Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 93 references

MICONIC: The spatial relationship between star formation and the AGN in Centaurus A revealed by JWST/MIRI

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read JWST/MIRI finds 928 red mid-IR sources in Cen A that track the warped disc and recent star formation, not the radio jet.

desk verdict Clean first JWST/MIRI census of Cen A’s disc that delivers a solid geometric test of merger-driven vs jet-driven star formation; YSO classification is the only soft spot and is already caveated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04942 v1 pith:JWN6WEC4 submitted 2026-07-06 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

O. C. Jones , M. L. Jones , D. Dicken , G. S. Wright , M. García Marín , A. Alonso Herrero , P. Guillard , K. Justtanont
show 16 more authors
M. Meixner A. Labiano D. Rouan P. van der Werf L. Pantoni V. A. Buiten T. Böker G. Östlin L. Evangelista M. Baes L. Colina L. Hermosa Muñoz Th. Henning M. Güdel T. P. Ray P.-O. Lagage
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords CentaurusAJWST/MIRIstarformationyoungstellarobjectswarpeddustdiscAGNjet-ISMinteractionmid-infraredphotometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Centaurus A is the nearest active radio galaxy and hosts a warped dust disc left over from a gas-rich merger. This paper uses JWST/MIRI imaging in three mid-infrared filters over a roughly 4 by 2 kpc central region to resolve the point sources inside that disc. Colour diagnostics isolate 928 red sources with strong infrared excess, about 36 percent of the high-quality three-band sample; they show rising spectral slopes from warm dust and sit tightly along the disc and its filaments. The authors argue these sources are dominated by embedded young stellar objects that mark star formation only a few hundred thousand to a million years old. Because the sources align with the merger-built disc and show no spatial correlation with the radio jet, the paper concludes that central star formation is regulated by the accreted gas reservoir rather than by jet–ISM interactions.

What carries the argument

Mid-infrared colour cuts (F560W–F770W > 1.4 and F560W–F1130W > 1.8) applied to high-quality three-band photometry, combined with the sources’ measured spatial confinement to the warped disc and rising spectral slopes, that separate the red dust-enshrouded population from ordinary photospheric sources.

What would settle it

Near-infrared imaging or mid-infrared spectroscopy of a substantial fraction of the 928 red sources that reclassifies most of them as extreme AGB or other evolved stars, or that reveals a clear overdensity of the red sources along the radio-jet axis rather than the disc.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A population of 928 red mid-infrared point sources with strong infrared excess is spatially confined to Cen A’s warped dust disc, exhibits rising mid-IR spectral slopes from warm dust, and is consistent with embedded young stellar objects tracing recent (~10^5–10^6 yr) star formation. Their geometric alignment with the disc and lack of correlation with the radio jet imply that star formation in the central regions is primarily regulated by merger-accreted gas, with no strong evidence for AGN jet–ISM interactions.

Load-bearing premise

That the mid-infrared colours plus spatial confinement to the disc are enough to show the red sources are mostly embedded young stars rather than extreme dust-producing evolved stars or other contaminants.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST/MIRI F560W, F770W and F1130W imaging of the central ~4 imes2 kpc of Centaurus A, producing a band-matched PSF catalogue of 58 445 sources (2 558 with σ≤0.1 mag in all three bands). Colour–magnitude and colour–colour diagrams show a clear bimodality; 928 sources selected by F560W–F770W>1.4 and F560W–F1130W>1.8 exhibit rising mid-IR slopes (median α=3.55) and are spatially confined to the warped dust disc (PCA first-component variance 94 %, perpendicular dispersion 0.38 kpc versus 0.63 kpc for the photospheric population). The authors interpret these sources as dominated by embedded Stage-I YSOs tracing recent (~10^5–10^6 yr) star formation regulated by merger-accreted gas, with no geometric correlation to the radio jet. The previously known Spitzer “oval dusty shell” is resolved into multiple F1130W-bright loops associated with the disc.

Significance. If the geometric result holds, the work cleanly separates merger-driven star formation in the central disc of the nearest radio galaxy from jet-triggered modes previously reported only in the outer halo. The public MIRI catalogue, the quantitative PCA/dispersion statistics, the multi-wavelength overlays with CO, radio and X-ray, and the resolution of the dusty shell into multiple loops are lasting observational contributions. The mid-IR colour selection and SED-slope analysis are carefully executed and provide a useful benchmark for future spectroscopic follow-up.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 4.1 (and colour cuts in §3.1.1): the claim that the 928 red sources are “dominated by embedded YSO candidates” rests on mid-IR colour analogy to Local Group regions, source counts exceeding the expected extreme-AGB fraction, and spatial confinement to the disc. The paper itself notes the colour overlap between Stage-I YSOs and extreme AGB stars and the absence of spectroscopic confirmation. While the geometric argument against a pure AGB population is persuasive, the language should be softened to “consistent with a population dominated by…” and residual AGB/RSG contamination should be quantified more explicitly (e.g., an upper limit scaled from LMC statistics or a simple luminosity-function comparison).
  2. Section 4.3: the conclusion of “no strong evidence for AGN jet–ISM interactions” on the scales probed is well supported by the lack of alignment with the radio/X-ray jet and by the thin-disc geometry. However, the paper also cites Espada et al. (2019) that star-formation efficiency is lower in the circumnuclear disc, possibly due to AGN-related shear/turbulence. A short quantitative statement of the surface-density contrast (or lack thereof) between jet-proximate and jet-distant regions of the disc would make the “no strong evidence” claim more falsifiable.
minor comments (5)
  1. Table 1 / §2.1: the two programmes have very different on-source times (1199 s vs 233 s). A brief note on how the depth variation is handled in the completeness limits (Fig. 4) and in the final high-quality sample would help the reader.
  2. Figure 9: the weak positive slope of the “main population” is attributed to residual diffuse/PAH background. A short test (e.g., aperture-size dependence or local-background residual map) would strengthen that interpretation.
  3. §3.3: the elevated 11.3/7.7 µm PAH ratio in the shells is cited from Quillen et al. (2008). Given that MIRI imaging alone cannot separate the two features, the statement should be clearly labelled as a literature result rather than a new measurement.
  4. Catalogue description (Table 4): magnitudes are stated to be uncorrected for extinction; a one-sentence reminder in the abstract or §3.1 would avoid misinterpretation by catalogue users.
  5. Typographical: “Observ ations” in the section heading; occasional missing spaces after commas in the abstract and introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: observational colour selection and geometric comparison to external disc/jet maps are independent of any fitted prediction or self-definitional loop.

full rationale

The paper is a straightforward JWST/MIRI imaging study. Source detection and PSF photometry (Section 2.3, starbugii parameters in Table 2) produce a catalogue; colour cuts F560W–F770W > 1.4 and F560W–F1130W > 1.8 are chosen at the observed density minimum separating bimodal populations in the CMD/CCD (Section 3.1.1, Figs 5–6), not derived from a model that already encodes the YSO claim. Spatial confinement is measured via PCA and perpendicular dispersions (Section 3.1.2) and compared to independently mapped CO, radio, and X-ray structures (Figs 10–11, citations to Espada et al. 2019, Hardcastle et al. 2003/2007). The interpretation that the 928 red sources are dominated by embedded YSOs rests on colour analogy to Local Group studies, source counts exceeding expected extreme-AGB fractions, and disc morphology; the paper itself flags the colour overlap and lack of spectroscopy (Section 4.1, 4.4). No parameter is fitted to a subset and then re-labelled a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and self-citations (Alonso Herrero et al. 2025, Pantoni et al. 2026, Evangelista et al. 2026) supply only ancillary MRS context for the nucleus, not the load-bearing disc-versus-jet geometry. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external multi-wavelength benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central geometric claim rests on standard photometric practice, literature distance and extinction values, and an empirical colour cut. No new physical entities are introduced; the main free choices are the colour thresholds and the morphological sharpness/roundness filters used to reject extended sources.

free parameters (3)
  • F560W-F770W colour cut = >1.4 mag
    Threshold >1.4 mag chosen at the observed density minimum separating the two CMD populations (Section 3.1.1); directly controls the size of the red sample.
  • F560W-F1130W colour cut = >1.8 mag
    Threshold >1.8 mag likewise set by the colour-colour density minimum; jointly defines the 928-source sample.
  • Photometric uncertainty threshold = ≤0.1 mag
    ≤0.1 mag in all three bands for the high-quality sample of 2558 sources used in population analysis.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Distance to Cen A is 3.8 Mpc
    Adopted from Neumayer et al. (2007) and Harris (2010); converts angular scales to physical kpc used throughout.
  • domain assumption Mid-IR extinction is relatively flat (A_5.6 ~0.05 A_V, A_11.3 ~0.02 A_V)
    Used in Section 3.2 to argue that extinction alone cannot produce the observed steep spectral slopes of the red sources.
  • domain assumption Extreme AGB stars are rare (~4 percent of evolved stars in the LMC) and follow the smooth stellar mass distribution
    Invoked in Section 4.1 to argue that the large number and disc-confined geometry of red sources cannot be explained by evolved stars.
  • ad hoc to paper Colour loci of Stage-I YSOs and extreme AGB stars can be distinguished statistically by spatial distribution even if they overlap in colour space
    Core interpretive step of Section 4.1; not independently verified for Cen A.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MICONIC: The spatial relationship between star formation and the AGN in Centaurus A revealed by JWST/MIRI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JWN6WEC4

@misc{pith2026260704942,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MICONIC: The spatial relationship between star formation and the AGN in Centaurus A revealed by JWST/MIRI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JWN6WEC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04942}
}
read the original abstract

Centaurus A (Cen A), the nearest active radio galaxy, hosts a warped dust disc formed in a gas-rich merger. We present JWST/MIRI imaging in three filters, F560W, F770W, and F1130W, of this central disc over a ~4 x 2 kpc region to characterise its resolved mid-infrared stellar populations. The images reveal a system of extended dusty structures, previously identified with Spitzer as an "oval dusty shell", now resolved into multiple loop-like features that are brightest in F1130W and closely associated with the warped disc. Colour-magnitude and colour-colour diagnostics reveal a distinct population of 928 red point sources with strong infrared excess, accounting for ~36 per cent of sources with high-quality photometry in all three bands, spatially confined to the disc. These sources exhibit rising mid-infrared spectral slopes indicative of emission from warm dust. Their colours and spatial distribution are consistent with a population dominated by embedded young stellar objects, tracing recent (~10^5-10^6 yr) star formation within the disc. The strong geometric alignment of these sources with the disc, together with the lack of correlation with the radio jet, suggests that star formation in the central regions of Cen A is primarily regulated by merger-accreted gas, with no strong evidence for AGN jet-ISM interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04942 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Colour composite image of Centaurus A: red corresponds to 5.8 𝜇m emission from Spitzer/IRAC (Quillen et al. 2006), green to X-ray emission from Chandra/ACIS (Hardcastle et al. 2007), and blue to the VLA radio jet (Hardcastle et al. 2003). The MIRI imaging mosaic (this work) is outlined in solid white, while the MICONIC MIRI/MRS footprint of the central 7 ′′ × 12′′ (see Alonso Herrero et al. 2025; Pantoni et al. 2026… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Three-colour JWST/MIRI mosaic of the central region and inner disc of Centaurus A. The image combines F560W (blue), F770W (green), and F1130W (red), highlighting the prominent warped dust disc, filamentary structures, and the active nucleus. The nucleus appears as a bright compact source located between the prominent dust lanes of the warped disc. The mosaic covers approximately 6.9 arcmin2 . MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2026) … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Photometric uncertainty as a function of AB magnitude for sources detected in the MIRI F560W, F770W, and F1130W filters. The Cen A band￾matched catalogue includes sources with uncertainties up to 0.4 mag. The red horizontal line indicates the more stringent 0.1 mag uncertainty threshold used in this work. 10 1 10 2 10 3 (a) F560W 10 1 10 2 10 3 (b) F770W 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 Apparent magnitude 10 1 10 2 10 3 (c) F11… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Luminosity functions for sources detected in the MIRI F560W, F770W, and F1130W filters. The turnover at faint magnitudes, marked by the red vertical dashed lines, indicates the estimated photometric completeness limit. MNRAS 000, 1–14 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/f…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: F560W versus F560W–F770W colour–magnitude diagram for Cen A point sources. Grey points show all 2,558 sources; red points indicate the 928 objects with an infrared excess. Representative uncertainties as a function of magnitude are indicated on the right. The separatio…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Colour–colour diagram of 𝐹560𝑊 − 𝐹770𝑊 versus 𝐹560𝑊 − 𝐹1130𝑊 for the Cen A point-source sample. The dashed lines mark the adopted colour cuts used to select the red dust-enshrouded population. Sym￾bols are colour-coded as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spatial distribution of resolved sources in the central region of Cen A. Grey points show all sources detected in all three MIRI bands with photometric uncertainties < 0.1 mag, while red circles indicate the dust-enshrouded sources selected using the mid-infrared colou…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Positions of the red, dust-enshrouded sources from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Median normalised mid-infrared SEDs of the colour-selected red sources (red) and the main point-source population (grey) in Cen A. Fluxes are normalised at F560W (5.6 𝜇m); shaded regions show the 16–84 per cent ranges. The red population exhibits a systematically steep…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the JWST/MIRI F1130W emission with tracers of cold molecular gas and radio continuum in Cen A. The JWST/MIRI F1130W image is overlaid with contours of CO(1–0) emission (cyan contours, from Espada et al. 2019, with a beam of 1"×1.5"), tracing the cold mol…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of the JWST/MIRI F1130W emission with radio and X-ray tracers of the AGN jet in Cen A. The F1130W image is overlaid with VLA 21 cm radio continuum (blue contours; Hardcastle et al. 2003) and Chandra X-ray emission (green contours; Hardcastle et al. 2007). T…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad57c0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972...47A 972, 47

    Aghdam S. T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad57c0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972...47A 972, 47

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad57c0 2024

  2. [2]

    Alonso Herrero A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A.334A 699, A334

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554823 2025

  3. [3]

    Andr \'e P., Mattern M., Arzoumanian D., Shimajiri Y., Zavagno A., Abe D., Russeil D., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/adc73d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...984L..59A 984, L59

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc73d 2025

  4. [4]

    L., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/40 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...748...40B 748, 40

    Boyer M. L., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/40 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...748...40B 748, 40

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/40 2012

  5. [5]

    Bradley L., et al., 2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.13989456 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.13989456 2024

  6. [6]

    Bushouse H., et al., 2025, JWST Calibration Pipeline , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.6984365

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.6984365 2025

  7. [7]

    A., Burns J

    Clarke D. A., Burns J. O., Norman M. L., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171663 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...395..444C 395, 444

    work page doi:10.1086/171663 1992

  8. [8]

    Cresci G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799...82C 799, 82

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/82 2015

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20418.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.1603C 421, 1603

    Crockett R. M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20418.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.1603C 421, 1603

    2012 doi

  2. [10]

    A., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5f66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1002..217C 1002, 217

    Cronin S. A., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5f66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1002..217C 1002, 217

    2026 doi

  3. [11]

    H., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14715.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.395.1999C 395, 1999

    Croston J. H., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14715.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.395.1999C 395, 1999

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ARA&A..45..177C 45, 177

    Crowther P. A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ARA&A..45..177C 45, 177

    2007 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    Dicken D., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A...5D 689, A5

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    J., van den Bergh S., Harvel C

    Dufour R. J., van den Bergh S., Harvel C. A., Martins D. H., Schiffer III F. H., Talbot Jr. R. J., Talent D. L., Wells D. C., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/112421 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979AJ.....84..284D 84, 284

    1979 doi

  7. [15]

    Espada D., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...695..116E 695, 116

    2009 doi

  8. [16]

    Espada D., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa78a9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843..136E 843, 136

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Espada D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab262d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887...88E 887, 88

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    arXiv:2605.22497

    Evangelista L., et al., 2026, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2605.22497 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260522497E p. arXiv:2605.22497

    2026 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Garc \' a-Bernete I., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450086 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.162G 691, A162

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135f8001G 135, 068001

    Gardner J. P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135f8001G 135, 068001

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    A., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157265 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232...60G 232, 60

    Graham J. A., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157265 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232...60G 232, 60

    1979 doi

  14. [22]

    Habel N., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971..108H 971, 108

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    J., Olofsson H., eds, 2003, Asymptotic giant branch stars

    Habing H. J., Olofsson H., eds, 2003, Asymptotic giant branch stars

    2003

  16. [24]

    J., Worrall D

    Hardcastle M. J., Worrall D. M., Kraft R. P., Forman W. R., Jones C., Murray S. S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376519 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...593..169H 593, 169

    2003 doi

  17. [25]

    J., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670L..81H 670, L81

    Hardcastle M. J., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670L..81H 670, L81

    2007 doi

  18. [26]

    Harris G. L. H., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1071/AS09063 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASA...27..475H 27, 475

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    E., Harris G

    Harris W. E., Harris G. L. H., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340466 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123.3108H 123, 3108

    2002 doi

  20. [28]

    Hermosa Mu \ n oz L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.350H 690, A350

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    W., Kennicutt Jr

    Hodge P. W., Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983AJ.....88..296H 88, 296

    1983 doi

  22. [30]

    P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s001590050011 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&ARv...8..237I 8, 237

    Israel F. P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s001590050011 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&ARv...8..237I 8, 237

    1998 doi

  23. [31]

    C., Meixner M., Sargent B

    Jones O. C., Meixner M., Sargent B. A., Boyer M. L., Sewi o M., Hony S., Roman-Duval J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...811..145J 811, 145

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    C., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.3250J 470, 3250

    Jones O. C., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.3250J 470, 3250

    doi

  25. [33]

    C., Meixner M., Justtanont K., Glasse A., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6bf6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841...15J 841, 15

    Jones O. C., Meixner M., Justtanont K., Glasse A., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6bf6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841...15J 841, 15

    doi

  26. [34]

    C., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01945-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..694J 7, 694

    Jones O. C., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01945-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..694J 7, 694

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    S., Paul K

    Joseph P., Sreekumar P., Stalin C. S., Paul K. T., Mondal C., George K., Mathew B., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.2300J 516, 2300

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    T., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912624 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502L...5K 502, L5

    Kainulainen J. T., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912624 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502L...5K 502, L5

    2009 doi

  29. [37]

    C., Banfield J

    Keel W. C., Banfield J. K., Medling A. M., Neff S. G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf809 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157...66K 157, 66

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    L., Hawarden T

    Leeuw L. L., Hawarden T. G., Matthews H. E., Robson E. I., Eckart A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324494 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...565..131L 565, 131

    2002 doi

  31. [39]

    Lenki \'c L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3f90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...967..110L 967, 110

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaf85 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L...9L 944, L9

    Leroy A. K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaf85 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L...9L 944, L9

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    J., Koekemoer A., Capetti A., Axon D., Macchetto D., Caon N., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528..276M 528, 276

    Marconi A., Schreier E. J., Koekemoer A., Capetti A., Axon D., Macchetto D., Caon N., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528..276M 528, 276

    2000 doi

  34. [42]

    G., Kennicutt Jr

    Minniti D., Rejkuba M., Funes J. G., Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422546 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...612..215M 612, 215

    2004 doi

  35. [43]

    F., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9810419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...341..667M 341, 667

    Mirabel I. F., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9810419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...341..667M 341, 667

    1999 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    R., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536..266M 536, 266

    Mould J. R., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536..266M 536, 266

    2000 doi

  37. [45]

    V., Sutherland R., Wagner A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..967M 461, 967

    Mukherjee D., Bicknell G. V., Sutherland R., Wagner A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..967M 461, 967

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    V., Wagner A

    Mukherjee D., Bicknell G. V., Wagner A. Y., Sutherland R. S., Silk J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1776 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.5544M 479, 5544

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    Nally C., 2023, StarbugII: JWST PSF photometry for crowded fields , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2309.012 ( @eprint ascl 2309.012 )

    2023

  40. [48]

    Nally C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1163 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531..183N 531, 183

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Nayak O., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7baf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..262N 975, 262

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    G., Eilek J

    Neff S. G., Eilek J. A., Owen F. N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/87 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...802...87N 802, 87

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    Nesvadba N. P. H., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...521A..65N 521, A65

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    P., de Zeeuw P

    Neumayer N., Cappellari M., Reunanen J., Rix H.-W., van der Werf P. P., de Zeeuw P. T., Davies R. I., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523039 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671.1329N 671, 1329

    2007 doi

  45. [53]

    A., Morganti R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041379 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...429..469O 429, 469

    Oosterloo T. A., Morganti R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041379 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...429..469O 429, 469

    2005 doi

  46. [54]

    Pantoni L., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202558839 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...709A.237P 709, A237

    2026 doi

  47. [55]

    W., Ford H

    Peng E. W., Ford H. C., Freeman K. C., White R. L., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344308 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.3144P 124, 3144

    2002 doi

  48. [56]

    W., Ford H

    Peng E. W., Ford H. C., Freeman K. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...602..705P 602, 705

    2004 doi

  49. [57]

    Perna M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038328 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A.139P 643, A139

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    C., de Zeeuw P

    Quillen A. C., de Zeeuw P. T., Phinney E. S., Phillips T. G., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171329 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...391..121Q 391, 121

    1992 doi

  51. [59]

    C., Graham J

    Quillen A. C., Graham J. R., Frogel J. A., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172943 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412..550Q 412, 550

    1993 doi

  52. [60]

    C., Brookes M

    Quillen A. C., Brookes M. H., Keene J., Stern D., Lawrence C. R., Werner M. W., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504418 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...645.1092Q 645, 1092

    2006 doi

  53. [61]

    C., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12768.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384.1469Q 384, 1469

    Quillen A. C., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12768.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384.1469Q 384, 1469

    2008 doi

  54. [62]

    C., Neumayer N., Oosterloo T., Espada D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1071/AS09069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASA...27..396Q 27, 396

    Quillen A. C., Neumayer N., Oosterloo T., Espada D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1071/AS09069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASA...27..396Q 27, 396

    2010 doi

  55. [63]

    A., Smith N., Haworth T

    Reiter M., Morse J. A., Smith N., Haworth T. J., Kuhn M. A., Klaassen P. D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2820 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.5382R 517, 5382

    2022 doi

  56. [64]

    R., Bedding T

    Rejkuba M., Minniti D., Silva D. R., Bedding T. R., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...379..781R 379, 781

    2001 doi

  57. [65]

    R., Bedding T

    Rejkuba M., Minniti D., Silva D. R., Bedding T. R., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20034056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...411..351R 411, 351

    2003 doi

  58. [66]

    E., Harris G

    Rejkuba M., Greggio L., Harris W. E., Harris G. L. H., Peng E. W., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/432462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...631..262R 631, 262

    2005 doi

  59. [67]

    E., Greggio L., Crnojevi \'c D., Harris G

    Rejkuba M., Harris W. E., Greggio L., Crnojevi \'c D., Harris G. L. H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A..41R 657, A41

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    Riebel D., Srinivasan S., Sargent B., Meixner M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753...71R 753, 71

    2012 doi

  61. [69]

    H., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/682252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..584R 127, 584

    Rieke G. H., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/682252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..584R 127, 584

    2015 doi

  62. [70]

    Rigby J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acb293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135d8001R 135, 048001

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    Rigopoulou D., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1535 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.1598R 532, 1598

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    P., Whitney B

    Robitaille T. P., Whitney B. A., Indebetouw R., Wood K., Denzmore P., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/508424 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..167..256R 167, 256

    2006 doi

  65. [73]

    Salom \'e Q., Salom \'e P., Miville-Desch \^e nes M.-A., Combes F., Hamer S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..98S 608, A98

    2017 doi

  66. [74]

    Santoro F., Oonk J. B. R., Morganti R., Oosterloo T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...574A..89S 574, A89

    2015 doi

  67. [75]

    H., van der Hulst J

    Schiminovich D., van Gorkom J. H., van der Hulst J. M., Kasow S., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187246 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...423L.101S 423, L101

    1994 doi

  68. [76]

    J., Capetti A., Macchetto F., Sparks W

    Schreier E. J., Capetti A., Macchetto F., Sparks W. B., Ford H. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176917 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...459..535S 459, 535

    1996 doi

  69. [77]

    P., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....148..124S 148, 124

    Seale J. P., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/148/6/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....148..124S 148, 124

    2014 doi

  70. [78]

    Shin J., Woo J.-H., Chung A., Baek J., Cho K., Kang D., Bae H.-J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2e72 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...881..147S 881, 147

    2019 doi

  71. [79]

    C., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...664.1144S 664, 1144

    Sloan G. C., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...664.1144S 664, 1144

    2007 doi

  72. [80]

    Soria R., et al., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...465...79S 465, 79

    1996 doi

  73. [81]

    Srinivasan S., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/4810 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137.4810S 137, 4810

    2009 doi

  74. [82]

    A., Morganti R., Saripalli L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...515A..67S 515, A67

    Struve C., Oosterloo T. A., Morganti R., Saripalli L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...515A..67S 515, A67

    2010 doi

  75. [83]

    Y., Sijacki D., Bourne M

    Talbot R. Y., Sijacki D., Bourne M. A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1566 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.4535T 514, 4535

    2022 doi

  76. [84]

    B., 2005, in Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

    Taylor M. B., 2005, in Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV. p. 29

    2005

  77. [85]

    Villanueva V., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202553891 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A.202V 695, A202

    2025 doi

  78. [86]

    Wang J., Hammer F., Rejkuba M., Crnojevi \'c D., Yang Y., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.2766W 498, 2766

    2020 doi

  79. [87]

    M., van der Hucht K

    Williams P. M., van der Hucht K. A., The P. S., 1987, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987A&A...182...91W 182, 91

    1987

  80. [88]

    S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135d8003W 135, 048003

    Wright G. S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135d8003W 135, 048003

    2023 doi

  81. [89]

    Wykes S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321622 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..19W 558, A19

    2013 doi

  82. [90]

    M., Kobayashi N., Ressler M

    Yasui C., Izumi N., Saito M., Lau R. M., Kobayashi N., Ressler M. E., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae56fe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1002...73Y 1002, 73

    2026 doi

  83. [91]

    C., Pacifici C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad779e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975...18Z 975, 18

    Zeidler P., Sabbi E., Nota A., Manjavacas E., Jones O. C., Pacifici C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad779e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975...18Z 975, 18

    2024 doi

  84. [92]

    H., van der Hulst J

    van Gorkom J. H., van der Hulst J. M., Haschick A. D., Tubbs A. D., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115456 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990AJ.....99.1781V 99, 1781

    1990 doi

  85. [93]

    van den Bergh S., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...208..673V 208, 673

    1976 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.