Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 56 references

The giant radio source 0917+75: Origin and properties

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The diffuse radio source 0917+75 is a 1.5 Mpc giant radio galaxy powered by a low-excitation galaxy in a poor group, not a cluster halo or relic.

desk verdict Solid multi-wavelength reclassification of an ambiguous diffuse source into a low-power FR I GRG; the outer kinematic age is soft but not load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03368 v1 pith:P27S2A5Z submitted 2026-07-03 astro-ph.CO

G. Giovannini , N. Biava , M. Girardi , W. Boschin , R. Barrena , A. Bonafede , L. Feretti , C. Ferrari
show 6 more authors
F. Govoni M. Iacobelli M. Murgia E. Orru' R. Pizzo V. Vacca
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords giantradiogalaxiesFanaroff-RileyClassIlow-excitationgalaxygroupssuperclustersspectralagingpolarizationcosmicwebmagneticfields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

For decades the elongated diffuse radio source GRS0917+75 has sat in an ambiguous category: large, steep-spectrum emission outside any rich cluster, sometimes called a remnant or a filament feature of the Rood 27 supercluster. New optical redshifts, a LOFAR image at 144 MHz and a re-analysis of archival VLA L- and C-band data reclassify it as a giant radio galaxy. Its projected size is 1.5 Mpc and its estimated age is about 100 Myr. The optical parent is a bright low-excitation elliptical that is the brightest member of a very poor group on the outskirts of Abell 786 inside supercluster SCL245. The radio morphology is a peculiar low-power Fanaroff-Riley Class I source: bright central emission, an S-shaped inner structure, no jets, and highly polarized lobes whose magnetic field lies roughly parallel to the major axis. Because such a source can inject and retain relativistic particles and magnetic fields far from dense clusters, it offers a concrete route by which those ingredients reach the low-density cosmic web.

What carries the argument

Multifrequency radio imaging (LOFAR 144 MHz plus matched-uv VLA L- and C-band) combined with new TNG and DESI spectroscopy that pins the parent galaxy and group membership; spectral-index and JP/KP aging maps, equipartition magnetic-field estimates, and polarization vectors that together establish age, morphology class and environmental density.

What would settle it

Higher-resolution, deeper radio imaging that either detects a jet or counter-jet from BGG1, or a clear spectral-index discontinuity that would force a restarted or multi-source interpretation instead of a single aged FR I giant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

GRS0917+75 is a giant radio galaxy of projected linear size 1.5 Mpc and radiative/kinematic age ~100 Myr whose parent is a bright low-excitation radio galaxy (BGG1) at the centre of a poor group (velocity dispersion ~156 km s^{-1}, mass a few times 10^{12}–10^{13} M⊙) belonging to supercluster SCL245; the source is a low-power FR I with central emission but no jet-like features, a spectral break indicating aging, and high polarization consistent with expansion into a rarefied medium.

Load-bearing premise

The outer-lobe age of 50–100 Myr assumes an average expansion speed of 0.02–0.05 times the speed of light, taken from other sources rather than measured for this object.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Low-power FR I giants can grow to megaparsec scales even when hosted by a very poor group, provided the ambient density is low enough.
  • Polarized emission with little depolarization between 1.4 and 4.7 GHz is expected for such sources and can be used as a selection criterion.
  • Relativistic particles and microgauss magnetic fields observed in supercluster filaments can be supplied by faded giant radio galaxies rather than solely by cluster mergers.
  • Compact or quasi-compact groups on the outskirts of clusters remain viable hosts for giant radio galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If free expansion into a sub-microgauss medium is the main growth channel, similar low-surface-brightness giants should be common in upcoming low-frequency surveys of supercluster filaments.
  • The spiral-like central structure may record dynamical interaction with the collapsing group core, linking group coalescence to the fueling of the radio source.
  • A measured Faraday rotation measure or a firm upper limit on lobe advance speed would turn the present kinematic age into a true dynamical age and tighten the seed-particle budget for the cosmic web.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reclassifies the elongated diffuse radio source GRS0917+75 as a giant radio galaxy (GRG) of projected size ~1.5 Mpc and estimated age ~100 Myr. Combining new TNG multi-object and long-slit spectroscopy with DESI-DR1 redshifts, the authors identify a poor group of seven galaxies at z=0.1240 whose brightest member (BGG1) is a low-excitation radio galaxy coincident with a discrete radio core. New LOFAR 144 MHz imaging and a re-reduction of archival VLA L- and C-band data show an FR I morphology with bright central emission, no jet-like features, a spectral-index gradient that steepens outward, JP/KP radiative ages of 20–46 Myr in the central region, and high polarization (~35%) with magnetic field roughly parallel to the outer structure. The group lies in the outskirts of Abell 786 within supercluster SCL245; the authors argue that such GRGs can seed relativistic particles and magnetic fields in low-density environments.

Significance. If the classification holds, the work adds a well-documented low-power FR I GRG in a sparse group environment to the still-small sample of such objects, and supplies multi-frequency morphology, spectral-index maps, equipartition B-field estimates, and polarization data that can be compared with larger GRG catalogs (Dabhade et al. 2020; Simonte et al. 2024). The optical membership analysis (1D/2D/3D DEDICA, phase-space caustics) and the matched-uv multi-frequency radio reduction are quantitative and reproducible from the published tables and figures. The environmental conclusion—that GRGs can inject relativistic plasma into supercluster filaments—is of interest for cosmic-web magnetism studies, even though it remains qualitative.

major comments (1)
  1. Sect. 3.3.2 and the abstract/conclusions: the kinematic age of the outer lobes (50–100 Myr) rests on an assumed advance speed of 0.02–0.05c chosen by analogy rather than measured for this source. The paper already separates the more secure JP/KP radiative ages of the central region (20–46 Myr) from this outer estimate, and the GRG classification itself does not require a precise outer age. However, the abstract and conclusions quote “about 100 Myr” as a headline number; the text should state more explicitly that this is a kinematic upper-range estimate under a standard but unmeasured expansion speed, and that the classification and low-density-environment argument stand without it.
minor comments (7)
  1. Abstract and Introduction: “Several author have studied” should be “Several authors have studied”.
  2. Sect. 2.2 / Table 3: the two mass estimates (M200,L ~ 2.1e13 Msun vs. M200,sigma ~ 3.9e12 Msun) differ by a factor of ~5; the text attributes this to a collapsing phase, but a short quantitative note on how the small N and bootstrap errors affect the comparison would help the reader.
  3. Sect. 3.2 and Figs. 6, 9, 10: the strong nearby source southwest of GRS0917+75 produces dynamic-range artifacts; a brief statement of residual rms or blanked regions would clarify which spectral-index features are reliable.
  4. Sect. 3.3.2: the injection index is fixed at alpha_inj = 0.5 after a chi-squared search; reporting the chi-squared surface or the range of acceptable alpha_inj would strengthen the aging fits.
  5. Sect. 4.2: the comparison with the Giovannini et al. (2001) core–total power correlation is useful; stating the exact 408 MHz power (after spectral scaling and cosmology conversion) in the text would make the comparison fully quantitative.
  6. Table 1 caption and CDS note: the extract shows only two rows; ensure the full electronic table includes all 47 new TNG redshifts as stated.
  7. Fig. 2 inset: the small black arrows highlighting possible structures of BGG1 are hard to see in grayscale; a higher-contrast inset or labeled features would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: classification of GRS0917+75 as a 1.5 Mpc low-power FR I GRG follows from independent optical membership and multi-frequency radio data, not from self-definitional or fitted-as-prediction constructions.

full rationale

The paper is an observational reclassification study. The load-bearing chain is: (1) new TNG+DESI redshifts + 1D/2D/3D-DEDICA identify a seven-galaxy group at z=0.1240 centered on BGG1; (2) LOFAR 144 MHz and re-reduced VLA L/C-band images give projected size ~1.5 Mpc, FR I morphology without jets, spectral-index gradient, and high polarization; (3) JP/KP spectral aging on the central region (with equipartition B and B_CMB) yields 20–46 Myr; (4) an outer kinematic age of 50–100 Myr is obtained by assuming an expansion speed 0.02–0.05 c by analogy with other sources. None of these steps is circular. Equipartition B and the expansion-speed range are standard domain assumptions, not parameters fitted to the target result and then re-presented as predictions. Self-citations (Giovannini & Feretti 2000; Giovannini et al. 2015) appear only as historical context for earlier VLA work and are not used to force uniqueness or to smuggle an ansatz. The GRG classification and the low-density-environment conclusion stand on the new redshift membership, morphology, and spectral-index maps without requiring the precise outer age number. Score 0 is therefore the correct outcome.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard cosmological conversion, standard radio-source aging models, and two conventional but unmeasured parameters (equipartition B and lobe advance speed). No new particles or forces are introduced; the only free numbers are those fitted or assumed inside the aging calculation.

free parameters (3)
  • lobe expansion speed = 0.02–0.05 c
    Assumed 0.02–0.05 c to convert 750 kpc projected distance into a 50–100 Myr kinematic age (Sect. 3.3.2); not measured for this source.
  • injection spectral index α_inj = 0.5
    Fixed to 0.5 after a grid search that minimized χ² in the JP/KP fits (Sect. 3.3.2).
  • equipartition magnetic field B_eq = 0.6–1.0 µG range explored
    Derived from classical and revised equipartition formulae (0.63–0.75 µG) and compared with the IC lower limit; used as input to the aging calculation.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Flat ΛCDM cosmology with H0=70 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, Ωm=0.3, ΩΛ=0.7
    Used throughout to convert angular size and redshift into physical size and luminosity (Sect. 1).
  • domain assumption JP and KP continuous-injection aging models with constant B and pure synchrotron+IC losses
    Applied via BRATS to the central-region spectra (Sect. 3.3.2).
  • domain assumption Galaxies selected by 1D/2D/3D DEDICA and shifting-gapper methods are true physical members of the group and of A786
    Membership defines the host environment and the association of BGG1 with the radio source (Sect. 2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The giant radio source 0917+75: Origin and properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P27S2A5Z

@misc{pith2026260703368,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The giant radio source 0917+75: Origin and properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P27S2A5Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03368}
}
read the original abstract

Context. Several author have studied the giant radio source GRS0917 + 75 , but its origin remains unclear. Aims. This source is unusual, because of its large size and its location outside a rich cluster of galaxies. We aim to understand and discuss the properties and nature of this source and its connection to the environment. Methods. We conducted optical observations to obtain new spectroscopic data. We also acquired a LOFAR image at 144 MHz to derive information at low radio frequency. Moreover, we performed a new analysis of archival VLA data in the L and C bands for a multifrequency study of the source properties in the radio band. Results. From the observational data, we classify GRS0917 + 75 as a giant radio galaxy with a size of 1.5 Mpc and an estimated age of about 100 Myr. The optical parent galaxy is a bright low-excitation radio galaxy, the brightest member of a very poor group belonging to a large supercluster. GRS0917 + 75 is a peculiar low-power Fanaroff-Riley Class I giant radio galaxy with a bright central emission but no jet-like features. Conclusions. The existence of giant radio galaxies such as GRS0917 + 75 could explain the origin of relativistic particles and magnetic fields in low-density environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03368 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of spectroscopic redshift of galaxies. The histogram shows the 47 galaxies with spectroscopic redshift within the 5′ radius around BGG1, while the green line shows the density reconstruction from the 1D-DEDICA analysis in arbitrary y-units. The blue histogram corresponds to the peak of ten galaxies surrounding BGG1; seven of these are clustered in the sky and selected as GRS0917 + 75 group members (see … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Zoomed region of a wide-field Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) R-band image with overlaid small circles marking galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts. Red circles and labels indicate members of the GRS0917 + 75 group, while brown circles indicate non-members based on redshift and/or position (see text). Blue contours are from a LOFAR image with HPBW = 20 arcsec. Levels are -0.3, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. summarizes the above analysis and shows the projected phase-space distribution of the galaxies in A786. The escape-velocity curves, calculated following den Hartog & Katgert (1996), are also shown. In the compu￾tation, we assumed a Navarro, Frenk and White (NFW) mass density profile (Navarro et al. 1997), adopted the concentration parameter from the relation of Dolag et al. (2004), and applied the mass estimate obta… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial distribution and 2D-DEDICA isodensity contours of the galaxies in the redshift range of A786 (35 682 < cz < 38 015). The circle highlights the region within a radius of 15′ (∼ 2 Mpc) around the cluster center, marked by a cross. An second cross marks the GRS091…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Image of the source GRS0917 + 75 at 1.4 GHz with a circular HPBW of 20 arcsec. The noise level is 47 microJy/beam. Contour levels are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, 2, 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, and 30 mJy/beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Image of the source GRS0917 + 75 at 4.7 GHz with a circular HPBW of 14 arcsec. The noise level is 15 microJy/beam. Contour levels are 0.02, 0.05, 0.07, 0.1, 0.15, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 5, and 10 mJy/beam. The gray-scale range is 100 - 150 microJy/beam. ness and show no hot…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spectral index map between 144 MHz and 1.4 GHz at 20 arcsec resolution, with overlaid VLA L-band contours. 3.3.2. Spectral index, age, and magnetic field To compare source properties at different wavelengths (0.15–4.7 GHz) and derive the spectral index distribution, we…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top: LOFAR 144 MHz image of the central region of GRS0917 + 75 with a circular HPBW of 6 arcsec. The noise level is 80 microJy/beam. Contour levels are 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7, and 2.3 mJy/beam. Bottom: Image at 4.7 GHz of the inner region of GRS0917 + 75 with …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Spectral index maps between 144 MHz and 1.4 GHz (left) and between 1.4 GHz and 4.7 GHz (right) at 14 arcsec resolution, with over￾laid VLA C-band contours. Minor bands present in images are artifacts of a strong nearby source; see Sect. 3.2 (Harwood et al. 2013), whic…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Jaffe–Perola (JP) spectral aging map (left), corresponding error map (middle), and reduced chi-squared map (right) of the central region of the radio source at 14 arcsec resolution. The C-band contours are overlaid. The fit assumes αin j = 0.5 and B = 1.0 µG [PITH_FU…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Image of the polarized emission at 1.4 GHz with HPBW of 14 arcsec. Contours represent the intensity of the polarized emission and are 0.05, 0.07, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mJy/beam. Vectors are proportional in length to the total polarized intensity (POL…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top: Total-intensity (I) of the source at 4.7 GHz with HPBW of 14 arcsec. Contour levels are 0.05, 0.07, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 1 mJy/beam. Superimposed vectors are proportional in length to the polarized intensity, with 20 arcsec corresponding t…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Abell, G. O. 1958, ApJS, 3, 211

    1958

  2. [2]

    1992, A&AS, 93, 331 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Andernach, H., Feretti, L., Giovannini, G., et al. 1992, A&AS, 93, 331 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    1992

  3. [3]

    & Krause, M

    Beck, R. & Krause, M. 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 414 Böhringer, H., V oges, W., Huchra, J. P., et al. 2000, ApJS, 129, 435

    2005

  4. [4]

    Capetti, A., Massaro, F., & Baldi, R. D. 2017, A&A, 598, A49

    2017

  5. [5]

    Chen, C. M. H., Harris, D. E., Harrison, F. A., & Mao, P. H. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 1259 Chow-Martínez, M., Andernach, H., Caretta, C. A., & Trejo-Alonso, J. J. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 4073

    2008

  6. [6]

    Dabhade, P., Röttgering, H. J. A., Bagchi, J., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A5

    2020

  7. [7]

    1980, A&A, 82, 322 de Gasperin, F., Williams, W

    Danese, L., de Zotti, G., & di Tullio, G. 1980, A&A, 82, 322 de Gasperin, F., Williams, W. L., Best, P., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A104 den Hartog, R. & Katgert, P. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 349 DESI Collaboration, Abdul Karim, M., Adame, A. G., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 285 DESI Collaboration, Adame, A. G., Aguilar, J., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 58

    1980

  8. [8]

    E., Costain, C

    Dewdney, P. E., Costain, C. H., McHardy, I., et al. 1991, ApJS, 76, 1055

    1991

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168 Díaz-Giménez, E., Zandivarez, A., & Mamon, G. A. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 394

    2019

  2. [10]

    2004, A&A, 416, 853

    Dolag, K., Bartelmann, M., Perrotta, F., et al. 2004, A&A, 416, 853

    2004

  3. [11]

    1996, ApJ, 473, 670

    Fadda, D., Girardi, M., Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., & Mezzetti, M. 1996, ApJ, 473, 670

    1996

  4. [12]

    2012, A&A Rev., 20, 54

    Feretti, L., Giovannini, G., Govoni, F., & Murgia, M. 2012, A&A Rev., 20, 54

    2012

  5. [13]

    2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 104

    Giovannini, G., Bonafede, A., Brown, S., et al. 2015, in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), 104

    2015

  6. [14]

    D., Feretti, L., Lara, L., & Venturi, T

    Giovannini, G., Cotton, W. D., Feretti, L., Lara, L., & Venturi, T. 2001, ApJ, 552, 508

    2001

  7. [15]

    & Feretti, L

    Giovannini, G. & Feretti, L. 2000, New A, 5, 335

    2000

  8. [16]

    2024, A&A, 692, A175

    Girardi, M., Boschin, W., Mercurio, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A175

    2024

  9. [17]

    2022, A&A, 658, A159

    Girardi, M., Boschin, W., Nonino, M., Innocentin, C., & De Grandi, S. 2022, A&A, 658, A159

    2022

  10. [18]

    1996, ApJ, 457, 61

    Girardi, M., Fadda, D., Giuricin, G., et al. 1996, ApJ, 457, 61

    1996

  11. [19]

    1998, ApJ, 505, 74

    Girardi, M., Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., Mezzetti, M., & Boschin, W. 1998, ApJ, 505, 74

    1998

  12. [20]

    2015, A&A, 579, A4

    Girardi, M., Mercurio, A., Balestra, I., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A4

    2015

  13. [21]

    2023, A&A, 671, A83

    Girardi, M., Zarattini, S., Boschin, W., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A83

    2023

  14. [22]

    J., Shimwell, T

    Hardcastle, M. J., Shimwell, T. W., Tasse, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A10

    2021

  15. [23]

    E., Stern, C

    Harris, D. E., Stern, C. P., Willis, A. G., & Dewdney, P. E. 1993, AJ, 105, 769

    1993

  16. [24]

    J., Hardcastle, M

    Harwood, J. J., Hardcastle, M. J., Croston, J. H., & Goodger, J. L. 2013, MN- RAS, 435, 3353

    2013

  17. [25]

    1982, ApJ, 255, 382

    Hickson, P. 1982, ApJ, 255, 382

    1982

  18. [26]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  19. [27]

    Jaffe, W. J. & Perola, G. C. 1973, A&A, 26, 423 Jaffé, Y . L., Poggianti, B. M., Verheijen, M. A. W., Deshev, B. Z., & van Gorkom, J. H. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 2111

    1973

  20. [28]

    Kardashev, N. S. 1962, Soviet Ast., 6, 317

    1962

  21. [29]

    D., Feretti, L., et al

    Lara, L., Cotton, W. D., Feretti, L., et al. 2001, A&A, 370, 409

    2001

  22. [30]

    D., et al

    Lara, L., Giovannini, G., Cotton, W. D., et al. 2004, A&A, 421, 899

    2004

  23. [31]

    Leahy, J. P. & Perley, R. A. 1991, AJ, 102, 537

    1991

  24. [32]

    T., Ellison, S

    Mendel, J. T., Ellison, S. L., Simard, L., Patton, D. R., & McConnachie, A. W. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1409

    2011

  25. [33]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 2638

    Munari, E., Biviano, A., Borgani, S., Murante, G., & Fabjan, D. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2638

    2013

  26. [34]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1997, ApJ, 490, 493

    1997

  27. [35]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606

    2014

  28. [36]

    Pacholczyk, A. G. & Swihart, T. L. 1970, ApJ, 161, 415

    1970

  29. [37]

    1993, MNRAS, 265, 706

    Pisani, A. 1993, MNRAS, 265, 706

    1993

  30. [38]

    1996, MNRAS, 278, 697

    Pisani, A. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 697

    1996

  31. [39]

    R., & Iovino, A

    Pompei, E., de Carvalho, R. R., & Iovino, A. 2006, A&A, 445, 857

    2006

  32. [40]

    & Iovino, A

    Pompei, E. & Iovino, A. 2012, A&A, 539, A106

    2012

  33. [41]

    2007, A&A, 464, 451

    Popesso, P., Biviano, A., Böhringer, H., & Romaniello, M. 2007, A&A, 464, 451

    2007

  34. [42]

    Reiprich, T. H. & Böhringer, H. 2002, ApJ, 567, 716

    2002

  35. [43]

    & Bressert, E

    Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python

    2012

  36. [44]

    Rood, H. J. 1976, ApJ, 207, 16

    1976

  37. [45]

    & Dabhade, P

    Sankhyayan, S. & Dabhade, P. 2024, A&A, 687, L8

    2024

  38. [46]

    Scaife, A. M. M. & Heald, G. H. 2012, MNRAS, 423, L30

    2012

  39. [47]

    W., Hardcastle, M

    Shimwell, T. W., Hardcastle, M. J., Tasse, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A1

    2022

  40. [48]

    K., & Barthel, P

    Simonte, M., Andernach, H., Brüggen, M., Miley, G. K., & Barthel, P. 2024, A&A, 686, A21

    2024

  41. [49]

    Smirnov, O. M. & Tasse, C. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2668

    2015

  42. [50]

    Struble, M. F. & Rood, H. J. 1987, ApJS, 63, 555

    1987

  43. [51]

    P., Bonafede, A., et al

    Stuardi, C., O’Sullivan, S. P., Bonafede, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 638, A48

    2020

  44. [52]

    2014a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1410.8706

    Tasse, C. 2014a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1410.8706

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    2018, A&A, 611, A87

    Tasse, C., Hugo, B., Mirmont, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A87

    2018

  46. [54]

    & Davis, M

    Tonry, J. & Davis, M. 1979, AJ, 84, 1511 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22 van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A2 van Weeren, R. J., de Gasperin, F., Akamatsu, H., et al. 2019,...

    1979

  47. [55]

    L., van Weeren, R

    Williams, W. L., van Weeren, R. J., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2385

    2016

  48. [56]

    G., Strom, R

    Willis, A. G., Strom, R. G., & Wilson, A. S. 1974, Nature, 250, 625 Article number, page 12

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.