Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 39 references

Molecule-dependent Abundance Behavior of Oxygen-bearing Complex Organics in High-Mass Star-Forming Regions: A Uniform 50-source Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A uniform 49-source survey finds that oxygen-bearing organic abundances in high-mass star-forming regions are molecule-dependent, not driven by a single shared pattern: methyl formate and dimethyl ether track methanol together, while acetal

desk verdict A useful, transparent 50-source survey whose central molecule-dependent claim rests on a proxy-temperature assumption the paper discloses but never stress-tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16734 v1 pith:JK6MLMH4 submitted 2026-07-18 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Xuefang Xu , Mingwei He , Qian Gou , Jiao He , Junzhi Wang , Donghui Quan , Di Li , Laurent Pagani
show 5 more authors
Juan Li Guoming Zhao Chunguo Duan Yang Lu Luyao Zou
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords complexorganicmoleculeshotcoreshigh-massstarformationacetaldehydemethylformatedimethylethermethanolabundanceratios
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes four oxygen-bearing complex organic molecules—methanol, acetaldehyde, methyl formate, and dimethyl ether—in 50 high-mass star-forming regions associated with 6.7 GHz methanol masers, using a homogeneous IRAM-30m rotation-diagram analysis. The central claim is that the source-to-source abundance behavior is molecule-dependent: methyl formate and dimethyl ether correlate strongly with each other when normalized to methanol, while acetaldehyde correlates only weakly. The authors provide a uniform, beam-averaged set of abundance-ratio constraints that modelers can use directly, and show that no simple dependence on Galactocentric distance or H2 column density explains the scatter. A qualitative warm-up model comparison suggests the observed abundances fit a post-desorption, early-decline phase of hot-core chemistry.

What carries the argument

The CH3OH-normalized logarithmic abundance-ratio space (log[N(X)/N(CH3OH)]) is the central analytical device; the pairwise Pearson correlations in this space carry the argument. Column densities were derived from rotation-diagram fits under an optically thin LTE assumption, and the CH3CN rotation temperature in the same 22.4″ beam serves as a proxy excitation temperature whenever fewer than three usable transitions are available. Sgr B2 is excluded from quantitative analyses because a single-component optically thin treatment is not representative.

What would settle it

Recompute CH3CHO/CH3OH ratios for a subset of the 49 sources using direct rotation-diagram fits to acetaldehyde lines from higher-resolution, line-rich observations (e.g., ALMA); if the Pearson correlations involving CH3CHO rise substantially above 0.42 and 0.18, or the CH3OCHO–CH3OCH3 correlation drops, the molecule-dependent pattern would be largely an artifact of the CH3CN proxy assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In CH3OH-normalized abundance-ratio space, the paper finds that CH3OCHO/CH3OH and CH3OCH3/CH3OH remain tightly correlated across the sample (Pearson γ = 0.81), while correlations involving CH3CHO are much weaker (γ = 0.42 with CH3OCHO/CH3OH; γ = 0.18 with CH3OCH3/CH3OH). This is interpreted as evidence that methyl formate and dimethyl ether share a common chemical pathway linked to methanol (through methoxy-type chemistry), whereas acetaldehyde's abundance is governed by additional, more variable processes. The result is based on a homogeneous analysis of column densities derived assuming optically thin LTE, with CH3CN rotation temperatures adopted as a proxy excitation temperature for all C

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the CH3CN rotation temperature, measured in the same beam, is a faithful proxy for the excitation temperature of the other molecules—especially CH3CHO, whose column density was never derived from its own rotation diagram in any of the 43 detected sources.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the molecule-dependent pattern is correct, chemical models of hot cores should tie methyl formate and dimethyl ether production closely to methanol-derived radicals (e.g., CH3O), while treating acetaldehyde with separate, more variable formation routes.
  • The homogeneous beam-averaged abundance ratios provide a direct observational benchmark for warm-up chemical models during the post-desorption decline phase, narrowing the range of physical conditions and timescales that can reproduce the data.
  • The absence of monotonic trends with Galactocentric distance or H2 column density implies that local conditions (e.g., temperature structure, radiation field, ice composition) dominate the abundance scatter, rather than global Galactic gradients.
  • The comparison with previous studies indicates that methyl formate and dimethyl ether ratios are robust across different samples and telescopes, whereas acetaldehyde ratios are not, suggesting that acetaldehyde measurements are particularly sensitive to excitation assumptions and beam dilution.
  • The results support the use of CH3OCHO/CH3OCH3 as a relatively stable chemical diagnostic in high-mass star-forming regions, as previously suggested, but caution against using acetaldehyde ratios as robust tracers without careful excitation corrections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension would be to measure acetaldehyde's rotation temperature directly in a subset of these sources with more line-rich data; if its own Trot is systematically lower than CH3CN's, the derived CH3CHO/CH3OH ratios would shift and could raise the Pearson correlations involving CH3CHO, weakening the claimed molecule-dependence.
  • The proxy-temperature assumption might also affect the scatter of the CH3OCHO–CH3OCH3 correlation, though both molecules have many direct fits in several sources; a sensitivity analysis that re-derives all ratios under a common fixed temperature (e.g., 80 K) would show whether the γ = 0.81 correlation is an artifact of temperature assignment.
  • These results could be combined with smaller-scale interferometric observations (e.g., ALMA) to test whether the molecule-dependent pattern persists at core scales where beam dilution and multiple components are less severe.
  • If acetaldehyde's independent behavior is confirmed, it would strengthen the case for grain-surface formation of CH3CHO via the CH3 + HCO route being highly environment-sensitive, potentially explaining the large inter-study variation seen in the literature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a uniform IRAM-30 m survey analysis of four oxygen-bearing complex organic molecules (CH3OH, CH3CHO, CH3OCHO, CH3OCH3) toward 50 high-mass star-forming regions associated with 6.7 GHz methanol masers. Column densities are derived with a homogeneous rotation-diagram method under the optically thin LTE assumption, using CH3CN as a proxy excitation temperature when fewer than three usable transitions are available. In CH3OH-normalized abundance-ratio space, the survey finds that CH3OCHO/CH3OH and CH3OCH3/CH3OH are strongly correlated (Pearson γ=0.81), whereas correlations involving CH3CHO are weaker (γ=0.42 and 0.18). No monotonic trends with Galactocentric distance or beam-averaged H2 column density are reported. The CH3OCHO–CH3OCH3 ratio is compared with literature values, and a qualitative NAUTILUS warm-up model is used to contextualize the observed abundance ranges. The paper concludes that source-to-source abundance behavior is molecule-dependent rather than described by a single common abundance pattern.

Significance. If the central correlation result is robust, the paper provides a valuable homogeneous, 49-source constraint on O-bearing COM abundance ratios in high-mass star-forming regions. The analysis is generally careful: the rotation-diagram equations (A.1–A.4) are explicit, the CH3CN proxy is clearly flagged in Table B.2, Sgr B2 is excluded for well-justified reasons, and the data products are made publicly available on Zenodo. The agreement of the CH3OCHO/CH3OCH3 ratio with Coletta et al. (2020) is a useful external benchmark. However, the paper's headline claim—molecule-dependent behavior—rests on the contrast between Pearson correlations in Figure 2, and that contrast is not yet shown to survive the dominant systematic in the data: every CH3CHO column density is proxy-temperature based, and a substantial fraction of CH3OCHO/CH3OCH3 points are proxy-based as well. The manuscript is transparent about the proxy, but it does not quantify how the proxy assumption affects the correlation coefficients. A focused sensitivity analysis is needed before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Fig. 2; Appendix A; Table B.2] The central 'molecule-dependent' claim rests on the contrast between γ=0.81 (CH3OCHO/CH3OH vs CH3OCH3/CH3OH) and γ=0.42/0.18 for correlations involving CH3CHO. However, every CH3CHO column density in Table B.2 is derived with a fixed CH3CN-proxy temperature (flagged ‡/†; Appendix A), never from a CH3CHO rotation diagram. If the true CH3CHO excitation differs from CH3CN by a source-dependent amount, the CH3CHO/CH3OH scatter is inflated and the two γ values involving CH3CHO are attenuated. Conversely, CH3OCHO and CH3OCH3 are both proxy-based in a substantial subset of sources (e.g., G005.88, G010.62, G011.91, G031.58, G043.16), so correlated temperature errors can inflate γ=0.81. The paper discloses the proxy but does not quantify its effect. Please add a robustness analysis: propagate Trot uncertainties into Ntot via Eq. A.3, rerun Fig. 2 using only sources with independent direct fits fo
  2. [§3, Fig. 2] The three Pearson coefficients are reported without confidence intervals, p-values, or tests for whether the correlations differ. With 32–43 detections, γ=0.42 is not obviously 'weak' in a statistical sense, and the difference between 0.81 and 0.42 is not tested. Report confidence intervals (e.g., bootstrap or Fisher z-transformation) and, ideally, a test that the pairwise correlations are significantly different. This is necessary to support the 'molecule-dependent' wording beyond a visual comparison of point estimates.
  3. [Appendix A; Table B.2] The CH3OH normalization itself is not immune to the proxy issue. In several sources CH3OH has no independent rotation-diagram fit (e.g., G012.80, G034.39, G075.76, G133.94, and G168.06 is a non-detection), so its column density is also estimated with the CH3CN proxy. Since all three abundance ratios are divided by N(CH3OH), errors in N(CH3OH) are common-mode across the ratios and can induce or inflate positive correlations. The paper should quantify the impact of CH3OH column-density uncertainties on the pairwise γ values, ideally by marginalizing over the CH3OH temperature/column-density errors in the same robustness analysis as the CH3CHO proxy concern.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. A.4] The representative linewidth Δv used for 3σ upper limits is not fully defined. Please state whether Δv is FWHM or another measure, and describe how the representative line is selected when CH3CN is not detected or has no usable line.
  2. [§3 and Abstract] The abstract says '50-source survey,' but after excluding Sgr B2 the quantitative analysis uses 49 sources. The detection counts in §3 (50, 43, 32, 35) include Sgr B2. Please clarify the exact sample size at each stage of the analysis.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption describes 'black horizontal ticks and symbols' for medians/representative values, but the figure symbols are not explicitly distinguished in the caption. Please identify the exact markers used for this work's median and for literature values.
  4. [§3, Fig. 3] The claim of no monotonic trends with Galactocentric distance and N(H2) is based on visual inspection. A quantitative trend test, such as a Spearman rank correlation or a bootstrap regression, would make the statement more robust and less dependent on the chosen plotting scale.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: observed line intensities, an external benchmark, and a qualitative model drive the central correlation claim; proxy-temperature caveats are limitations, not reductions.

full rationale

The central claim (molecule-dependent abundance behavior) is inferred from Pearson correlations of CH3OH-normalized ratios computed from column densities. Those column densities are derived from observed integrated intensities via Eqs. A.1–A.3; no parameter is fitted to the target correlations, and no equation defines the claim in terms of its own inputs. The CH3OCHO/CH3OCH3 behavior agrees with the independent Coletta et al. (2020) benchmark, and the NAUTILUS comparison is explicitly qualitative, with Tmax = 200 K 'not fitted to individual sources.' Self-citations (Xu et al. 2025 for line identification; Zhao et al. 2025 for the warm-up setup) are used for inventory and physical context, but the paper states that final rotation temperatures and column densities were 'derived independently from the rotation-diagram analysis described in Appendix A,' and the model is not used to generate the abundance-ratio correlations. The CH3CN-proxy treatment of CH3CHO column densities, flagged with ‡/† in Table B.2 and described in Appendix A, is a genuine systematic limitation that could affect the reported γ values; however, it is a measurement assumption, not a circular reduction. The claimed pattern is not forced by the proxy construction, because the proxy is an external temperature diagnostic rather than a parameter fitted to the correlation output. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard observational reduction: measured line intensities → LTE column densities (A.1–A.3) → CH3OH-normalized ratios → Pearson correlations. No new entities are introduced (no invented species, forces, or parameters of nature). The main hand-set values are the CH3CN-proxy temperatures adopted for essentially all CH3CHO and many CH3OCHO/CH3OCH3 column densities, the linewidths used for upper limits, and the representative 200 K model endpoint. The NAUTILUS model is used qualitatively, so its reaction-network assumptions do not enter the observational claim.

free parameters (3)
  • Proxy excitation temperatures (CH3CN Trot adopted as T_ex for species lacking direct fits) = ~30–140 K per source (Table B.2, ‡ entries)
    Chosen hand-values that directly set Ntot for all 43 CH3CHO detections and a large fraction of CH3OCHO/CH3OCH3 detections († entries); any bias propagates into the ratio scatter and the correlations.
  • Representative linewidth Δv for 3σ upper limits = taken from detected lines in the same spectrum (e.g., CH3CN)
    Chosen per source in Eq. A.4; affects only upper limits, which are excluded from the correlation analysis.
  • Warm-up model endpoint Tmax = 200 K
    Representative hot-core endpoint, stated explicitly as not fitted to individual sources; used only for the qualitative comparison in Fig. 5 (Sect. 4.2).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Target emissions are optically thin and in LTE with Trot = Tex (Eqs. A.1–A.3)
    Invoked in Appendix A for the rotation-diagram analysis; if violated (e.g., optically thick CH3OH lines), column densities and hence all ratios are biased.
  • domain assumption CH3CN rotation temperature is a valid proxy excitation temperature for O-bearing COMs in the same 22.4″ beam
    Default proxy for all species with fewer than three usable transitions (Appendix A); every CH3CHO column density in Table B.2 uses it, making this assumption load-bearing for the CH3CHO correlations.
  • standard math JPL/CDMS line parameters (rest frequencies, A_ul, Q(T)) are accurate
    Adopted for line identification and rotation-diagram analysis (Sect. 2.3 and Appendix A).
  • domain assumption The 6.7 GHz methanol-maser + HC3N J=12–11 > 1 K selection yields a representative HMSFR sample
    Source-selection criteria in Sect. 2.1; the selection could bias the sample toward brighter, chemically richer regions, affecting the generalization of the ratio ranges.
  • domain assumption Beam-averaged quantities across sources at different distances are comparable
    The 22.4″ beam; sources span Galactocentric distances 1.6–15.9 kpc, so the physical scale subtended varies by roughly an order of magnitude; the paper acknowledges this affects absolute values and scatter (Appendix A).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Molecule-dependent Abundance Behavior of Oxygen-bearing Complex Organics in High-Mass Star-Forming Regions: A Uniform 50-source Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JK6MLMH4

@misc{pith2026260716734,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Molecule-dependent Abundance Behavior of Oxygen-bearing Complex Organics in High-Mass Star-Forming Regions: A Uniform 50-source Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JK6MLMH4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16734}
}
abstract

We present a uniform IRAM-30\,m survey analysis of four oxygen-bearing complex organic molecules (COMs), methanol (CH$_3$OH), acetaldehyde (CH$_3$CHO), methyl formate (CH$_3$OCHO), and dimethyl ether (CH$_3$OCH$_3$), toward 50 high-mass star-forming regions (HMSFRs) associated with 6.7\,GHz methanol masers. Column densities were derived through a homogeneous rotation-diagram approach, with CH$_3$CN used as a proxy excitation-temperature reference when needed. In CH$_3$OH-normalized abundance-ratio space, CH$_3$OCHO/CH$_3$OH and CH$_3$OCH$_3$/CH$_3$OH show the strongest pairwise correlation, whereas the correlations involving CH$_3$CHO are weaker. No clear monotonic trends are found with Galactocentric distance or beam-averaged H$_2$ column density. Comparison with previous observations places the CH$_3$OCHO--CH$_3$OCH$_3$ behavior within the range of earlier abundance-ratio measurements, while CH$_3$CHO shows larger inter-study variation. A representative warm-up chemical model is used only for qualitative comparison with the observed abundance ranges, which are most closely matched during the decline from the post-desorption abundance peaks in the model. These results provide homogeneous beam-averaged abundance-ratio constraints for common O-bearing COMs in high-mass star-forming regions and show that their source-to-source behavior is molecule-dependent rather than fully described by a single common abundance pattern.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16734 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative spectra toward G009.62+00.19 for CH3CN, CH3OH, CH3CHO, CH3OCHO, and CH3OCH3. The black histograms show the observed IRAM-30 m spectra, the red curves show the corresponding LTE synthetic spectra, and the dashed horizontal lines mark the 3 rms noise level. essarily expected to follow the same pattern as CH3OCHO and CH3OCH3. Detailed studies of individual sources provide important in￾sight into local pr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pairwise correlations of CH3OH-normalized abundance ratios for CH3CHO, CH3OCHO, and CH3OCH3 across the sample. Symbols with arrows indicate upper limits in the corresponding abundance ratios. Upper-limit points are shown for reference and are excluded from the correlation analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients (γ) are reported in each panel. sinusoidal baselines were subtracted to mitigate low-amplitude standing… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Abundance ratios of CH3CHO, CH3OCHO, and CH3OCH3 rela￾tive to CH3OH as functions of (a) Galactocentric distance and (b) beam￾averaged H2 column density. No clear monotonic trends are apparent across the sampled ranges, indicating that these relative abundance ra￾tios show no obvious dependence on the two global quantities examined here. 200 K (Table B.2). In some sources, O-bearing species reach rotation temperature… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of CH3OH-normalized abundance ratios and the CH3OCHO/CH3OCH3 ratio in this work and selected litera￾ture studies. The literature labels on the x-axis correspond to the source samples and references listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gas-phase abundance evolution of CH3OH, CH3CHO, CH3OCHO, and CH3OCH3 in the representative warm-up model with Tmax = 200 K. The shaded rectangles indicate the observed abundance ranges derived in this work. The gray vertical band marks the time in￾terval, (1.25–1.42) ×…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references

  1. [1]

    2005, ApJS, 157, 279

    Araya, E., Hofner, P., Kurtz, S., Bronfman, L., & DeDeo, S. 2005, ApJS, 157, 279

    2005

  2. [2]

    Belloche, A., Müller, H. S. P., Menten, K. M., Schilke, P., & Comito, C. 2013, A&A, 559, A47

    2013

  3. [3]

    2016, ApJ, 817, L12

    Bertin, M., Romanzin, C., Doronin, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, L12

    2016

  4. [4]

    E., Jørgensen, J

    Bisschop, S. E., Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & de Wachter, E. B. M. 2007, A&A, 465, 913

    2007

  5. [5]

    2021, A&A, 648, A49

    Biver, N., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Boissier, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A49

    2021

  6. [6]

    L., Ellingsen, S

    Breen, S. L., Ellingsen, S. P., Contreras, Y ., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 524

    2013

  7. [7]

    2013, A&A, 550, A46

    Brouillet, N., Despois, D., Baudry, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A46

    2013

  8. [8]

    Chen, Y ., Rocha, W. R. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A205

    2024

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    M., et al

    Coletta, A., Fontani, F., Rivilla, V . M., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A54

    2020

  2. [10]

    2021, A&A, 655, A9

    Enrique-Romero, J., Ceccarelli, C., Rimola, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 655, A9

    2021

  3. [11]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, L6

    Enrique-Romero, J., Rimola, A., Ceccarelli, C., & Balucani, N. 2016, MNRAS, 459, L6

    2016

  4. [12]

    A., Langer, W

    Frerking, M. A., Langer, W. D., & Wilson, R. W. 1982, ApJ, 262, 590

    1982

  5. [13]

    Garrod, R. T. & Herbst, E. 2006, A&A, 457, 927

    2006

  6. [14]

    T., Widicus Weaver, S

    Garrod, R. T., Widicus Weaver, S. L., & Herbst, E. 2008, ApJ, 682, 283

    2008

  7. [15]

    2019, A&A, 631, A142

    Gieser, C., Semenov, D., Beuther, H., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A142

    2019

  8. [16]

    & van Dishoeck, E

    Herbst, E. & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427 Hernández-Hernández, V ., Zapata, L., Kurtz, S., & Garay, G. 2014, ApJ, 786, 38

    2009

  9. [17]

    A., Ceccarelli, C., Kahane, C., & Caux, E

    Jaber, A. A., Ceccarelli, C., Kahane, C., & Caux, E. 2014, ApJ, 791, 29 Jørgensen, J. K., Belloche, A., & Garrod, R. T. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 727 Jørgensen, J. K., Müller, H. S. P., Calcutt, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A170

    2014

  10. [18]

    2024, MNRAS, 533, 1583

    Li, C., Qin, S.-L., Liu, T., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1583

    2024

  11. [19]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 4934

    Li, Y ., Wang, J., Li, J., Liu, S., & Luo, Q. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 4934

    2022

  12. [20]

    2019, ApJ, 885, 82

    Luo, G., Feng, S., Li, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 82

    2019

  13. [21]

    Z., Zhang, X., et al

    Luo, R., Wang, J. Z., Zhang, X., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A359

    2024

  14. [22]

    K., Calcutt, H., et al

    Manigand, S., Jørgensen, J. K., Calcutt, H., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A48

    2020

  15. [23]

    2011, A&A, 526, A47

    Maret, S., Hily-Blant, P., Pety, J., Bardeau, S., & Reynier, E. 2011, A&A, 526, A47

    2011

  16. [24]

    Menten, K. M. 1991, ApJ, 380, L75

    1991

  17. [25]

    P., Norris, R

    Minier, V ., Ellingsen, S. P., Norris, R. P., & Booth, R. S. 2003, A&A, 403, 1095 Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215 Müller, H. S. P., Thorwirth, S., Roth, D. A., & Winnewisser, G. 2001, A&A, 370, L49

    2003

  18. [26]

    D., Charnley, S

    Peeters, Z., Rodgers, S. D., Charnley, S. B., et al. 2006, A&A, 445, 197

    2006

  19. [27]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 4419

    Peng, Y ., Liu, T., Qin, S.-L., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 4419

    2022

  20. [28]

    M., Poynter, R

    Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, J. Quant. Spectr. Rad. Transf., 60, 883

    1998

  21. [29]

    J., Menten, K

    Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 130

    2014

  22. [30]

    J., Pesce, D

    Reid, M. J., Pesce, D. W., & Riess, A. G. 2019, ApJ, 886, L27

    2019

  23. [31]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, 3756

    Ruaud, M., Wakelam, V ., & Hersant, F. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3756

    2016

  24. [32]

    2018, ApJ, 863, 51

    Suzuki, T., Majumdar, L., Ohishi, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 51

    2018

  25. [33]

    2014, ApJ, 795, L2

    Vastel, C., Ceccarelli, C., Lefloch, B., & Bachiller, R. 2014, ApJ, 795, L2

    2014

  26. [34]

    2024, A&A, 684, A189

    Vastel, C., Sakai, T., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A189

    2024

  27. [35]

    2024, A&A, 689, A63

    Wakelam, V ., Gratier, P., Loison, J.-C., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A63

    2024

  28. [36]

    A., Li, D., et al

    Xie, J., Fuller, G. A., Li, D., et al. 2021, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 64, 279511

    2021

  29. [37]

    2025, PASJ, 77, 307

    Xu, X., Wang, J., Gou, Q., et al. 2025, PASJ, 77, 307

    2025

  30. [38]

    2021, ApJ, 910, 20

    Yang, Y .-L., Sakai, N., Zhang, Y ., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 20

    2021

  31. [39]

    Zhao, G., He, M., Quan, D., et al. 2025, ApJS, 277, 14 Article number, page 6 of 9 Xu et al.: Molecule-dependent Abundance Behavior of Oxygen-bearing Complex Organics in High-Mass Star-Forming Regions Appendix A: Rotation temperature and column density derivation This appendix...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.