Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 76 references

Complex field-induced magnetic phases and anisotropic magnetotransport in off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2 single crystals are claimed to combine Kondo heavy-fermion behavior, field-induced spin-glass-like phases, and large anisotropic magnetoresistance.

desk verdict Solid experimental characterization with credible magnetotransport and metamagnetic data; the field-induced spin-glass claim is under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04946 v1 pith:RMLQ7NYJ submitted 2026-08-05 cond-mat.str-el

Vikas Chahar , Shivam Rathod , Sneh , Lipika , Shobha Singh , Balwant Singh Chauhan , Subhadeep Bej , Weida Yin
show 4 more authors
Yin-Chen Huang Rie Y. Umetsu Ratnamala Chatterjee Kaustuv Manna
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords CeCuBi2Kondolatticeheavyfermionmetamagnetictransitionsspinglassmagnetoresistanceanisotropicmagnetotransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that slightly copper-deficient CeCuBi2 crystals are one material in which Kondo-driven heavy-fermion behavior, several field-induced magnetic phases, and a spin-glass-like frozen state all appear. It reports antiferromagnetic order at $T_N\sim14$ K, a Sommerfeld coefficient $\gamma=102$ mJ K$^{-2}$ mol$^{-1}$, and at least five metamagnetic phases for fields along the easy $c$-axis, with frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peaks at 47 and 51 kOe whose Mydosh parameter and relaxation time fall in the canonical spin-glass range. The same crystals show large positive magnetoresistance, about 22 percent at 300 K and 90 kOe, and a butterfly-shaped anisotropic magnetoresistance reaching about 10.9 percent at 2.5 K and 90 kOe. If correct, the paper identifies off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2 as a tunable platform for correlated, field-tunable quantum phenomena in which the magnetism and the transport are two readings of one competition among Kondo hybridization, magnetic anisotropy, and Cu-vacancy disorder. The central novelty is that the glassy dynamics appear inside the metamagnetic region, not at zero field.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the field-driven rearrangement of an Ising-like easy-axis antiferromagnet: for $\mathbf{H}\parallel c$, the competition among exchange, anisotropy, and Zeeman energy produces spin-flop and spin-flip transitions, with the spin-flop field $H_{SF}=\sqrt{2H_AH_E-H_A^2}$, and the paper encodes the resulting states in a field–temperature phase diagram with regions I–V. The glassiness claim is carried by the Mydosh parameter $K=\Delta T_f/(T_f\,\Delta\log_{10}f)$ and by the critical slowing-down form $\tau=\tau_0(T_f/T_g-1)^{-z\nu}$, which place the frequency shift of the AC susceptibility peaks at 47 and 51 kOe in the canonical spin-glass window. The magnetotransport claim is carried by angle-resolved magnetoresistance and AMR polar plots, whose evolution from two-lobed or four-lobed patterns at low field to eight-lobed butterfly-like patterns at 90 kOe links spin reorientation to anisotropic scattering.

What would settle it

Cool the crystal at 47 and 51 kOe through the freezing peak with an aging stop and then with a memory protocol: a canonical spin glass shows a memory dip and time-dependent AC susceptibility, whereas a metamagnetic transition with domain-wall pinning does not. A parallel field-dependent neutron diffraction measurement would show whether the intermediate state is frozen disorder or a long-range canted magnetic structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2, with elemental composition near Ce:Cu:Bi = 1:0.8:2.2, is an anisotropic Kondo antiferromagnet in which one set of crystals shows weak heavy-fermion behavior ($\gamma=102$ mJ K$^{-2}$ mol$^{-1}$, $T_N\sim14$ K), five field-induced metamagnetic phases for $\mathbf{H}\parallel c$, and a field-induced spin-glass-like state inside the metamagnetic region: AC susceptibility peaks at 47 and 51 kOe shift with frequency, with Mydosh parameter $K=0.006$–$0.008$ and relaxation time $\tau_0\sim7\times10^{-13}$–$7\times10^{-10}$ s. The same crystals show large anisotropic magnetotransport, with positive magnetoresistance of about 22 percent at 300 K and 90 kOe, roughly 32–35 percent at 2.5 K, and butterfly-like anisotropic magnetoresistance up to about 10.9 percent. The conclusion is that Kondo hybridization, magnetic anisotropy, and Cu-vacancy disorder compete to produce a single field–temperature phase diagram in which the magnetization and transport anomalies align, making this compound a possible platform for correlated and anisotropic quantum phenomena.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peaks at 47 and 51 kOe are canonical spin-glass freezing; without aging, memory, or nonlinear-susceptibility measurements, those peaks could equally come from the first-order metamagnetic transitions, domain-wall pinning, or thermal-history effects that the same data show.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magnetization and resistivity track the same spin reconfiguration: the drop in magnetoresistance near 49–53 kOe coincides with the sharp rise in magnetization, so transport can be used as a probe of the metamagnetic phase boundaries.
  • The reported $\gamma\sim102$ mJ K$^{-2}$ mol$^{-1}$ and the broad resistivity hump near 47 K place off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2 in the weak heavy-fermion regime, where Kondo hybridization coexists with long-range antiferromagnetic order instead of destroying it.
  • At 47 and 51 kOe, the frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peaks, the Mydosh parameter $K=0.006$–$0.008$, and the relaxation time $\tau_0\sim10^{-13}$–$10^{-10}$ s indicate a field-induced spin-glass-like region that exists only in intermediate fields.
  • A magnetoresistance of about 22 percent at 300 K and 90 kOe, together with an anisotropic magnetoresistance up to about 10.9 percent at 2.5 K, makes the Néel-vector orientation a strong control knob for resistance in this antiferromagnet.
  • The angular resistivity patterns are strongly field-sensitive and develop higher-order lobes at 90 kOe, implying that the anisotropic Fermi-surface or scattering contributions change with the direction and strength of the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test not reported in the paper is to measure aging, memory, and the nonlinear susceptibility $\chi_3$ in region IV; if those confirm canonical freezing, field-induced glassiness in a Kondo antiferromagnet would become a tunable model for disorder- and frustration-driven slow dynamics.
  • The butterfly-shaped AMR at 90 kOe resembles the angular magnetoresistance attributed in the isostructural nodal-line semimetal ZrSiS to Zeeman-tuned electron–hole compensation; angle-dependent Hall or quantum-oscillation measurements could test whether the same compensation contributes here.
  • The microscopic identity of the intermediate phases is still open: field-dependent neutron diffraction or resonant X-ray magnetic scattering would reveal whether the region IV state is a true frozen glass or a pinned first-order canted structure, and would refine the proposed H–T phase diagram.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a comprehensive experimental study of single crystals identified by EDS as off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2 (Ce:Cu:Bi ≈ 1:0.8:2.2), covering structure, anisotropic magnetization, specific heat, resistivity, magnetoresistance, angle-dependent AMR, and AC susceptibility. The authors find antiferromagnetic ordering at TN ≈ 14 K with strong uniaxial anisotropy, a Sommerfeld coefficient γ ≈ 102 mJ K−2 mol−1, a Kondo-like resistivity hump near 47 K, multiple metamagnetic steps for H || c, frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peaks at 47 and 51 kOe interpreted as field-induced spin-glass-like behavior, and large anisotropic magnetotransport (MR ≈ 22% at 300 K and 90 kOe; AMR ≈ 10.9% at 2.5 K and 90 kOe). They conclude that off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2 is a platform where Kondo-driven heavy-fermion behavior, large anisotropic magnetotransport, and field-induced glassiness coexist.

Significance. If substantiated, this paper would provide a valuable experimental phase diagram for an anisotropic Kondo antiferromagnet with strong magnetotransport responses, and the reported 10.9% AMR is a useful addition to the antiferromagnetic AMR database. The core observations—TN ≈ 14 K, γ ≈ 102 mJ K−2 mol−1, metamagnetic step fields, MR values, and AMR values—are directly supported by the presented data; the angle-dependent measurements and polar plots are a particular strength. The two weakest points are the field-induced glassy-state interpretation, which rests on AC-susceptibility frequency shifts at only two DC fields without standard spin-glass diagnostics, and the sample composition, which rests on EDS alone. Neither point invalidates the transport and magnetization measurements, but the central claim of coexisting field-induced glassiness needs either new measurements or a substantial reinterpretation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, AC susceptibility measurements; Figs. 8(e), 8(f), 9(a)–9(d)] The central claim of field-induced glassiness is not established by the presented data. The frequency-dependent χ′(T) peaks are observed at only two DC fields, 47 and 51 kOe, both inside metamagnetic region IV, where DC magnetization already shows hysteresis, ZFC–FC bifurcation, and an unusual ZFC–FC crossing. No aging, memory, or nonlinear-susceptibility measurements are reported, and the frequency list used for the fits is not given. The critical-slowing-down fits at the two fields yield τ0 = 7.2×10−13 s and 7.3×10−10 s, a spread of about three orders of magnitude, and the latter value sits at the cluster-glass/superparamagnetic end of the canonical range the authors cite. The fits are also underreported: no zν values, fit ranges, or uncertainties are given. First-order metamagnetic transitions, domain-wall pinning, or thermal-history effects can produce frequency-dependent AC peaks without canonical spin freezing. To support the conclusion, the authors should provide a complete frequency series, aging or memory checks, nonlinear susceptibility data, or a clear exclusion of metamagnetic-transition artifacts; otherwise the conclusion should be weakened to 'slow spin dynamics' and the word 'glassiness' should be removed from the central claim.
  2. [Section II and Table I] The identification of the sample as off-stoichiometric 'CeCuBios2' with composition 1:0.8:2.2 rests entirely on EDS measurements on the crystal surface. The nine measured regions are mentioned, but no table or list of individual EDS values and no standard deviations are provided. Because the title, the lattice-contraction discussion, and the assignment of the Kondo hump and enhanced γ to Cu vacancies and Bi excess all depend on the composition being bulk and uniform, the authors need to either report the full EDS statistics or provide complementary bulk composition data (for example, wavelength-dispersive electron microprobe analysis or solution-based elemental analysis).
  3. [Section IV and Fig. 8(a)] The H–T phase diagram labels five field-induced phases (I–V), but their boundaries are inferred from dM/dH and susceptibility anomalies, and the microscopic spin arrangements are not determined. The authors themselves state in Section IV that field-dependent neutron diffraction or resonant X-ray scattering is needed to determine the intermediate magnetic structures. Since the transport interpretation repeatedly invokes specific field-induced spin configurations (canting, spin-flop, spin-locked states), the macroscopic signatures alone cannot prove those configurations. The manuscript should clearly separate what is measured (metamagnetic steps, MR anomalies, AC peak shifts) from what is inferred (particular spin reorientation mechanisms and glassy freezing), and the concluding claim should be calibrated accordingly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [General] The notation CeCuBios2 is used before its definition is fully explained; please define it at first occurrence, including in the abstract if the symbol is used there.
  2. [Section II and Table I] Please include uncertainties for the new lattice parameters in Table I and a clear statement of how many spots were averaged for the EDS composition.
  3. [Section III, AC susceptibility] The text refers to 'at constant fields of 29.7 kOe and 30 kOe' (Fig. 8); please clarify whether these are two distinct measurements or whether one value is a typographical error.
  4. [Fig. 9 and Section III] The captions and text for the critical-slowing-down fits do not specify the excitation frequencies used or the number of points in each fit; please add this information so the fits can be evaluated.
  5. [General] There are minor typographical issues, including 'resistivty' in the magnetoresistance discussion and inconsistent hyphenation of 'spin-glass-like'; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  6. [General] No data availability statement is included; many journals now require one, so please add it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central claims are fresh measurements interpreted with standard fits, and the spin-glass assignment is an acknowledged limitation rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental characterization study, and none of its central results are derived from a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The values TN ≈ 14 K, γ = 102 mJ K−2 mol−1, the metamagnetic transitions, MR ≈ 22%, and AMR ≈ 10.9% are direct measurements, not outputs of a fitted theory. The Curie–Weiss law, C/T = γ + βT², ρ(T) = ρ0 + ρM T³ + ρP T⁵, MR = aHⁿ, and the critical-slowing-down model are standard parameterizations used to interpret the data, rather than definitions of the conclusions. The spin-glass-like classification at 47 kOe and 51 kOe rests on frequency-dependent AC susceptibility peaks and critical slowing down fits; the authors themselves concede in Section IV that field-dependent neutron diffraction or resonant X-ray magnetic scattering is needed to determine the intermediate magnetic structures, which is an acknowledged evidentiary limitation, not a circular step. Self-citations (Refs. 12, 26, 67–70) appear as methodological examples for spin-glass fitting and related techniques, and they do not carry the argument alone; the data are fresh and benchmarked against external literature values such as TN for CeCuBi2, γ for related Ce compounds, and AMR for other antiferromagnets. No fitted input is relabeled as a prediction, and no cited uniqueness theorem forces the authors' choices. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 15 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central conclusions are primarily direct experimental observations. The free parameters listed are standard model fits used for interpretation rather than a derivation of the measured behavior. The main interpretive load is carried by the assumptions that Kondo/RKKY/CEF models and canonical spin-glass criteria apply to this off-stoichiometric sample, and that the EDS-derived composition represents the bulk. The topological context is weakened by a citation mismatch: Ref. [11] is a CeAuBi2 calculation, not a CeCuBi2 calculation. No new physical entities are invented.

free parameters (15)
  • gamma (Sommerfeld coefficient) = 102 mJ K^-2 mol^-1
    Fitted from C/T = gamma + beta T^2 in Section III; used to claim weak heavy-fermion behavior.
  • beta (specific heat T^3 coefficient) = 8 mJ K^-4 mol^-1
    Fitted from the same C/T expression; used to account for lattice and magnon contributions.
  • theta_C, H parallel c = 21.8 K
    Curie-Weiss fit to inverse susceptibility; used to infer ferromagnetic correlations along c-axis.
  • theta_C, H parallel [110] = -27.5 K
    Curie-Weiss fit to inverse susceptibility; used to infer antiferromagnetic interactions in the ab-plane.
  • mu_eff, H parallel c = 2.44 mu_B/Ce
    Curie-Weiss fit effective moment; supports localized Ce 4f moment picture.
  • mu_eff, H parallel [110] = 2.56 mu_B/Ce
    Curie-Weiss fit effective moment; supports localized Ce 4f moment picture.
  • rho_M, rho_ab(T) = 3.43e-7 Ohm cm K^-3
    Magnon scattering coefficient from Eq. (1) fit below 10 K; used to discuss directional scattering.
  • rho_M, rho_c(T) = 3.52e-7 Ohm cm K^-3
    Magnon scattering coefficient from Eq. (1) fit below 10 K; used to infer stronger c-axis magnon scattering.
  • rho_P, rho_ab(T) = 1.18e-9 Ohm cm K^-5
    Phonon scattering coefficient from Eq. (1) fit below 10 K.
  • rho_P, rho_c(T) = 1.24e-9 Ohm cm K^-5
    Phonon scattering coefficient from Eq. (1) fit below 10 K.
  • MR exponent n = close to 1 for T <= 10 K; rises above 10 K
    Power-law fit MR percent = a H^n in the low-field range 0 to 30 kOe; used to characterize linear magnetoresistance.
  • tau0 at 47 kOe = 7.2e-13 s
    Relaxation time from critical slowing down fit; used to argue for canonical spin-glass-like dynamics.
  • tau0 at 51 kOe = 7.3e-10 s
    Relaxation time from critical slowing down fit; used to argue for canonical spin-glass-like dynamics.
  • Tg at 47 kOe = not stated in text
    Zero-frequency freezing temperature from the critical slowing down fit; required together with tau0 for the model.
  • Tg at 51 kOe = not stated in text
    Zero-frequency freezing temperature from the critical slowing down fit; required together with tau0 for the model.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Curie-Weiss law chi = C/(T - theta_C) holds in the fitted paramagnetic range
    Used in Section III to extract theta_C and mu_eff from high-temperature susceptibility.
  • domain assumption Low-temperature specific heat is separable as C/T = gamma + beta T^2
    Used to extract gamma and beta; the beta T^3 term lumps lattice and magnon contributions, which may not be cleanly separable.
  • domain assumption Resistivity in the antiferromagnetic metal follows Eq. (1): rho = rho_0 + rho_M T^3 + rho_P T^5
    Used for fits below 10 K; assumes standard magnon and phonon scattering power laws.
  • domain assumption The broad resistivity hump near 47 K is the Kondo-lattice coherence maximum
    Central to the Kondo/heavy-fermion interpretation; competing explanations such as a hybridization gap or disorder are discussed but not excluded.
  • domain assumption A frequency-dependent chi-prime peak shift with Mydosh parameter K near 0.005 to 0.01 indicates canonical spin-glass freezing
    Used in the AC susceptibility section to identify region IV as the field-induced glassy state.
  • domain assumption The critical slowing down model tau = tau_0 (Tf/Tg - 1)^(-z nu) applies with a single relaxation process
    Used to fit tau0 at 47 and 51 kOe; assumes no broad distribution of relaxation times or additional dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper The as-grown crystal is a bulk off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2 crystal with uniform composition near Ce:Cu:Bi = 1:0.8:2.2
    Based on EDS at nine regions and powder XRD; no microscopic vacancy distribution or phase purity beyond XRD is shown.
  • domain assumption LaCuBi2 grown under identical conditions is a valid phonon background for the magnetic specific heat of CeCuBi2
    Used to compute C_mag; assumes identical lattice heat capacity and no magnetic contribution from the reference compound.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complex field-induced magnetic phases and anisotropic magnetotransport in off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RMLQ7NYJ

@misc{pith2026260804946,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complex field-induced magnetic phases and anisotropic magnetotransport in off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RMLQ7NYJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04946}
}
read the original abstract

We report a detailed study on the structural, angle-dependent magnetic and magnetotransport properties of highly anisotropic off-stoichiometric CeCuBi2 single crystals. Our results reveal CeCuBi2 as an anisotropic Kondo antiferromagnet exhibiting complex field-induced magnetic behavior and unusual magnetotransport properties. Magnetic susceptibility and specific heat measurements reveal antiferromagnetic (AFM) ordering below TN = 14 K with strong anisotropy and weak heavy-fermion behavior. Electrical transport measurements show highly anisotropic resistivity and a broad hump around 47 K, indicative of Kondo-driven heavy-fermion behavior. Magnetization measurements reveal multiple field-induced metamagnetic phases, while AC susceptibility measurements indicate slow spin dynamics and spin-glass-like behavior in intermediate field-induced magnetic states. Furthermore, we observe large and strongly anisotropic magneto transport responses, including room-temperature magnetoresistance of approximately 22% at 300 K and 9 T and butterfly-like anisotropic magnetoresistance with AMR values reaching approximately 10.9%. These results highlight a strong interplay among Kondo correlations, magnetic anisotropy, and field-tunable spin configurations, making CeCuBi2 a possible platform for exploring correlated and anisotropic quantum phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04946 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Optical image of the CeCuBi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) DC magnetic susceptibility measured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Field dependence of magnetization at 2 K for magnetic fields applied parallel and perpendicular to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Temperature dependence of longitudinal resistivity measured for current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Magnetic field dependence of the magnetization of CeCuBi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Magnetic field dependence of MR% at 2.5 K with current along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Polar plots of angle dependent resistivity measured at 2.5 K with the magnetic field rotated from 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Magnetic field–temperature ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a)The plot of spin-freezing temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. Ye, Y. Huang, K. Kadowaki, and T. Matsumoto, A novel intermetallic compound, CeCu 1−xBi2, Acta Crys- tallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun.52, 1323 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Adriano, P

    C. Adriano, P. F. S. Rosa, C. B. Jesus, J. R. L. Marde- gan, T. M. Garitezi, T. Grant, Z. Fisk, D. J. Garcia, A. Reyes, P. Kuhns,et al., Physical properties and mag- netic structure of the intermetallic CeCuBi 2 compound, Phys. Rev. B90, 235120 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Thamizhavel, A

    A. Thamizhavel, A. Galatanu, E. Yamamoto, T. Okubo, M. Yamada, K. Tabata, T. C Kobayashi, N. Nakamura, K. Sugiyama, K. Kindo,et al., Low temperature mag- netic properties of CeTBi 2 (T: Ni, Cu and Ag) single crystals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.72, 2632 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Nicklas, R

    M. Nicklas, R. Borth, E. Lengyel, P. Pagliuso, J. Sar- rao, V. Sidorov, G. Sparn, F. Steglich, and J. Thompson, Response of the heavy-fermion superconductor CeCoIn 5 to pressure: roles of dimensionality and proximity to a quantum-critical point, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter13, L905 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    M. M. Piva, M. Ajeesh, D. Christovam, R. Dos Reis, C. Jesus, P. F. S. Rosa, C. Adriano, R. Urbano, M. Nick- las, and P. Pagliuso, High-pressure studies on heavy- fermion antiferromagnet CeTBi 2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter30, 375601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Hossain, H

    Z. Hossain, H. Ohmoto, K. Umeo, F. Iga, T. Suzuki, T. Takabatake, N. Takamoto, and K. Kindo, Anti- ferromagnetic Kondo-lattice systems Ce 2Rh3Ge5 and Ce2Ir3Ge5 with moderate heavy-fermion behavior, Phys. Rev. B60, 10383 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    S. Seo, V. Sidorov, H. Lee, D. Jang, Z. Fisk, J. D. Thompson, and T. Park, Pressure effects on the heavy- fermion antiferromagnet CeAuSb 2, Phys. Rev. B85, 205145 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Steglich, J

    F. Steglich, J. Aarts, C. Bredl, W. Lieke, D. Meschede, W. Franz, and H. Sch¨ afer, Superconductivity in the pres- ence of strong Pauli paramagnetism: CeCu 2Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1892 (1979)

    work page 1979

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Mizoguchi, S

    H. Mizoguchi, S. Matsuishi, M. Hirano, M. Tachibana, E. Takayama-Muromachi, H. Kawaji, and H. Hosono, Coexistence of Light and Heavy Carriers Associ- ated with Superconductivity and Antiferromagnetism in CeNi0.8Bi2 with a Bi Square Net, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 057002 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    C. B. R. d. Jesus, M. M. Piva, P. F. S. Rosa, C. Adri- ano, and P. Pagliuso, Evolution of the magnetic proper- ties along the RCuBi2 (R= Ce, Pr, Nd, Gd, Sm) series of intermetallic compounds, J. Appl. Phys.115, 17E115 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Wang and X

    A. Wang and X. Luo, Topologically nontrivial type-I and type-II nodal-line states in magnetic configurations of square-net pnictide CeAuBi 2, Comput. Mater. Sci.194, 110434 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Singh, S

    S. Singh, S. Rathod, R. Chen, Lipika, Sneh, R. Y. Umetsu, Y. Sun, and K. Manna, Berry curvature induced giant anomalous and spin texture driven hall responses in the layered kagome antiferromagnet GdTi 3Bi4, Phys. Rev. B113, 134437 (2026)

    2026

  5. [13]

    S. M. Thomas, P. F. S. Rosa, S. B. Lee, S. A. Parameswaran, Z. Fisk, and J. Xia, Hall effect anomaly and low-temperature metamagnetism in the Kondo com- pound CeAgBi 2, Phys. Rev. B93, 075149 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    L. Wang, C. Wang, Z. Liu, J. Cheng, S. Miao, Y. Song, Y. Shi, and Y. F. Yang, Magnetic phase diagrams of the ferromagnetic kondo lattice CePd2Al8, Phys. Rev. B100, 085122 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Gornicka, B

    K. Gornicka, B. R. Ortiz, M. S. Cook, H. Zhang, A. D. Christianson, and A. F. May, Anisotropic magnetism and kondo-lattice behavior in the frustrated antiferromagnet Ce3MgBi5, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, 054413 (2026)

    2026

  8. [16]

    Ashtar, X

    M. Ashtar, X. Liu, Z. Zhuang, J. Xiang, Z. Tian, and P. Sun, K3RETe2O9 (RE = Pr, Nd, and Gd–Yb): A fam- ily of rare-earth triangular-lattice antiferromagnets with large lattice spacings, Inorg. Chem.65, 10474 (2026)

    2026

  9. [17]

    C. H. Wang, J. M. Lawrence, A. D. Christianson, E. A. Goremychkin, V. R. Fanelli, K. Gofryk, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, J. D. Thompson, N. R. D. Souza, A. I. Kolesnikov, and K. C. Littrell, Kondo behavior, ferro- magnetic correlations, and crystal fields in the heavy- fermion co...

    2010

  10. [18]

    J. Chen, Z. Wang, S. Zheng, C. Feng, J. Dai, and Z. Xu, Antiferromagnetic kondo lattice compound CePt 3P, Sci. Rep.7, 41853 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Feringa, J

    F. Feringa, J. Vink, and B. Van Wees, Spin-flop transition in the quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet MnPS3 de- tected via thermally generated magnon transport, Phys. Rev. B106, 224409 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Li, Possible ground states and parallel magnetic- field-driven phase transitions of collinear antiferromag- nets, npj Comput

    H.-F. Li, Possible ground states and parallel magnetic- field-driven phase transitions of collinear antiferromag- nets, npj Comput. Mater.2, 16032 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    M. M. Piva, R. Tartaglia, G. S. Freitas, J. C. Souza, D. S. Christovam, S. M. Thomas, J. B. Lea˜ o, W. Rat- cliff, J. W. Lynn, C. Lane, J. X. Zhu, J. D. Thomp- son, P. F. Rosa, C. Adriano, E. Granado, and P. G. Pagliuso, Electronic and magnetic properties of stoichio- metric C...

    2020

  14. [22]

    Hodovanets, H

    H. Hodovanets, H. Kim, T. Metz, Y. Nakajima, C. J. Eckberg, K. Wang, J. Yong, S. R. Saha, D. Graf, N. P. Butch, T. Vojta, and J. Paglione, Magnetic field tuned magnetic order and metamagnetic criticality in nonstoi- chiometric CeAuBi2, Phys. Rev. B113, 054432 (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    Keffer, H

    F. Keffer, H. Kaplan, and Y. Yafet, Spin waves in ferro- magnetic and antiferromagnetic materials, Am. J. Phys. 21, 250 (1953)

    1953

  16. [24]

    Rathod, M

    S. Rathod, M. Malasi, A. Lakhani, and D. Ku- mar, Electron-magnon scattering in an anisotropic half- metallic ferromagnetic weyl semimetal Co 3Sn2S2, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 084202 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Z. Li, S. Xu, Y. Y. Wang, T. H. Li, S. X. Li, J. J. Wang, J. J. Mi, Q. Tao, and Z. A. Xu, Field-induced magnetic phase transitions and transport anomalies in GdAlSi, Phys. Rev. B113, 045113 (2026)

    2026

  18. [26]

    Singh, A

    Lipika, S. Singh, A. Saraswati, V. Chahar, Y. Sun, P. Manuel, D. Adroja, W. Schnelle, N. Kumar, J. Sanni- grahi,et al., Complex spin dynamics induced metamag- netic phase transitions in Dirac semimetal EuAuBi, Phys. Rev. B113, 104406 (2026)

    2026

  19. [27]

    Kumar, J

    B. Kumar, J. K. Tiwari, H. C. Chauhan, and S. Ghosh, Multiple magnetic phase transitions with different uni- versality classes in bilayer La 1.4Sr1.6Mn2O7 manganite, Sci. Rep.11, 21184 (2021). 16

    2021

  20. [28]

    S. Chun, Y. Lyanda-Geller, M. Salamon, R. Surya- narayanan, G. Dhalenne, and A. Revcolevschi, Reen- trant spin glass behavior in layered manganite La1.2Sr1.8Mn2O7 single crystals, J. Appl. Phys.90, 6307 (2001)

    2001

  21. [29]

    Goltsev and M

    A. Goltsev and M. Abd-Elmeguid, Origin of the pressure dependence of the kondo temperature in ce-and yb-based heavy-fermion compounds, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S813 (2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    Samwer and K

    K. Samwer and K. Winzer, Magnetoresistivity of the kondo-system (La, Ce)B 6, Z. Physik B25, 269 (1976)

    1976

  23. [31]

    J. D. Thompson, R. D. Parks, and H. Borges, Effect of pressure on the nhel temperature of kondo-lattice sys- tems, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.54, 377 (1986)

    1986

  24. [32]

    C. L. Lin, A. Wallash, J. E. Crow, T. Mihalisin, and P. Schlottmann, Heavy-fermion behavior and the single- ion kondo model, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 1232 (1987)

    1987

  25. [33]

    Ishikawa, Electrical resistivity due to antiferromag- netic spin waves in Cr, J

    A. Ishikawa, Electrical resistivity due to antiferromag- netic spin waves in Cr, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.51, 441 (1982)

    1982

  26. [34]

    Cornut and B

    B. Cornut and B. Coqblin, Influence of the crystalline field on the Kondo effect of alloys and compounds with cerium impurities, Phys. Rev. B5, 4541 (1972)

    1972

  27. [35]

    Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog

    J. Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog. Theor. Phys.32, 37 (1964)

    1964

  28. [36]

    Xiang, L

    Z. Xiang, L. Chen, K.-W. Chen, C. Tinsman, Y. Sato, T. Asaba, H. Lu, Y. Kasahara, M. Jaime, F. Balakirev, et al., Unusual high-field metal in a Kondo insulator, Nat. Phys.17, 788 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Dzero, K

    M. Dzero, K. Sun, P. Coleman, and V. Galitski, Theory of topological Kondo insulators, Phys. Rev. B85, 045130 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    F. Chen, C. Shang, Z. Jin, D. Zhao, Y. Wu, Z. Xiang, Z. Xia, A. Wang, X. Luo, T. Wu,et al., Magnetoresis- tance evidence of a surface state and a field-dependent insulating state in the Kondo insulator SmB6, Phys. Rev. B91, 205133 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Rauchschwalbe, F

    U. Rauchschwalbe, F. Steglich, A. de Visser, and J. Franse, Magnetoresistance of ce-based kondo lattices: CeCu2Si2 and CeAl3, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.63-64, 347 (1987)

    1987

  32. [40]

    M. F. Hundley, A. Lacerda, P. Canfield, J. D. Thompson, and Z. Fisk, Magnetoresistance of the Kondo insulator Ce3Bi4Pt3, Physica B: Condens. Matter186, 425 (1993)

    1993

  33. [41]

    Mendon¸ ca Ferreira, T

    L. Mendon¸ ca Ferreira, T. Park, V. Sidorov, M. Nick- las, E. Bittar, R. Lora-Serrano, E. Hering, S. Ramos, M. Fontes, E. Baggio-Saitovich,et al., Tuning the pressure-induced superconducting phase in doped CeRhIn5, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 017005 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Y. Muro, K. Yutani, J. Kajino, T. Onimaru, and T. Tak- abatake, Anisotropic c–f hybridization in the kondo semi- conductor CeFe 2Al10, J. Korean Phys. Soc.63, 508 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    Myers, S

    K. Myers, S. Bud’Ko, I. Fisher, Z. Islam, H. Kleinke, A. Lacerda, and P. Canfield, Systematic study of anisotropic transport and magnetic properties of RAgSb2 (R= Y, La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Tm), J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 205, 27 (1999)

    1999

  36. [44]

    Petrovic, S

    C. Petrovic, S. Bud’ko, and P. Canfield, Anisotropic properties of rare-earth dibismites, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.247, 270 (2002)

    2002

  37. [45]

    Petrovic, S

    C. Petrovic, S. Bud’ko, J. Strand, and P. Canfield, Anisotropic properties of rare earth silver dibismites, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.261, 210 (2003)

    2003

  38. [46]

    Ruvalds’ and Q

    J. Ruvalds’ and Q. G. Sheng, Magaetoresistance in heavy-fermion alloys, Phys. Rev. B8, 1959 (1988)

    1988

  39. [47]

    E. V. Sampathkumaran, Y. Nakazawa, M. Ishikawa, and R. Vijayaraghavan, Nature of 4f magnetism in Ce1−xLaxPd2Si2, Phys. Rev. B40, 11452(R) (1989)

    1989

  40. [48]

    Nakatsuji, D

    S. Nakatsuji, D. Pines, and Z. Fisk, Two fluid description of the kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 4 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    A. P. Pikul, U. Stockert, A. Steppke, T. Ci- chorek, S. Hartmann, N. Caroca-Canales, N. Oeschler, M. Brando, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, Single-ion kondo scaling of the coherent fermi liquid regime in Ce1−xLaxNi2Ge2, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 066405 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    Hodovanets, S

    H. Hodovanets, S. L. Bud’Ko, W. E. Straszheim, V. Tau- four, E. D. Mun, H. Kim, R. Flint, and P. C. Canfield, Remarkably robust and correlated coherence and anti- ferromagnetism in (Ce 1−xLax)Cu2Ge2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 236601 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    R. Hu, K. J. Thomas, Y. Lee, T. Vogt, E. S. Choi, V. F. Mitrovi´ c, R. P. Hermann, F. Grandjean, P. C. Canfield, J. W. Kim, A. I. Goldman, and C. Petrovic, Colossal positive magnetoresistance in a doped nearly magnetic semiconductor, Phys. Rev. B77, 085212 (2008)

    2008

  44. [52]

    Pavlosiuk, D

    O. Pavlosiuk, D. Kaczorowski, and P. Wi¨ sniewski, Shub- nikov - de haas oscillations, weak antilocalization effect and large linear magnetoresistance in the putative topo- logical superconductor LuPdBi, Sci. Rep.5, 9158 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Abrikosov, Quantum magnetoresistance, Phys

    A. Abrikosov, Quantum magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. B58, 2788 (1998)

    1998

  46. [54]

    Parish and P

    M. Parish and P. Littlewood, Non-saturating magnetore- sistance in heavily disordered semiconductors, Nature 426, 162 (2003)

    2003

  47. [55]

    M. K. Dasoundhi, S. Baral, I. Rajput, D. Kumar, and A. Lakhani, Extremely large magnetoresistance and non- trivial band topology in YSb semimetal, Mater. Today Phys.40, 101310 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Onishi, R

    S. Onishi, R. Jha, A. Miyake, R. Higashinaka, T. D. Matsuda, M. Tokunaga, and Y. Aoki, Deviation from the Kohler’s rule and Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in type-II Weyl semimetal WTe2: High magnetic field study up to 56 T, AIP Adv.8, 101330 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Ritzinger and K

    P. Ritzinger and K. V` yborn` y, Anisotropic magnetoresis- tance: materials, models and applications, R. Soc. Open Sci.10, 230564 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Bolte, M

    M. Bolte, M. Steiner, C. Pels, M. Barthelmess, J. Kruse, U. Merkt, G. Meier, M. Holz, and D. Pfannkuche, Magnetotransport through magnetic domain patterns in permalloy rectangles, Phys. Rev. B72, 224436 (2005)

    2005

  51. [59]

    Marti, I

    X. Marti, I. Fina, C. Frontera, J. Liu, P. Wadley, Q. He, R. Paull, J. Clarkson, J. Kudrnovsk` y, I. Turek,et al., Room-temperature antiferromagnetic memory resistor, Nat. Mater.13, 367 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    H. Wang, C. Lu, J. Chen, Y. Liu, S. Yuan, S.-W. Cheong, S. Dong, and J.-M. Liu, Giant anisotropic magnetoresis- tance and nonvolatile memory in canted antiferromagnet Sr2IrO4, Nat. Commun.10, 2280 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    H. Yang, Q. Liu, Z. Liao, L. Si, P. Jiang, X. Liu, Y. Guo, J. Yin, M. Wang, Z. Sheng,et al., Colossal angular magnetoresistance in the antiferromagnetic semiconduc- tor EuTe2, Phys. Rev. B104, 214419 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    J.-R. Soh, P. Manuel, N. Schr¨ oter, C. Yi, F. Orlandi, Y. Shi, D. Prabhakaran, and A. Boothroyd, Magnetic and electronic structure of Dirac semimetal candidate EuMnSb2, Phys. Rev. B100, 174406 (2019). 17

    2019

  55. [63]

    Voerman, L

    J. Voerman, L. Mulder, J. De Boer, Y. Huang, L. Schoop, C. Li, and A. Brinkman, Origin of the butterfly mag- netoresistance in ZrSiS, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 084203 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    J. A. Mydosh,Spin glasses: an experimental introduction (CRC press, 1993)

    1993

  57. [65]

    Mulder, A

    C. Mulder, A. Van Duyneveldt, and J. Mydosh, Suscep- tibility of the Cu Mn spin-glass: Frequency and field de- pendences, Phys. Rev. B23, 1384 (1981)

    1981

  58. [66]

    M. Giot, A. Pautrat, G. Andr´ e, D. Saurel, M. Hervieu, and J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Magnetic states and spin- glass properties in Bi 0.67Ca0.33MnO3: Macroscopic ac measurements and neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B77, 134445 (2008)

    2008

  59. [67]

    Manna, D

    K. Manna, D. Samal, S. Elizabeth, H. Bhat, and P. Anil Kumar, On the Magnetic Ground State of La0.85Sr0.15CoO3 Single Crystals, J. Phys. Chem. C115, 13985 (2011)

    2011

  60. [68]

    H. Guo, K. Manna, H. Luetkens, M. Hoelzel, and A. Ko- marek, Spin glass behavior in LaCo 1−xRhxO3 (x=0.4, 0.5, and 0.6), Phys. Rev. B94, 205128 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Manna, A

    K. Manna, A. K. Bera, M. Jain, S. Elizabeth, S. M. Yusuf, and P. S. Anil Kumar, Structural-modulation- driven spin canting and reentrant glassy magnetic phase in ferromagnetic Lu 2MnNio6, Phys. Rev. B91, 224420 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    Manna, D

    K. Manna, D. Samal, A. Bera, S. Elizabeth, S. Yusuf, and P. Anil Kumar, Correspondence between neutron depolarization and higher order magnetic susceptibility to investigate ferromagnetic clusters in phase separated systems, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter26, 016002 (2014)

    2014

  63. [71]

    Chakrabarty, A

    T. Chakrabarty, A. V. Mahajan, and S. Kundu, Cluster spin glass behavior in geometrically frustrated Zn 3V3O8, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter26, 405601 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    B. Maji, K. Suresh, and A. Nigam, Low temperature clus- ter glass behavior in Nd 5Ge3, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 506002 (2011)

    2011

  65. [73]

    W. Feng, D. Li, W. Ren, Y. Li, W. Li, J. Li, Y. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, Glassy ferromagnetism in Ni 3Sn-type Mn3.1Sn0.9, Phys. Rev. B73, 205105 (2006)

    2006

  66. [74]

    Hiroi, T

    M. Hiroi, T. Rokkaku, K. Matsuda, T. Hisamatsu, I. Shigeta, M. Ito, T. Sakon, K. Koyama, K. Watanabe, S. Nakamura,et al., Ferromagnetism and spin-glass tran- sitions in the Heusler compounds Ru 2−xFexCrSi, Phys. Rev. B79, 224423 (2009)

    2009

  67. [75]

    ´Slebarski, Role of ce 4 f-conduction band on-site hy- bridisation in the nature of magnetism in Ce 5MGe2, where m is d-electron-type metal, Philos

    A. ´Slebarski, Role of ce 4 f-conduction band on-site hy- bridisation in the nature of magnetism in Ce 5MGe2, where m is d-electron-type metal, Philos. Mag.100, 1193 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    Ishii, Y

    Y. Ishii, Y. Narumi, Y. Matsushita, M. Oda, T. Kida, M. Hagiwara, and H. Yoshida, Field-induced succes- sive phase transitions in the j 1-j 2 buckled honeycomb antiferromagnet Cs 3Fe2Cl9, Phys. Rev. B103, 104433 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.