Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 105 references

An HI+radio continuum study of local cluster galaxies: Intercepting the early stages of environmental processing with MeerKAT

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dual HI and radio selection catches cluster galaxies while external pressure still boosts star formation before gas is stripped.

desk verdict Solid MeerKAT dual-selection paper that cleanly isolates the early RPS compression phase and delivers a quantitative HI-deficiency gradient; main 2.7 imes SFR excess is robust, radio-excess interpretation secondary. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11426 v1 pith:VWMS5V3H submitted 2026-07-13 astro-ph.GA

Alessandro Ignesti , Paolo Serra , Alessandro Bianchetti , Antonino Marasco , Alessia Moretti , Francesca Loi , Bianca M. Poggianti , Benedetta Vulcani
show 9 more authors
Laura Bisigello Myriam Gitti Marco Gullieuszik Augusto E. Lassen Rosita Paladino Christoph Pfrommer Mpati Ramatsoku Francesco Sinigaglia Neven Tomičić
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyclustersram-pressurestrippingHIdeficiencyradiocontinuumstarformationjellyfishgalaxiesunwindingMeerKAT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Galaxies that fall into clusters lose gas and eventually stop forming stars, but the earliest moments of that process have been hard to catch. This paper uses MeerKAT observations of three nearby clusters to select 61 galaxies that still retain detectable neutral hydrogen and radio continuum emission. Those galaxies form stars roughly 2.7 times faster than field galaxies of the same stellar and HI mass, showing that the dual selection has intercepted the brief compression phase when external pressure has not yet removed the gas but has already raised the star-formation rate and radio luminosity. Unwinding spiral morphologies appear mainly among the most massive, gas-rich systems, while stacking of hundreds of optically selected members shows that average HI content falls by a factor of about three toward the cluster center. The result supplies a practical way to isolate the start of environmental quenching and to time the sequence of morphological and radio changes that follow.

What carries the argument

The joint HI 21 cm plus 1.4 GHz continuum selection, combined with the luminosity ratio L_R / L_R^SFR and the offset from the star-forming main sequence. Together these quantities order galaxies into successive early stages of ram-pressure compression, SFR burst, and subsequent decline.

What would settle it

Deep multi-frequency radio continuum spectra of the same sample showing flat rather than steep spectral indices would favor ongoing shock acceleration or compression over residual old electrons, falsifying the claimed origin of the radio excess.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Cluster galaxies detected simultaneously in HI and 1.4 GHz continuum are on average ~2.7 times more star-forming than field galaxies of matched stellar and HI mass. The dual selection therefore intercepts the earliest stages of environmental processing, when external pressure compresses the interstellar medium and temporarily boosts both star formation and radio luminosity before significant gas removal occurs. Galaxies at this stage can also show radio excess relative to their current SFR, attributed to old relativistic electrons still permeating the disk.

Load-bearing premise

That the radio continuum excess relative to the SED-derived star-formation rate is produced by old relativistic electrons (or mild compression) rather than residual AGN, uncorrected thermal free-free emission, or systematic mismatch between the 100-Myr SED average and the ~10-Myr radio tracer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • HI+radio continuum selection becomes a practical filter for assembling samples of galaxies still in the pre-stripping compression phase.
  • The L_R / L_R^SFR ratio can separate galaxies observed before, during, and immediately after the compression-induced SFR boost.
  • Unwinding morphologies preferentially mark massive, baryon-dominated systems whose spiral structure resists rapid disruption.
  • Stacking confirms that average HI deficiency already exists near R_200 and grows by a factor of ~3 inside R_500, quantifying the radial progress of environmental gas loss.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dual selection cleanly isolates the compression phase, the same cut applied to SKA-Mid Band 2 surveys should yield statistical samples large enough to measure the duration of the SFR boost as a function of cluster mass and orbital parameters.
  • The higher radio asymmetry of jellyfish relative to unwinding systems implies that non-thermal plasma is stripped later than neutral gas, offering a timing diagnostic for multi-phase ISM-ICM coupling.
  • The radio excess attributed to old electrons predicts steep spectral indices at lower frequencies; a non-detection of that steepening would reopen the possibility of low-level AGN or free-free contamination.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents MeerKAT L-band observations of three local clusters (IIZW108, A4059, A3558) that simultaneously map HI 21 cm and 1.4 GHz continuum emission out to ~2 R200. From 116 HI detections the authors assemble a clean sample of 61 galaxies detected in both tracers, derive stellar masses and 100-Myr-averaged SFRs via Bagpipes SED fitting of UV-to-IR photometry, and classify objects by phase-space location and optical morphology (jellyfish/unwinding). They report that these dual-selected cluster galaxies are on average ~2.7 times more star-forming than xGASS field galaxies of comparable stellar and HI mass, interpret the excess as the signature of early ram-pressure compression before substantial gas removal, and use the LR/LSFR_R ratio together with offsets from the main sequence and HI–M* relation to sketch successive early-processing stages. Unwinding candidates are found to be systematically more massive and HI-rich than jellyfish systems. Stacking of 677 optically selected members further shows that the average HI mass is already ~0.4–0.5 dex below field values at R200 and declines further inside R500, reaching a factor ~3 deficit near the centre.

Significance. The work exploits MeerKAT’s simultaneous HI+continuum capability to isolate a rare, short-lived phase of environmental processing that optical or single-tracer radio surveys miss. The dual-selection result, the quantitative stacking gradient against mass-matched xGASS controls, and the tentative UW-to-JF evolutionary ordering are concrete, falsifiable contributions that will be directly testable with SKA-Mid. The analysis is transparent (KS tests, S/N≥5 stacks, explicit detection limits) and the caveats (solar RFI loss, ~40-arcsec resolution, projection effects) are stated. If the early-compression interpretation holds, the paper supplies a practical selection method for next-generation multi-phase ISM studies of cluster galaxies.

major comments (3)
  1. Section 3 and Figure 3: the headline factor “~2.7 times more star-forming” is central to the abstract and discussion, yet the precise statistical definition is not given. Is it the ratio of median SFRs after matching both M* and MHI, the ratio of means, or a KS-derived shift? Please state the matching procedure, the uncertainty on the factor, and whether the result survives when the xGASS comparison sample is further restricted to the same radio-luminosity floor used for the cluster sample.
  2. Section 4.1 and Figures 8–9: the five-stage evolutionary sequence rests on the interpretation that LR/LSFR_R > 1 at Δlog10 SFR < 0 is produced by old relativistic electrons. The manuscript already notes that thermal free-free is expected <6 % and that AGN templates were omitted from the SED fits, but does not quantify how residual low-level AGN or a systematic mismatch between the 100-Myr SED SFR and the ~10-Myr radio tracer would move objects across the stage boundaries. A short quantitative estimate (or an explicit statement that the primary 2.7 factor is independent of the radio excess) is needed to keep the stage scheme from over-interpreting the data.
  3. Section 4.2: the claim that unwinding morphology “may result from their large baryonic mass” is plausible but currently rests on a small subsample (10 UW vs 13 JF) whose stellar-mass distributions barely overlap. Given the acknowledged orientation bias (UW face-on, JF edge-on) and the modest numbers, the evolutionary sequence UW → JF should be presented more cautiously as a working hypothesis rather than a demonstrated time sequence, or supported by a simple survival-analysis or mass-matched comparison.
minor comments (7)
  1. Abstract and Section 5: “can features a radio luminosity excess” → “can feature”.
  2. Table 1: the HI band and ΔV rows are useful; adding the final continuum RMS and HI column-density limits already quoted in the text would make the table self-contained.
  3. Figure 1 / A.1: the 3–24σ contour levels are clear, but a scale bar in kpc (in addition to the 6-arcmin cutout size) would help readers unfamiliar with the redshift.
  4. Section 2.1: the ~30–60 % data loss to solar RFI is stated; a brief note on whether the lost data preferentially affect one cluster or one side of the primary beam would reassure readers that the sample is not spatially biased.
  5. Section 2.3 / Table 2: the xGASS matching is performed by drawing random realisations that match the stellar-mass distribution; stating the number of realisations (already 10) and the resulting scatter on MxGASS_HI in the table caption would improve reproducibility.
  6. Figure 6 and Table 4: AHI and ARC are computed relative to their own barycentres and at different resolutions; a one-sentence reminder of these caveats in the caption would prevent over-interpretation of the modest ARC difference between UW and JF.
  7. References: a few recent MeerKAT/ASKAP HI-deficiency papers (e.g., Reynolds et al. 2022 is cited; check completeness of 2023–2025 works) could be added for context, but this is optional.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: dual-selection excess and stacking gradient rest on external field benchmarks and independent optical catalogs, not on self-fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (the ~2.7 imes SFR excess of the HI+radio continuum sample relative to mass-matched field galaxies, the radio-luminosity stages defined via LR/LSFR_R, the UW/JF mass differences, and the radial HI-deficiency gradient from stacking) are obtained by direct comparison of new MeerKAT measurements against external, independent relations (xGASS, Renzini & Peng 2015 main sequence, Pan et al. 2023 HI–M*, Heesen et al. 2024 SFR–LR) and against the WINGS/OmegaWINGS spectroscopic membership catalog. No free parameters are fitted to the present data and then re-used as predictions; the 2.7 factor is a measured ratio of cumulative distributions (Fig. 3) confirmed by KS tests. Self-citations to prior GASP papers supply morphological labels and contextual interpretation of individual objects but do not calibrate the new HI masses, radio luminosities, or stacked averages. The only minor self-referential element is the interpretive framing of radio excess as “old electrons,” which is offered as one of several possibilities and is not required for the primary SFR-excess result (itself measured from SED-derived SFRs). The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Standard observational cosmology, SED modeling choices, and literature scaling relations are adopted without free parameters tuned to the central claim. The only ad-hoc elements are the dual-detection threshold and the visual rejection of RFI, both of which are selection cuts rather than fitted constants.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption ΛCDM cosmology with ΩΛ=0.7, Ωm=0.3, H0=70 km s−1 Mpc−1 used for all distances and masses
    Stated in Section 1; converts angular sizes and redshifts into physical units for the three clusters.
  • domain assumption Non-parametric SFH with continuity prior and Charlot & Fall dust attenuation in Bagpipes SED fits
    Section 2.2; produces the M* and 100-Myr SFR values that enter the 2.7× excess comparison.
  • domain assumption xGASS field sample, after IMF and mass-matching cuts, is an unbiased control for HI and SFR distributions
    Used throughout Sections 3 and 4.1; any residual selection difference would rescale the reported excess.
  • domain assumption Phase-space classes of Rhee et al. (2017) statistically separate first/recent/intermediate/ancient infallers despite projection effects
    Figure 2 and Table 3; underpins the claim that intermediate systems are more HI-deficient than recent ones.
  • domain assumption Thermal free-free contribution to 1.4 GHz continuum is <6 % and can be ignored
    Section 2.1 citing Ignesti et al. 2022a; affects the interpretation of radio excess.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An HI+radio continuum study of local cluster galaxies: Intercepting the early stages of environmental processing with MeerKAT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VWMS5V3H

@misc{pith2026260711426,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An HI+radio continuum study of local cluster galaxies: Intercepting the early stages of environmental processing with MeerKAT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VWMS5V3H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11426}
}
abstract

The evolution of galaxies in clusters is driven by their interaction with the environment, which deeply affects and alters the properties of the multi-phase interstellar medium. Here we make use of MeerKAT observations to study the properties of the neutral and nonthermal interstellar medium, traced respectively by the HI 21 cm line and by the radio continuum emission at 1.4 GHz, out to about twice the virial radius of three local ($z\simeq0.04$) galaxy clusters, namely IIZW108, A4059 and A3558, with $M_{200}\simeq2-9\times10^{14}~M_\odot$. We assemble a sample of 61 galaxies, including the so-called jellyfish and unwinding galaxies, detected in both HI and radio continuum, and derive their optical properties from IR-to-UV photometry using ancillary data. We find that cluster galaxies in our sample are on average $\sim2.7$ times more star-forming than galaxies with the same stellar and HI mass in the field, indicating that the HI + radio-continuum selection has intercepted galaxies at the very early stages of their environmental processing when the external pressure has not yet removed the gas, but the resulting fast compression has enhanced both the star formation and the radio continuum luminosity. The study also reveals that galaxies at the initial stage can features a radio luminosity excess due to the old relativistic electrons permeating the interstellar medium. We show that unwinding galaxies are characterized by high stellar and HI masses, arguing that their peculiar morphology may results from their large baryonic mass. Finally, via the stacking analysis of 677 optically-selected cluster members we quantitatively show that cluster galaxies are more HI-poor than in the field, and the deficiency steadily grows approaching the cluster center where galaxies have, on average, a factor $\sim3\times$ less HI mass than those in the field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11426 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of detected galaxies. For each galaxy we show a 6 arcmin cutout (∼ 360 kpc at cluster redshift) of Legacy R-band images with the MeerKAT HI emission (red filled contours) and radio continuum (blue contours) at the 3, 6, 12, 24σ levels on top. In the top-left corners are reported galaxy ID and optical center J2000 co￾ordinates. Unwinding (UW) and jellyfish (JF) galaxies are labeled accordingly in the bottom￾… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phase-space diagram. Galaxies are color-coded for their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. From left to right: cumulative distribution of measured stellar mass, star formation rate, HI mass, and radio continuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Star formation rate (top), HI mass (center) and HI mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HI vs. radio continuum asymmetry. Along each axis are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Stacked HI mass for bin in stellar mass (left) and cluster-centric distance (right) for cluster galaxies (triangles) for both the full (red) and star-forming (SF, blue) samples. For each cluster galaxy bin, hexagons indicate the aver￾age HI mass of xGASS galaxies sub-s…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Observed vs. expected radio continuum luminosity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references

  1. [1]

    C., Ciesla, L., Ilbert, O., et al

    Arango-Toro, R. C., Ciesla, L., Ilbert, O., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A126

    2023

  2. [2]

    Barnes, J. E. & Hernquist, L. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 705

    1992

  3. [3]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 3879

    Basu, A., Beck, R., Schmidt, P., & Roy, S. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3879

    2015

  4. [4]

    2000, in Astronomy, physics and chemistry of H+3, V ol

    Beck, R. 2000, in Astronomy, physics and chemistry of H+3, V ol. 358, 777–796

    2000

  5. [5]

    L., Smith, R., et al

    Bellhouse, C., McGee, S. L., Smith, R., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1285

    2021

  6. [6]

    & Arnouts, S

    Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    1996

  7. [7]

    2025, ApJ, 982, 82

    Bianchetti, A., Sinigaglia, F., Rodighiero, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 82

    2025

  8. [8]

    2022, A&A Rev., 30, 3

    Boselli, A., Fossati, M., & Sun, M. 2022, A&A Rev., 30, 3

    2022

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    2019, Anticipated Performance of the Square Kilometre Array – Phase 1 (SKA1)

    Braun, R., Bonaldi, A., Bourke, T., Keane, E., & Wagg, J. 2019, Anticipated Performance of the Square Kilometre Array – Phase 1 (SKA1)

    2019

  2. [10]

    & Charlot, S

    Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000 Çakır, O., Owers, M. S., Cortese, L., et al. 2026, PASA, 43, 1

    2003

  3. [11]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379

    2018

  4. [12]

    2018, MNRAS, 476, 875

    Catinella, B., Saintonge, A., Janowiecki, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 875

    2018

  5. [13]

    & Fall, S

    Charlot, S. & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718

    2000

  6. [14]

    2020, MNRAS, 496, 4654

    Chen, H., Sun, M., Yagi, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 4654

    2020

  7. [15]

    S., Ruszkowski, M., Werhahn, M., Pfrommer, C., & Thomas, T

    Chiu, H.-H. S., Ruszkowski, M., Werhahn, M., Pfrommer, C., & Thomas, T. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.03229

    2025

  8. [16]

    H., Kenney, J

    Chung, A., van Gorkom, J. H., Kenney, J. D. P., & V ollmer, B. 2007, ApJ, 659, L115

    2007

  9. [17]

    Condon, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 575

    1992

  10. [18]

    2021, PASA, 38, e035

    Cortese, L., Catinella, B., & Smith, R. 2021, PASA, 38, e035

    2021

  11. [19]

    Deb, T., Verheijen, M. A. W., & van der Hulst, J. M. 2023, A&A, 676, A118

    2023

  12. [20]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168 Di Gennaro, G., Venturi, T., Giacintucci, S., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A28

    2019

  13. [21]

    1980, ApJ, 236, 351

    Dressler, A. 1980, ApJ, 236, 351

    1980

  14. [22]

    Dursi, L. J. & Pfrommer, C. 2008, ApJ, 677, 993

    2008

  15. [23]

    2014, ApJS, 211, 21

    Ebeling, H., Ma, C.-J., & Barrett, E. 2014, ApJS, 211, 21

    2014

  16. [24]

    W., Roberts, I

    Edler, H. W., Roberts, I. D., Boselli, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A149

    2024

  17. [25]

    J., Ruszkowski, M., Tonnesen, S., & Holguin, F

    Farber, R. J., Ruszkowski, M., Tonnesen, S., & Holguin, F. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 5927

    2022

  18. [26]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63

    1999

  19. [27]

    2021, MNRAS, 507, 2300

    For, B.-Q., Wang, J., Westmeier, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 2300

    2021

  20. [28]

    M., et al

    Franchetto, A., Tonnesen, S., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, L6

    2021

  21. [29]

    Fumagalli, M., Fossati, M., Hau, G. K. T., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 4335

    2014

  22. [30]

    2006, A&A, 446, 839 Gil de Paz, A., Boissier, S., Madore, B

    Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., Cortese, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 446, 839 Gil de Paz, A., Boissier, S., Madore, B. F., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 185

    2006

  23. [31]

    & Haynes, M

    Giovanelli, R. & Haynes, M. P. 1985, ApJ, 292, 404

    1985

  24. [32]

    M., McGee, S

    Gullieuszik, M., Poggianti, B. M., McGee, S. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 13

    2020

  25. [33]

    Gunn, J. E. & Gott, III, J. R. 1972, ApJ, 176, 1

    1972

  26. [34]

    E., Pearce, F

    Haggar, R., Gray, M. E., Pearce, F. R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 6074

    2020

  27. [35]

    2024, A&A, 682, A83

    Heesen, V ., Schulz, S., Brüggen, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A83

    2024

  28. [36]

    2026, A&A, 708, A65

    Ignesti, A., Loi, F., Marasco, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A65

    2026

  29. [37]

    2023, A&A, 675, A118

    Ignesti, A., Vulcani, B., Botteon, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A118

    2023

  30. [38]

    M., et al

    Ignesti, A., Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2022b, ApJ, 924, 64 Józsa, G. I. G., White, S. V ., Thorat, K., et al. 2020, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 527, Astronomical Data Analysis Soft- ware and Systems XXIX, ed. R. Pizzo, E. R. Deul...

    2020

  31. [39]

    Kenney, J. D. P., Geha, M., Jáchym, P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 119

    2014

  32. [40]

    Kenney, J. D. P., van Gorkom, J. H., & V ollmer, B. 2004, AJ, 127, 3361

    2004

  33. [41]

    Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531

    2012

  34. [42]

    & Boily, C

    Kroupa, P. & Boily, C. M. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1188

    2002

  35. [43]

    C., Johnson, B

    Leja, J., Carnall, A. C., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2019, ApJ, 876, 3

    2019

  36. [44]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 1694

    Lelli, F., Verheijen, M., & Fraternali, F. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1694

    2014

  37. [45]

    2025, A&A, 694, A125

    Loi, F., Serra, P., Murgia, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A125

    2025

  38. [46]

    2021, A&A, 648, A31

    Loni, A., Serra, P., Kleiner, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A31

    2021

  39. [47]

    H., et al

    Luber, N., Müller, A., van Gorkom, J. H., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 39

    2022

  40. [48]

    Machado, R. E. G., Grinberg, C. F. O., & Mello-Terencio, E. A. 2025, Galaxies, 13, 76

    2025

  41. [49]

    M., Di Teodoro, E

    Marasco, A., Fall, S. M., Di Teodoro, E. M., & Mancera Piña, P. E. 2025, A&A, 695, L23

    2025

  42. [50]

    M., Vulcani, B., et al

    Marasco, A., Poggianti, B. M., Vulcani, B., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A18

    2026

  43. [51]

    D., Condon, J

    Mauch, T., Cotton, W. D., Condon, J. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 61

    2020

  44. [52]

    McKee, C. F. & Cowie, L. L. 1977, ApJ, 215, 213

    1977

  45. [53]

    2015, A&A, 575, A37

    Mernier, F., de Plaa, J., Lovisari, L., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A37

    2015

  46. [54]

    2017, PASA, 34, 52 Molnár, D

    Meyer, M., Robotham, A., Obreschkow, D., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, 52 Molnár, D. C., Serra, P., van der Hulst, T., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A94

    2017

  47. [55]

    1996, Nature, 379, 613

    Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., & Oemler, A. 1996, Nature, 379, 613

    1996

  48. [56]

    2017, A&A, 599, A81

    Moretti, A., Gullieuszik, M., Poggianti, B., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A81

    2017

  49. [57]

    M., Fasano, G., et al

    Moretti, A., Poggianti, B. M., Fasano, G., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A138 Müller, A., Poggianti, B. M., Pfrommer, C., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 159

    2014

  50. [58]

    J., Kenney, J

    Murphy, E. J., Kenney, J. D. P., Helou, G., Chung, A., & Howell, J. H. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1435

    2009

  51. [59]

    Nulsen, P. E. J. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 377

    1986

  52. [60]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606

    2014

  53. [61]

    R., van de Gronde, J

    Offringa, A. R., van de Gronde, J. J., & Roerdink, J. B. T. M. 2012, A&A, 539, A95

    2012

  54. [62]

    J., Santos, M

    Pan, H., Jarvis, M. J., Santos, M. G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 256

    2023

  55. [63]

    D., Laor, A., et al

    Panessa, F., Baldi, R. D., Laor, A., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 387

    2019

  56. [64]

    2026, A&A, 706, A111

    Peluso, G., Delvecchio, I., Radcliffe, J., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A111

    2026

  57. [65]

    M., et al

    Peluso, G., Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 130

    2022

  58. [66]

    & Dursi, L

    Pfrommer, C. & Dursi, L. J. 2010, Nature Physics, 6, 520

    2010

  59. [67]

    Pfrommer, C., Werhahn, M., Pakmor, R., Girichidis, P., & Simpson, C. M. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4229

    2022

  60. [68]

    M., Fasano, G., Omizzolo, A., et al

    Poggianti, B. M., Fasano, G., Omizzolo, A., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 78

    2016

  61. [69]

    M., Jaffé, Y

    Poggianti, B. M., Jaffé, Y . L., Moretti, A., et al. 2017, Nature, 548, 304

    2017

  62. [70]

    M., Moretti, A., Gullieuszik, M., et al

    Poggianti, B. M., Moretti, A., Gullieuszik, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 48

    2017

  63. [71]

    Poggianti, B. M. & van Gorkom, J. H. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 240, Gas and Galaxy Evolution, ed. J. E. Hi- bbard, M. Rupen, & J. H. van Gorkom, 599

    2001

  64. [72]

    M., Vulcani, B., Tomicic, N., et al

    Poggianti, B. M., Vulcani, B., Tomicic, N., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A357

    2025

  65. [73]

    M., et al

    Ramatsoku, M., Serra, P., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A22

    2020

  66. [74]

    J., & Mulchaey, J

    Rasmussen, J., Ponman, T. J., & Mulchaey, J. S. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 453

    2006

  67. [75]

    & Peng, Y .-j

    Renzini, A. & Peng, Y .-j. 2015, ApJ, 801, L29

    2015

  68. [76]

    S., Casper, E

    Reynolds, C. S., Casper, E. A., & Heinz, S. 2008, ApJ, 679, 1181

    2008

  69. [77]

    N., Catinella, B., Cortese, L., et al

    Reynolds, T. N., Catinella, B., Cortese, L., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 1716

    2022

  70. [78]

    2017, ApJ, 843, 128

    Rhee, J., Smith, R., Choi, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 128

    2017

  71. [79]

    Roberts, I. D. & Parker, L. C. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 554

    2020

  72. [80]

    D., van Weeren, R

    Roberts, I. D., van Weeren, R. J., McGee, S. L., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A111

    2021

  73. [81]

    2007, A&A, 463, 839

    Rossetti, M., Ghizzardi, S., Molendi, S., & Finoguenov, A. 2007, A&A, 463, 839

    2007

  74. [82]

    Ruszkowski, M., Brüggen, M., Lee, D., & Shin, M. S. 2014, ApJ, 784, 75

    2014

  75. [83]

    Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    2011

  76. [84]

    M., Kleiner, D., et al

    Serra, P., Maccagni, F. M., Kleiner, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A146 Article number, page 12 Ignesti et al.: An HI+radio continuum study of local cluster galaxies:

    2023

  77. [85]

    2015, MNRAS, 448, 1922

    Serra, P., Westmeier, T., Giese, N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1922

    2015

  78. [86]

    1930, Harvard College Observatory Bulletin, 874, 9

    Shapley, H. 1930, Harvard College Observatory Bulletin, 874, 9

    1930

  79. [87]

    2022, ApJ, 935, L13

    Sinigaglia, F., Rodighiero, G., Elson, E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, L13

    2022

  80. [88]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

    2006

  81. [89]

    J., Lucey, J

    Smith, R. J., Lucey, J. R., Hammer, D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 1417

    2010

  82. [90]

    M., Manrique, A., García-Gómez, C., et al

    Solanes, J. M., Manrique, A., García-Gómez, C., et al. 2001, ApJ, 548, 97

    2001

  83. [91]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 5829

    Sparre, M., Pfrommer, C., & Puchwein, E. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 5829

    2024

  84. [92]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 6, 270

    Sun, M., Ge, C., Luo, R., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 6, 270

    2021

  85. [93]

    L., & van Gorkom, J

    Tonnesen, S., Bryan, G. L., & van Gorkom, J. H. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1434 van Gorkom, J. H. 2004, in Clusters of Galaxies: Probes of Cosmological Struc- ture and Galaxy Evolution, ed. J. S. Mulchaey, A. Dressler, & A. Oemler, 305

    2007

  86. [94]

    2022, A&A, 660, A81 V ollmer, B., Beck, R., Kenney, J

    Venturi, T., Giacintucci, S., Merluzzi, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A81 V ollmer, B., Beck, R., Kenney, J. D. P., & van Gorkom, J. H. 2004, AJ, 127, 3375 V ollmer, B., Cayatte, V ., Balkowski, C., & Duschl, W. J. 2001, ApJ, 561, 708 V ollmer, B., Soida, M., Beck, R., et al. 201...

    2022

  87. [95]

    2026, A&A, 708, A141

    Vulcani, B., De Lucia, G., Zakharova, D., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A141

    2026

  88. [96]

    M., Moretti, A., et al

    Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., Moretti, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 27

    2021

  89. [97]

    M., Smith, R., et al

    Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., Smith, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 91

    2022

  90. [98]

    M., Tonnesen, S., et al

    Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., Tonnesen, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 98

    2020

  91. [99]

    2021, ApJ, 915, 70

    Wang, J., Staveley-Smith, L., Westmeier, T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 915, 70

    2021

  92. [100]

    B., Cortese, L., Catinella, B., et al

    Watts, A. B., Cortese, L., Catinella, B., et al. 2023, PASA, 40, e017

    2023

  93. [101]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4072

    Werhahn, M., Pfrommer, C., & Girichidis, P. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4072

    2021

  94. [102]

    W., Roellig, T

    Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1

    2004

  95. [103]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 3962

    Westmeier, T., Kitaeff, S., Pallot, D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3962

    2021

  96. [104]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868

    2010

  97. [105]

    2025, ApJ, 986, 38 Article number, page 13 A&A proofs:manuscript no

    Yoon, H., Ivy Wong, O., Chung, A., & Huang, S. 2025, ApJ, 986, 38 Article number, page 13 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa_example_v3 Appendix A: Full sample We report here the combined images for the full sample (Figure A.1) and the detailed information (Table A.1). Fig. A.1: Gal...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.