Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 54 references

Distribution solutions of a static dispersion Schr\"{o}dinger equation

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read No positive solutions below q=5 for a mixed-dispersion Schrödinger equation

desk verdict Sharp Liouville theorems for a fourth-order elliptic operator with a second-order term: critical exponents match the Lane-Emden case, but the PDE-side Pohozaev identity has a gap in its variational justification. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05919 v1 pith:YO55LB5X submitted 2026-07-07 math.AP

Tiantian Zhou , Yutian Lei This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q5535Q6035J9145E10
keywords LiouvilletheoremmixeddispersionSchrödingerequationdistributionsolutionsPohozaevidentityCoulombpotentialcriticalexponentintegralradialsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the equation $-Δu + a²Δ²u = u^q$ in $ℝ³$, which arises as the static form of a mixed-dispersion nonlinear Schrödinger equation and as the Euler–Lagrange equation for a Sobolev-type embedding inequality. The central claim is a Liouville theorem: if a positive distribution solution exists, then necessarily $q > 5$; if only a positive super-solution exists, then $q > 3$. These thresholds match the classical Lane–Emden exponents for $-Δu = u^q$, showing that the second-order operator $-Δ$ dominates the fourth-order term $a²Δ²$ in governing existence. The method hinges on proving equivalence between the PDE and an integral equation involving the kernel $K_a(x) = (1 - e^{-|x|/a})/|x|$, a modified Coulomb potential. Once equivalence is established, the authors deploy integral estimates, a regularity lifting lemma, the method of moving planes in integral form, and a Pohozaev identity derived from the integral formulation to obtain regularity, radial symmetry, decay rates, and the nonexistence results. A consequence is that the best constant in the embedding inequality $||u||_{L^{q+1}} ≤ C(||∇u||_{L²} + a||Δu||_{L²})$ is not attained at $q = 5$, and similarly the best constant in a Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev-type inequality with the Coulomb kernel is not attained. The paper extends the same Pohozaev identity technique to an Allen–Cahn-type integral equation, obtaining Liouville theorems there as well.

What carries the argument

The modified Coulomb potential $K_a(x) = (1 - e^{-|x|/a})/|x|$, which serves as the Green's function for the operator $-Δ + a²Δ²$ and bridges the PDE to an equivalent integral equation. The Pohozaev identity in integral form, derived from the variational structure of the energy functional, yields the exponent bound $q > 5$.

What would settle it

If one could construct a positive distribution solution of $-Δu + a²Δ²u = u^q$ in D for some $q ≤ 5$, or a positive super-solution for $q ≤ 3$, the Liouville theorem would fail. Alternatively, if the equivalence between the PDE and the integral equation (Theorem 1.1) were shown to be incomplete—e.g., if there exist distribution solutions in D that do not satisfy the integral equation—then the regularity, symmetry, and Pohozaev arguments built on the integral formulation would not apply to all distribution solutions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The critical exponent for positive distribution solutions of $-Δu + a²Δ²u = u^q$ in $ℝ³$ is $q = 5$: solutions exist only for $q > 5$, and super-solutions only for $q > 3$. This is established by proving equivalence between the PDE and the integral equation $u(x) = ∫ K_a(x-y) u^q(y) dy$ with $K_a(x) = (1-e^{-|x|/a})/|x|$, then applying a Pohozaev identity in integral form. The thresholds coincide with the Serrin exponent ($q=3$) and Sobolev exponent ($q=5$) of the Lane–Emden equation $-Δu = u^q$, demonstrating that the $-Δ$ operator governs the critical exponents despite the presence of the fourth-order term.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the PDE and the integral equation are equivalent—that for any test function ψ, the convolution $Φ = K_a * ψ$ belongs to the energy space D (meaning its gradient and Laplacian are both square-integrable). This is verified by case-by-case estimates of $|∇Φ|$ and $|ΔΦ|$ near the origin, at infinity, and in bounded annuli. If any of these estimates fail—particularly the square-integrability of $ΔΦ$ near the origin, where $|ΔΦ| ≤ C/|x|$—the bridge,

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The non-attainability of the best constant in the embedding inequality at $q=5$ means that extremal functions for this Sobolev-type embedding do not exist, which constrains the variational approach to finding ground states of the mixed-dispersion NLS.
  • The equivalence between the PDE and the integral equation with kernel $K_a$ provides a toolbox—regularity lifting, moving planes, decay estimates—that can be applied to other fourth-order elliptic problems whose Green's functions have similar Coulomb-type structure, such as the Bopp–Podolsky electrostatic theory.
  • The Allen–Cahn-type Liouville theorem (trivial solutions only for $1 < q ≤ 6$) suggests a phase-transition threshold: for the mixed-dispersion Allen–Cahn equation, nontrivial phase-coexistence solutions require sufficiently strong nonlinearity ($q > 6$).
  • The radial symmetry and precise decay rate $u(x) ∼ K_a(x) ∼ 1/|x|$ at infinity for positive solutions provide the asymptotic profile needed to study stability and scattering of standing waves in the time-dependent mixed-dispersion Schrödinger equation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper studies distribution solutions of the fourth-order semilinear equation $-Δu + a^2 Δ^2 u = u^q$ in $R^3$, which arises as the static equation of a mixed-dispersion Schrödinger equation and as the Euler–Lagrange equation for an embedding inequality in the space $D = {u ∈ D^{1,2} : Δu ∈ L^2}$. The authors establish: (i) equivalence between the PDE and an integral equation with the modified Coulomb kernel $K_a(x) = (1-e^{-|x|/a})/|x|$; (ii) Liouville theorems giving critical exponents $q>3$ (super-solutions) and $q>5$ (solutions), implying non-attainability of the best constant in the embedding inequality at $q=5$; (iii) regularity (differentiability, $L^p$ integrability, radial symmetry via moving planes) and decay estimates for positive solutions; (iv) an integral-form Pohozaev identity yielding the $q>5$ threshold independently; and (v) a Liouville theorem for an Allen–Cahn-type integral equation. The proofs span 36 pages and combine variational arguments, HLS estimates, regularity lifting, and moving-plane methods.

Significance. The paper addresses a natural and well-motivated problem. The equivalence between the PDE and the integral formulation (Theorem 1.1) is a useful structural result, and the Liouville theorems (Theorems 1.2–1.3) provide clean critical exponents that parallel the classical Lane–Emden theory. The implication that the best constant of the embedding inequality (1.6) is non-attainable at $q=5$ is a concrete, falsifiable consequence. The integral-form Pohozaev identity (Theorem 6.1) is developed with explicit convergence arguments, which is a strength. The extension to the Allen–Cahn-type equation (§7) broadens the scope. The results are parameter-free in the sense that the critical exponents emerge from the analysis rather than being assumed.

major comments (4)
  1. Theorem 2.2 (Pohozaev identity, PDE side), which is the main route to the Liouville theorem $q>5$ for distribution solutions, contains a gap in justification. The proof states (page 8, between (2.10) and the identity): 'In view of (2.4), the distribution solution $u$ is the critical point of $E(u)$. Therefore, we have the following Pohozaev identity $0 = [d/dμ E(u(x/μ))]_{μ=1}$.' Equation (2.4) is the weak formulation with test functions in $C_0^∞(R^3)$, i.e., $∫(∇u·∇φ + a^2 Δu·Δφ) = ∫u^q φ$. The step from this weak formulation to $d/dμ E(u(x/μ))|_{μ=1} = 0$ requires justification that the scaling variation $μ ↦ u(·/μ)$ is an admissible variation in the energy space and that the first variation of $E$ vanishes along it. The paper asserts this without verification. The authors should either: (a) provide a direct Pohozaev-type computation from the PDE using cut-off functions and passage to
  2. the limit (justifying that boundary terms vanish), or (b) verify that the scaling $u(·/μ)$ lies in the function space where $E$ is Fréchet-differentiable and that the weak formulation (2.4) suffices to conclude $δE(u)[v] = 0$ for the specific variation $v = x·∇u$. Note that the integral-form Pohozaev identity (Theorem 6.1) is derived more carefully with explicit convergence arguments, but Theorem 2.2 is the one used for the main Liouville theorem for distribution solutions (Theorem 1.2(ii)). The gap is load-bearing because Theorem 1.2(ii) and its corollary (non-attainability of the best constant at $q=5$, Remark 1.2) depend on it.
  3. Theorem 2.5 (equivalence, Step 1): the key estimate $|ΔΦ| ≤ C/|x|$ for small $|x|$ (equation 2.17) is used to conclude $ΔΦ ∈ L^2(R^3)$ via $∫_{B_δ} |x|^{-2} dx < ∞$ in $R^3$. This integral indeed converges. However, the estimate (2.17) itself is derived by splitting $B_R$ into $B_{|x|/2}(x)$ and $B_R ∖ B_{|x|/2}(x)$; the bound on the first piece uses $∫_0^{|x|} r dr ≤ C|x|^2$ divided by $|x|$, giving $C|x|$, while the second uses $e^{-|x|/(2a)}/|x| ≤ C/|x|$. The $L^2$-integrability then follows. This appears correct, but the reader's concern about whether $ΔΦ ∈ L^2$ near the origin is the load-bearing premise for the equivalence (Theorem 1.1) and hence for all results derived via the integral formulation. The authors should verify and, if necessary, explicitly confirm that the case $ψ$ supported near the origin (where $|x|/2$ may not be small relative to the support) is handled. As far I
  4. can verify, the estimates do go through because $ψ ∈ C_0^∞$ is bounded and the kernel estimates (2.2)–(2.3) are uniform, but a sentence clarifying this would strengthen the proof.
minor comments (8)
  1. Page 2: the notation $D^{1,2}(R^3)$ is used without definition; a brief reference to the homogeneous Sobolev space would help readers.
  2. Equation (1.3): the functional $E(u)$ is written with $α$ and $β$, but the PDE (1.5) uses $α=1, β=-a^2$. The relationship between the general functional and the specific case studied should be stated more explicitly.
  3. Theorem 1.5(iii), equation (1.13): the decay estimate $C^{-1}K_a(x) ≤ u(x) ≤ CK_a(x)$ is stated for 'sufficiently large $|x|$' but the constant $C>1$ is not quantified. This is acceptable but could note dependence on $u$.
  4. Section 4.4, proof of Theorem 1.5(iii): the choice $m(x) = 1 + (s/q) log_8 log[c_*^{-1} K_a(x)|x|^{3q/s-2}]$ requires $c_*^{-1} K_a(x)|x|^{3q/s-2} > 1$ for the logarithm to be positive. Since $K_a(x) ~ |x|^{-1}$ for large $|x|$, this requires $|x|^{3q/s-3} > c_*$, which holds for large $|x|$ when $3q/s - 3 > 0$, i.e., $s < q$. The text states $s ∈ (3, q)$, so this is consistent, but the verification should be explicit.
  5. Typo on page 5: 'Theoerm' should be 'Theorem' (Remark 1.5).
  6. Page 14, proof of Theorem 3.2: the notation $c_1(x)$ for a 'double bounded function' is introduced but the term 'double bounded function' is defined on page 9. A forward reference or brief reminder would help.
  7. Theorem 6.1, Step 2: the differentiation under the integral sign in $u(μx) = μ^2 ∫ [(1-e^{-μ|x-y|/a})/|x-y|] u^q(μy) dy$ should note that the convergence of the resulting integrals is guaranteed by Step 1 (equations 6.4–6.5). This is mentioned but could be more explicit.
  8. Reference [53] (Xu, 2005) is cited for the result that $a^2 Δ^2 u = u^q$ has $C^4$-solutions iff $q=-7$. This seems surprising for $q>0$; the authors should verify the citation context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying two specific points where the exposition can be strengthened. Both comments are substantive and we address them in detail below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Theorem 2.2 (Pohozaev identity, PDE side) contains a gap: the step from the weak formulation (2.4) to d/dμ E(u(x/μ))|_{μ=1} = 0 is not justified. The scaling variation μ ↦ u(·/μ) must be shown to be admissible in the energy space, and the first variation must be shown to vanish along it. The referee suggests either (a) a direct Pohozaev computation with cut-off functions, or (b) verification that the scaling lies in the Fréchet-differentiability domain and that the weak formulation suffices for the specific variation v = x·∇u.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the justification in the current manuscript is insufficient. The step from the weak formulation (2.4) to the Pohozaev identity via scaling of the energy functional is stated too tersely, and the admissibility of the scaling variation is not verified. We will revise the proof of Theorem 2.2 along the following lines. First, we note that Theorem 2.1 already establishes u ∈ L^{q+1}(R^3), so all three terms in E(u) are finite. The weak formulation (2.4), combined with the density of C_0^∞(R^3) in D, shows that δE(u)[φ] = 0 for all φ ∈ D. To obtain the Pohozaev identity, one needs the specific test function v = x·∇u, which does not lie in C_0^∞(R^3). We will add a direct Pohozaev-type computation using standard cut-off functions: multiply the PDE by (x·∇u)ζ_R^2 for a suitable cut-off ζ_R, integrate by parts, and pass to the limit R → ∞. The key boundary terms are controlled by the estimates already established in Theorem 2.1 (u ∈ L^{q+1}) and the fact that u ∈ D (so ∇u ∈ L^2 and Δu ∈ L^2). Specifically, the boundary terms on ∂B_R involve R∫_{∂B_R} u^{q+1} dS, R∫_{∂B_R} |∇u|^2 dS, and similar terms, all of which vanish along a sequence R_j → ∞ by standard arguments using the integrability already established. We will write out this computation explicitly. We also note that the integral-form Pohozaev identity (Theorem 6.1), which is derived with full convergence arguments, provides an independent route to the same conclusion q > 5 for solutions of the integral equation; the PDE-side Pohozaev identity in Theorem 2.2 is needed specifically for distribution solutions before the equivalence (Theorem 1.1) is fully established. The revised proof will make the logical dependency clear. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Theorem 2.5 (equivalence, Step 1): the estimate |ΔΦ| ≤ C/|x| for small |x| (equation 2.17) is used to conclude ΔΦ ∈ L^2(R^3) via ∫_{B_δ} |x|^{-2} dx < ∞. The referee asks the authors to verify and explicitly confirm that the case ψ supported near the origin (where |x|/2 may not be small relative to the support) is handled.

    Authors: The referee's concern is well-taken, and we agree that a clarifying sentence would strengthen the proof. The estimates do go through as written, but the reason is somewhat implicit and should be made explicit. The key point is the following. When |x| is small and ψ ∈ C_0^∞(B_R), the split into B_{|x|/2}(x) and B_R ∖ B_{|x|/2}(x) is valid regardless of where ψ is supported within B_R. On B_{|x|/2}(x), we use only that |ψ| ≤ ‖ψ‖_∞ and that |x−y| ≤ |x|/2, so the integral is bounded by C∫_0^{|x|/2} r dr / (a^2 |x|) ≤ C|x|, using (2.2). On B_R ∖ B_{|x|/2}(x), we have |x−y| ≥ |x|/2, and the exponential decay of ΔK_a gives the bound C e^{−|x|/(2a)} / |x| ≤ C/|x|. The boundedness of ψ (not its support properties) is what enters. The case where ψ is supported near the origin is therefore handled identically: the estimates depend only on ‖ψ‖_∞ and the kernel bounds (2.2)–(2.3), which are uniform. We will add a sentence after (2.17) making this explicit, stating that the estimates rely on the uniform bound |ψ| ≤ ‖ψ‖_∞ and the kernel estimates (2.2)–(2.3), and are therefore independent of the specific support of ψ within B_R. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the Pohozaev identity and Liouville theorems are derived from the PDE/integral equation structure, not from fitted or self-referentially defined inputs.

full rationale

This is a pure mathematics paper with no fitted parameters, no empirical constants, and no circular reasoning. The central Liouville theorem (Theorem 2.2: q > 5) is derived from a Pohozaev-type identity obtained by scaling the energy functional E(u) and using the weak formulation (2.4) as the critical-point condition. The skeptic's concern that the step from 'u satisfies the weak equation' to 'd/dμ E(u(x/μ))|_{μ=1} = 0' is unjustified is a correctness/rigor concern, not a circularity concern: the Pohozaev identity is not defined in terms of the conclusion q > 5, nor is any input fitted to the output. The exponent q > 5 emerges from the algebra of the identity (1/2 - 3/(q+1)) = (1/2 + 3/(q+1)) G2/G1 > 0, which is a genuine derivation. The integral-form Pohozaev identity (Theorem 6.1) is derived independently with explicit convergence arguments. Self-citations ([13, 14, 34, 54] by Lei and collaborators) are used for methods (iteration, moving planes, integral Pohozaev) but are not load-bearing in the sense of defining the result in terms of itself. The kernel K_a is the exact fundamental solution of the operator, not an ansatz. No step reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities. The kernel $K_a$ is the exact fundamental solution of $-Δ + a²Δ² = 4πδ_0$, not a postulated object. The space $D$ was introduced in prior work [18].

free parameters (2)
  • a
    Physical parameter $a > 0$ representing the ratio of fourth-order to second-order dispersion. Treated as a given input throughout; all results hold for any $a > 0$.
  • q
    Nonlinearity exponent $q > 0$. Treated as a given input; the paper determines which values of $q$ admit solutions.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality for the Newton potential $I_2$ in ℝ³
    Used throughout §4-6 to bound convolutions with $K_a ≤ |x|^{-1}$. Cited as Theorem 1 in Ch. 5 of Stein [52].
  • standard math Regularity lifting lemma (Theorem 3.3.1 in Chen-Li [15])
    Used in §4.1 to bootstrap integrability from $L^{3(q-1)/2}$ to $L^s$ for all $s > 3$.
  • standard math Method of moving planes in integral form (Chen-Li-Ou [16,17])
    Used in §4.3 to prove radial symmetry of solutions to the integral equation (1.7).
  • domain assumption Density of $C_0^∞(ℝ³)$ in the space $D$ (Lemma 3.2 in [18])
    Used in Theorems 2.1, 2.2, and 2.5 to justify taking test functions $ϕ = uζ_R²$ and $ϕ = u$ in the weak formulation.
  • domain assumption Distributional derivative formulas $∇u = (∇K_a)*u^q$ and $Δu = (ΔK_a)*u^q$ (Lemma 3.3 in [18])
    Used in §2 (Theorem 2.5) and §5 (Theorem 5.1) to compute derivatives of solutions via convolution with kernel derivatives.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Distribution solutions of a static dispersion Schr\"{o}dinger equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YO55LB5X

@misc{pith2026260705919,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Distribution solutions of a static dispersion Schr\"odinger equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YO55LB5X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05919}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study qualitative properties of distribution solutions of a fourth order equation $$ -\Delta u(x)+a^2\Delta^2u(x)=u^q(x), \quad u(x)>0 \ \ in \ \ \mathbb{R}^3, $$ where $a>0$ and $q>0$. It is the static equation of a mixed dispersion Schrodinger equation, and also the Euler-Lagrange equation satisfied by extremal functions of an embedding inequality. We obtain some Liouville theorems and the corresponding related critical exponents, which imply the best constant of the embedding inequality cannot be attainable. We also obtain some regularity results (involving differentiability, integrability, radial symmetry) and asymptotics at infinity of distribution solutions. Here an equivalent integral equation with the Coulomb potential $|x|^{-1}(1-e^{-|x|/a})$ plays a key role. In addition, we also use the Pohozaev identity in integral form to obtain the Liouville theorem of this integral equation. Such the Pohozaev identity still works to handle the Allen-Cahn-type integral equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. J. S. Alves, C. Chen,A new method of fundamental solutions applied to nonhomogeneous elliptic problems, Adv. Comput. Math.,23(2005), 125-142

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Ben-Artzi, H

    M. Ben-Artzi, H. Koch, J.-C. Saut,Dispersion estimates for fourth order Schr¨ odinger equa- tions, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.,330(2000), 87-92

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Benedetto,Real variable and integration: with historical notes, Mathematische Leitf¨ aden, B

    J. Benedetto,Real variable and integration: with historical notes, Mathematische Leitf¨ aden, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1976

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Bogomolny,Fundamental solutions method for elliptic boudary value problems, SIAM J

    A. Bogomolny,Fundamental solutions method for elliptic boudary value problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal.,22(1985), 644-669

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Bopp,Eine lineare theorie des elektrons, Ann

    F. Bopp,Eine lineare theorie des elektrons, Ann. Phys. (5)38(1940), 345-384

    work page 1940

  6. [6]

    Brezis, F

    H. Brezis, F. Merle, T. Riviere,Quantization effects for−∆u=u(1− |u| 2)inR 2, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.,126(1994), 35-58

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    Bonheure, J.-B

    D. Bonheure, J.-B. Cast´ eras, E. M. dos Santos, R. Nascimento,Orbitally stable standing waves of a mixed dispersion nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal.,50 (2018), 5027-5071

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Bonheure, J.-B

    D. Bonheure, J.-B. Cast´ eras, T. Gou, L. Jeanjean,Strong instability of ground states to a fourth order Schr¨ odinger equation, Int. Math. Res. Not. (IMRN),2019(17)(2019), 5299- 5315

    work page 2019

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Bonheure, R

    D. Bonheure, R. Nascimento,Waveguide solutions for a nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with mixed dispersion, in Contributions to Nonlinear Elliptic Equations and Systems, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 86, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2015, 31-53

    2015

  2. [10]

    Boulenger, E

    T. Boulenger, E. Lenzmann,Blowup for biharmonic NLS, Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 50(2017), 503-544. 33

    2017

  3. [11]

    Caristi, L

    G. Caristi, L. D’Ambrosio, E. Mitidieri,Representation formulae for solutions to some classes of higher order systems and related Liouville theorems, Milan J. Math.,76(2008), 27-67

    2008

  4. [12]

    Carlen, J

    E. Carlen, J. Carrillo and M. Loss,Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities via fast diffusion flows, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,107(2010), 19696-19701

    2010

  5. [13]

    Q. Chen, Y. Lei,Asymptotic estimates for an integral equation in theory of phase transition, Nonlinearity,34(2021), 3953-3968

    2021

  6. [14]

    Q. Chen, Y. Lei,Regularity and Liouville theorem on an integral equation of Allen-Cahn type, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.,45(2025), 37-55

    2025

  7. [15]

    W. Chen, C. Li,Methods on Nonlinear Elliptic Equations, AIMS Book Series on Diff. Equa. Dyn. Sys., 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    W. Chen, C. Li, B. Ou,Qualitative properties of solutions for an integral equation, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.,12(2005), 347-354

    2005

  9. [17]

    W. Chen, C. Li, B. Ou,Classification of solutions for an integral equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,59(2006), 330-343

    2006

  10. [18]

    d’Avenia, G

    P. d’Avenia, G. Siciliano,Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in the Bopp-Podolsky electrody- namics: solutions in the electrostatic case, J. Differential Equations,267(2019), 1025-1065

    2019

  11. [19]

    Fairweather, A

    G. Fairweather, A. Karageorghis,The method of fundamental solutions for elliptic boundary value problems, Adv. Comput. Math.,9(1998) 69-95

    1998

  12. [20]

    Farina,Two results on entire solutions of Ginzburg-Landau system in higher dimensions, J

    A. Farina,Two results on entire solutions of Ginzburg-Landau system in higher dimensions, J. Funct. Anal.,214(2004), 386-395

    2004

  13. [21]

    Fibich, B

    G. Fibich, B. Ilan, G. Papanicolaou,Self-focusing with fourth-order dispersion, SIAM J. Appl. Math.,62(2002), 1437-1462

    2002

  14. [22]

    Gao,Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in the Bopp-Podolsky electrodynamics: global boundedness, blow-up and no scattering in the energy space, J

    Y. Gao,Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in the Bopp-Podolsky electrodynamics: global boundedness, blow-up and no scattering in the energy space, J. Differential Equations,357 (2023), 64-97

    2023

  15. [23]

    Gidas, J

    B. Gidas, J. Spruck,Global and local behavior of positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,34(1981), 525-598

    1981

  16. [24]

    Gilbarg, N

    D. Gilbarg, N. Trudinger,Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1977

    1977

  17. [25]

    Guo,Scattering for the focusingL 2-supercritical and ˙H2-subcritical biharmonic NLS equations, Comm

    Q. Guo,Scattering for the focusingL 2-supercritical and ˙H2-subcritical biharmonic NLS equations, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,41(2016), 185-207

    2016

  18. [26]

    Ibrahim, N

    S. Ibrahim, N. Masmoudi, K. Nakanishi,Scattering threshold for the focusing nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation, Anal. PDE,4(2011), 405–460

    2011

  19. [27]

    V. I. Karpman,Stabilization of soliton instabilities by higher-order dispersion: fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equations, Phys. Rev. E,53 (2)(1996), R1336-R1339

    1996

  20. [28]

    V. I. Karpman, A. G. Shagalov,Stability of solitons described by nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equations with higher-order dispersion, Phys. D,144(2000), 194-210. 34

    2000

  21. [29]

    E. W. Laedke, K. H. Spatschek,Stability properties of multidimensional finite-amplitude solitons, Phys. Rev. A (3),30(1984), 3279-3288

    1984

  22. [30]

    E. W. Laedke, K. H. Spatschek, L. Stenflo,Evolution theorem for a class of perturbed envelope soliton solutions, J. Math. Phys.,24(1983), 2764-2769

    1983

  23. [31]

    Lande,Finite self-energies in radiation theory

    A. Lande,Finite self-energies in radiation theory. Part I, Phys. Rev.,60(1941), 121-127

    1941

  24. [32]

    Lande, L

    A. Lande, L. H. Thomas,Finite self-energies in radiation theory. Part II, Part III, Phys. Rev.,60(1941), 514-523;65(1944), 175-184

    1941

  25. [33]

    Laurencot, C

    P. Laurencot, C. Walker,Some singular equations modeling MEMS, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 54(2017), 437-479

    2017

  26. [34]

    Y. Lei, C. Li,Sharp criteria of Liouville type for some nonlinear systems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.,36(2016), 3277-3315

    2016

  27. [35]

    Levandosky,Stability and instability of fourth-order solitary waves, J

    S. Levandosky,Stability and instability of fourth-order solitary waves, J. Dynam. Differential Equations,10(1998), 151-188

    1998

  28. [36]

    Li,Remark on some conformally invariant integral equations: the method of moving spheres, J

    Y.-Y. Li,Remark on some conformally invariant integral equations: the method of moving spheres, J. Eur. Math. Soc.,6(2004), 153-180

    2004

  29. [37]

    Y. Li, Q. Chen, Y. Lei,A Liouville theorem of the fractional Ginzburg-Landau equation, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris,358(2020), 727-731

    2020

  30. [38]

    Lieb,Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities, Ann

    E. Lieb,Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities, Ann. of Math.,118(1983), 349-374

    1983

  31. [39]

    Lieb,Coherent States as a Tool for Obtaining Rigorous Bounds, Proceedings of the Symposium on Coherent States, past, present and future, Oak Ridge, D.H

    E. Lieb,Coherent States as a Tool for Obtaining Rigorous Bounds, Proceedings of the Symposium on Coherent States, past, present and future, Oak Ridge, D.H. Feng, J. Klauder and M.R. Strayer eds., World Scientific (1994), pages 267-278

    1994

  32. [40]

    F.-H. Lin, Y. Yang,Nonlinear non-local elliptic equation modelling electrostatic actuation, Proc. R. Soc. A,463(2007), 1323-1337

    2007

  33. [41]

    C. Ma, W. Chen, C. Li,Regularity of solutions for an integral system of Wolff type, Adv. Math.,226(2011), 2676-2699

    2011

  34. [42]

    Melnikov, M

    Y. Melnikov, M. Melnikov,Green’s functions : construction and applications, De Gruyter studies in mathematics 42, Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012

    2012

  35. [43]

    C. Miao, G. Xu, L. Zhao,Global well-posedness and scattering for the focusing energycritical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations of fourth order in the radial case, J. Differential Equations, 246(2009), 3715-3749

    2009

  36. [44]

    Natali, A

    F. Natali, A. Pastor,The fourth-order dispersive nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: Orbital stability of a standing wave, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst.,14(2015), 1326-1347

    2015

  37. [45]

    Pausader,Global well-posedness for energy critical fourth-order Schr¨ odinger equations in the radial case, Dyn

    B. Pausader,Global well-posedness for energy critical fourth-order Schr¨ odinger equations in the radial case, Dyn. Partial Differ. Equ.,4(2007), 197-225

    2007

  38. [46]

    Pausader,Scattering for the defocusing beam equation in low dimensions, Indiana Univ

    B. Pausader,Scattering for the defocusing beam equation in low dimensions, Indiana Univ. Math. J.,59(2010), 791-822. 35

    2010

  39. [47]

    Pausader, S

    B. Pausader, S. Xia,Scattering theory for the fourth-order Schr¨ odinger equation in low dimensions, Nonlinearity,26(2013), 2175-2191

    2013

  40. [48]

    Podolsky,A generalized electrodynamics Part I

    B. Podolsky,A generalized electrodynamics Part I. Non-quantum, Phys. Rev.,62(1942), 68-71

    1942

  41. [49]

    H. R. Quoirin, J. Silva, K. Silva,Zero energy critical points of functionals depending on a parameter, Diff. Int. Equ.,36(2023) 413-436

    2023

  42. [50]

    Shafrir,Remarks on solutions of−∆u=u(1− |u| 2)inR 2, C

    I. Shafrir,Remarks on solutions of−∆u=u(1− |u| 2)inR 2, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,318 (1994), 327-331

    1994

  43. [51]

    Siciliano, K

    G. Siciliano, K. Silva,The fibering method approach for a nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation coupled with the electromagnetic field, Publ. Mat.,64(2020), 373-390

    2020

  44. [52]

    Stein,Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton Mathe- matical Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970

    E. Stein,Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton Mathe- matical Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970

    1970

  45. [53]

    Xu,Exact solution of nonlinear conformally invariant integral equations inR 3, Adv

    X. Xu,Exact solution of nonlinear conformally invariant integral equations inR 3, Adv. Math.,194(2005), 485-503

    2005

  46. [54]

    Xu,Uniqueness theorem for integral equations and its application, J

    X. Xu,Uniqueness theorem for integral equations and its application, J. Funct. Anal.,247 (2007), 95-109. Tiantian Zhou Institute of Mathematics, School of Mathematical Sciences Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China Email:ztt0515@foxmail.com Yutian Lei Ministry of E...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.