Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 210 references

Prithvi-Precip: Integrating Satellite Observations into an Atmospheric AI Foundation Model for Precipitation Forecasting

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that training an AI precipitation model on satellite-derived rain estimates and feeding it raw satellite observations makes forecasts substantially more accurate, beating a conventional operational baseline and matching a

desk verdict A careful, well-executed finetuning study with two genuinely useful results—satellite-derived training targets and a sensor-agnostic observation encoder—but the headline generalization claim rests on thin independent validation and an untreated circularity risk. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03959 v1 pith:FCGS6ZU7 submitted 2026-08-04 physics.ao-ph

Simon Pfreundschuh , Christian D. Kummerow , Johannes Schmude , Sujit Roy , Rahul Ramachandran , Tsengdar Lee , Valentine Anantharaj , Katherine H. Breen This is my paper
classification physics.ao-ph
keywords AIweatherpredictionprecipitationforecastingsatelliteobservationsIMERGMERRA-2foundationmodelfine-tuningautoregressiverolloutquantileregression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Prithvi-Precip is a global AI precipitation forecasting system built by fine-tuning the Prithvi-WxC weather foundation model. The paper's central claim is that two interventions—using satellite-based IMERG precipitation estimates rather than MERRA-2 reanalysis fields as training targets, and feeding raw satellite observations directly into the model—each improve forecast skill, and together they substantially beat the GEOS-FP operational baseline while staying competitive with the stronger AIFS system out to about 36–40 hours. The key evidence is generalization: IMERG-trained forecasts agree better with independent ground-radar and gauge data than MERRA-2-trained forecasts, even though MERRA-2-trained forecasts look better when scored against MERRA-2 itself. The paper concludes that better precipitation training targets and fuller use of the satellite observing system are practical levers for advancing medium-range AI precipitation prediction.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is a sensor-agnostic observation encoder: each satellite channel is treated as an independent observation layer with metadata (wavelength, polarization, time offset), tiles are stored sparsely, and a Perceiver-style cross-attention block with a single learnable query compresses the variable-length layer sequence into a fixed-size latent that is merged into the Prithvi-WxC hidden state by a residual MLP. A second mechanism is the precipitation head: a pixel-wise four-layer MLP that outputs 32 quantiles of the precipitation distribution, trained with quantile loss, so the model learns a predictive distribution rather than a point estimate. Autoregressive rollout with

What would settle it

Run the same trained-model comparison against independent high-quality precipitation references over, say, Europe, Australia, and tropical Africa. If IMERG-trained forecasts do not beat MERRA-2-trained forecasts there, or if satellite ingestion gives no short-lead improvement outside CONUS and Brazil, the generalization claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that an autoregressively rollout-trained version of Prithvi-WxC, extended with a precipitation head and a sensor-agnostic observation encoder, can forecast precipitation up to 96 hours at six-hour intervals with skill that substantially exceeds GEOS-FP precipitation forecasts and matches AIFS through roughly 36–40 hours. The method's force comes from two complementary claims. First, training targets matter: models trained on IMERG V07 satellite precipitation estimates transfer better to independent MRMS radar and INMET gauge observations than models trained on MERRA-2 precipitation, which merely learn reanalysis-specific artifacts. Second, observations

Load-bearing premise

The global conclusion that IMERG targets and satellite ingestion improve skill rests on independent validation over just two regions, CONUS and Brazil; if those regions are unrepresentative of global precipitation, the global claim may overstate the benefit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Forecast skill against independent radar and gauge references improves across the full 96-hour window when training targets switch from MERRA-2 precipitation to IMERG V07.
  • Autoregressive rollout, even with only precipitation in the loss, beats direct lead-time conditioning for precipitation forecasts.
  • Ingesting passive-microwave and geostationary brightness temperatures alongside reanalysis improves short-lead forecasts, with the largest gains in tropical and subtropical regions.
  • The same model can produce forecasts with full, partial, or no satellite observations because of input dropout, which could simplify operational deployment.
  • Prithvi-Precip substantially outperforms GEOS-FP precipitation forecasts and remains competitive with AIFS up to roughly 36–40 hours, after which AIFS pulls ahead.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the observation encoder is sensor-agnostic, the method should scale with the satellite constellation: adding new sensors should require no architectural change, and the short-lead gain is a testable prediction when next-generation sounders or imagers are included.
  • The regional validation suggests the global improvement maps are a hypothesis rather than a measurement; extending the same evaluation to other continents would either confirm or bound the claimed tropical/subtropical benefit.
  • The 2.7-billion-parameter model underperformed under a reduced rollout budget, which implies model scale is not the current bottleneck; retraining the large model with the full six-step rollout and a longer schedule could extend the competitive lead time beyond 40 hours.
  • Observation-only forecasts beat reanalysis-only at 6 hours but decay quickly, implying raw observations carry immediate precipitation information but little dynamical memory; a hybrid initialization (assimilation for the atmospheric state, observations for precipitation) may be the most robust operational configuration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops Prithvi-Precip, a global AI precipitation forecasting system built by fine-tuning the Prithvi-WxC foundation model with an additional precipitation head. The study examines two interventions: replacing MERRA-2 reanalysis precipitation training targets with IMERG V07 satellite-based precipitation estimates, and directly ingesting raw satellite observations through a proposed sensor-agnostic observation encoder. Forecasting is done autoregressively in 6-hour steps out to 96 hours. The authors evaluate design choices (continuous vs. rollout training, small vs. large model, target dataset), then compare the final system against GEOS-FP and AIFS baselines for March–August 2025, using IMERG, MRMS (CONUS) radar, and INMET (Brazil) gauge data as references. The headline claims are that autoregressive rollout training is clearly superior, that IMERG targets generalize better to independent references than MERRA-2 targets, that satellite observations improve short-lead skill (especially in the tropics/subtropics), and that Prithvi-Precip substantially outperforms GEOS-FP while remaining competitive with AIFS out to roughly 36–40 h.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution to AI weather prediction by showing that training-target quality and direct use of satellite observations are both practical levers for precipitation forecast skill. The experimental design has genuine strengths: training on 2000–2020, design tuning on 2022, and evaluation on March–August 2025 is a careful temporal separation; the authors explicitly acknowledge that the IMERG evaluation favors their model; and the paper makes code and data-preparation scripts publicly available. The finding that the choice of the precipitation reference data matters as much as architecture is important for the community. However, the central generalization claim is weakened by the fact that the two supposedly independent evaluation references (MRMS, INMET) likely share gauge information with the gauge correction applied to the IMERG training target, and the paper does not quantify this overlap. In addition, all headline skill differences are presented without uncertainty quantification or significance testing. The significance is therefore contingent on addressing those two issues.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2e1, 2e2, 3c2, 3c3] The manuscript calls MRMS and INMET 'independent validation data' (Sec. 2e2) and uses them to support the claim that IMERG training targets generalize better than MERRA-2 targets (Secs. 3a2, 3c2, 3c3, abstract). However, Sec. 2e1 states that the IMERG V07 Final run 'additionally applies a monthly gauge corrections over land surfaces.' The gauge networks feeding that correction (e.g., GPCC) likely overlap with the surface gauge data used in MRMS gauge correction and with INMET stations over Brazil. If so, the evaluation is partly circular: the IMERG target and the reference share a common gauge-based climatological bias, so higher IMERG-trained skill may reflect agreement with that shared bias rather than a genuinely more realistic precipitation field. The authors should disclose this overlap, quantify the fraction of shared gauges/stations, test sensitivity to excluding those stations, o
  2. [Sec. 3c, Figs. 11–13] The headline comparisons against GEOS-FP and AIFS—and the conclusions about 'substantial' improvements and competitiveness out to 36–40 h—are based on single deterministic curves over a six-month evaluation period, with no uncertainty quantification. No confidence intervals, bootstrap uncertainty, or paired significance tests are reported for NRMSE, CRPS, or correlation. Differences between Prithvi-Precip and AIFS are visually small at many lead times, and the period March–August 2025 samples only a limited set of weather regimes. The authors should add, at minimum, bootstrap confidence intervals over forecast initializations and paired significance tests for the differences shown in Figs. 11–13 (and ideally in Figs. 6 and 8 as well). Without this, the reader cannot assess whether the reported improvements are robust or within sampling variability.
  3. [Sec. 3b, Figs. 8 and 10; Sec. 3c2, 3c3] The abstract and Sec. 3b state that direct satellite ingestion provides additional improvements at short lead times, with the largest gains in tropical and subtropical regions. Figs. 8 and 10 appear to be evaluated against IMERG (or at least the reference product is not stated in the caption), and Sec. 3c itself notes that IMERG evaluation favors the model. The independent MRMS evaluation (Sec. 3c2) shows only 'very small improvements' over CONUS, and the INMET evaluation (Sec. 3c3) is limited to Brazil. Thus the global tropical/subtropical claim is not supported by independent reference data. The authors should clearly state the reference used in Figs. 8–10 and qualify the abstract-level claim, or provide independent global evidence such as evaluation against a satellite-only precipitation product or a different gauge network not used in IMERG correction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 2e1] Typo: 'Pritvh-WxC' should be 'Prithvi-WxC'.
  2. [Sec. 3c] The text refers to 'GOES-FP' in the first paragraph and later 'availability of the GOES-FP forecasts'; the model is elsewhere correctly called GEOS-FP. Please correct.
  3. [Table 1] Table 1 caption says 'satellite observations used to drive the Prithvi-Prithvi forecasts'; should be 'Prithvi-Precip forecasts'.
  4. [Fig. 10] The first-row axis label says 'NMSE' while the caption and text refer to 'NRMS'/'NRMSE'. Make the notation consistent.
  5. [Sec. 2c] Typo in the introduction: 'operating completely in observations pace' should be 'observation space'.
  6. [Author affiliations] Morgan State 'Univeresity' should be 'University'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: core claims rest on independent holdout evaluations; in-distribution IMERG evaluation is explicitly disclosed as favoring the model.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical comparisons of trained forecast models rather than analytical derivations that reduce to their inputs. The target-data claim (IMERG vs MERRA-2 training targets) is decided on MRMS and INMET evaluations (Sec. 3c2, 3c3) that were not used in training, and the paper explicitly flags the IMERG evaluation as favoring Prithvi-Precip: 'The evaluation against IMERG V07 will naturally favor the Prithvi-Precip model since it was trained the data' (Sec. 3c). The satellite-ingestion claim is tested by controlled input ablation on the same trained model (Sec. 3b), and its independent-data gains are reported, including the statement that CONUS gains are small. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. Self-citations (Schmude et al. 2024 for Prithvi-WxC; Pfreundschuh et al. for quantile loss and GPROF-NN) provide the base architecture and loss, but the finetuning results are independently evaluated. The only conceivable circularity would be if IMERG Final's monthly gauge correction shared gauge sources with MRMS/INMET, making those references partially non-independent; however, the paper does not state that overlap, and asserting it would require external assumptions rather than an exhibited reduction from the text. Accordingly, there is no demonstrated circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical ML study; the model weights are learned from training data, and all training hyperparameters are disclosed design choices that were not tuned to the independent evaluation metrics. The load-bearing assumptions are the reliability of the reference datasets, the representativeness of the evaluation regions and period, and the inter-calibration consistency of the satellite record.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Prithvi-WxC foundation model is a suitable backbone for finetuned precipitation forecasting
    The entire system is built on this pretrained model; no alternative backbone is benchmarked (Section 2a).
  • domain assumption MRMS gauge-corrected radar over CONUS and INMET gauges over Brazil are reliable independent references at the MERRA-2 grid scale
    These are the only independent references supporting the claimed global improvements (Sections 2e2, 3c).
  • domain assumption Level-1C inter-calibrated brightness temperatures are consistent enough across sensors and generations to be treated as interchangeable observation layers
    The sensor-agnostic encoder relies on this consistency without re-calibration in the model (Section 2c).
  • domain assumption The March-August 2025 evaluation window with 0Z/12Z initializations is representative of long-term forecast skill
    The evaluation period is constrained by GEOS-FP availability and the paper notes diurnal-cycle oscillations from discrete initialization times (Section 3c).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prithvi-Precip: Integrating Satellite Observations into an Atmospheric AI Foundation Model for Precipitation Forecasting." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FCGS6ZU7

@misc{pith2026260803959,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prithvi-Precip: Integrating Satellite Observations into an Atmospheric AI Foundation Model for Precipitation Forecasting},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FCGS6ZU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03959}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate precipitation forecasting remains one of the most challenging problems in weather prediction. While recent AI weather prediction (AIWP) systems have achieved substantial improvements in medium-range forecasting skill, precipitation often remains a secondary target and is commonly learned from reanalysis datasets that contain considerable uncertainty. In this work, we investigate two complementary strategies for improving AI-based precipitation forecasts. Building on the Prithvi-WxC foundation model, we develop Prithvi-Precip, a global precipitation forecasting system, and examine (1) the impact of training targets derived from satellite-based precipitation estimates rather than reanalysis fields and (2) the direct assimilation of satellite observations into the forecasting model. We systematically evaluate key design choices for finetuning the Prithvi-WxC AI foundation model for precipitation forecasting. We find that autoregressive rollout training produces substantially more accurate forecasts than direct conditioning on forecast lead time. Using independent radar-based precipitation estimates for evaluation, we show that training on satellite-derived precipitation targets yields improved forecast accuracy relative to training on MERRA-2 precipitation fields. Furthermore, direct ingestion of satellite observations provides additional improvements at short lead times, with the largest gains occurring in tropical and subtropical regions. Together, these advances enable Prithvi-Precip to substantially improve upon directly comparable precipitation forecasts from the Goddard Earth Observing System. Our results highlight the potential of improved precipitation targets and the direct integration of satellite observations as promising pathways for advancing medium-range AI precipitation forecasting.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03959 by the authors.

Figure 5
Figure 5. In terms of biases, the autoregressive forecast remains nearly bias free up to a lead time of around 36 hours after which it exhibits an increasing tendency to underestimate precipitation. Since the model was trained using roll out up to 36 hours, we suspect that the biases are caused by the model producing predictions outside the lead times it has encountered during training. The direct forecast model produces comp… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

210 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Reviews of Geophysics , author =

    An. Reviews of Geophysics , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1029/2019RG000678 , abstract =

    doi:10.1029/2019rg000678 2020

  2. [2]

    Nat Commun , author =

    Separability and geometry of object manifolds in deep neural networks , volume =. Nat Commun , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14578-5 , abstract =

    doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14578-5 2020

  3. [3]

    Accurate,

    Goyal, Priya and Dollár, Piotr and Girshick, Ross and Noordhuis, Pieter and Wesolowski, Lukasz and Kyrola, Aapo and Tulloch, Andrew and Jia, Yangqing and He, Kaiming , month = apr, year =. Accurate,

  4. [4]

    Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =

    Development and. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0084.1 , abstract =

    doi:10.1175/jamc-d-20-0084.1 2020

  5. [5]

    Liu, Zhuang and Mao, Hanzi and Wu, Chao-Yuan and Feichtenhofer, Christoph and Darrell, Trevor and Xie, Saining , year =. A

  6. [6]

    2022 , eprint=

    MaxViT: Multi-Axis Vision Transformer , author=. 2022 , eprint=

    2022

  7. [7]

    , month = mar, year =

    Smith, Leslie N. , month = mar, year =. Cyclical. 2017. doi:10.1109/WACV.2017.58 , abstract =

    doi:10.1109/wacv.2017.58 2017

  8. [8]

    He, Kaiming and Zhang, Xiangyu and Ren, Shaoqing and Sun, Jian , month = jun, year =. Deep. 2016. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 , abstract =

    doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 2016

Show all 210 references
  1. [9]

    Revisiting

    Bello, Irwan and Fedus, William and Du, Xianzhi and Cubuk, Ekin D and Srinivas, Aravind and Lin, Tsung-Yi and Shlens, Jonathon and Zoph, Barret , keywords =. Revisiting

  2. [10]

    Wightman, Ross and Touvron, Hugo and Jégou, Hervé , month = oct, year =

  3. [11]

    Yu, Fisher and Wang, Dequan and Shelhamer, Evan and Darrell, Trevor , month = jun, year =. Deep. 2018. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2018.00255 , abstract =

    2018

  4. [12]

    Aggregated

    Xie, Saining and Girshick, Ross and Dollar, Piotr and Tu, Zhuowen and He, Kaiming , month = jul, year =. Aggregated. 2017. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.634 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    , month = jul, year =

    Huang, Gao and Liu, Zhuang and Van Der Maaten, Laurens and Weinberger, Kilian Q. , month = jul, year =. Densely. 2017. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 , language =

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Tan, Mingxing and Le, Quoc V , year =

  7. [15]

    Neurocomputing , author =

    Deep visual domain adaptation:. Neurocomputing , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.083 , language =

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    Sandler, Mark and Howard, Andrew and Zhu, Menglong and Zhmoginov, Andrey and Chen, Liang-Chieh , month = jun, year =. 2018. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 , abstract =

    2018

  9. [17]

    Decoupled

    Loshchilov, Ilya and Hutter, Frank , month = jan, year =. Decoupled

  10. [18]

    Wang, Yingheng and Schiff, Yair and Gokaslan, Aaron and Pan, Weishen and Wang, Fei and De Sa, Christopher and Kuleshov, Volodymyr , month = jun, year =

  11. [19]

    Dosovitskiy, Alexey and Beyer, Lucas and Kolesnikov, Alexander and Weissenborn, Dirk and Zhai, Xiaohua and Unterthiner, Thomas and Dehghani, Mostafa and Minderer, Matthias and Heigold, Georg and Gelly, Sylvain and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Houlsby, Neil , month = jun, year =. An

  12. [20]

    Aytekin, Caglar , month = oct, year =. Neural

  13. [22]

    Kovachki, Nikola and Li, Zongyi and Liu, Burigede and Azizzadenesheli, Kamyar and Bhattacharya, Kaushik and Stuart, Andrew and Anandkumar, Anima , month = apr, year =. Neural

  14. [23]

    Rethinking

    Chen, Liang-Chieh and Papandreou, George and Schroff, Florian and Adam, Hartwig , month = dec, year =. Rethinking

  15. [24]

    Liu, Ze and Lin, Yutong and Cao, Yue and Hu, Han and Wei, Yixuan and Zhang, Zheng and Lin, Stephen and Guo, Baining , month = oct, year =. Swin. 2021. doi:10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 , abstract =

    2021

  16. [25]

    Hu, Han and Zhang, Zheng and Xie, Zhenda and Lin, Stephen , month = apr, year =. Local

  17. [26]

    Lam, Remi and Sanchez-Gonzalez, Alvaro and Willson, Matthew and Wirnsberger, Peter and Fortunato, Meire and Alet, Ferran and Ravuri, Suman and Ewalds, Timo and Eaton-Rosen, Zach and Hu, Weihua and Merose, Alexander and Hoyer, Stephan and Holland, George and Vinyals, Oriol and ...

  18. [27]

    Neurocomputing , author =

    A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning , volume =. Neurocomputing , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  19. [28]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    Tropical. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1029/2020JD033107 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  20. [29]

    Clim Dyn , author =

    Global precipitation hindcast quality assessment of the. Clim Dyn , author =. 2019 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00382-018-4457-z , abstract =

    2019 doi

  21. [30]

    Journal of Hydrology , author =

    Evaluation of. Journal of Hydrology , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127058 , abstract =

    2021

  22. [31]

    2021 , pages =

    AAAI , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17749 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  23. [32]

    Zhang, Richard , month = jun, year =. Making

  24. [33]

    Tran, Du and Wang, Heng and Torresani, Lorenzo and Ray, Jamie and LeCun, Yann and Paluri, Manohar , month = apr, year =. A

  25. [34]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Outcomes of the. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0046.1 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    Parameter-

    Houlsby, Neil and Giurgiu, Andrei and Jastrzebski, Stanislaw and Morrone, Bruna and de Laroussilhe, Quentin and Gesmundo, Andrea and Attariyan, Mona and Gelly, Sylvain , month = jun, year =. Parameter-

  27. [36]

    Gao, Peng and Ma, Teli and Li, Hongsheng and Lin, Ziyi and Dai, Jifeng and Qiao, Yu , month = may, year =

  28. [37]

    Ryali, Chaitanya and Hu, Yuan-Ting and Bolya, Daniel and Wei, Chen and Fan, Haoqi and Huang, Po-Yao and Aggarwal, Vaibhav and Chowdhury, Arkabandhu and Poursaeed, Omid and Hoffman, Judy and Malik, Jitendra and Li, Yanghao and Feichtenhofer, Christoph , month = jun, year =. Hiera:

  29. [38]

    Ronneberger, Olaf and Fischer, Philipp and Brox, Thomas , editor =. U-. Medical. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  30. [39]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    Cloud ice:. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2009 , note =. doi:10.1029/2008JD010015 , abstract =

    2009 doi

  31. [40]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    A global survey of the instantaneous linkages between cloud vertical structure and large-scale climate , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1002/2013JD020669 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  32. [41]

    Nature Geosci , author =

    Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity , volume =. Nature Geosci , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1038/ngeo2398 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  33. [42]

    Journal of Climate , author =

    Radiative. Journal of Climate , author =. 2000 , note =. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0264:REOCTV>2.0.CO;2 , abstract =

    2000 doi

  34. [43]

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =

    Assessing observed and modelled spatial distributions of ice water path using satellite data , volume =. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.5194/acp-11-375-2011 , number =

    2011 doi

  35. [44]

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =

    An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses , volume =. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018 , number =

    2018 doi

  36. [45]

    and Pfreundschuh, S

    Amell, A. and Pfreundschuh, S. and Eriksson, P. , year =. The. doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-1953 , journal =

    2023 doi

  37. [46]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =

    Ice water path retrievals from. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.5194/amt-15-5701-2022 , number =

    2022 doi

  38. [47]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =

    A neural network approach to estimating a posteriori distributions of. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.5194/amt-11-4627-2018 , number =

    2018 doi

  39. [48]

    Surv Geophys , author =

    Lessons. Surv Geophys , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10712-024-09824-0 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  40. [49]

    IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2020.3015155 , abstract =

    2021

  41. [50]

    Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems , author =

    Toward an object-based assessment of high-resolution forecasts of long-lived convective precipitation in the central. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1002/2015MS000497 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  42. [51]

    Convolutional

    SHI, Xingjian and Chen, Zhourong and Wang, Hao and Yeung, Dit-Yan and Wong, Wai-kin and WOO, Wang-chun , year =. Convolutional. Advances in

  43. [52]

    Remote Sensing , author =

    Precipitation. Remote Sensing , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3390/rs14132992 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  44. [53]

    Google Docs , month = nov, year =

    Improved temporal and spectral merging of satellite observations for precipitation cloud-property retrievals , url =. Google Docs , month = nov, year =

  45. [54]

    https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/fy-22-strategic-plan-1.pdf?emrc=ff1a1e , url =

    2023

  46. [55]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    The. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0299.1 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  47. [56]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1029/2020JD034202 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  48. [57]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1029/2019JD030449 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  49. [58]

    Clim Dyn , author =

    Special issue:. Clim Dyn , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00382-020-05240-3 , language =

    2020 doi

  50. [59]

    A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling:

  51. [60]

    2024 , doi =

    Read ". 2024 , doi =

    2024

  52. [61]

    and Bolvin, David T

    Huffman, George J. and Bolvin, David T. and Braithwaite, Dan and Hsu, Kuo-Lin and Joyce, Robert J. and Kidd, Christopher and Nelkin, Eric J. and Sorooshian, Soroosh and Stocker, Erich F. and Tan, Jackson and Wolff, David B. and Xie, Pingping , editor =. Integrated. Satellite. ...

    2020

  53. [62]

    Personal communication , author =

  54. [63]

    doi:10.25921/stkw-7w73 , urldate =

    U. doi:10.25921/stkw-7w73 , urldate =

    doi

  55. [64]

    2021 , note =

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1029/2020GL092032 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  56. [65]

    2024 , note =

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.5194/amt-17-515-2024 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  57. [66]

    and Becker, A

    Schneider, U. and Becker, A. and Finger, P. and Meyer-Christoffer, A. and Rudolf, B. and Ziese, M. , year =

  58. [67]

    Schmude, Johannes and Roy, Sujit and Trojak, Will and Jakubik, Johannes and Civitarese, Daniel Salles and Singh, Shraddha and Kuehnert, Julian and Ankur, Kumar and Gupta, Aman and Phillips, Christopher E. and Kienzler, Romeo and Szwarcman, Daniela and Gaur, Vishal and Shinde, ...

    doi arXiv

  59. [68]

    Multiscale

    Guilloteau, Clément and Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi , editor =. Multiscale. Satellite. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  60. [69]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =

    An improved near-real-time precipitation retrieval for. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.5194/amt-15-6907-2022 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  61. [70]

    Tran, Du and Wang, Heng and Torresani, Lorenzo and Ray, Jamie and LeCun, Yann and Paluri, Manohar , month = apr, year =. A. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1711.11248 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  62. [71]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    The. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  63. [72]

    Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =

    A. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =. 1988 , note =. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1988)027<0030:ASITTE>2.0.CO;2 , abstract =

    1988 doi

  64. [73]

    Monthly Weather Review , author =

    Rain. Monthly Weather Review , author =. 1978 , note =. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<1153:REFGSI>2.0.CO;2 , abstract =

    1978 doi

  65. [74]

    Journal of Hydrometeorology , author =

    Integrating. Journal of Hydrometeorology , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-23-0006.1 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  66. [75]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , author =

    The. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2403303 , abstract =

    2015

  67. [76]

    and Weng, Fuzhong , editor =

    Goldberg, Mitchell D. and Weng, Fuzhong , editor =. Advanced. Earth. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  68. [77]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Multi-. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00173.1 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  69. [78]

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =

    The. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1175/2006JAS2375.1 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  70. [79]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    So,. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00283.1 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  71. [80]

    Hastings, D. A. (David A. ) and Dunbar, Paula K. , month = aug, year =. Global

  72. [81]

    Journal of Hydrology , author =

    Inter-comparison of radar rainfall rate using. Journal of Hydrology , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.063 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  73. [82]

    Remote Sensing , author =

    Radar–. Remote Sensing , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.3390/rs17030530 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  74. [83]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Optimal. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0027.1 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  75. [84]

    and Schmit, Timothy J

    Goodman, Steven J. and Schmit, Timothy J. and Daniels, Jaime and Redmon, Robert J. , month = oct, year =. The

  76. [85]

    An. 気象集誌. 第2輯 , author =. 2016 , keywords =. doi:10.2151/jmsj.2016-009 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  77. [86]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Meteosat. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  78. [87]

    2021 , note =

    Earth System Science Data , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.5194/essd-13-1307-2021 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  79. [88]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology , author =

    The. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0039.1 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  80. [89]

    Information (NCEI), National Centers for Environmental , month = aug, year =. Daily

  81. [90]

    Monthly Weather Review , author =

    Characteristic. Monthly Weather Review , author =. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-00075.1 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  82. [91]

    Trmm観測による強雨の雲頂高度と降水頂の差異 , volume =. 気象集誌. 第2輯 , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.2151/jmsj.2020-044 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  83. [92]

    Meteorological Applications , author =

    Global precipitation measurement , volume =. Meteorological Applications , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1002/met.284 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  84. [93]

    Journal of Hydrometeorology , author =

    A. Journal of Hydrometeorology , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1175/2011JHM1347.1 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  85. [94]

    and Grabowski, Wojciech W

    Morrison, Hugh and van Lier-Walqui, Marcus and Fridlind, Ann M. and Grabowski, Wojciech W. and Harrington, Jerry Y. and Hoose, Corinna and Korolev, Alexei and Kumjian, Matthew R. and Milbrandt, Jason A. and Pawlowska, Hanna and Posselt, Derek J. and Prat, Olivier P. and Reimel...

    doi

  86. [95]

    Meteorological Applications , author =

    Convection-permitting models: a step-change in rainfall forecasting , volume =. Meteorological Applications , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1002/met.1538 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  87. [96]

    Weather and Forecasting , author =

    Extreme. Weather and Forecasting , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1175/WAF-D-13-00061.1 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  88. [97]

    Journal of Hydrology , author =

    Convolutional neural network-based statistical post-processing of ensemble precipitation forecasts , volume =. Journal of Hydrology , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127301 , abstract =

    2022

  89. [98]

    Lang, Simon and Alexe, Mihai and Chantry, Matthew and Dramsch, Jesper and Pinault, Florian and Raoult, Baudouin and Clare, Mariana C. A. and Lessig, Christian and Maier-Gerber, Michael and Magnusson, Linus and Bouallègue, Zied Ben and Nemesio, Ana Prieto and Dueben, Peter D. a...

    doi arXiv

  90. [99]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2202.11214 , abstract =

    Pathak, Jaideep and Subramanian, Shashank and Harrington, Peter and Raja, Sanjeev and Chattopadhyay, Ashesh and Mardani, Morteza and Kurth, Thorsten and Hall, David and Li, Zongyi and Azizzadenesheli, Kamyar and Hassanzadeh, Pedram and Kashinath, Karthik and Anandkumar, Animas...

    doi arXiv

  91. [100]

    and El-Kadi, Andrew and Masters, Dominic and Ewalds, Timo and Stott, Jacklynn and Mohamed, Shakir and Battaglia, Peter and Lam, Remi and Willson, Matthew , month = may, year =

    Price, Ilan and Sanchez-Gonzalez, Alvaro and Alet, Ferran and Andersson, Tom R. and El-Kadi, Andrew and Masters, Dominic and Ewalds, Timo and Stott, Jacklynn and Mohamed, Shakir and Battaglia, Peter and Lam, Remi and Willson, Matthew , month = may, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2...

    doi arXiv

  92. [101]

    Nature , author =

    Skilful nowcasting of extreme precipitation with. Nature , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06184-4 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  93. [102]

    Andrychowicz, Marcin and Espeholt, Lasse and Li, Di and Merchant, Samier and Merose, Alexander and Zyda, Fred and Agrawal, Shreya and Kalchbrenner, Nal , month = jul, year =. Deep. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.06079 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  94. [103]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Advancing. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-25-0011.1 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  95. [104]

    2011 , keywords =

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , author =. 2011 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2158438 , abstract =

    2011

  96. [105]

    Remote Sensing , author =

    A. Remote Sensing , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3390/rs14061467 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  97. [106]

    Remote Sensing , author =

    The. Remote Sensing , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.3390/rs13091701 , language =

    2021 doi

  98. [107]

    Remote Sensing , author =

    The. Remote Sensing , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.3390/rs10071122 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  99. [108]

    Practical

    Bengio, Yoshua , editor =. Practical. Neural. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  100. [109]

    , month = apr, year =

    Smith, Leslie N. , month = apr, year =. A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1803.09820 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  101. [110]

    Atmosphere , author =

    The. Atmosphere , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.3390/atmos14111677 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  102. [111]

    2022 , note =

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.5194/amt-15-5033-2022 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  103. [112]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983 , year=

    Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983 , year=

    arXiv

  104. [113]

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =

    Rainfall,. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0314.1 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  105. [114]

    Monthly Weather Review , author =

    The. Monthly Weather Review , author =. 1986 , note =. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1539:TRBSMC>2.0.CO;2 , abstract =

    1986 doi

  106. [115]

    Monthly Weather Review , author =

    Airborne. Monthly Weather Review , author =. 2013 , note =. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00357.1 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  107. [116]

    Proceedings of the IEEE , author =

    High. Proceedings of the IEEE , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2025.3582502 , abstract =

    2025

  108. [117]

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =

    Tropical. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1175/JAS3988.1 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  109. [118]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Tropical. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0052.1 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  110. [119]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology , author =

    The. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0019.1 , language =

    2016 doi

  111. [120]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    Probabilistic. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1029/2025JD044595 , language =

    2025 doi

  112. [121]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    The. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1029/2024JD042618 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  113. [122]

    Scientific Data , year=

    A Benchmark Dataset for Satellite-Based Estimation and Detection of Rain , author=. Scientific Data , year=

  114. [123]

    Spectral

    GPM SLH Algorithm Development Team , file =. Spectral

  115. [124]

    National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) , month = jul, year =

    International. National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) , month = jul, year =

  116. [125]

    Agrawal, Shreya and Hassen, Mohammed Alewi and Brempong, Emmanuel Asiedu and Babenko, Boris and Zyda, Fred and Graham, Olivia and Li, Di and Merchant, Samier and Potes, Santiago Hincapie and Russell, Tyler and Cheresnick, Danny and Kakkirala, Aditya Prakash and Rasp, Stephan a...

    doi

  117. [126]

    Nguyen, Tung and Shah, Rohan and Bansal, Hritik and Arcomano, Troy and Madireddy, Sandeep and Maulik, Romit and Kotamarthi, Veerabhadra and Foster, Ian and Grover, Aditya , month = mar, year =. Scaling

  118. [127]

    Bi, Kaifeng and Xie, Lingxi and Zhang, Hengheng and Chen, Xin and Gu, Xiaotao and Tian, Qi , month = nov, year =. Pangu-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2211.02556 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  119. [128]

    David and Chen, Deliang and Feng, Jie and Han, Wei and Wu, Libo and Qi, Yuan , month = nov, year =

    Sun, Xiuyu and Zhong, Xiaohui and Xu, Xiaoze and Huang, Yuanqing and Li, Hao and Neelin, J. David and Chen, Deliang and Feng, Jie and Han, Wei and Wu, Libo and Qi, Yuan , month = nov, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.05472 , abstract =

    doi

  120. [129]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.07188 , abstract =

    Zhong, Xiaohui and Chen, Lei and Fan, Xu and Qian, Wenxu and Liu, Jun and Li, Hao , month = sep, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.07188 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  121. [130]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2003.12140 , abstract =

    Sønderby, Casper Kaae and Espeholt, Lasse and Heek, Jonathan and Dehghani, Mostafa and Oliver, Avital and Salimans, Tim and Agrawal, Shreya and Hickey, Jason and Kalchbrenner, Nal , month = mar, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2003.12140 , abstract =

    2003 doi arXiv

  122. [131]

    Nat Commun , author =

    Deep learning for twelve hour precipitation forecasts , volume =. Nat Commun , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32483-x , abstract =

    2022 doi

  123. [132]

    A new equitable score suitable for verifying precipitation in numerical weather prediction -

  124. [133]

    The Annals of Statistics , author =

    Greedy. The Annals of Statistics , author =. 2001 , note =

    2001

  125. [134]

    Journal of Climate , author =

    The. Journal of Climate , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  126. [135]

    Journal of Climate , author =

    The. Journal of Climate , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0123.1 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  127. [136]

    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , author =

    The. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1002/qj.3803 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  128. [137]

    A new estimate for oceanic precipitation amount and distribution using complementary precipitation observations from space and comparison with. Environ. Res. Lett. , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc6d1 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  129. [138]

    Surv Geophys , author =

    Global. Surv Geophys , author =. 2017 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10712-017-9416-4 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  130. [139]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Efficientnetv2: Smaller models and faster training , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  131. [140]

    and Eriksson, P

    Ekelund, R. and Eriksson, P. and Pfreundschuh, S. , TITLE =. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , VOLUME =. 2020 , NUMBER =

    2020

  132. [141]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume=

    CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after the first year of operation , author=. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  133. [142]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    A convnet for the 2020s , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  134. [143]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 , year=

    Layer normalization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 , year=

    arXiv

  135. [144]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415 , year=

    Gaussian error linear units (gelus) , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415 , year=

    arXiv

  136. [145]

    CloudSat Data Processing Center , year=

    Level 2C RAIN-PROFILE product process description and interface control document , author=. CloudSat Data Processing Center , year=

  137. [146]

    and L'Ecuyer, Tristan S

    Haynes, John M. and L'Ecuyer, Tristan S. and Stephens, Graeme L. and Miller, Steven D. and Mitrescu, Cristian and Wood, Norman B. and Tanelli, Simone , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009973 , url =. https://a...

    doi

  138. [147]

    and L'Ecuyer, Tristan S

    Lebsock, Matthew D. and L'Ecuyer, Tristan S. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016076 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2011JD016076 , abstract =

    doi

  139. [148]

    and L'Ecuyer, Tristan S

    Wood, Norman B. and L'Ecuyer, Tristan S. and Heymsfield, Andrew J. and Stephens, Graeme L. and Hudak, David R. and Rodriguez, Peter , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021303 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibra...

    doi

  140. [149]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology , volume=

    The GPM combined algorithm , author=. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology , volume=

  141. [150]

    Scientific Data , volume=

    OceanRAIN, a new in-situ shipboard global ocean surface-reference dataset of all water cycle components , author=. Scientific Data , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  142. [151]

    Journal of hydrometeorology , volume=

    A parameterization of the probability of snow--rain transition , author=. Journal of hydrometeorology , volume=

  143. [152]

    Journal of Hydrometeorology , volume=

    Advancing Passive Microwave Retrievals of Precipitation Using CloudSat and GPM Coincidences: Integration of Machine Learning with a Bayesian Algorithm , author=. Journal of Hydrometeorology , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  144. [153]

    Warm Rain Rates from AMSR-E 89-GHz Brightness Temperatures Trained Using CloudSat Rain-Rate Observations

    Ryan Eastman and Matthew Lebsock and Robert Wood. Warm Rain Rates from AMSR-E 89-GHz Brightness Temperatures Trained Using CloudSat Rain-Rate Observations. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 2019. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0185.1

    2019 doi

  145. [154]

    2006--present , publisher =

    2006

  146. [155]

    2014--present , publisher =

    2014

  147. [156]

    2020 , publisher =

    Klepp, Christian and Protat, Alain and Burdanowitz, J. 2020 , publisher =

    2020

  148. [157]

    and Kachi, Misako and Arai, Yoriko and Tashima, Tomoko and Masaki, Takeshi and Kawamoto, Nozomi and Mega, Tomoaki and Yamamoto, Munehisa K

    Kubota, Takuji and Aonashi, Kazumasa and Ushio, Tomoo and Shige, Shoichi and Takayabu, Yukari N. and Kachi, Misako and Arai, Yoriko and Tashima, Tomoko and Masaki, Takeshi and Kawamoto, Nozomi and Mega, Tomoaki and Yamamoto, Munehisa K. and Hamada, Atsushi and Yamaji, Moeka an...

    2020 doi

  149. [158]

    Reprocessed, Bias-Corrected CMORPH Global High-Resolution Precipitation Estimates from 1998

    Pingping Xie and Robert Joyce and Shaorong Wu and Soo-Hyun Yoo and Yelena Yarosh and Fengying Sun and Roger Lin. Reprocessed, Bias-Corrected CMORPH Global High-Resolution Precipitation Estimates from 1998. Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2017. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-16-0168.1

    1998 doi

  150. [159]

    and Bolvin, David T

    Huffman, George J. and Bolvin, David T. Bolvin and Joyce, Robert and Nelkin, Eric J. and Tan, Jackson and Braithwaite, Dan and Hsu, Kuolin and Kelley, Owen A. and Nguyen, Phu and Sorooshian Soroosh and Watters, Daniel C. and West, B. Jason, and Xie, Pingping , title =. 2019 , type =

    2019

  151. [160]

    2017 , howpublished =

    2017

  152. [161]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , volume=

    A real-time global half-hourly pixel-resolution infrared dataset and its applications , author=. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  153. [162]

    Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology , volume=

    The evolution of the Goddard profiling algorithm to a fully parametric scheme , author=. Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology , volume=

  154. [163]

    2023 , howpublished =

    2023

  155. [164]

    Journal of hydrometeorology , volume=

    Persiann dynamic infrared--rain rate (PDIR-now): A near-real-time, quasi-global satellite precipitation dataset , author=. Journal of hydrometeorology , volume=

  156. [165]

    doi:10.24381/cds.adbb2d47 , note =

    2023 , howpublished =. doi:10.24381/cds.adbb2d47 , note =

    2023 doi

  157. [166]

    2026 , howpublished =

    2026

  158. [167]

    2026 , url =

    Pfreundschuh, Simon , title =. 2026 , url =

    2026

  159. [168]

    2026 , eprint=

    Bridging the Sensitivity Gap in Precipitation Estimates from Spaceborne Radars using Passive Microwave Observations , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  160. [169]

    Tapiador and F.J

    Francisco J. Tapiador and F.J. Turk and Walt Petersen and Arthur Y. Hou and Eduardo García-Ortega and Luiz A.T. Machado and Carlos F. Angelis and Paola Salio and Chris Kidd and George J. Huffman and Manuel. Global precipitation measurement: Methods, datasets and applications ,...

    2012 doi

  161. [170]

    and Levizzani, V

    Kidd, C. and Levizzani, V. , TITLE =. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences , VOLUME =. 2011 , NUMBER =

    2011

  162. [171]

    Remote Sensing , VOLUME =

    Ryu, Soorok and Song, Joon Jin and Lee, GyuWon , TITLE =. Remote Sensing , VOLUME =. 2025 , NUMBER =

    2025

  163. [172]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume =

    Bi, Mingming and Zou, Xiaolei , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043523 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2025JD043523 , note =

    doi

  164. [173]

    Huffman and F

    Phu Nguyen and Vu Dao and Tu Ung and Claudia Jimenez Arellano and Kuolin Hsu and Soroosh Sorooshian and Amir AghaKouchak and George J. Huffman and F. Martin Ralph. PERSIANN-U-Net: A Global Deep Learning Framework for Near-Real-Time Precipitation Estimation Using Infrared Data....

    2026 doi

  165. [174]

    Hong and K.-L

    Y. Hong and K.-L. Hsu and S. Sorooshian and X. Gao. Precipitation estimation from remotely sensed imagery using an artificial neural network cloud classification system. J. Appl. Meteor. 2004

    2004

  166. [175]

    2022 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2022 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/SSMI/F13/1C/07 , url =

    2022 doi

  167. [176]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/SSMI/F14/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  168. [177]

    2022 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2022 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/SSMI/F15/1C/07 , url =

    2022 doi

  169. [178]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/SSMIS/F16/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  170. [179]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/SSMIS/F17/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  171. [180]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/SSMIS/F18/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  172. [181]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:https://doi.org/10.5067/GPM/SSMIS/F19/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  173. [182]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/AMSUB/NOAA15/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  174. [183]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/AMSUB/NOAA16/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  175. [184]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/AMSUB/NOAA17/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  176. [185]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/MHS/NOAA18/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  177. [186]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/MHS/NOAA19/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  178. [187]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/ATMS/NOAA20/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  179. [188]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/ATMS/NPP/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  180. [189]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/MHS/METOPA/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  181. [190]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/MHS/METOPB/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  182. [191]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/MHS/METOPC/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  183. [192]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/GMI/GPM/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  184. [193]

    2026 , publisher =

    Berg, Wesley , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5067/GPM/AMSR2/GCOMW1/1C/08 , url =

    2026 doi

  185. [194]

    and Ansari, S

    Knapp, Kenneth R. and Ansari, S. and Bain, Christopher L. and Bourassa, Mark A. and Dickinson, Matthew J. and Funk, Christopher and Helms, Charles N. and Hennon, Christopher C. and Holmes, Christopher D. and Huffman, George J. and Kossin, James P. and Lee, H.-T. and Loew, Alex...

    doi

  186. [195]

    and Wilkins, Stephen , title =

    Knapp, Kenneth R. and Wilkins, Stephen , title =. Earth System Science Data , year =. doi:10.5194/essd-10-1417-2018 , url =

    2018 doi

  187. [196]

    Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems , volume=

    Weatherbench 2: A benchmark for the next generation of data-driven global weather models , author=. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  188. [197]

    Radford and Imme Ebert-Uphoff and Jebb Q

    Jacob T. Radford and Imme Ebert-Uphoff and Jebb Q. Stewart. A Comparison of AI Weather Prediction and Numerical Weather Prediction Models for 1–7-Day Precipitation Forecasts. Weather and Forecasting. 2025. doi:10.1175/WAF-D-24-0081.1

    2025 doi

  189. [198]

    Nature , volume=

    End-to-end data-driven weather prediction , author=. Nature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  190. [199]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15586 , year=

    Data driven weather forecasts trained and initialised directly from observations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15586 , year=

    arXiv

  191. [200]

    2025 , eprint=

    DAWP: A framework for global observation forecasting via Data Assimilation and Weather Prediction in satellite observation space , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  192. [201]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , month =

    Liu, Ze and Lin, Yutong and Cao, Yue and Hu, Han and Wei, Yixuan and Zhang, Zheng and Lin, Stephen and Guo, Baining , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , month =. 2021 , pages =

    2021

  193. [202]

    2022 , eprint=

    Perceiver IO: A General Architecture for Structured Inputs and Outputs , author=. 2022 , eprint=

    2022

  194. [203]

    Microwave Journal , volume=

    NEXRAD: Next generation weather radar (WSR-88D) , author=. Microwave Journal , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  195. [204]

    Documentation and validation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation system, version 4 , author=

  196. [205]

    Nature , volume=

    The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction , author=. Nature , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  197. [206]

    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , volume=

    An evaluation of ERA5 precipitation for climate monitoring , author=. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  198. [207]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Accuracy on the line: on the strong correlation between out-of-distribution and in-distribution generalization , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  199. [208]

    Dados Históricos , year =

  200. [209]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , volume=

    Introducing the next-generation Advanced Baseline Imager on GOES-R , author=. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  201. [210]

    2026 , note =

    Simon Pfreundschuh , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  202. [211]

    and Parker, Douglas J

    Keane, Richard J. and Parker, Douglas J. and Dunn-Sigouin, Etienne and Kolstad, Erik W. and Marsham, John H. , title =. Meteorological Applications , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70055 , url =. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/met.70055 , note =

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.