Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Weak Weak Lensing: How Accurately Can Small Shears be Measured?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0007368 v1 pith:MOWF2MRR submitted 2000-07-25 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords weaklensingshearsaccuratelypercentsystematictechniqueable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Now that weak lensing signals on the order of a percent are actively being searched for (cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, large radii in clusters...) it is important to investigate how accurately weak shears can be determined. Many systematic effects are present, and need to be understood. I show that the Kaiser et al. technique can leave residual systematic errors at the percent level (through imperfect PSF anisotropy correction), and present an alternative technique which is able to recover shears a factor of ten weaker.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools