Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Geometric Parametric Instability in Nonlinear Multipass Cells

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Geometric parametric instability can occur in gas-filled nonlinear multipass cells, driven by the single-pass Gouy-phase imbalance of the signal-idler pair.

desk verdict A well-derived Floquet theory for a new MPC instability, with a diagonal-radial truncation that should not be mistaken for a selection rule. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13288 v1 pith:SIWVHVRJ submitted 2026-08-13 physics.optics

Chao Mei , Junhong Yang , Tao Sun , Qian Gao , Jinhui Yuan , Jintao Fan , Peilong Yang , Günter Steinmeyer This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords geometricparametricinstabilitymultipasscellsGouyphaseFloquetquasi-phase-matchingfour-wavemixingmultimodenonlinearopticspulsecompressionLaguerre-Gaussmodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that geometric parametric instability--the resonant growth of discrete, symmetrically detuned spectral sidebands--can arise in a gas-filled nonlinear multipass cell, not only in graded-index fibers. The mechanism is Floquet quasi-phase-matching with each mirror-to-mirror pass as one period: the single-pass Gouy-phase imbalance between the signal-idler pair and the pump pair, $4p_s\Phi_0$, adds to an integer Floquet phase $2\pi h$ to balance the material-dispersion phase, giving a sideband detuning $\Delta f_{\mathrm{SB}}\approx(1/2\pi)\sqrt{(4p_s\Phi_0+2\pi h)/(\beta_2 L_{\mathrm{cav}})}$ (Eq. 14). The paper derives small-signal gain, bandwidth, and a pump-depleted conversion limit, and reproduces the sideband frequencies in multimode generalized nonlinear Schrödinger simulations. If correct, this makes MPCs both a potential source of beam-quality degradation in pulse compression and a tunable platform for multicolor and vortex sideband generation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the single-pass Gouy phase $\Phi_0(C)=2\arctan\sqrt{C/(2-C)}$ of the fundamental Laguerre-Gaussian mode in a symmetric MPC with $C=L_{\mathrm{cav}}/R_0$, along with the mode-order multiplier $N_{\ell p}=1+2p+|\ell|$. The MPC is mapped to an equivalent waveguide whose effective propagation constants $\tilde{\beta}_{\ell p}=N_{\ell p}\Phi_0/L_{\mathrm{cav}}$ are uniformly spaced by $2\Phi_0/L_{\mathrm{cav}}$ between adjacent radial modes, mimicking the self-imaging spectrum of a graded-index fiber. This machinery turns each mirror-to-mirror pass into one Floquet period: the phase-matching condition $\delta\phi=0$ with integer Floquet order $h$ selects discrete sideband frequencies (Eq. 14), determines the gain (Eq. 16) and bandwidth (Eq. 20), and through the normalized mismatch $D_h$ sets the pump-depleted conversion ceiling (Eq. 22).

What would settle it

Measure the first $p_s=1$, $h=0$ sideband pair in an argon-filled MPC at 5 bar, pumped at 1030 nm, for $C=0.05$ and $C=1.95$; Eq. (14) predicts detunings near 96 THz and 46 THz, respectively. If no sidebands emerge at the predicted detunings, or their dependence on $C$ and pressure deviates from $\sqrt{(4\Phi_0+2\pi h)/(\beta_2 L_{\mathrm{cav}})}$ scaling, the Floquet quasi-phase-matching picture fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a mode-matched, rotationally symmetric gas-filled MPC pumped by a Gaussian beam in a normally dispersive gas is parametrically unstable: photon-seeded sideband pairs grow at discrete frequencies selected by a Floquet quasi-phase-matching condition. With $\mu_p=(0,0)$ and $\mu_s=\mu_i=(0,p_s)$, the single-pass residual mismatch is $\delta\phi=\phi_D(\Omega)-4p_s\Phi_0+\Delta\phi_{NL}-2\pi h$, and setting it to zero gives the sideband detuning; retaining only $\beta_2$ yields $\Delta f_{\mathrm{SB}}\approx(1/2\pi)\sqrt{(4p_s\Phi_0+2\pi h)/(\beta_2 L_{\mathrm{cav}})}$. The small-signal amplitude gain is $g=\sqrt{|\kappa(p_s)|^2-[\delta\phi/(2L_{\mathrm{cav}})]^2}$, and the pump-depleted coupled-mode model gives a maximum converted fraction $u_{\max}=1-|D_h|/2$ with exponential instability only for $|D_h|<2$. Truncated MMGNLSE simulations seeded with one photon per spectral mode reproduce the predicted sideband frequencies and show the $p_s=1$ channel growing fastest, depleting the shared pump, and competing with higher radial orders.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes successive mirror-to-mirror passages through the cell interior do not interact nonlinearly with each other--the pulse is much shorter than the temporal separation between crossings--so the single-pass Floquet map is the correct evolution operator.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A mode-matched MPC becomes a discrete parametric amplifier whose sideband spectrum is fixed by cavity geometry and gas pressure, instead of by fiber design.
  • In a normally dispersive gas the theory predicts multiple sideband pairs from different Floquet orders and radial indices; for the $p_s=1$, $h=0$ branch at 5 bar the detuning shifts from roughly 96 to 46 THz as $C$ goes from 0.05 to 1.95.
  • Pump depletion sets a hard conversion ceiling: a single signal-idler pair can convert at most $1-|D_h|/2$ of the pump, and no exponential growth occurs once $|D_h|\ge 2$.
  • GPI can degrade spatial beam quality in nonlinear pulse compression by populating higher-order radial modes, while also enabling tunable multicolor generation, with angular-momentum conservation allowing counter-rotating vortex sidebands from a Gaussian pump.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the crossing-separation assumption is violated--shorter pulses or tighter cavities--the single-pass Floquet map should break down, and the predicted discrete sidebands would be expected to shift or merge as inter-pass nonlinear interactions at the crossing turn on; this regime is testable by varying pulse duration at fixed cavity geometry.
  • The same machinery should carry over to solid-state MPCs with different dispersion and Kerr coefficients, so the sideband detuning formula suggests a design rule: choose $R_0$, $L_{\mathrm{cav}}$, and gas pressure to place sidebands at target frequencies.
  • The pump-depleted model's coherent back-conversion hints at an all-optical switch or frequency shifter: seeding a strong sideband pair could convert power back toward the pump or to another radial channel, though the paper does not develop this application.
  • The orbital-angular-momentum selection rule implies a Gaussian pump can generate counter-rotating vortex sidebands without bulk vortex optics; simulating or measuring those vortex channels is a natural extension the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that geometric parametric instability (GPI) can occur in gas-filled nonlinear multipass cells (MPCs). The authors map a mode-matched symmetric MPC onto an equivalent waveguide with Laguerre–Gaussian modes, take each mirror-to-mirror pass as one period of a Floquet map, and derive a quasi-phase-matching condition governed by the single-pass Gouy-phase imbalance of the signal–idler pair relative to the pump pair. The central spectral prediction is Eq. (14), giving the sideband detuning Δf_SB ≈ (1/2π)√((4p_sΦ0 + 2πh)/(β2 L_cav)). They derive the small-signal gain (Eq. 16), bandwidth (Eq. 20), and a pump-depleted coupled-mode model (Eq. 21) with a maximum converted fraction u_max = 1 − |D_h|/2. A truncated MMGNLSE retaining five radial modes and diagonal pump–sideband overlaps is used to simulate the process; the simulations reproduce the predicted sideband positions and show pump depletion and competition among radial channels. The paper concludes that GPI may limit spatial beam quality in nonlinear pulse compression while offering a tunable mechanism for broadband multicolor generation.

Significance. If the central prediction holds, the paper describes a new physical mechanism in a technologically relevant platform: a mode-matched MPC would act as a discrete parametric amplifier whose sideband spectrum is set by geometry and gas pressure. The analytical derivation is parameter-free in an important sense: the dispersion uses literature Sellmeier data for argon, the Gouy phase and overlap integrals are computed analytically, and no free parameters are tuned to match the simulated sideband positions. The numerical data do reproduce the predicted frequencies and the gain hierarchy, which is a meaningful internal consistency check. However, the validation is not independent of the theory: the MMGNLSE is built from the same diagonal-overlap and path-averaged Gouy-phase assumptions as the analytical model and truncates to five radial modes. The load-bearing idealization is the omission of pump-mediated FWM between sideband modes with different radial indices. This limitation is explicitly acknowledged in the Conclusion, but it is central to the claim that the full multimode GPI spectrum has been described.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.3 and Appendix C (Eqs. 6, 12, 23, C1–C2)] The phase-matching and gain analysis restricts the signal–idler pair to equal radial indices, μ_s = μ_i = (0, p_s), giving ΔN = 4p_s in Eq. (6). The overlap tensor in Eq. (5) does not enforce p_s = p_i: for example, S_{1,0,0,2} = 3/8 is comparable to S_{1,0,0,1} = 1/2, so the degenerate-FWM tensor contains additional pump-mediated couplings A_0^2 A_{p_i}^* with p_i ≠ p_s. Equations (23) and (C1)–(C2) drop all such cross-radial terms, and Eq. (12) consequently predicts only branches with ΔN = 4p_s. Including the full tensor would introduce additional Floquet branches at ΔN = 6, 10, ... (e.g., from p_s = 1, p_i = 2), which can change the fastest-growing radial composition and the sideband spectrum. The Conclusion states that direct energy transfer between different higher-order radial modes is not included; my reading is that this is the load-bearing assumption of the paper. I request a quantitative estimate of the magnitude of the omitted cross-radial terms relative to the retained γ_FWM(p_s) at the parameters of Figs. 5–8, or a simulation that includes them.
  2. [Sec. III.1 and III.2 (Figs. 5–8)] The numerical verification is not independent of the analytical model. The MMGNLSE in Eq. (23) uses the same diagonal-overlap restriction S_{p,0,0,p}, the same path-averaged γ_eff(C), and the same Gouy-phase term as the theory, and it retains only five radial modes. The agreement between the simulated sideband positions and Eq. (14) therefore demonstrates internal consistency of the reduced model, but it does not test the full multimode GPI spectrum. I recommend either extending the MMGNLSE to include the full overlap tensor (or a controlled subset with p_s ≠ p_i), or providing an analytic estimate of the omitted cross-radial FWM terms. This distinction matters because the manuscript's abstract and conclusion claim that a Gaussian pump will amplify discrete sidebands at Floquet quasi-phase-matching frequencies set by the Gouy-phase imbalance; if the cross-radial terms introduce additional branches or modify the dominant radial order, the central spectral prediction is incomplete.
  3. [Sec. II.4.2 and Appendix A (Eqs. 21, A1–A6)] The pump-depleted coupled-mode model fixes the nonlinear phase mismatch δϕ_NL at the input pump power and neglects depletion-induced changes of pump SPM and sideband XPM; the authors disclose this in Appendix A. In the large-signal simulations of Fig. 7, the gain saturation and the 'competition' among radial channels are therefore derived from a model that also uses the diagonal truncation. If cross-radial FWM is present, energy can be transferred directly between p_s = 1 and p_s = 2 channels, so the interpretation of higher-order channels as independent competitors driven by a common pump may change. I ask the authors to clarify, at least quantitatively, whether the omitted cross-radial terms could alter the predicted conversion dynamics or the pump-depletion scenario in Fig. 7.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.3 (Eq. 14)] The text says that Floquet orders with 4p_sΦ0 + 2πh ≤ 0 have no positive-detuning solution, but the figures include negative h. Please state explicitly the allowed h range for the branches shown in Figs. 3 and 9 so that readers can map the notation onto the plotted bands.
  2. [Fig. 9 caption] The caption describes the color scale as '(20/ln 10)G' and the text says '10 log10 e^{2G}'; these are equivalent, but the caption could be simplified to 'gain in dB' to avoid confusion about the factor of two.
  3. [Eq. (24)] The effective pass number J_eff(J) = (1−R^J)/(1−R) is introduced without derivation. A brief sentence explaining how mirror loss per pass is folded into the gain expression would help the reader assess the 18 dB discrepancy in Fig. 6(b).
  4. [Sec. IV (Conclusion)] The final sentence, 'Direct energy transfer between different higher-order radial modes is not included in the present model,' is an important limitation that appears only at the end of the paper. I recommend stating this assumption explicitly in the abstract or in a dedicated model-assumptions paragraph in Sec. II so that readers do not over-interpret the numerical confirmation.
  5. [Sec. II.1 (Eq. 2)] The expression Φ0(C) = 2 arctan[√(C/(2−C))] assumes the beam waist is at the cavity center (ζ = 0) and that the mirrors are at ζ = ±L_cav/2. This is stated in the text, but it would be helpful to repeat it in the caption of Fig. 1(a) where the geometry is illustrated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: sideband prediction is derived from independent Gouy-phase, Sellmeier, and overlap inputs; the numerical comparison is a disclosed internal consistency check, not a fitted reproduction.

full rationale

The central GPI prediction is not equivalent to its inputs. The Floquet quasi-phase-matching condition in Eq. (12) is built from independent ingredients: the single-pass Gouy phase in Eq. (2), the literature argon Sellmeier dispersion in Eq. (9), and the analytic mode-overlap tensor in Eq. (5), with no parameters tuned to force the result. Equation (14) is only a beta-2-dominated approximation to that QPM condition. The small-signal gain in Eq. (16) and the pump-depleted conversion limit in Eq. (22) follow from standard linearization and coupled-mode reductions in Appendices B and A, rather than restating the predicted sideband frequencies. The MMGNLSE in Eq. (23) shares the same diagonal overlap restriction and Gouy-phase term as the analytic model, so the simulation comparison is an internal consistency check rather than a fully independent test; however, the sideband frequencies are not inserted as inputs, and the paper explicitly discloses that 'Direct energy transfer between different higher-order radial modes is not included in the present model' in the Conclusion. That is a stated modeling limitation, not a circularity, because the analytic result does not depend on fitting the numerical output. The self-citations, mainly [17] and [38], are used for parameter values and background and are not load-bearing as uniqueness proofs or authority chains. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and anchored to external dispersion and nonlinear-index data.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the equivalent-waveguide mapping and the truncation choices, not on fitted parameters. All numerical inputs, such as n2, Sellmeier coefficients, mirror reflectivity, and cavity dimensions, are taken from prior literature or stated experimental conditions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The MPC can be mapped to a collinear equivalent waveguide with effective propagation constants β̃ℓp=NℓpΦ0/Lcav and single-pass Floquet period Lcav.
    Sec. II.1 defines the equivalent-waveguide representation and uses ZJ=J Lcav as the Floquet period; this assumes the resonator is symmetric, mode-matched, and astigmatism-free.
  • domain assumption Nonlinear interaction at the crossing point of successive passes is negligible.
    Sec. II first paragraph states the model 'neglects direct nonlinear interaction between subsequent passes at their crossing point', justified by short pulse duration compared with pass separation.
  • ad hoc to paper The nonlinear dynamics can be truncated to five radial modes and only pump SPM, diagonal XPM, and FWM terms.
    Appendix C, Eqs. (C1)-(C2), restrict the nonlinear sum to S0,0,0,0 and Sp,0,0,p; direct mixing between different higher-order radial modes is excluded.
  • ad hoc to paper Gouy phase is accumulated discretely per pass while the Kerr nonlinearity is applied with a path-averaged coefficient γeff(C).
    Eq. (7) defines γeff as the single-pass average of γ(ζ), and Appendix C says the intra-pass variation of w(ζ) is not propagated explicitly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric Parametric Instability in Nonlinear Multipass Cells." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SIWVHVRJ

@misc{pith2026260813288,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric Parametric Instability in Nonlinear Multipass Cells},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SIWVHVRJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13288}
}
abstract

Geometric parametric instability (GPI) is the resonant growth of discrete spectral sidebands enabled by longitudinally periodic multimode evolution and has been studied primarily in graded-index fibers. Here we show theoretically and numerically that GPI can occur in gas-filled nonlinear multipass cells (MPCs). By mapping a mode-matched MPC onto an equivalent waveguide, we derive a Floquet quasi-phase-matching condition governed by the single-pass Gouy-phase imbalance of the signal--idler pair relative to the pump pair. The theory predicts the small-signal gain and bandwidth. A pump-depleted coupled-mode model (CMM) further relates the maximum converted fraction to the residual phase mismatch. The CMM predicts multiple geometrically tunable sideband pairs associated with different radial indices and Floquet orders. For argon at $5$~bar, varying the cavity geometry shifts the sideband detuning from approximately $96$ to $46$~THz when the $p_{\mathrm{s}}=1$, $h=0$ branch is considered. A truncated multimode generalized nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (MMGNLSE) model is used for numerical simulations with a semiclassical stochastic seed corresponding to one photon per spectral mode. The MMGNLSE simulations reproduce the predicted sideband frequencies and reveal pump depletion and competition among the retained radial channels. GPI in MPCs may therefore limit spatial beam quality in nonlinear pulse compression while providing a tunable mechanism for broadband multicolor generation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13288 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Effective modal structure of the symmetric MPC. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Floquet phase-matching construction for a quasi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Small-signal Floquet gain for a quasi-concentric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Large-signal dynamics of the reduced pump–signal– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Small-signal GPI in a quasi-collimated MPC ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Small-signal gain comparison for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Large-signal multichannel GPI in a quasi-concentric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Tunability of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    by using Eq. (5). Heren 2 is the nonlin- ear refractive index of the gas in the MPC. Because the beam radius varies within a mirror-to-mirror pass, the local coefficient isγ(ζ) =γ 0w2 0/w2(ζ) =γ 0/(1 +ζ 2/z2 R). The longitudinal dependence ofγ(ζ) is represented by its single-pass average, γeff (C) = 1 Lcav Z Lcav/2 −Lcav/2 γ(ζ) dζ=γ 0F(C).(7) 4 where F(C)...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Here,δϕis evaluated using Eq

    The discrete markers show ∆f BW = (Ω+ −Ω −)/(2π), where Ω − and Ω + are the two band-edge solutions of |δϕ(ps, h,Ω)|= 2|κ(ps)|Lcav. Here,δϕis evaluated using Eq. (11) with the full Sellmeier-based dispersive phase in Eq. (9). The continuous curves show the local approx- imation in Eq. (20). The close agreement between the markers and curves indicates that...

    work page

  3. [3]

    L. G. Wright, Z. Liu, D. A. Nolan, M.-J. Li, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, Self-organized instabil- ity in graded-index multimode fibres, Nat. Photon.10, 771 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    L. G. Wright, F. O. Wu, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, Physics of highly multimode nonlinear optical sys- tems, Nat. Phys.18, 1018 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    L. G. Wright, W. H. Renninger, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, Nonlinear multimode photonics: nonlin- ear optics with many degrees of freedom, Optica9, 824 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Y. Sun, P. Parra-Rivas, G. P. Agrawal, T. Hansson, C. Antonelli, A. Mecozzi, F. Mangin, and S. Wabnitz, Multimode solitons in optical fibers: a review, Photon. Res.12, 2581 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Krupa, A

    K. Krupa, A. Tonello, A. Barth´ el´ emy, V. Couderc, B. M. Shalaby, A. Bendahmane, G. Millot, and S. Wabnitz, Observation of geometric parametric instability induced by the periodic spatial self-imaging of multimode waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 183901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Patorski, The self-imaging phenomenon and its appli- cations, inProgress in Optics, Vol

    K. Patorski, The self-imaging phenomenon and its appli- cations, inProgress in Optics, Vol. 27, edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989) pp. 1–108

    work page 1989

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    J. Wen, Y. Zhang, and M. Xiao, The Talbot effect: Re- cent advances in classical optics, nonlinear optics, and quantum optics, Adv. Opt. Photonics5, 83 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    H. E. Lopez-Aviles, F. O. Wu, Z. S. Eznaveh, M. A. Eftekhar, F. Wise, R. A. Correa, and D. N. Christodoulides, A systematic analysis of parametric in- stabilities in nonlinear parabolic multimode fibers, APL 13 Photonics4, 022803 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    C. M. Arab ´ ı, A. Kudlinski, A. Mussot, and M. Conforti, Geometric parametric instability in periodically modu- lated graded-index multimode fibers, Phys. Rev. A97, 023803 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    L. G. Wright, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, Controllable spatiotemporal nonlinear effects in multi- mode fibres, Nat. Photonics9, 306 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    L. G. Wright, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, Spatiotemporal mode-locking in multimode fiber lasers, Science358, 94 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Krupa, A

    K. Krupa, A. Tonello, A. Barth´ el´ emy, T. Mansuryan, V. Couderc, G. Millot, P. Grelu, D. Modotto, S. A. Babin, and S. Wabnitz, Multimode nonlinear fiber op- tics, a spatiotemporal avenue, APL Photonics4, 110901 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Schulte, T

    J. Schulte, T. Sartorius, J. Weitenberg, A. Vernaleken, and P. Russbueldt, Nonlinear pulse compression in a multi-pass cell, Opt. Lett.41, 4511 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Hanna, F

    M. Hanna, F. Guichard, N. Daher, Q. Bournet, X. D´ elen, and P. Georges, Nonlinear optics in multipass cells, Laser Photonics Rev.15, 2100220 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Viotti, M

    A.-L. Viotti, M. Seidel, E. Escoto, S. Rajhans, W. P. Leemans, I. Hartl, and C. M. Heyl, Multi-pass cells for post-compression of ultrashort laser pulses, Optica9, 197 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Daher, F

    N. Daher, F. Guichard, S. W. Jolly, X. D´ elen, F. Qu´ er´ e, M. Hanna, and P. Georges, Multipass cells: 1D numerical model and investigation of spatio-spectral couplings at high nonlinearity, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B37, 993 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    J. Yu, H. Duan, G. Steinmeyer, and C. Mei, Nonlinear propagation of high-energy multimode pulses in solid- state multipass cells, Appl. Phys. B131, 60 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Hanna, M

    M. Hanna, M. Natile, F. Guichard, G. Parize, X. D´ elen, and P. Georges, Higher-order- and multimode properties of nonlinear multipass cells for temporal compression, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B42, 631 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Hanna, N

    M. Hanna, N. Daher, F. Guichard, X. D´ elen, and P. Georges, Hybrid pulse propagation model and quasi- phase-matched four-wave mixing in multipass cells, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B37, 2982 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Escoto, A

    E. Escoto, A. Zablah, S. Rajhans, X. D´ elen, M. Hanna, and C. M. Heyl, Vector modulation instability in gas- filled multi-pass cells, Opt. Lett.51, 4328 (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    Ieran` o, M

    A. Ieran` o, M. Natile, A.-L. Viotti, F. Guichard, M. Hanna, and P. Georges, Energy scaling and propa- gation properties of Laguerre-Gauss modes in gas-filled multipass cells, Opt. Express34, 19478 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    D. Wei, P. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Yao, R. Ni, X. Hu, X. Lv, S. N. Zhu, M. Xiao, and Y. Zhang, Generation of high-efficiency, high-purity, and broadband Laguerre- Gaussian modes from a Janus optical parametric oscilla- tor, Adv. Photon. Nexus2, 036007 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    H. K. Meena, B. Pant, and B. K. Singh, Controllable ex- perimental modulation of high-order Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A40, 1770 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    R. F. Offer, A. Daffurn, E. Riis, P. F. Griffin, A. S. Arnold, and S. Franke-Arnold, Gouy phase-matched an- gular and radial mode conversion in four-wave mixing, Phys. Rev. A103, L021502 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Herriott, H

    D. Herriott, H. Kogelnik, and R. Kompfner, Off-axis paths in spherical mirror interferometers, Appl. Opt.3, 523 (1964)

    1964

  20. [28]

    R. Kong, T. Sun, P. Liu, and X. Zhou, Optical design and analysis of a two-spherical-mirror-based multipass cell, Appl. Opt.59, 1545 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    W. Wang, H. Liu, H. Li, B. Yang, X. Zhai, J. Li, D. Zhang, and L. Ren, LightTools-based ray tracing and spot distribution rules for Herriott cells, J. Appl. Spec- trosc.91, 172 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    H. A. Haus,Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984)

    1984

  23. [31]

    B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich,Fundamentals of Pho- tonics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    A. E. Siegman,Lasers(University science books, 1986)

    1986

  25. [33]

    Dalgarno and A

    A. Dalgarno and A. E. Kingston, The refractive indices and Verdet constants of the inert gases, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences259, 424 (1960)

    1960

  26. [34]

    E. R. Peck and D. J. Fisher, Dispersion of argon, J. Opt. Soc. Am.54, 1362 (1964)

    1964

  27. [35]

    B¨ orzs¨ onyi, Z

    A. B¨ orzs¨ onyi, Z. Heiner, M. P. Kalashnikov, A. P. Kov´ acs, and K. Osvay, Dispersion measurement of inert gases and gas mixtures at 800 nm, Appl. Opt.47, 4856 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    G. P. Agrawal,Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 6th ed. (Academic Press, 2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear Optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, 2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Poletti and P

    F. Poletti and P. Horak, Description of ultrashort pulse propagation in multimode optical fibers, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B25, 1645 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    L. G. Wright, Z. M. Ziegler, P. M. Lushnikov, Z. Zhu, M. A. Eftekhar, and D. N. Christodoulides, Multi- mode nonlinear fiber optics: Massively parallel numerical solver, tutorial, and outlook, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.24, 5100516 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    C. Bree, A. Demircan, and G. Steinmeyer, Method for computing the nonlinear refractive index via Keldysh theory, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.46, 433 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Zahedpour, J

    S. Zahedpour, J. K. Wahlstrand, and H. M. Milchberg, Measurement of the nonlinear refractive index of air con- stituents at mid-infrared wavelengths, Opt. Lett.40, 5794 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Dudley and S

    J. Dudley and S. Coen, Numerical simulations and co- herence properties of supercontinuum generation in pho- tonic crystal and tapered optical fibers, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.8, 651 (2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    M. H. Frosz, Validation of input-noise model for simu- lations of supercontinuum generation and rogue waves, Opt. Express18, 14778 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    J. Guo, L. Guo, Z. Gao, Y. Gao, Z. Gan, Y. Huang, X. Liang, and R. Li, Spatial mode cleaning and efficient nonlinear pulse compression to sub-50 fs in a gas-filled multipass cell, Opt. Lett.49, 4385 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, and P. S. Pershan, Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric, Phys. Rev.127, 1918 (1962)

    1962

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.