Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 81 references

Edge-state interferometry as a probe of local flux in isolated quantum Hall systems

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Scattering of chiral edge states at a quantum point contact can be read from stationary currents of a closed lattice, without any reservoirs.

desk verdict Clean closed-system mapping from edge-current ratios to QPC S-matrix elements plus two concrete flux protocols; soft spot is geometric-phase dominance, already stress-tested by the numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.10868 v1 pith:LQSFFUPC submitted 2026-07-12 cond-mat.quant-gas

Botao Wang , Nathan Goldman , André Eckardt This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords quantumpointcontactchiraledgestatesAharonov-BohmfluxHofstadtermodelisolatedHallsystemsedge-stateinterferometryultracoldatomsanyonicstatistics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum point contacts are the standard tool for measuring fractional charge and anyonic braiding in solid-state quantum Hall devices, but they normally require open leads and external reservoirs. This paper shows that the same scattering information—reflection and transmission amplitudes of chiral edge modes—can be recovered from the ratio of left and right edge currents that already exist in an isolated, reservoir-free lattice. Because those currents are sensitive to an Aharonov-Bohm flux difference between the two edge loops, the current ratio directly encodes both the transmission probability of the constriction and any unknown local flux. The authors give a closed-form expression that converts the measured ratio into these quantities and demonstrate two practical protocols: one based on the equilibrium ground-state currents of a Chern insulator, and a second based on the time-averaged current imbalance after a potential-bias quench that remains readable at finite temperature and fluctuating particle number. The result supplies a realistic interferometric route for flux and, potentially, anyonic statistics measurements in cold-atom and other quantum-engineered platforms that cannot easily couple to reservoirs.

What carries the argument

The closed-form relation (Eq. 5) that expresses the complex amplitude ratio γ = ψ_L_in / ψ_R_in in terms of the reflection amplitude |r| and the flux difference δφ; the measured current ratio is |γ|^{2}, so a single fit or inversion recovers both |t|^{2} and δφ.

What would settle it

In a closed Hofstadter lattice with a controlled QPC and known flux difference δφ, measure the left/right edge-current ratio and check whether it matches the analytic expression (Eq. 5) for the independently determined |r|; a clear mismatch at low temperature would falsify the mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a closed lattice hosting chiral edge modes that meet at a quantum point contact, the stationary edge-current ratio j_L/j_R is fixed by the unitary scattering matrix of the constriction and by the Aharonov-Bohm flux difference δφ between the two edge loops. Measuring that ratio therefore yields both the transmission probability of the QPC and the unknown local flux, without any external reservoirs or transport leads.

Load-bearing premise

The only phase difference between the left and right edge-mode loops is the geometric flux contribution; dynamical phases are assumed to cancel so that the current ratio collapses exactly onto the unitary-scattering formula.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Local magnetic fluxes in isolated Chern-insulator lattices can be read out from ground-state edge currents by comparison with a tunable reference flux.
  • A post-quench current-imbalance protocol remains readable at temperatures of order the tunneling energy and without precise particle-number control.
  • Because anyonic quasiparticles carry a quantized local flux, the same interferometry can in principle extract their statistical phases in quantum-engineered platforms.
  • Transport-style QPC diagnostics become available in cold-atom and photonic systems that cannot be coupled to external reservoirs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same current-ratio formula should apply to helical edge modes of two-dimensional topological insulators once a suitable constriction is engineered.
  • If local fluxes can be made dynamical, the quench protocol could track the motion of an anyonic excitation in real time via the evolving current imbalance.
  • The method offers a route to calibrate artificial gauge fields in Floquet-engineered lattices by using the QPC as an on-chip interferometer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper shows that the scattering properties (reflection/transmission) of chiral edge modes at a QPC can be read out from stationary edge-current ratios in a closed, reservoir-free lattice. From S-matrix unitarity and the assumption that the only relative phase between left and right edge loops is the geometric flux difference δϕ, they derive a closed-form expression (Eq. 5) for the current ratio j_L/j_R in terms of |r| and δϕ. Numerics on 25×16 Hofstadter lattices (single edge modes and Chern-insulator fillings) match the formula after stitching across avoided crossings; the fitted |t|^{2} agrees with independent Kwant open-system conductance. They propose an equilibrium flux-measurement protocol (compare unknown flux to a tunable reference via ground-state currents) and a dynamical post-quench protocol (sudden removal of a left-right bias) that remains robust to finite temperature and particle-number fluctuations. The framework is suggested to extend to anyonic statistical phases.

Significance. If the result holds, it supplies a practical interferometric probe of local Aharonov-Bohm fluxes (and potentially anyonic phases) that is native to isolated quantum-simulation platforms such as ultracold atoms, where multi-terminal reservoirs are difficult to combine with artificial gauge fields. The analytic derivation from unitarity is clean, |r| is the sole free parameter, and the cross-check against open-system transport plus two distinct flux-insertion geometries constitutes a strong internal validation. The dynamical scheme directly addresses the experimental constraints of temperature and number control that limit the equilibrium protocol. These are concrete, falsifiable advances for topological quantum simulation.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Edge-mode scattering at a QPC] In the paragraph introducing the scattering problem, the phrase “an incoming (“in”) and and outgoing” contains a duplicated “and”; correct to “and an outgoing”.
  2. [Eq. (5) / End Matter A] Eq. (5) and End Matter A present two branches (±). A short sentence clarifying which branch applies when j_L/j_R ≷ 1 (already noted in End Matter) would help the main-text reader.
  3. [Throughout] Notation for the flux difference alternates between δϕ and δφ; standardize on one symbol throughout the main text and End Matter.
  4. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 caption in the source contains residual LaTeX artifacts (“/g73R/g73L”); ensure the published version renders cleanly.
  5. [Fig. 3(c)] The inset of Fig. 3(c) shows that the current-ratio signal is maximized near mid-gap; a brief remark on how this guides experimental choice of filling would be useful.
  6. [Robust scheme based on post-quench dynamics] The dynamical protocol (Fig. 4) demonstrates a clear δϕ-dependent time-averaged imbalance, but a short note on whether |r| itself can be extracted from the amplitude of the imbalance (beyond mere detection of nonzero δϕ) would complete the parallel with the equilibrium case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (5) is a direct unitary-scattering derivation under a stated geometric-phase assumption; |r| is extracted by fit and cross-checked against independent open-system conductance, not used as a self-fulfilling prediction.

full rationale

The load-bearing relation (current ratio j_L/j_R = |γ|^{2} with γ given by Eq. (5)) is obtained in the main text and End Matter A solely from unitarity of the 2 imes2 scattering matrix S together with the kinematic identification ψ_out = e^{iφ} ψ_in and the assumption that the only relative phase is the Aharonov-Bohm difference δφ. No parameter of that formula is taken from the closed-system numerics; |r| is subsequently fitted once to the simulated current ratios and the resulting |t|^{2} is compared to an independent Kwant Landauer calculation of the open QPC. The two flux-insertion geometries produce the same collapse, confirming that dynamical phases cancel to numerical precision. Self-citations [65–67] supply only the experimental protocol for inserting the local fluxes; they are not invoked to justify the form of Eq. (5) or to forbid alternatives. The post-quench protocol is a numerical observation, not a forced prediction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard tight-binding and scattering theory plus a small set of modeling choices (non-interacting fermions, geometric-phase dominance, barrier height). No new particles or forces are invented; free parameters are ordinary numerical knobs used for illustration.

free parameters (3)
  • |r| (reflection amplitude) = ≈0.026 (Chern ground state); order-1 values for single modes
    Single fitting parameter used to match analytic current-ratio curves to numerical edge-mode data in Figs. 2 and 3; once fixed it predicts the full δφ dependence.
  • QPC barrier height V_m,n = 100J
    Set by hand to 100J to create an effectively hard constriction; not derived from a microscopic potential.
  • Initial bias V_L and temperature k_B T = V_L=-0.5; k_B T=0.1–0.2
    Chosen for the quench protocol (V_L = -0.5, k_B T up to ~J) to illustrate robustness; results are shown to be linear in V_L inside a window but the precise values are free.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Unitarity of the 2 imes2 edge-mode scattering matrix S at the QPC implies |r|^{2}+|t|^{2}=1 and cos( heta_t- heta_r)=0.
    Invoked in End Matter A to derive the closed-form current-ratio formula (Eq. 5 / A8).
  • domain assumption Only geometric (Aharonov-Bohm) phases differ between left and right edge loops; dynamical phases cancel.
    Stated explicitly before Eq. 5; required for δφ=φ_R-φ_L to be the sole phase difference controlling the current ratio.
  • domain assumption Bulk states carry no steady edge current, so measured currents filter pure edge-mode contributions.
    Used throughout to equate current ratios with |ψ_in^L/ψ_in^R|^{2}.
  • domain assumption Non-interacting spin-polarized fermions on the Harper-Hofstadter lattice (Floquet-engineered) faithfully realize the model.
    Stated in Model section; interactions and Floquet heating are assumed negligible.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Edge-state interferometry as a probe of local flux in isolated quantum Hall systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LQSFFUPC

@misc{pith2026260710868,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Edge-state interferometry as a probe of local flux in isolated quantum Hall systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LQSFFUPC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.10868}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum point contacts (QPCs) are essential tools for transport experiments in solid-state systems, enabling the detection of fractional charges and anyonic braiding statistics. Realizing analogous transport setups in isolated quantum-simulation platforms, such as ultracold atoms, remains challenging, since it typically requires coupling to external reservoirs. Here we show that the scattering properties of chiral edge states at a QPC can instead be extracted directly from the stationary edge currents of an isolated, reservoir-free lattice system. Exploiting the sensitivity of this scattering to Aharonov-Bohm-type phases, we propose an equilibrium protocol to detect local magnetic fluxes from ground-state edge currents. We further introduce a dynamical scheme, robust against finite temperature and particle-number fluctuations, based on the post-quench evolution following a sudden potential-bias removal. Since anyonic excitations are themselves associated with a local, quantized magnetic flux, our approach should extend to probing anyonic statistical phases in quantum-engineered platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10868 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of a QPC system coupled to two leads [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Density and current distribution of eigenstate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Spatial density and current distributions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) shows the time evolution of the current imbal￾ance after the potential offset of VL = −0.5 is switched off, with the initial state being prepared at a finite tem￾perature kBT = 0.1 and a phase difference of δϕ = π. We can clearly see that the imbalance fluctuates a…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    D. E. Feldman and B. I. Halperin, Fractional charge and fractional statistics in the quantum hall effects, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 076501 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Carrega, L

    M. Carrega, L. Chirolli, S. Heun, and L. Sorba, Anyons in quantum hall interferometry, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 698 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    B. J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C. W. J. Beenakker, J. G. Williamson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel, and C. T. Foxon, Quantized conductance of point contacts in a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 848 (1988)

    1988

  4. [4]

    D. A. Wharam, T. J. Thornton, R. Newbury, M. Pep- per, H. Ahmed, J. E. F. Frost, D. G. Hasko, D. C. Pea- cock, D. A. Ritchie, and G. A. C. Jones, One-dimensional transport and the quantisation of the ballistic resis- tance, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics21, L209 (1988). 6

    1988

  5. [5]

    S. A. Kivelson and V. L. Pokrovsky, Methods to measure the charge of the quasiparticles in the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B40, 1373 (1989)

    1989

  6. [6]

    C. de C. Chamon, D. E. Freed, S. A. Kivelson, S. L. Sondhi, and X. G. Wen, Two point-contact interferom- eter for quantum hall systems, Phys. Rev. B55, 2331 (1997)

    1997

  7. [7]

    Kim, Aharanov-bohm interference and fractional statistics in a quantum hall interferometer, Phys

    E.-A. Kim, Aharanov-bohm interference and fractional statistics in a quantum hall interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 216404 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    B. I. Halperin, A. Stern, I. Neder, and B. Rosenow, The- ory of the fabry-p´ erot quantum hall interferometer, Phys. Rev. B83, 155440 (2011)

    2011

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Rosenow and S

    B. Rosenow and S. H. Simon, Telegraph noise and the fabry-perot quantum hall interferometer, Phys. Rev. B 85, 201302 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Schuster, E

    R. Schuster, E. Buks, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, V. Uman- sky, and H. Shtrikman, Phase measurement in a quantum dot via a double-slit interference experiment, Nature385, 417 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    E. V. Deviatov and A. Lorke, Experimental realization of a fabry-perot-type interferometer by copropagating edge states in the quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. B77, 161302 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    N. Ofek, A. Bid, M. Heiblum, A. Stern, V. I. Uman- sky, and D. Mahalu, Role of interactions in an electronic fabry–perot interferometer operating in the quantum hall effect regime, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 5276 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. T. McClure, E. M. Levenson-Falk, C. M. Marcus, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Distinct signa- tures for coulomb blockade and aharonov-bohm interfer- ence in electronic fabry-perot interferometers, Phys. Rev. B79, 241304 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    D. T. McClure, Y. Zhang, B. Rosenow, E. M. Levenson- Falk, C. M. Marcus, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Edge-state velocity and coherence in a quantum hall fabry-p´ erot interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 206806 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    D. T. McClure, W. Chang, C. M. Marcus, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Fabry-perot interferometry with frac- tional charges, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 256804 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    H. Choi, I. Sivan, A. Rosenblatt, M. Heiblum, V. Uman- sky, and D. Mahalu, Robust electron pairing in the inte- ger quantum hall effect regime, Nature communications 6, 7435 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Aharonov–bohm interference of fractional quantum hall edge modes, Nature Physics15, 563 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Y. Ji, Y. Chung, D. Sprinzak, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, and H. Shtrikman, An electronic mach–zehnder interfer- ometer, Nature422, 415 (2003)

    2003

  11. [19]

    Neder, M

    I. Neder, M. Heiblum, Y. Levinson, D. Mahalu, and V. Umansky, Unexpected behavior in a two-path elec- tron interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 016804 (2006)

    2006

  12. [20]

    Neder, N

    I. Neder, N. Ofek, Y. Chung, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, and V. Umansky, Interference between two indistinguish- able electrons from independent sources, Nature448, 333 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Neder, M

    I. Neder, M. Heiblum, D. Mahalu, and V. Umansky, Entanglement, dephasing, and phase recovery via cross- correlation measurements of electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 036803 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Roulleau, F

    P. Roulleau, F. Portier, D. C. Glattli, P. Roche, A. Ca- vanna, G. Faini, U. Gennser, and D. Mailly, Finite bias visibility of the electronic mach-zehnder interferometer, Phys. Rev. B76, 161309 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Roulleau, F

    P. Roulleau, F. Portier, P. Roche, A. Cavanna, G. Faini, U. Gennser, and D. Mailly, Noise dephasing in edge states of the integer quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 186803 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    Roulleau, F

    P. Roulleau, F. Portier, P. Roche, A. Cavanna, G. Faini, U. Gennser, and D. Mailly, Direct measurement of the coherence length of edge states in the integer quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 126802 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    Bonderson, K

    P. Bonderson, K. Shtengel, and J. Slingerland, Interfer- ometry of non-abelian anyons, Annals of Physics323, 2709 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Bartolomei, M

    H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Pla¸ cais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F` eve, Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science368, 173 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Ruelle, E

    M. Ruelle, E. Frigerio, J.-M. Berroir, B. Pla¸ cais, J. Rech, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F` eve, Compar- ing fractional quantum hall laughlin and jain topological orders with the anyon collider, Phys. Rev. X13, 011031 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    J.-Y. M. Lee, C. Hong, T. Alkalay, N. Schiller, V. Uman- sky, M. Heiblum, Y. Oreg, and H.-S. Sim, Partitioning of diluted anyons reveals their braiding statistics, Nature 617, 277 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Jonckheere, J

    T. Jonckheere, J. Rech, B. Gr´ emaud, and T. Martin, Anyonic statistics revealed by the hong-ou-mandel dip for fractional excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 186203 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Werkmeister, J

    T. Werkmeister, J. R. Ehrets, M. E. Wesson, D. H. Na- jafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. I. Halperin, A. Yacoby, and P. Kim, Anyon braiding and telegraph noise in a graphene interferometer, Science388, 730 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    de Picciotto, M

    R. de Picciotto, M. Reznikov, M. Heiblum, V. Uman- sky, G. Bunin, and D. Mahalu, Direct observation of a fractional charge, Nature389, 162 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    Saminadayar, D

    L. Saminadayar, D. C. Glattli, Y. Jin, and B. Eti- enne, Observation of the e/3 fractionally charged laughlin quasiparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2526 (1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics, Nature Physics16, 931 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Man- fra, Fabry-p´ erot interferometry at theν= 2/5 fractional quantum hall state, Phys. Rev. X13, 041012 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    R. L. Willett, K. Shtengel, C. Nayak, L. N. Pfeiffer, Y. J. Chung, M. L. Peabody, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Interference measurements of non-abelian e/4 and abelian e/2 quasiparticle braiding, Phys. Rev. X13, 011028 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    H. K. Kundu, S. Biswas, N. Ofek, V. Umansky, and M. Heiblum, Anyonic interference and braiding phase in a mach-zehnder interferometer, Nature physics19, 515 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Chien, S

    C.-C. Chien, S. Peotta, and M. Di Ventra, Quantum transport in ultracold atoms, Nature Physics11, 998 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Krinner, T

    S. Krinner, T. Esslinger, and J.-P. Brantut, Two-terminal transport measurements with cold atoms, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 343003 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Amico, D

    L. Amico, D. Anderson, M. Boshier, J.-P. Brantut, L.-C. Kwek, A. Minguzzi, and W. von Klitzing, Colloquium: 7 Atomtronic circuits: From many-body physics to quan- tum technologies, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 041001 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Brantut, C

    J.-P. Brantut, C. Grenier, J. Meineke, D. Stadler, S. Krinner, C. Kollath, T. Esslinger, and A. Georges, A thermoelectric heat engine with ultracold atoms, Science 342, 713 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Krinner, D

    S. Krinner, D. Stadler, D. Husmann, J.-P. Brantut, and T. Esslinger, Observation of quantized conductance in neutral matter, Nature517, 64 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Lebrat, S

    M. Lebrat, S. H¨ ausler, P. Fabritius, D. Husmann, L. Cor- man, and T. Esslinger, Quantized conductance through a spin-selective atomic point contact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 193605 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Corman, P

    L. Corman, P. Fabritius, S. H¨ ausler, J. Mohan, L. H. Dogra, D. Husmann, M. Lebrat, and T. Esslinger, Quan- tized conductance through a dissipative atomic point contact, Phys. Rev. A100, 053605 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Huang, J

    M.-Z. Huang, J. Mohan, A.-M. Visuri, P. Fabritius, M. Talebi, S. Wili, S. Uchino, T. Giamarchi, and T. Esslinger, Superfluid signatures in a dissipative quan- tum point contact, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 200404 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Sekino, H

    Y. Sekino, H. Tajima, and S. Uchino, Mesoscopic spin transport between strongly interacting fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023152 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Fabritius, J

    P. Fabritius, J. Mohan, M. Talebi, S. Wili, W. Zw- erger, M.-Z. Huang, and T. Esslinger, Irreversible en- tropy transport enhanced by fermionic superfluidity, Na- ture Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Mohan, P

    J. Mohan, P. Fabritius, M. Talebi, S. Wili, M.- Z. Huang, and T. Esslinger, Universal entropy trans- port far from equilibrium across the bcs-bec crossover, arXiv:2403.17838 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Talebi, S

    M. Talebi, S. Wili, J. Mohan, P. Fabritius, M.-Z. Huang, and T. Esslinger, Dark state transport between unitary fermi superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 223403 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Salerno, H

    G. Salerno, H. M. Price, M. Lebrat, S. H¨ ausler, T. Esslinger, L. Corman, J.-P. Brantut, and N. Gold- man, Quantized hall conductance of a single atomic wire: A proposal based on synthetic dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041001 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    V. A. J. Pyykk¨ onen, S. Peotta, P. Fabritius, J. Mohan, T. Esslinger, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Flat-band transport and josephson effect through a finite-size sawtooth lattice, Phys. Rev. B103, 144519 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. ¨Ohberg, Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. ¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spiel- man, Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 126401 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    Goldman, J

    N. Goldman, J. Budich, and P. Zoller, Topological quan- tum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices, Nat. Phys.12, 639 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Zhang and Q

    S.-L. Zhang and Q. Zhou, Manipulating novel quan- tum phenomena using synthetic gauge fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics50, 222001 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Aidelsburger, S

    M. Aidelsburger, S. Nascimbene, and N. Goldman, Ar- tificial gauge fields in materials and engineered systems, Comptes Rendus Physique19, 394 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Zhang, Y.-Q

    D.-W. Zhang, Y.-Q. Zhu, Y. X. Zhao, H. Yan, and S.- L. Zhu, Topological quantum matter with cold atoms, Advances in Physics67, 253 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Topo- logical bands for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015005 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Ozawa and H

    T. Ozawa and H. M. Price, Topological quantum matter in synthetic dimensions, Nature Reviews Physics1, 349 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Weitenberg and J

    C. Weitenberg and J. Simonet, Tailoring quantum gases by Floquet engineering, Nature Physics17, 1342 (2021), arXiv:2102.07009 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    D. W. Hone, R. Ketzmerick, and W. Kohn, Statistical mechanics of floquet systems: The pervasive problem of near degeneracies, Phys. Rev. E79, 051129 (2009)

    2009

  54. [63]

    P. G. Harper, Single band motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  55. [64]

    D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

    1976

  56. [65]

    B. Wang, F. N. ¨Unal, and A. Eckardt, Floquet engineer- ing of optical solenoids and quantized charge pumping along tailored paths in two-dimensional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 243602 (2018)

    2018

  57. [66]

    Raˇ ci¯ unas, F

    M. Raˇ ci¯ unas, F. N.¨Unal, E. Anisimovas, and A. Eckardt, Creating, probing, and manipulating fractionally charged excitations of fractional Chern insulators in optical lat- tices, Phys. Rev. A98, 063621 (2018)

    2018

  58. [67]

    Wang, X.-Y

    B. Wang, X.-Y. Dong, and A. Eckardt, Measurable sig- natures of bosonic fractional Chern insulator states and their fractional excitations in a quantum-gas microscope, SciPost Phys.12, 095 (2022)

    2022

  59. [68]

    Navon, R

    N. Navon, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantum gases in optical boxes, Nature Physics17, 1334 (2021)

    2021

  60. [69]

    E. A. de Andrada e Silva, Probability current in the tight-binding model, American Journal of Physics60, 753 (1992)

    1992

  61. [70]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders, Nat. Phys.10, 588 (2014)

    2014

  62. [71]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, S. Huh, C. Schweizer, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Local read- out and control of current and kinetic energy operators in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 063401 (2024)

    2024

  63. [72]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Huh, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Strongly interacting meissner phases in large bosonic flux ladders, Nature Physics21, 895 (2025)

    2025

  64. [73]

    Landauer, Spatial variation of currents and fields due to localized scatterers in metallic conduction, IBM Jour- nal of Research and Development1, 223 (1957)

    R. Landauer, Spatial variation of currents and fields due to localized scatterers in metallic conduction, IBM Jour- nal of Research and Development1, 223 (1957)

    1957

  65. [74]

    B¨ uttiker, Y

    M. B¨ uttiker, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas, Gen- eralized many-channel conductance formula with appli- cation to small rings, Phys. Rev. B31, 6207 (1985)

    1985

  66. [75]

    Imry and R

    Y. Imry and R. Landauer, Conductance viewed as trans- mission, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, S306 (1999)

    1999

  67. [76]

    Datta,Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    S. Datta,Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor (Cambridge University Press, 2005). 8

    2005

  68. [77]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  69. [78]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  70. [79]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. Taylor, Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics, Na- ture Photonics7, 1001 (2013)

    2013

  71. [80]

    Schiller, Y

    N. Schiller, Y. Shapira, A. Stern, and Y. Oreg, Anyon statistics through conductance measurements of time- domain interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 186601 (2023)

    2023

  72. [81]

    C. E. Henzinger, J. R. Ehrets, R. Fushio, J. Dong, T. Werkmeister, M. E. Wesson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, B. I. Halperin,et al., Con- trolled localization of anyons in a graphene quantum hall interferometer, arXiv:2603.11182 (2026)

    2026

  73. [82]

    J. Kim, A. Shaer, R. Kumar, A. Ilin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Stern, D. F. Mross, and Y. Ronen, Selec- tive braiding of different anyons in the even-denominator fractional quantum hall effect, arXiv:2603.11162 (2026). End Matter A. SCA TTERING A T A QPC Consider a generic...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.