Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Counting Lattice Points in Minkowski Sums of Cross Polytopes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.16037 v1 pith:UTEPCWV2 submitted 2026-08-17 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords polytopeslatticeminkowskipointscrosssumsformulanumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Motivated by Postnikov's study of lattice-point enumeration in Minkowski sums of simplices, we investigate lattice points in Minkowski sums of cross polytopes and establish analogous results, together with several related consequences. In particular, we introduce the support-enumerator associated with Postnikov's notion of draconian sequences and show that it coincides with the $h^*$-polynomial of the corresponding root polytope. This provides a new interpretation of the $h^*$-polynomial and yields a simple method for computing the volume of the corresponding polytope. We further exploit the symmetry of such root polytopes to establish a duality property for support-enumerators, which in turn provides a proof of a conjecture by Chapoton and Athanasiadis concerning the $h$-polynomials of preorders. As an immediate consequence, we prove that a Minkowski sum of cross polytopes and its dual polytope have the same number of lattice points. This duality then leads to a general formula for the number of lattice points in Minkowski sums of cross polytopes in terms of draconian sequences. Our formula enables us to compute the Ehrhart polynomials of these polytopes and show that they are Ehrhart positive. Furthermore, the formula allows us to derive analogous formulas for the number of lattice points on their boundaries and for their surface volumes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools