed. In both cases, we fixed the redshift, Galactic extinction and lu￾minosity distance of the source, employing 5000 walkers to en￾sure a wide exploration of the parameter sp… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Luminosity SED of SN 2024jlc near maximum light, from op￾tical to high-energy γ-rays. A black-body is fit to the optical+UV data. For XRT and BAT, we plot both the night-wise upper limit (solid line) and the integrated upper-limit obtained by integrating over the entire observing period. For Fermi-LAT, we show both the upper-limit and the flux point as discussed in Sect. 6.2. As a comparison, we plot the p… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of SN 2024jlc parameters with the distribution of the five samples: SLSN-Ic (teal), SLSN-Ib (red), Type Ic with broad light curves (blue), Type Ic-BL (orange), and Type Ic (green). We used three sets of SN 2024jlc parameters: model-independent (black dashed vertical lines), and the results from MOSFiT for the csmni (gray dotted vertical lines) and the slsnni (purple vertical dotted lines) models… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Type I super-luminous supernova SN~2024jlc (ZTF24aapadbb) exploded on the 25th of May 2024 at $z = 0.039$. Being the closest supernova of this class discovered in recent years and one of the closest ever, represented a rare opportunity to study in detail this type of objects. We performed a multi-wavelength analysis, spanning ten orders of magnitude in frequency, including optical/UV photometry and spectroscopy, soft and hard X-rays, and high-energy $\gamma$-rays. We characterized the event as a slow-evolving and He-rich supernova, with one of the lowest peak luminosities reported for a super-luminous event $M_g\sim-19.37$ mag, and a light curve evolution compatible with both circumstellar interaction and magnetar spin-down models, with noticeable contribution from $^{56}$Ni decay. No significant excess was found in the soft and hard X-ray bands, for which we provide upper-limits on the flux. Additionally, we analyzed two years of \textit{Fermi}-LAT data, from which we report an intriguing hint of a $\gamma$-ray signal at the $\sim 3.6 \sigma$ level, although no firm detection can be claimed. The gamma to optical efficiency ratio, $\eta = 0.38$, is suggestive of the presence of a central-engine scenario, similar to SN~2017egm. Our analysis suggests that SN~2024jlc could bridge the gap between SLSNe and classical stripped-envelope supernovae. While still poorly populated, this bridge could consist of all SLSN-Ib supernovae, with the key difference residing in the powering mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports multi-wavelength observations (optical/UV photometry/spectroscopy, X-ray upper limits, and Fermi-LAT gamma-ray analysis) of the nearby (z=0.039) SLSN-Ib SN 2024jlc, classifying it as slow-evolving and He-rich with low peak luminosity (M_g ~ -19.37). The light curve is compatible with both circumstellar-interaction and magnetar spin-down (plus 56Ni) models; no X-ray excess is found, but a ~3.6σ gamma-ray hint yields η=0.38 suggestive of a central engine. The authors conclude that SN 2024jlc bridges SLSNe and SE-SNe, with all SLSN-Ib objects sharing central-engine powering as the distinguishing feature.

Significance. A well-substantiated bridge population between SLSNe and classical stripped-envelope SNe would be significant for understanding explosion mechanisms and diversity in core-collapse events. The multi-wavelength dataset on one of the closest SLSNe provides useful constraints and upper limits, but the central interpretive claim rests on marginal evidence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and final paragraph: the claim that 'the key difference residing in the powering mechanism' (central engine for all SLSN-Ib) is not supported, because the light-curve evolution is explicitly compatible with both CSI and magnetar+56Ni models and the gamma-ray signal is only a ~3.6σ hint described as 'suggestive' with no firm detection, no model preference, and no exclusion of CSI.
  2. [Final paragraph] Abstract and final paragraph: the bridging interpretation requires that central-engine powering distinguishes the SLSN-Ib class, yet the provided data show only dual compatibility plus a non-firm gamma-ray excess (η=0.38); this under-constrains the central claim that the bridge 'could consist of all SLSN-Ib supernovae'.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and methods sections lack detailed fitting procedures, error analysis, or data tables, making the model-compatibility statements difficult to verify quantitatively.
  2. Consider adding a quantitative comparison (e.g., chi-squared or Bayesian evidence) between the CSI and magnetar models to assess relative preference rather than stating compatibility with both.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We agree that the interpretive claims in the abstract and final paragraph regarding the powering mechanism as the key difference and the potential composition of the bridge population are not strongly supported by the data, which show model compatibility and only a marginal gamma-ray signal. We will revise these sections to adopt more cautious phrasing.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and final paragraph: the claim that 'the key difference residing in the powering mechanism' (central engine for all SLSN-Ib) is not supported, because the light-curve evolution is explicitly compatible with both CSI and magnetar+56Ni models and the gamma-ray signal is only a ~3.6σ hint described as 'suggestive' with no firm detection, no model preference, and no exclusion of CSI.

    Authors: We acknowledge this point. The manuscript already states that the light-curve evolution is compatible with both circumstellar-interaction and magnetar spin-down (plus 56Ni) models and describes the gamma-ray signal as a ~3.6σ 'hint' with no firm detection. We will revise the abstract to remove any implication that central-engine powering is definitively the distinguishing feature, instead noting that the data are consistent with a central-engine contribution but do not exclude CSI. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Final paragraph] Abstract and final paragraph: the bridging interpretation requires that central-engine powering distinguishes the SLSN-Ib class, yet the provided data show only dual compatibility plus a non-firm gamma-ray excess (η=0.38); this under-constrains the central claim that the bridge 'could consist of all SLSN-Ib supernovae'.

    Authors: We agree that the current dataset under-constrains the suggestion that the bridge population could consist of all SLSN-Ib events. We will revise the final paragraph to present SN 2024jlc as a possible bridge object whose properties are compatible with central-engine powering, while emphasizing that extension to the full SLSN-Ib class is speculative and requires further multi-wavelength observations of additional events. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; bridging claim is interpretive suggestion from model compatibility and marginal detection

full rationale

The paper performs multi-wavelength observations and light-curve modeling for a single event, reporting compatibility with both CSI and magnetar+56Ni models plus a ~3.6σ gamma-ray hint (η=0.38) described as suggestive but not firm. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the bridging interpretation to inputs by construction; the claim remains an external inference from data rather than a self-referential derivation. This is the standard non-circular outcome for observational classification papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described. Standard astrophysical assumptions such as redshift-based distance and model applicability are implicit but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5959 in / 1103 out tokens · 33672 ms · 2026-07-02T07:34:14.814959+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , volume =

    Simongini, Andrea and Ragosta, F and Piranomonte, S and Di Palma, I , title = ". , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1911 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1911 2024

  2. [2]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06209 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  3. [3]

    SN 2006tf: Precursor Eruptions and the Optically Thick Regime of Extremely Luminous Type IIn Supernovae

    SN 2006tf: Precursor Eruptions and the Optically Thick Regime of Extremely Luminous Type IIn Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/591021 , archivePrefix =. 0804.0042 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/591021

  4. [4]

    Ground-based Telescopes , volume=

    The Liverpool Telescope: performance and first results , author=. Ground-based Telescopes , volume=. 2004 , organization=

    2004

  5. [5]

    Transient Name Server Discovery Report , keywords =

    ZTF Transient Discovery Report for 2024-05-28. Transient Name Server Discovery Report , keywords =

    2024

  6. [6]

    Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    SGLF Transient Classification Report for 2024-07-08. Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    2024

  7. [7]

    Transient Name Server AstroNote , keywords =

    Shane Kast classification of 2 superluminous supernovae 2024-07-08. Transient Name Server AstroNote , keywords =

    2024

  8. [8]

    , volume=

    On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor , author=. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  9. [9]

    , volume=

    Super-luminous type Ic supernovae: catching a magnetar by the tail , author=. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  10. [10]

    WISeREP - An Interactive Supernova Data Repository

    WISeREP An Interactive Supernova Data Repository. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/666656 , archivePrefix =. 1204.1891 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/666656

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    On Determining Extinction from Reddening. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/424933 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/424933

  12. [12]

    , volume=

    SN 2017egm: A helium-rich superluminous supernova with multiple bumps in the light curves , author=. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  13. [13]

    Space Science Reviews , volume=

    Superluminous supernovae , author=. Space Science Reviews , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  14. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12302 , year=

    Superluminous supernovae , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12302 , year=

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    Observational properties of extreme supernovae , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Astro-COLIBRI-The COincidence LIBrary for Real-time Inquiry for Multimessenger Astrophysics. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac1517 , archivePrefix =. 2109.01672 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac1517

  17. [17]

    , volume=

    The Swift gamma-ray burst mission , author=. , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  18. [18]

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe , archivePrefix =. 1902.01932 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 1902

  19. [19]

    The Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Zwicky Transient Facility Phase I Survey. I. Light Curves and Measurements , author=. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  20. [20]

    , volume=

    Results from a systematic survey of X-ray emission from hydrogen-poor superluminous SNe , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  21. [21]

    Space Science Reviews , volume=

    The burst alert telescope (BAT) on the SWIFT midex mission , author=. Space Science Reviews , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  22. [22]

    Methodology , author=

    The Palermo Swift-BAT hard X-ray catalogue-I. Methodology , author=. A & A , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  23. [23]

    1994 , institution=

    Lick Obs , author=. 1994 , institution=

    1994

  24. [24]

    Space Science Reviews , volume=

    The Swift ultra-violet/optical telescope , author=. Space Science Reviews , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  25. [25]

    A & A , volume=

    HI4PI: a full-sky H i survey based on EBHIS and GASS , author=. A & A , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  26. [26]

    Space science reviews , volume=

    The Swift X-ray telescope , author=. Space science reviews , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  27. [27]

    , volume=

    Where is the engine hiding its missing energy? Constraints from a deep X-ray non-detection of the Superluminous SN 2015bn , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  28. [28]

    , volume=

    Hard X-Ray Observations of the Hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernova SN 2018hti with NuSTAR , author=. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  29. [29]

    , volume=

    Core-collapse supernovae in dense environments--particle acceleration and non-thermal emission , author=. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  30. [30]

    , volume=

    The first days of Type II-P core collapse supernovae in the gamma-ray range , author=. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  31. [31]

    , volume=

    The Pan-STARRS1 database and data products , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  32. [32]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Fermi LAT gamma-ray detection of the recurrent nova RS ophiuchi during its 2021 outburst , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2021

  33. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Gamma-Ray Thermalization and Leakage from Millisecond Magnetar Nebulae: Toward a Self-consistent Model for Superluminous Supernovae , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  34. [34]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    A superluminous supernova lightened by collisions with pulsational pair-instability shells. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01957-3 , archivePrefix =. 2304.10416 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01957-3

  35. [35]

    , volume=

    The Type I superluminous supernova catalogue I: light-curve properties, models, and catalogue description , author=. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  36. [36]

    and Villar, V

    Thornton, I. and Villar, V. A. and Gomez, S. and Hosseinzadeh, G. , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10652250 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10652250

  37. [37]

    , volume=

    Supernova 2020wnt: An Atypical Superluminous Supernova with a Hidden Central Engine , author=. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  38. [38]

    , volume=

    Helium-rich superluminous supernovae from the Zwicky transient facility , author=. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  39. [39]

    , volume=

    Spectra of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the palomar transient factory , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  40. [40]

    , volume=

    A Detection of Helium in the Bright Superluminous Supernova SN 2024rmj , author=. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  41. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01485 , year=

    A Near-IR Search for Helium in the Superluminous Supernova SN 2024ahr , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01485 , year=

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    A & A , volume=

    A nearby super-luminous supernova with a long pre-maximum & “plateau” and strong C II features , author=. A & A , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  43. [43]

    Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    ZTF Transient Classification Report for 2019-07-26. Transient Name Server Classification Report , keywords =

    2019

  44. [44]

    , volume=

    Supernova light curves powered by young magnetars , author=. , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  45. [45]

    , volume=

    Luminous supernovae: unveiling a population between superluminous and normal core-collapse supernovae , author=. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  46. [46]

    , volume=

    MOSFiT: modular open source fitter for transients , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  47. [47]

    , volume=

    The large area telescope on the Fermi gamma-ray space telescope mission , author=. , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  48. [48]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Spectroscopic classification of AT 2020oio and SN 2020qef with MMT and Binospec. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  49. [49]

    , volume=

    SN 2005ap: A most brilliant explosion , author=. , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  50. [50]

    , volume=

    X-ray emission from supernovae in dense circumstellar matter environments: a search for collisionless shocks , author=. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  51. [51]

    , volume=

    Complexity in the light curves and spectra of slow-evolving superluminous supernovae , author=. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  52. [52]

    The hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae from the Zwicky Transient Facility phase I survey. II. Light-curve modeling and characterization of undulations , author=. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  53. [53]

    , volume=

    Hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae in the nebular phase: spectral diversity due to ejecta ionization as a probe of the power source , author=. , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  54. [54]

    , volume=

    Superluminous X-rays from a superluminous supernova , author=. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  55. [55]

    , volume=

    A radio source coincident with the superluminous supernova PTF10hgi: Evidence for a central engine and an analog of the repeating FRB 121102? , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  56. [56]

    , volume=

    SN 2015BN: a detailed multi-wavelength view of a nearby superluminous supernova , author=. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  57. [57]

    , volume=

    Gaia17biu/SN 2017egm in NGC 3191: the closest hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova to date is in a “normal,” massive, metal-rich spiral galaxy , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  58. [58]

    , volume=

    Jets in hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae: constraints from a comprehensive analysis of radio observations , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  59. [59]

    A & A , volume=

    Search for -ray emission from superluminous supernovae with the Fermi-LAT , author=. A & A , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  60. [60]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Evidence for GeV Emission from the Superluminous Supernova SN 2017egm , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  61. [61]

    , volume=

    VERITAS and Fermi-LAT constraints on the gamma-ray emission from superluminous supernovae SN2015bn and SN2017egm , author=. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  62. [62]

    , volume=

    X-Rays from the Location of the Double-humped Transient ASASSN-15lh , author=. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  63. [63]

    Nature Astronomy , volume=

    The superluminous transient ASASSN-15lh as a tidal disruption event from a Kerr black hole , author=. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  64. [64]

    , volume=

    Luminous radio emission from the superluminous supernova 2017ens at 3.3 yr after explosion , author=. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  65. [65]

    , volume=

    Superluminous supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  66. [66]

    , volume=

    Light curves of hydrogen-poor Superluminous Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory , author=. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  67. [67]

    , volume=

    The most luminous supernovae , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  68. [68]

    Handbook of Supernovae , pages=

    Superluminous Supernovae , author=. Handbook of Supernovae , pages=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  69. [69]

    , volume=

    A spectroscopically normal type Ic supernova from a very massive progenitor , author=. , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  70. [70]

    , volume=

    Type I superluminous supernovae as explosions inside non-hydrogen circumstellar envelopes , author=. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  71. [71]

    , volume=

    Circumstellar interaction models for the bolometric light curve of Type I superluminous SN 2017egm , author=. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  72. [72]

    , volume=

    Analytical light curve models of superluminous supernovae: 2-minimization of parameter fits , author=. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  73. [73]

    The properties of NI to CO to Fe decay , author=. , vol. 92, no. 2, p. 527-531 , volume=

  74. [74]

    , volume=

    Inverse Compton X-ray emission from supernovae with compact progenitors: application to SN2011fe , author=. , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  75. [75]

    , volume=

    Relativistic supernovae have shorter-lived central engines or more extended progenitors: the case of SN 2012ap , author=. , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  76. [76]

    Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=

    New class of high-energy transients from crashes of supernova ejecta with massive<? format?> circumstellar material shells , author=. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  77. [77]

    , volume=

    Gamma-ray and hard X-ray emission from pulsar-aided supernovae as a probe of particle acceleration in embryonic pulsar wind nebulae , author=. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  78. [78]

    , volume=

    SN 2006gy: An extremely luminous supernova in the galaxy NGC 1260 , author=. , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  79. [79]

    , volume=

    High-energy emission from interacting supernovae: New constraints on cosmic-ray acceleration in dense circumstellar environments , author=. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  80. [80]

    Simulations of ion acceleration at non-relativistic shocks. I. Acceleration efficiency , author=. , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

Showing first 80 references.