pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0403167 · v3 · submitted 2004-03-06 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

Star Formation at z~6: The UDF-Parallel ACS Fields

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords i-dropoutsluminosityevolutionlowerdensityfieldsfoundredshift
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We report on the i-dropouts detected in two exceptionally deep ACS fields (B_{435}, V_{606}, i_{775}, and z_{850} with 10 sigma limits of 28.8, 29.0, 28.5, and 27.8, respectively) taken in parallel with the UDF NICMOS observations. Using an i-z>1.4 cut, we find 30 i-dropouts over 21 arcmin^2 down to z_AB=28.1, or 1.4 i-dropouts arcmin^{-2}, with significant field-to-field variation (as expected from cosmic variance). This extends i-dropout searches some ~0.9^m further down the luminosity function than was possible in the GOODS field, netting a ~7x increase in surface density. An estimate of the size evolution for UV bright objects is obtained by comparing the composite radial flux profile of the bright i-dropouts (z<27.2) with scaled versions of the HDF-N + HDF-S U-dropouts. The best-fit is found with a (1+z)^{-1.57_{-0.53} ^{+0.50}} scaling in size (for fixed luminosity), extending lower redshift (1<z<5) trends to z~6. Adopting this scaling and the brighter i-dropouts from both GOODS fields, we make incompleteness estimates and construct a z~6 LF in the rest-frame continuum UV (~1350 A) over a 3.5 magnitude baseline, finding a shape consistent with that found at lower redshift. To evaluate the evolution in the LF from z~3.8, we make comparisons against different scalings of a lower redshift B-dropout sample. Though a strong degeneracy is found between luminosity and density evolution, our best-fit model scales as (1+z)^{-2.8} in number and (1+z)^0.1 in luminosity, suggesting a rest-frame continuum UV luminosity density at z~6 which is just 0.38_{-0.07} ^{+0.09}x that at z~3.8. Our inclusion of size evolution makes the present estimate lower than previous z~6 estimates.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.