Kinetic temperature of massive star-forming molecular clumps measured with formaldehyde VI. The photodissociation region M17SW

C. Henkel; C. S. Luo; C. Y. Wang; D. Li; J. Esimbek; J. J. Qiu; J. J. Zhou; J. S. Li; J. W. Wu; K. M. Menten

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 127 references

Kinetic temperature of massive star-forming molecular clumps measured with formaldehyde VI. The photodissociation region M17SW

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dense gas in M17SW is heated by large-scale OB-star radiation plus local protostars and turbulence, producing a 28–181 K temperature map.

desk verdict Solid ~0.2 pc H2CO temperature map of M17SW that cleanly shows the dual external/internal heating picture; the fixed-density RADEX step is the main soft spot but does not break the result. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03084 v1 pith:TWWJPA2G submitted 2026-07-03 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

X. Zhao , X. D. Tang , C. Henkel , K. M. Menten , Y. Gong , Y. Sun , Y. P. Ao , T. Liu

show 15 more authors

X. Lu D. Li Y. X. He K. Wang X. P. Chen J. W. Wu J. Esimbek J. J. Zhou X. W. Zheng J. J. Qiu J. S. Li C. S. Luo Q. Zhao L. D. Liu C. Y. Wang

This is my paper

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

keywords photodissociationregionM17SWformaldehydekinetictemperaturestarformationturbulentheatingradiativemolecularclouds

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper maps the kinetic temperature of dense molecular gas in the photodissociation region M17SW at ~0.2 pc resolution using para-formaldehyde line ratios observed with the IRAM 30 m telescope. The authors convert the averaged H2CO (3–2) line ratios into temperatures with a non-LTE model and find values from 28 to 181 K (average 54 K). They show that the large-scale temperature gradient matches the expected fall-off of radiation from the nearby OB cluster NGC 6618, while the hottest pockets sit next to an ultracompact H II region, dense clumps, and masers, and that non-thermal line widths also rise with temperature. The work therefore establishes that both external UV heating and local star-formation and turbulent heating shape the thermal structure of the dense gas that will form the next generation of stars.

What carries the argument

The average para-H2CO line-intensity ratio 0.5×[(322–221 + 321–220)/303–202] converted to kinetic temperature by the RADEX non-LTE model at fixed density 5.5×10^5 cm^{-3} and column density 6.5×10^{13} cm^{-2}.

What would settle it

A map of H2CO (or another dense-gas thermometer) at higher angular resolution that resolves individual clumps and shows either no temperature gradient with distance from NGC 6618 or no correlation between non-thermal line width and temperature would falsify the dual-heating claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The complex temperature structure of M17SW, mapped by H2CO and compared with NH3, arises from large-scale external radiative heating by the OB cluster NGC 6618 together with small-scale internal radiative heating by embedded protostars or YSOs and turbulent heating on ~0.2 pc scales.

Load-bearing premise

A single fixed gas density and formaldehyde column density can be used everywhere to turn the observed line ratios into kinetic temperatures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Dense gas near the ionization front of M17SW is systematically warmer than gas deeper in the cloud, confirming external UV heating as the dominant large-scale process.
Clumps that host H2O or CH3OH masers or lie next to the ultracompact H II region UC1 are the warmest, so local star-formation feedback must be included in thermal models of PDRs.
The observed Tkin–σ_NT correlation implies that turbulent dissipation contributes measurably to heating on 0.2 pc scales.
Because the mean kinetic temperature raises the Jeans mass relative to cold molecular clouds, the IMF in M17SW is expected to be top-heavy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the same dual-heating pattern holds in other massive PDRs, global star-formation recipes that treat only large-scale radiation will under-predict the temperature (and therefore the Jeans mass) inside dense clumps.
High-resolution ALMA maps of the same H2CO triplet inside the individual clumps would separate the internal protostellar contribution from the external gradient and test whether the power-law index changes on sub-0.1 pc scales.
The mild optical-depth corrections reported for the densest cores suggest that future multi-transition H2CO modelling could tighten the absolute temperature scale without changing the spatial pattern.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a clean observational paper that delivers the first ~0.2 pc kinetic-temperature map of the classic PDR M17SW from the para-H2CO 3–2 triplet. That map, the power-law gradients versus distance from the NGC 6618 cavity and the ionization front, and the Tkin–σ_NT correlation on the same scale are the new products. They sit on top of an established H2CO-thermometer series, so the method itself is not novel, but the spatial resolution and the joint comparison with NH3 and dust are a genuine step forward for this source.

What they do well is straightforward. Line ratios are converted with RADEX using collision rates and a density/column density taken from earlier multi-transition work (Mundy et al. 1987; Tang et al. 2018b). They check optical depth (τ up to ~1.5 in the densest cores, <20 % T overestimate) and show that LTE and non-LTE agree below ~200 K. The large-scale gradient (T falling from >100 K near UC1 to ~30 K on the western edge) matches the NH3 and dust patterns and is the cleanest evidence yet that external FUV from the OB cluster dominates on parsec scales. On smaller scales the association of hot gas with masers and dense clumps, plus the modest T–turbulence correlation for M ≳ 4, supports the internal-heating claim without over-selling it. The Jeans-mass estimate at the end is a useful local implication.

The soft spot is exactly the one the reader flagged: a single n(H2) = 5.5 × 10^5 cm^{-3} and N(para-H2CO) = 6.5 × 10^{13} cm^{-2} for the whole map. The authors already quantify that Tkin shifts by <15 % below 100 K when density is varied over the observed range, so the gradients and the dual-heating interpretation survive. Dual-velocity components are averaged rather than separated, which slightly inflates some line widths; that is minor. Higher-resolution ALMA data will be needed to resolve internal clump structure, but that is a future step, not a flaw in the present claims.

Math, data reduction, and citation pattern look solid. Self-citations are to prior papers in the same series and are used appropriately. This is for people who work on PDRs, massive-star feedback, or dense-gas thermometry. It deserves a serious referee; I would accept it for peer review and would cite the map and the gradient fits myself.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper maps kinetic temperature in the M17SW PDR with the IRAM 30 m using the para-H2CO 3–2 triplet near 218 GHz at ~0.2 pc resolution. Line ratios 0.5 imes[(3₂₂–2₂₁ + 3₂₁–2₂₀)/3₀₃–2₀₂] are converted to T_kin via RADEX non-LTE models at fixed n(H₂)=5.5×10⁵ cm⁻³ and N(para-H₂CO)=6.5×10¹³ cm⁻², yielding 28–181 K (mean 54.2±0.3 K). The map shows a large-scale NE–SW temperature gradient away from the NGC 6618 cavity/ionization front, elevated T_kin near UC1, dense clumps, and H₂O/CH₃OH masers, and a positive T_kin–σ_NT correlation for M≳4. Comparison with NH₃ (1,1)–(6,6) and FIR dust temperatures supports a dual-heating picture: large-scale external radiative heating by the OB cluster plus small-scale internal radiative and turbulent heating around embedded sources.

Significance. M17SW is a benchmark Galactic PDR; a sub-pc H₂CO temperature map that can be compared directly with NH₃ and dust is a useful addition to the literature. The work continues a coherent series that has established H₂CO as a dense-gas thermometer. Strengths include explicit optical-depth and density-sensitivity checks (§3.4, Fig. C.1), power-law gradient fits against both cavity and ionization-front distances (Eqs. 1–8), and a quantitative T_kin–σ_NT relation (Fig. 7). If the dual-heating interpretation holds, the paper supplies concrete observational constraints for models of radiative and turbulent feedback in massive star-forming PDRs.

major comments (2)

§3.4 and Fig. C.1: The entire T_kin map rests on a single fixed n(H₂)=5.5×10⁵ cm⁻³ and N(para-H₂CO)=6.5×10¹³ cm⁻². The authors already show that T_kin shifts by <15% for T_kin<100 K when density is varied over 2×10⁴–2.5×10⁶ cm⁻³ and that optical-depth effects produce at most ~20% overestimation in the densest cores. These systematics should be propagated into the published T_kin map (or at least into the gradient fits of Eqs. 1–8 and the T_kin–σ_NT relation of Fig. 7) so that the dual-heating claims can be assessed with realistic error bars rather than formal ratio uncertainties alone.
§4.2, Eqs. (1)–(8) and Fig. 5: The power-law indices are derived from projected distances to the cavity and to an assumed ionization front. Projection effects and the morphological definition of the front are acknowledged but not quantified. A short test (e.g., restricting the fit to the eastern rim where the geometry is least ambiguous, or Monte-Carlo sampling of plausible line-of-sight depths) would strengthen the claim that the observed gradient is “direct evidence” for external radiative heating by NGC 6618.

minor comments (5)

§2: Clarify how the two velocity components at ~18.5 and 21.5 km s⁻¹ are intensity-weighted when constructing the average line ratio and the non-thermal line width; the present description leaves open whether the ratio map is biased in the dual-component zone.
Fig. 4 and §3.5: The non-thermal line-width and Mach-number maps show systematically lower values in the dual-component central region; a brief note that this is an artifact of the weighted-average procedure would prevent misinterpretation.
Table 1: Dust temperatures are listed for only four of the nine clumps; either supply the missing values or state explicitly that they are unavailable.
Appendix A / Table A.1: The synthesis of prior temperature measurements is valuable; adding a column for linear resolution (pc) would make the comparison with the present ~0.2 pc map more immediate.
Typographical: “Furthmore” (§2), “e ﬀects” and similar spacing artifacts throughout; “V elocity” in several figure captions.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Tkin is obtained from observed H2CO line ratios via an independent RADEX model with externally measured density and column density; gradient and turbulence correlations are empirical fits to those derived temperatures.

self citation load bearing [Sect. 3.4 (column-density and ortho-to-para assumptions)]
"Previous observations of H2CO (J = 3–2 and 4–3) with the APEX 12 m telescope towards the dense clump G15.03-0.67 in M17SW indicated n(H2), N(para-H2CO), and the ortho-to-para ratio of H2CO to be 1.3×10^6 cm^{-3}, 6.2×10^{13} cm^{-2}, and ∼3, respectively (Tang et al. 2018b). Based on these results, we assume the ortho-to-para ratio of H2CO to be 3 in the entire M17SW region."

The adopted ortho-to-para ratio (and supporting N(para-H2CO)) is taken from a prior paper by the same lead authors. This is a minor self-citation that sets a global scaling constant; it does not force the spatial temperature map or the dual-heating claim, which rest on the observed line-ratio morphology and external density measurements (Mundy et al. 1987).

full rationale

The derivation chain is observational and self-contained. Line ratios are measured directly from the IRAM maps (Sect. 3.3). Conversion to Tkin uses the public RADEX non-LTE code with collision rates from Wiesenfeld & Faure (2013) and fixed n(H2)=5.5e5 cm^{-3} and N(para-H2CO)=6.5e13 cm^{-2} taken from independent earlier work (Mundy et al. 1987; Tang et al. 2018b). The authors themselves quantify the sensitivity: Tkin changes by <15% for Tkin<100 K across the observed density range and optical-depth effects produce at most ~20% overestimation in dense cores. The subsequent power-law gradients (Eqs. 1–8) and Tkin–σ_NT correlations (Fig. 7) are ordinary least-squares fits to the resulting temperature map; they are not forced by construction from the input parameters. Self-citations to the authors’ prior H2CO series papers supply calibration and comparison, not the present temperature map or the dual-heating interpretation. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggled via self-citation, or fitted parameter re-labeled as a prediction is present. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing use of the authors’ own earlier abundance/ortho-to-para ratio.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard non-LTE radiative transfer plus a small set of adopted average physical conditions taken from earlier multi-transition studies. No new particles or forces are introduced. The free parameters are the single density and column density used for the whole map; the main domain assumptions are optical thinness (or mild saturation) and that the three H2CO lines sample the same volume.

free parameters (3)

n(H2) = 5.5e5 cm^{-3}
Fixed at 5.5×10^5 cm^{-3} for all RADEX runs; taken as the average from Mundy et al. (1987) multi-transition ortho-H2CO analysis.
N(para-H2CO) = 6.5e13 cm^{-2}
Fixed at 6.5×10^{13} cm^{-2} (ortho-to-para = 3) for the temperature–ratio conversion curve.
average FWHM linewidth = 3.8 km s^{-1}
Adopted 3.8 km s^{-1} as the representative value for RADEX input.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption RADEX non-LTE statistical-equilibrium solutions with Wiesenfeld & Faure (2013) collision rates correctly convert the observed H2CO line ratios into kinetic temperature under the adopted density and column density.
Invoked throughout §3.4 and Appendix C; standard tool but still an assumption about level populations.
domain assumption The three para-H2CO 3–2 lines arise from essentially the same volume of gas, so their intensity ratios are pure temperature diagnostics.
Stated in §2 and used to justify combining 3_{22}–2_{21} and 3_{21}–2_{20}.
domain assumption Optical depth of H2CO 3_{03}–2_{02} remains ≲1.5, producing at most a 20 % temperature overestimate in the densest cores.
Checked with RADEX in §3.4; mild saturation is acknowledged but treated as non-critical.
ad hoc to paper Projected distance from the NGC 6618 cavity (or the assumed ionization front) is a valid proxy for the true three-dimensional distance to the dominant heating source.
Used for the power-law fits in §4.2; projection effects are noted but not quantified.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kinetic temperature of massive star-forming molecular clumps measured with formaldehyde VI. The photodissociation region M17SW." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TWWJPA2G

@misc{pith2026260703084,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kinetic temperature of massive star-forming molecular clumps measured with formaldehyde VI. The photodissociation region M17SW},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TWWJPA2G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03084}
}

read the original abstract

The kinetic temperature structure of the photodissociation region M17SW was mapped using the IRAM 30 m telescope. This mapping employed the para-H2CO triplet (J(KaKc) = 303-202, 322-221, and 321-220) near 218 GHz on a scale of ~0.2 pc. The kinetic temperatures were derived by modeling the average H2CO line ratios (322-221/303-202 + 321-220/303-202) with the RADEX non-local thermodynamic equilibrium approach. These temperatures range from 28 to 181 K with an average of 54.2 +/- 0.3 K at a spatial density of 5.5x10^5 cm^-3. Comparing with the temperature measurements obtained from multiple transitions of NH3 (1,1)-(6,6) and the far infrared (FIR) dust continuum, the H2CO lines show temperatures similar to those measured by NH3 but slightly higher than values derived from FIR observations. The high kinetic temperatures observed from H2CO are associated with the ultracompact H II region UC1, dense clumps, as well as H2O and CH3OH masers, showing a similar distribution as NH3. This indicates that dense gas in the M17SW region is heated by star formation activity. The presence of a significant gas temperature gradient across the M17SW region, as measured by H2CO and NH3, provides direct evidence for gas heated predominantly by radiation emitted from the OB star cluster NGC 6618. On a smaller scale, the dense gas surrounding the dense clumps experiences significant heating from internal protostars and/or young stellar objects. Higher temperatures traced by H2CO are linked to turbulence on a scale of ~0.2 pc. The complex temperature structure of the M17SW region is revealed by H2CO and NH3, which may be attributed to both large-scale external radiative heating and small-scale internal radiative and turbulent heating.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03084 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Velocity-integrated intensity maps of H2CO 303–202 (left), 322–221 (mid-left), 321–220 (mid-right), and combined 322–221 and 321–220 (right) are shown on a Tmb scale, with the color bar in units of K km s−1 . These maps are integrated over the velocity range of VLSR = 14 to 26 km s−1 toward M17SW. Contour levels are from 6.0 to 27.0 K km s−1 with steps of 3.0 K km s−1 for H2CO 303–202, from 3 to 10 K km s−1 with ste… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The intensity-weighted velocity field (moment 1, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Observed H2CO spectra of the dense clumps in M17SW. Red, green, and blue lines show H2CO 303–202, 321–220, and 322– 221, respectively. The dense clumps were identified from 850 µm continuum emission by Eden et al. (2019) (details see Sect. 3.1 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Parameter maps of M17SW. Left: the averaged velocity-integrated intensity ratio map of H2CO, calculated as 0.5×[(322– 221 + 321–220)/303–202] (see Sect. 3.3). Mid-left: the kinetic temperatures derived from the H2CO line ratios, represented by the color bar in units of…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Variation in kinetic temperature across the M17SW region with distance from the NGC 6618 cavity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Variations of the gas kinetic temperatures derived from H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references

[1]

M., et al

Ao, Y ., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A135

2013
[2]

Bakes, E. L. O. & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1994, ApJ, 427, 822

1994
[3]

1976, A&A, 50, 41

Beetz, M., Elsaesser, H., Weinberger, R., & Poulakos, C. 1976, A&A, 50, 41

1976
[4]

A., Goldsmith, P

Bergin, E. A., Goldsmith, P . F., Snell, R. L., & Ungerechts, H. 1994, ApJ, 431, 674

1994
[5]

2025, ARA&A, 63, 1

Beuther, H., Kuiper, R., & Tafalla, M. 2025, ARA&A, 63, 1

2025
[6]

L., Caswell, J

Breen, S. L., Caswell, J. L., Ellingsen, S. P ., & Phillips, C. J. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1487

2010
[7]

Breen, S. L. & Ellingsen, S. P . 2011, MNRAS, 416, 178

2011
[8]

Brogan, C. L. & Troland, T. H. 2001, ApJ, 560, 821

2001

Show all 127 references

[9]

2016, ApJ, 819, 139

Busquet, G., Estalella, R., Palau, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 139

2016
[10]

I., & Herbst, E

Caselli, P ., Hasegawa, T. I., & Herbst, E. 1993, ApJ, 408, 548

1993
[11]

2012, PASJ, 64, 110

Chen, Z., Jiang, Z., Wang, Y ., et al. 2012, PASJ, 64, 110

2012
[12]

2025, AJ, 170, 125

Chen, Z., Johnstone, D., Contreras Peña, C., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 125

2025
[13]

Chen, Z., Nürnberger, D. E. A., Chini, R., et al. 2013, A&A, 557, A51

2013
[14]

2021, ApJ, 922, 90

Chen, Z., Sun, W., Chini, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 90

2021
[15]

1980, A&A, 91, 186

Chini, R., Elsaesser, H., & Neckel, T. 1980, A&A, 91, 186

1980
[16]

2000, A&A, 357, L33

Chini, R., Nielbock, M., & Beck, R. 2000, A&A, 357, L33

2000
[17]

2013, A&A, 552, A40

Chira, R.-A., Beuther, H., Linz, H., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A40

2013
[18]

R., Cernicharo, J., et al

Cuadrado, S., Goicoechea, J. R., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A124

2017
[19]

Dale, J. E. & Bonnell, I. A. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1352

2012
[20]

K., Ojha, D

Dewangan, L. K., Ojha, D. K., Luna, A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 66

2016
[21]

P ., et al

Dupac, X., Giard, M., Bernard, J. P ., et al. 2002, A&A, 392, 691

2002
[22]

J., Liu, T., Kim, K.-T., et al

Eden, D. J., Liu, T., Kim, K.-T., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2895

2019
[23]

Elmegreen, B. G. & Lada, C. J. 1977, ApJ, 214, 725

1977
[24]

1984, A&A, 136, 53

Felli, M., Churchwell, E., & Massi, M. 1984, A&A, 136, 53

1984
[25]

Forster, J. R. & Caswell, J. L. 1999, A&AS, 137, 43

1999
[26]

Gardner, F. F. & Whiteoak, J. B. 1981, PASA, 4, 240

1981
[27]

E., Sellgren, K., & Werner, M

Gatley, I., Becklin, E. E., Sellgren, K., & Werner, M. W. 1979, ApJ, 233, 575

1979
[28]

I., Ja ﬀe, D

Genzel, R., Harris, A. I., Ja ﬀe, D. T., & Stutzki, J. 1988, ApJ, 332, 1049

1988
[29]

2014, A&A, 563, A97

Gerner, T., Beuther, H., Semenov, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A97

2014
[30]

2023, A&A, 674, A160

Gieser, C., Beuther, H., Semenov, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A160

2023
[31]

2021, A&A, 648, A66

Gieser, C., Beuther, H., Semenov, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A66

2021
[32]

2022, A&A, 657, A3

Gieser, C., Beuther, H., Semenov, D., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A3

2022
[33]

2019, A&A, 631, A142

Gieser, C., Semenov, D., Beuther, H., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A142

2019
[34]

2011, ApJ, 736, 149

Ginsburg, A., Darling, J., Battersby, C., Zeiger, B., & Bally, J. 2011, ApJ, 736, 149

2011
[35]

2016, A&A, 586, A50

Ginsburg, A., Henkel, C., Ao, Y ., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A50

2016
[36]

Girichidis, P ., Oﬀner, S. S. R., Kritsuk, A. G., et al. 2020, Space Sci. Rev., 216, 68 Gómez, L., Luis, L., Hernández-Curiel, I., et al. 2010, ApJS, 191, 207

2020
[37]

N., Rugel, M

Gong, Y ., Ortiz-León, G. N., Rugel, M. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A130

2023
[38]

2025, ApJ, 994, 158

Gong, Y ., Zhang, Z.-y., Henkel, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 158

2025
[39]

2026, Science Advances, 12, 1.9433

Gong, Y ., Zhong, J., Ren, Y ., et al. 2026, Science Advances, 12, 1.9433

2026
[40]

& Hollenbach, D

Gorti, U. & Hollenbach, D. 2002, ApJ, 573, 215

2002
[41]

S., White, G

Greaves, J. S., White, G. J., & Williams, P . G. 1992, A&A, 257, 731 Güsten, R. & Fiebig, D. 1988, A&A, 204, 253 Guzmán, V ., Pety, J., Goicoechea, J. R., Gerin, M., & Roue ﬀ, E. 2011, A&A, 534, A49

1992
[42]

M., Howarth, I

Hanson, M. M., Howarth, I. D., & Conti, P . S. 1997, ApJ, 489, 698

1997
[43]

I., Stutzki, J., Genzel, R., et al

Harris, A. I., Stutzki, J., Genzel, R., et al. 1987, ApJ, 322, L49 Heikkilä, A., Johansson, L. E. B., & Olofsson, H. 1999, A&A, 344, 817

1987
[44]

K., & Izotov, Y

Henkel, C., Hunt, L. K., & Izotov, Y . I. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 11

2022
[45]

M., & Wilson, T

Henkel, C., Walmsley, C. M., & Wilson, T. L. 1980, A&A, 82, 41

1980
[46]

L., Walmsley, C

Henkel, C., Wilson, T. L., Walmsley, C. M., & Pauls, T. 1983, A&A, 127, 388 Hernández-V era, C., Guzmán, V . V ., Goicoechea, J. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A152

1983
[47]

D., Ngoc, N

Hoang, T. D., Ngoc, N. B., Diep, P . N., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 27

2022
[48]

Hobson, M. P . 1992, MNRAS, 256, 457

1992
[49]

P ., Padman, R., Scott, P

Hobson, M. P ., Padman, R., Scott, P . F., Prestage, R. M., & Ward-Thompson, D. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 1025 Hoﬀmeister, V . H., Chini, R., Scheyda, C. M., et al. 2006, A&A, 457, L29 Hoﬀmeister, V . H., Chini, R., Scheyda, C. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 686, 310

1993
[50]

J., Takahashi, T., & Tielens, A

Hollenbach, D. J., Takahashi, T., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1991, ApJ, 377, 192

1991
[51]

E., Ashby, M

Howe, J. E., Ashby, M. L. N., Bergin, E. A., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, L137

2000
[52]

Immer, K., Kauﬀmann, J., Pillai, T., Ginsburg, A., & Menten, K. M. 2016, A&A, 595, A94 Jaﬀe, D. T., Harris, A. I., & Genzel, R. 1987, ApJ, 316, 231

2016
[53]

2002, ApJ, 577, 245

Jiang, Z., Y ao, Y ., Y ang, J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 577, 245

2002
[54]

G., Beuther, H., Linz, H., et al

Johnston, K. G., Beuther, H., Linz, H., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A56

2014
[55]

Johnstone, D., Boonman, A. M. S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2003, A&A, 412, 157

2003
[56]

A., Hernández-Gómez, A., Wyrowski, F., & Menten, K

Kahle, K. A., Hernández-Gómez, A., Wyrowski, F., & Menten, K. M. 2023, A&A, 673, A143

2023
[57]

A., Wyrowski, F., König, C., et al

Kahle, K. A., Wyrowski, F., König, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A162

2024
[58]

A., Phillips, T

Keene, J., Blake, G. A., Phillips, T. G., Huggins, P . J., & Beichman, C. A. 1985, ApJ, 299, 967

1985
[59]

2019, ApJ, 884, 4 Article number, page 13 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no

Keown, J., Di Francesco, J., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 4 Article number, page 13 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa59755-26

2019
[60]

M., Rugel, M

Khan, S., Jacob, A. M., Rugel, M. R., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A280

2026
[61]

S., Spaans, M., & Jappsen, A.-K

Klessen, R. S., Spaans, M., & Jappsen, A.-K. 2007, MNRAS, 374, L29

2007
[62]

2017, ApJ, 834, 142

Kounkel, M., Hartmann, L., Loinard, L., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 142

2017
[63]

Kurtz, S., Hofner, P ., & Álvarez, C. V . 2004, ApJS, 155, 149

2004
[64]

& Chaisson, E

Lada, C. & Chaisson, E. J. 1975, ApJ, 195, 367

1975
[65]

F., & Penﬁeld, H

Lada, C., Dickinson, D. F., & Penﬁeld, H. 1974, ApJ, 189, L35

1974
[66]

Lada, C. J. 1976, ApJS, 32, 603

1976
[67]

J., Depoy, D

Lada, C. J., Depoy, D. L., Merrill, K. M., & Gatley, I. 1991, ApJ, 374, 533

1991
[68]

& Harris, A

Lemke, D. & Harris, A. W. 1981, A&A, 99, 285

1981
[69]

2010, A&A, 511, A82

Leurini, S., Parise, B., Schilke, P ., Pety, J., & Rol ﬀs, R. 2010, A&A, 511, A82

2010
[70]

M., & Radomski, J

Lim, W., De Buizer, J. M., & Radomski, J. T. 2020, ApJ, 888, 98

2020
[71]

B., et al

Lin, Y ., Wyrowski, F., Liu, H. B., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A128

2022
[72]

2022, MNRAS, 513, 4747

Liu, B., Y ang, R.-z., & Chen, Z. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 4747

2022
[73]

2020, ApJ, 901, 31

Liu, H.-L., Sanhueza, P ., Liu, T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 31

2020
[74]

2017, ApJ, 839, 1

Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Kau ﬀmann, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, 1

2017
[75]

D., Schneider, N., et al

Luisi, M., Anderson, L. D., Schneider, N., et al. 2021, Science Advances, 7, eabe9511

2021
[76]

G., Darling, J., Henkel, C., & Menten, K

Mangum, J. G., Darling, J., Henkel, C., & Menten, K. M. 2013, ApJ, 766, 108

2013
[77]

G., Darling, J., Menten, K

Mangum, J. G., Darling, J., Menten, K. M., & Henkel, C. 2008, ApJ, 673, 832

2008
[78]

G., Ginsburg, A

Mangum, J. G., Ginsburg, A. G., Henkel, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 170

2019
[79]

Mangum, J. G. & Wootten, A. 1993, ApJS, 89, 123

1993
[80]

G., Wootten, A., Loren, R

Mangum, J. G., Wootten, A., Loren, R. B., & Wadiak, E. J. 1990, ApJ, 348, 542

1990
[81]

N., Wyrowski, F., Menten, K

Mazumdar, P ., Tram, L. N., Wyrowski, F., Menten, K. M., & Tang, X. 2022, A&A, 668, A180

2022
[82]

R., Tielens, A

Meixner, M., Haas, M. R., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Erickson, E. F., & Werner, M. 1992, ApJ, 390, 499

1992
[83]

M., Reid, M

Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Forbrich, J., & Brunthaler, A. 2007, A&A, 474, 515 Mühle, S., Seaquist, E. R., & Henkel, C. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1579

2007
[84]

G., Evans, Neal J., I., Snell, R

Mundy, L. G., Evans, Neal J., I., Snell, R. L., & Goldsmith, P . F. 1987, ApJ, 318, 392

1987
[85]

G., Snell, R

Mundy, L. G., Snell, R. L., Evans, Neal J., I., Goldsmith, P . F., & Bally, J. 1986, ApJ, 306, 670

1986
[86]

& Y oshida, N

Nakatani, R. & Y oshida, N. 2019, ApJ, 883, 127

2019
[87]

2001, A&A, 377, 273

Nielbock, M., Chini, R., Jütte, M., & Manthey, E. 2001, A&A, 377, 273

2001
[88]

2018, PASJ, 70, S42

Nishimura, A., Minamidani, T., Umemoto, T., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S42

2018
[89]

R., et al

Pabst, C., Higgins, R., Goicoechea, J. R., et al. 2019, Nature, 565, 618

2019
[90]

& Padoan, P

Pan, L. & Padoan, P . 2009, ApJ, 692, 594

2009
[91]

P ., Thi, W.-F., Miniati, F., & Viti, S

Papadopoulos, P . P ., Thi, W.-F., Miniati, F., & Viti, S. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 1705

2011
[92]

2006, ApJ, 643, 1011

Paumard, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1011

2006
[93]

W., Baldwin, J

Pellegrini, E. W., Baldwin, J. A., Brogan, C. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1119 Pérez-Beaupuits, J. P ., Güsten, R., Spaans, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A107 Pérez-Beaupuits, J. P ., Spaans, M., Hogerheijde, M. R., et al. 2010, A&A, 510, A87 Pérez-Beaupuits, J. P ., Wiesemeyer, H...

2007
[94]

J., & Menten, K

Pillai, T., Wyrowski, F., Carey, S. J., & Menten, K. M. 2006, A&A, 450, 569

2006
[95]

E., Friesen, R

Pineda, J. E., Friesen, R. K., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2026, ApJS, 282, 18

2026
[96]

S., Stone, J

Povich, M. S., Stone, J. M., Churchwell, E., et al. 2007, ApJ, 660, 346

2007
[97]

M., et al

Qin, S.-L., Zhao, J.-H., Moran, J. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 353

2008
[98]

Reid, M. A. & Wilson, C. D. 2006, ApJ, 644, 990

2006
[99]

F., Boucher, C., Brunswig, W., et al

Schuster, K. F., Boucher, C., Brunswig, W., et al. 2004, A&A, 423, 1171

2004
[100]

Shirley, Y . L. 2015, PASP , 127, 299

2015
[101]

L., Howe, J

Snell, R. L., Howe, J. E., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, L97

2000
[102]

& Güsten, R

Stutzki, J. & Güsten, R. 1990, ApJ, 356, 513

1990
[103]

J., Genzel, R., et al

Stutzki, J., Stacey, G. J., Genzel, R., et al. 1988, ApJ, 332, 379

1988
[104]

D., Esimbek, J., Zhou, J

Tang, X. D., Esimbek, J., Zhou, J. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A28

2013
[105]

2014, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 14, 959

Tang, X.-D., Esimbek, J., Zhou, J.-J., Wu, G., & Okoh, D. 2014, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 14, 959

2014
[106]

D., Henkel, C., Menten, K

Tang, X. D., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., et al. 2021, A&A, 655, A12

2021
[107]

D., Henkel, C., Menten, K

Tang, X. D., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., et al. 2019, A&A, 629, A6

2019
[108]

Thronson, H. A., J. & Lada, C. J. 1983, ApJ, 269, 175

1983
[109]

J., Sheehan, P

Tobin, J. J., Sheehan, P . D., Reynolds, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 162

2020
[110]

K., Feigelson, E

Townsley, L. K., Feigelson, E. D., Montmerle, T., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 874

2003
[111]

S., König, C., Giannetti, A., et al

Urquhart, J. S., König, C., Giannetti, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 1059

2018
[112]

S., Morgan, L

Urquhart, J. S., Morgan, L. K., Figura, C. C., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1689 van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schöier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627 van ’t Ho ﬀ, M. L. R., Tobin, J. J., Harsono, D., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2018, A&A, 615, A83

2011
[113]

K., Whitworth, A

Walch, S. K., Whitworth, A. P ., Bisbas, T., Wünsch, R., & Hubber, D. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 625

2012
[114]

N., Henkel, C., Whiteoak, J

Wang, M., Chin, Y . N., Henkel, C., Whiteoak, J. B., & Cunningham, M. 2009, ApJ, 690, 580

2009
[115]

T., Evans, Neal J., I., et al

Wang, Y ., Jaﬀe, D. T., Evans, Neal J., I., et al. 1993, ApJ, 419, 707

1993
[116]

Weingartner, J. C. & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJS, 134, 263

2001
[117]

& Faure, A

Wiesenfeld, L. & Faure, A. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2573

2013
[118]

D., Howe, J

Wilson, C. D., Howe, J. E., & Balogh, M. L. 1999, ApJ, 517, 174

1999
[119]

Wiseman, J. J. & Ho, P . T. P . 1998, ApJ, 502, 676

1998
[120]

J., et al

Xu, Y ., Moscadelli, L., Reid, M. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 25 Y ang, W., Gong, Y ., Menten, K. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A112 Y ang, W., Xu, Y ., Choi, Y . K., et al. 2020, ApJS, 248, 18 Y anza, V ., Masqué, J. M., Dzib, S. A., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 276

2011
[121]

2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 035021 Y ue, Z., Ao, Y ., Tang, X., et al

Yin, J., Chen, Z., Y ao, Y ., et al. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 035021 Y ue, Z., Ao, Y ., Tang, X., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1002, 77

2022
[122]

2025, ApJ, 980, 44

Zhang, Z., Lu, X., Liu, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 44

2025
[123]

J., Papadopoulos, P

Zhang, Z.-Y ., Romano, D., Ivison, R. J., Papadopoulos, P . P ., & Matteucci, F. 2018, Nature, 558, 260

2018
[124]

2026, ApJ, 1005, 91

Zhao, M., Qiu, K., Kang, J.-h., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1005, 91

2026
[125]

D., Henkel, C., et al

Zhao, X., Tang, X. D., Henkel, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A207

2024
[126]

2024, ApJ, 969, L6

Zhou, W., Chen, Z., Jiang, Z., Feng, H., & Jiang, Y . 2024, ApJ, 969, L6

2024
[127]

Zhu, F.-Y ., Wang, J., Y an, Y ., Zhu, Q.-F., & Li, J. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 503 Article number, page 14 of 16 Zhao et al.: Kinetic temperatures in M17SW Appendix A: Previous measurements of temperature in M17SW region Based on previous observations of low- J transitions of 12CO, ...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

M., et al

Ao, Y ., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A135

2013

[2] [2]

Bakes, E. L. O. & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1994, ApJ, 427, 822

1994

[3] [3]

1976, A&A, 50, 41

Beetz, M., Elsaesser, H., Weinberger, R., & Poulakos, C. 1976, A&A, 50, 41

1976

[4] [4]

A., Goldsmith, P

Bergin, E. A., Goldsmith, P . F., Snell, R. L., & Ungerechts, H. 1994, ApJ, 431, 674

1994

[5] [5]

2025, ARA&A, 63, 1

Beuther, H., Kuiper, R., & Tafalla, M. 2025, ARA&A, 63, 1

2025

[6] [6]

L., Caswell, J

Breen, S. L., Caswell, J. L., Ellingsen, S. P ., & Phillips, C. J. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1487

2010

[7] [7]

Breen, S. L. & Ellingsen, S. P . 2011, MNRAS, 416, 178

2011

[8] [8]

Brogan, C. L. & Troland, T. H. 2001, ApJ, 560, 821

2001