Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 35 references

Hot Spot Evolution Measured by High-Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopy at the National Ignition Facility

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read High-resolution Kr spectroscopy tracks hot-spot density, temperature, size and areal density over the stagnation phase at NIF, showing W-doped ablators raise stagnation pressure.

desk verdict First simultaneous time-resolved ne, Te, Rhs and ρRhs from absolutely calibrated Kr Heβ at NIF, with a clean W-doping comparison that holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05738 v1 pith:436DWH2A submitted 2026-07-07 physics.plasm-ph

Lan Gao , B. F. Kraus , K. W. Hill , M. B. Schneider , A. Christopherson , B. Bachmann , M. Bitter , P. Efthimion
show 14 more authors
N. Pablant R. Betti C. Thomas D. Thorn A. G. MacPhee S. Khan R. Kauffman D. Liedahl H. Chen D. Bradley J. Kilkenny B. Lahmann E. Stambulchik Y. Maron
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.57.-z52.70.La52.25.Os
keywords inertialconfinementfusionhotspotx-rayspectroscopyStarkbroadeningKrHeβNIFW-dopedablatorstagnationpressure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that time-resolved, absolutely calibrated Kr Heβ spectra can give simultaneous, temporally resolved values of electron density, temperature, hot-spot radius and areal density during the brief stagnation phase of a NIF implosion. Density is read from Stark broadening of the resonance complex, temperature from the He/Li satellite intensity ratio, and size from absolute line brightness once those parameters are known. Comparing otherwise identical high-density-carbon capsules, one with a thin tungsten-doped layer and one without, the doped target reaches higher peak density (~5.2×10²⁴ cm⁻³), temperature (~3.2 keV) and stagnation pressure (~48 Gbar) and a smaller hot spot. These spectroscopic histories supply the time-dependent core conditions needed to test whether radiation-hydrodynamic models correctly predict ignition-scale performance.

What carries the argument

Absolutely calibrated, time-resolved Kr Heβ spectra whose Stark width maps to ne and whose He/Li satellite ratio maps to Te; absolute brightness then yields hot-spot radius once ne(t) and Te(t) are known.

What would settle it

A simultaneous monochromatic x-ray image or independent continuum measurement that yields a hot-spot radius or density history inconsistent with the spectroscopic values extracted under the isobaric assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Time-resolved, absolutely calibrated Kr Heβ spectra measured by dHIRES allow simultaneous inference of hot-spot electron density (from Stark width), electron temperature (from the He/Li dielectronic-satellite ratio), size and areal density; the W-doped HDC capsule reaches higher peak ne, Te and stagnation pressure than the undoped capsule under nearly identical laser drive.

Load-bearing premise

The isobaric hot-spot model plus a collisional-radiative emissivity database correctly convert the measured, x-ray-weighted line ratios and widths into the reported spatially averaged density and temperature histories.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first time-resolved, absolutely calibrated measurements of hot-spot electron density, temperature, size, and areal density in NIF-scale Kr-doped DD symcap implosions using the dHIRES high-resolution Bragg crystal spectrometer. Stark widths of the optically thin Kr Heβ complex (with ion-dynamics line-shape calculations) yield ne(t); He/Li dielectronic satellite intensity ratios matched to SCRAM grids yield Te(t). Absolute spectral intensity, combined with isobaric spatial profiles and collisional-radiative emissivities, then constrains hot-spot radius Rhs(t) and ρRhs(t). Two BigFoot HDC capsules (undoped vs 0.21 at.% W-doped) are compared under nearly identical laser drive; the W-doped case reaches higher peak ne (~5.2×10^24 cm^-3), Te (~3.21 keV) and stagnation pressure (~48 Gbar) than the undoped case (~2.6×10^24 cm^-3, ~2.93 keV, ~24 Gbar), consistent with independent nTOF yield, Ti and ρR trends. The work therefore supplies both a new multi-parameter diagnostic capability and direct spectroscopic evidence that high-Z ablator dopant improves stagnation conditions.

Significance. If the inferences hold, the paper supplies a rare, temporally resolved multi-parameter data set (ne, Te, Rhs, ρR) at NIF stagnation conditions that can directly benchmark rad-hydro and atomic-physics models aiming for ignition. Absolute cross-calibration of the streak camera against a simultaneous image-plate channel, explicit treatment of ion dynamics in the Stark profiles, and independent corroboration by SPIDER bang times, nTOF yields/Ti/ρR and penumbral imaging are genuine methodological strengths. The comparative demonstration that W doping raises both density and temperature (hence stagnation pressure) is of immediate practical interest for ablator design. The result is therefore significant for both diagnostic development and ICF performance physics.

major comments (3)
  1. The ne(t) extraction rests on matching measured Stark widths (defined by the ad-hoc E1/E2 thresholds at 90 % and 20 % of the central peak) to detailed line-shape calculations that include full ion dynamics (Ref. [26]). The actual spectral comparisons and sensitivity studies are deferred to a manuscript “to be submitted” (Ref. [28]). Without those comparisons (or equivalent figures/tables in the Supplemental Material), a reader cannot independently assess the accuracy of the density scale or the impact of residual Li-like blending and instrumental response. At minimum, representative measured-vs-calculated profiles at bang time for both shots, plus a short quantification of how ne changes when ion dynamics are omitted, should be added so that the central density claim is self-contained.
  2. Absolute size and areal-density inference (Fig. 5 and surrounding text) uses the isobaric Betti profiles + 1-D thick-shell central values + SCRAM emissivities to convert the measured, x-ray-weighted ne and Te into volume-averaged quantities that are then scaled to the absolutely calibrated Heβ intensity. The resulting time-averaged Rhs values (51.5 ± 4.0 µm undoped; 40.6 ± 20.1 µm W-doped) are substantially smaller than the penumbral imaging results listed in Table I (73.5 µm and 60.0 µm), and the spectroscopic ρRhs values are likewise lower than nTOF. While the text briefly notes possible causes (nTOF Te modeling, mix), no quantitative sensitivity study of Rhs to the assumed spatial profile is provided. Because absolute size and ρR are presented as key deliverables of the technique, the manuscript should either (i) quantify how Rhs changes under plausible alternative profiles (e.g., fla
  3. The W-doped data set (N180109) suffers from deliberately thick filtering that produces large statistical errors and temporal fluctuations (explicitly acknowledged). Peak values ne ~ 5.2 × 10^24 cm^-3, Te ~ 3.21 keV and P ~ 48 Gbar are nevertheless quoted and used to claim a factor-of-two pressure increase relative to the undoped shot. Given the error bars visible in Figs. 4 and 5, the quantitative pressure ratio should be accompanied by a proper uncertainty (or the claim should be re-phrased as a qualitative ranking that is independently confirmed by the nTOF yield and Ti increase in Table I). Without that, the strongest numerical claim of the paper rests on the noisier of the two data sets.
minor comments (6)
  1. Page 2, column 1: “refereed to as the undoped HDC capsule” → “referred to”.
  2. Figure 2 caption and text: the conversion factor from streak-camera counts to J/sr/keV/ns is central; a short numerical statement of the factor (or its uncertainty) would help reproducibility.
  3. Table I header “Hot-spot P0 … Penumbral imaging” is ambiguous; clarify that the last column is the penumbral radius (not pressure).
  4. The instrumental response is stated as a 12 eV Gaussian; a brief justification (measured resolution of the conical crystals) would be useful.
  5. Supplemental Material is cited for spectral comparison and error-bar analysis of Rhs, but is not available in the arXiv posting; ensure it is supplied with the revised manuscript.
  6. Minor typographical inconsistencies: “in-situ” hyphenation, “von Hámos” accent, and the future date “July 8, 2026” on the title page.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No reduction of claimed results to inputs by construction; only minor non-load-bearing self-citation of coauthored isobaric/thick-shell models for optional spatial profiles.

  1. self citation load bearing [Text preceding Fig. 4 and the paragraph extracting Rhs (pp. 4–5)]
    "It is sufficiently accurate to use the isobaric model by Betti et al. [30] to calculate the spatiotemporal profiles of the hot spot ne and Te, with their central values calculated using a 1-D thick-shell model [31]. … Taking the spatiotemporal profiles of the hot spot ne and Te that match the experimental observations, the hot spot size is determined by matching the measured Kr Heβ signals in simulations"

    The spatial profiles used both to produce the simulated (dashed) ne(t)/Te(t) curves and to convert absolute intensity into Rhs(t) are taken from prior papers whose author lists overlap the present work. This is a modeling choice rather than a tautology: the primary ne and Te still come from spectral matching to external atomic codes, and the ranking of the two shots is confirmed by independent neutron diagnostics. The self-citation is therefore minor and non-load-bearing for the central claim.

full rationale

The core inferences are direct and non-circular: measured Stark widths of the Kr Heβ complex are matched to independent line-shape calculations (including ion dynamics) to obtain ne(t); measured He/Li satellite intensity ratios are matched to SCRAM grids at those ne to obtain Te(t). Absolute spectral intensity then scales the emitting volume (Rhs) once those conditions are fixed. The isobaric model of Betti et al. plus a 1-D thick-shell central-value calculation (both coauthored) is invoked only afterward to generate x-ray-weighted spatial averages for the dashed curves of Fig. 4 and to convert absolute brightness into Rhs; this is a standard modeling assumption, not a definitional loop or a fitted parameter re-labeled as a prediction. The doped-versus-undoped ranking of peak ne, Te and stagnation pressure follows from the spectral matches alone and is independently corroborated by nTOF yield, Ti and ρR. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or self-definitional step appears. Score 1 reflects only the minor self-citation that is not required for the strongest claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central inferences rest on standard atomic-physics and ICF modeling assumptions plus a small number of experimental choices (energy windows, instrumental Gaussian, isobaric profiles). No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are limited to calibration and analysis thresholds.

free parameters (3)
  • Stark-width energy thresholds E1/E2 = 90 % / 20 % of peak
    Defined ad hoc as 90 % and 20 % of the central Heβ peak height to avoid Li-like satellite contamination; different thresholds would shift the inferred ne.
  • Instrumental response Gaussian width = 12 eV
    All theoretical spectra are convolved with a 12 eV Gaussian before comparison to data; the value is taken from the spectrometer calibration but is not independently re-measured on these shots.
  • Streak-to-image-plate conversion factor
    Obtained by equating integrated counts after filter correction; any residual space-charge or resolving-power difference propagates into absolute intensity and therefore into Rhs.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Kr Heβ complex is optically thin under the measured hot-spot conditions
    Stated explicitly so that observed intensity can be converted directly to emitting volume without radiative-transfer corrections.
  • domain assumption Isobaric hot-spot model of Betti et al. plus 1-D thick-shell central values correctly describe the radial ne and Te profiles
    Used to generate the x-ray-weighted averages that are matched to the spectroscopic data (Fig. 4) and to extract Rhs from absolute intensity.
  • domain assumption Ion density equals electron density (fully ionized DD + trace Kr)
    Invoked when converting measured ne and Rhs into areal density ρRhs.
  • domain assumption Stark broadening of Kr Heβ is dominated by electron density and is accurately given by the ion-dynamics calculations of Stambulchik & Maron
    Core of the ne inference; any systematic error in the line-shape tables maps directly into ne.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hot Spot Evolution Measured by High-Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopy at the National Ignition Facility." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/436DWH2A

@misc{pith2026260705738,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hot Spot Evolution Measured by High-Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopy at the National Ignition Facility},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/436DWH2A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05738}
}
abstract

Evolution of the hot spot plasma conditions was measured using high-resolution x-ray spectroscopy at the National Ignition Facility (NIF). The capsules were filled with DD gas with trace levels of Kr, and had either a high-density-carbon (HDC) ablator or a tungsten (W)-doped HDC ablator. Time-resolved measurement of the Kr He$\beta$ spectra, absolutely calibrated by a simultaneous time-integrated measurement, allows inference of the electron density and temperature through observing Stark broadening and the relative intensities of dielectronic satellites. By matching the calculated hot spot emission using a collisional-radiative code to experimental observations, the hot spot size and areal density are determined. These advanced spectroscopy techniques further reveal the effect of W dopant in the ablator on the hot spot parameters for their improved implosion performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05738 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (color online). (a) The cross-calibrated streak camera data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (color online). History of the high-resolution Kr He [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. (color online). Evolution of the hot spot radius R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    S. F. Khan, P. M. Bell, D. K. Bradley, S. R. Burns, J. R. Celeste, L. S. Dauffy, M. J. Eckart, M. A. Gerhard, C. Hagmann, D. I. Headley, J. P. Holder, N. Izumi, M. C. Jones, J. W. Kellogg, H. Y . Khater, J. R. Kimbrough, A. G. Macphee, Y . P. Opachich, N. E. Palmer, R. B. Petre, J. L. Porter, R. T. Shelton, T. L. Thomas, and J. B. Worden, inTarget Diagnos...

    work page 2012

  2. [28]

    Berzak Hopkins, L

    L. Berzak Hopkins, L. Divol, C. Weber, S. Le Pape, N. B. Meezan, J. S. Ross, R. Tommasini, S. Khan, D. D. Ho, J. Bi- ener, E. Dewald, C. Goyon, C. Kong, A. Nikroo, A. Pak, N. Rice, M. Stadermann, C. Wild, D. Callahan, and O. Hur- ricane, Physics of Plasmas25, 080706 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    An emissivity database was generated for a grid ofn e andT e using SCRAM

    to calculate the spatiotemporal profiles of the hot spotn e andT e, with their central values calculated using a 1-D thick- shell model [31]. An emissivity database was generated for a grid ofn e andT e using SCRAM. The spatially averaged, x-ray weightedn e(t) andT e(t) were then calculated using the radial profiles of the hot spot and the associated x-ra...

    work page

  4. [2]

    Lindl, Physics of Plasmas2, 3933 (1995)

    J. Lindl, Physics of Plasmas2, 3933 (1995)

    work page 1995

  5. [3]

    G. H. Miller, E. I. Moses, and C. R. Wuest, Nuclear Fusion44, S228 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [4]

    E. I. Moses, R. N. Boyd, B. A. Remington, C. J. Keane, and R. Al-Ayat, Physics of Plasmas16, 041006 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [5]

    L. C. Jarrott, B. Bachmann, T. Ma, L. R. Benedetti, F. E. Field, E. P. Hartouni, R. Hatarik, N. Izumi, S. F. Khan, O. L. Landen, S. R. Nagel, R. Nora, A. Pak, J. L. Peterson, M. B. Schneider, P. T. Springer, and P. K. Patel, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 085001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [6]

    V . Y . Glebov, T. C. Sangster, C. Stoeckl, J. P. Knauer, W. Theobald, K. L. Marshall, M. J. Shoup III, T. Buczek, M. Cruz, T. Duffy, M. Romanofsky, M. Fox, A. Pruyne, M. J. Moran, R. A. Lerche, J. McNaney, J. D. Kilkenny, M. J. Eckart, D. Schneider, D. Munro, W. Stoeffl, R. Zacharias, J. J. Haslam, T. Clancy, M. Yeoman, D. Warwas, C. J. Horsfield, J.-L. ...

    work page 2010

Show all 35 references
  1. [7]

    Gatu Johnson, J

    M. Gatu Johnson, J. P. Knauer, C. J. Cerjan, M. J. Eckart, G. P. Grim, E. P. Hartouni, R. Hatarik, J. D. Kilkenny, D. H. Munro, D. B. Sayre, B. K. Spears, R. M. Bionta, E. J. Bond, J. A. Caggiano, D. Callahan, D. T. Casey, T. D ¨oppner, J. A. Frenje, V . Y . Glebov, O. Hurrica...

    2016

  2. [8]

    Yaakobi, D

    B. Yaakobi, D. Steel, E. Thorsos, A. Hauer, and B. Perry, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 1526 (1977)

    1977

  3. [9]

    B. A. Hammel, C. J. Keane, M. D. Cable, D. R. Kania, J. D. Kilkenny, R. W. Lee, and R. Pasha, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1263 (1993)

    1993

  4. [10]

    N. C. Woolsey, B. A. Hammel, C. J. Keane, A. Asfaw, C. A. Back, J. C. Moreno, J. K. Nash, A. Calisti, C. Moss´e, R. Stamm, B. Talin, L. Klein, and R. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. E56, 2314 (1997)

    1997

  5. [11]

    S. P. Regan, J. A. Delettrez, R. Epstein, P. A. Jaanimagi, B. Yaakobi, V . A. Smalyuk, F. J. Marshall, D. D. Meyerhofer, W. Seka, D. A. Haynes, I. E. Golovkin, and C. F. Hooper, Physics of Plasmas9, 1357 (2002)

    2002

  6. [12]

    Florido, R

    R. Florido, R. C. Mancini, T. Nagayama, R. Tommasini, J. A. Delettrez, S. P. Regan, and B. Yaakobi, Phys. Rev. E83, 066408 (2011)

    2011

  7. [13]

    Golovkin, R

    I. Golovkin, R. Mancini, S. Louis, Y . Ochi, K. Fu- jita, H. Nishimura, H. Shirga, N. Miyanaga, H. Azechi, R. Butzbach, I. Uschmann, E. F ¨orster, J. Delettrez, J. Koch, R. W. Lee, and L. Klein, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 045002 (2002)

    2002

  8. [14]

    Welser-Sherrill, R

    L. Welser-Sherrill, R. C. Mancini, J. A. Koch, N. Izumi, R. Tommasini, S. W. Haan, D. A. Haynes, I. E. Golovkin, J. J. MacFarlane, J. A. Delettrez, F. J. Marshall, S. P. Regan, V . A. Smalyuk, and G. Kyrala, Phys. Rev. E76, 056403 (2007)

    2007

  9. [15]

    S. P. Regan, R. Epstein, B. A. Hammel, L. J. Suter, H. A. Scott, M. A. Barrios, D. K. Bradley, D. A. Callahan, C. Cerjan, G. W. Collins, S. N. Dixit, T. D ¨oppner, M. J. Edwards, D. R. Far- ley, K. B. Fournier, S. Glenn, S. H. Glenzer, I. E. Golovkin, S. W. Haan, A. Hamza, D. ...

    2013

  10. [16]

    T. Ma, H. Chen, P. K. Patel, M. B. Schneider, M. A. Barrios, D. T. Casey, H.-K. Chung, B. A. Hammel, L. F. B. Hopkins, L. C. Jarrott, S. F. Khan, B. Lahmann, R. Nora, M. J. Rosen- berg, A. Pak, S. P. Regan, H. A. Scott, H. Sio, B. K. Spears, and C. R. Weber, Review of Scientif...

    2016

  11. [17]

    K. W. Hill, M. Bitter, L. Delgado-Aparicio, P. C. Efthimion, R. Ellis, L. Gao, J. Maddox, N. A. Pablant, M. B. Schneider, H. Chen, S. Ayers, R. L. Kauffman, A. G. MacPhee, P. Beiers- dorfer, R. Bettencourt, T. Ma, R. C. Nora, H. A. Scott, D. B. Thorn, J. D. Kilkenny, D. Nelson...

    2016

  12. [18]

    L. Gao, B. F. Kraus, K. W. Hill, M. Bitter, P. Efthimion, M. B. Schneider, A. G. MacPhee, D. B. Thorn, J. Kilkenny, J. Ayers, R. Kauffman, H. Chen, and D. Nelson, Review of Scientific Instruments89, 10F125 (2018)

    2018

  13. [19]

    K. L. Baker, C. A. Thomas, D. T. Casey, S. Khan, B. K. Spears, R. Nora, T. Woods, J. L. Milovich, R. L. Berger, D. Strozzi, D. Clark, M. Hohenberger, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, 6 O. L. Landen, B. Bachmann, R. Benedetti, R. Bionta, P. M. Cel- liers, D. Fittinghoff, C. Goy...

    2018

  14. [20]

    D. T. Casey, C. A. Thomas, K. L. Baker, B. K. Spears, M. Ho- henberger, S. F. Khan, R. C. Nora, C. R. Weber, D. T. Woods, O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, R. L. Berger, J. L. Milovich, P. K. Patel, T. Ma, A. Pak, L. R. Benedetti, M. Millot, C. Jar- rott, O. L. Landen, R. M. Bi...

    2018

  15. [21]

    G. A. Kyrala, J. L. Kline, S. Dixit, S. Glenzer, D. Kalantar, D. Bradley, N. Izumi, N. Meezan, O. Landen, D. Callahan, S. V . Weber, J. P. Holder, S. Glenn, M. J. Edwards, J. Koch, L. J. Suter, S. W. Haan, R. P. J. Town, P. Michel, O. Jones, S. Langer, J. D. Moody, E. L. Dewal...

    2011

  16. [22]

    H. Chen, T. Ma, R. Nora, M. A. Barrios, H. A. Scott, M. B. Schneider, L. B. Hopkins, D. T. Casey, B. A. Hammel, L. C. Jarrott, O. L. Landen, P. K. Patel, M. J. Rosenberg, and B. K. Spears, Physics of Plasmas24, 072715 (2017)

    2017

  17. [23]

    J. R. Kimbrough, P. M. Bell, G. B. Christianson, F. D. Lee, D. H. Kalantar, T. S. Perry, N. R. Sewall, and A. J. Wootton, Review of Scientific Instruments72, 748 (2001)

    2001

  18. [24]

    Zimmerman and W

    G. Zimmerman and W. Kruer, Comments Plasma Phys Con- trolled Fusion2, 51 (1975)

    1975

  19. [25]

    H. A. Scott, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer71, 689 (2001)

    2001

  20. [27]

    Stambulchik and Y

    E. Stambulchik and Y . Maron, Journal of Quantitative Spec- troscopy and Radiative Transfer99, 730 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    Hill andet al., Manuscript to be submitted (2022)

    K. Hill andet al., Manuscript to be submitted (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Hansen, J

    S. Hansen, J. Bauche, C. Bauche-Arnoult, and M. Gu, High Energy Density Physics3, 109 (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Betti, M

    R. Betti, M. Umansky, V . Lobatchev, V . N. Goncharov, and R. L. McCrory, Physics of Plasmas8, 5257 (2001)

    2001

  24. [32]

    A. R. Christopherson, R. Betti, J. Howard, K. M. Woo, A. Bose, E. M. Campbell, and V . Gopalaswamy, Physics of Plasmas25, 072704 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org for details

  26. [34]

    Bachmann, J

    B. Bachmann, J. E. Ralph, A. B. Zylstra, S. A. MacLaren, T. D ¨oppner, D. O. Gericke, G. W. Collins, O. A. Hurricane, T. Ma, J. R. Rygg, H. A. Scott, S. A. Yi, and P. K. Patel, Phys. Rev. E101, 033205 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    H. G. Rinderknecht, M. J. Rosenberg, A. B. Zylstra, B. Lah- mann, F. H. S ´eguin, J. A. Frenje, C. K. Li, M. Gatu Johnson, R. D. Petrasso, L. F. Berzak Hopkins, J. A. Caggiano, L. Di- vol, E. P. Hartouni, R. Hatarik, S. P. Hatchett, S. Le Pape, A. J. Mackinnon, J. M. McNaney, ...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.