REVIEW 4 cited by
First Results of Fast One-dimensional Hybrid Simulation of EAS Using CONEX
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A hybrid simulation code is developed that is suited for fast one-dimensional simulations of shower profiles, including fluctuations. It combines the Monte Carlo simulation of high energy interactions with a fast numerical solution of cascade equations for the resulting distributions of secondary particles. Results obtained with this new code, called CONEX, are presented and compared to CORSIKA predictions.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Prospects for Deep-Learning-Based Mass Reconstruction of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays using Simulated Air-Shower Profiles
A CNN predicts ln A from longitudinal shower profiles with bias under 0.4, resolution 1-1.5, and proton-iron merit factor 2.19, outperforming simpler ML models on shape parameters and remaining robust to hadronic mode...
-
Constraining Lorentz invariance violation from the depth of air-shower maximum
A simulation-based toy analysis of Auger Xmax data yields M_LIV > 1.5e21 GeV (95% CL) for subluminal photon-sector Lorentz invariance violation, subject to simplified detector and composition assumptions.
-
Bounds on Lorentz invariance violation from muon fluctuations at the Pierre Auger Observatory
Muon-count fluctuations in Auger air showers exclude first-order Lorentz invariance violation in the hadronic sector down to η ≈ −1.3×10⁻⁶ at the highest confidence level reported.
-
Readdressing the contribution of photonuclear reactions to the muon content of extensive air showers: a heuristic approach
A new heuristic estimates photonuclear reactions' contribution to muon numbers in extensive air showers with roughly 10% absolute error over wide parameter ranges.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.