Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Photon vs Energy Magnitude Systems and the Measurement of the Cosmological Parameters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0203416 v1 pith:LH3JPF6G submitted 2002-03-23 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords cosmologicaldistanceenergymagnitudemodulusparametersphotonsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The relative brightnesses of standard candles have long been known to be potentially powerful probes of distance. The distance modulus, the difference between observed and absolute magnitudes, has been associated with the values of the cosmological parameters: Hubble's constant H_0, the mass density Omega_M and the cosmological constant Omega_Lambda. In the literature the relationship between these parameters and the distance modulus is calculated for an energy magnitude system; the Johnson-Cousins magnitude system used in observations is in fact a photon-counting system. In this paper, we present the relation between observed and absolute photon magnitudes in terms of the familiar energy distance modulus and derive the correct form of the K-correction. The differences between energy and photon systems are small relative to the measurement errors of contemporary high-redshift supernova searches. The distinction must be made, however, for precision cosmological measurements such as those planned for Type Ia supernovae.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools