pith. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0604221 · v1 · submitted 2006-04-10 · 🌌 astro-ph · physics.plasm-ph

Laboratory Plasma Dynamos, Astrophysical Dynamos, and Magnetic Helicity Evolution

classification 🌌 astro-ph physics.plasm-ph
keywords dynamosmagneticplasmatypeastrophysicalhelicitylaboratorythree
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The term ``dynamo'' means different things to the laboratory fusion plasma and astrophysical plasma communities. To alleviate the resulting confusion and to facilitate interdisciplinary progress, we pinpoint conceptual differences and similarities between laboratory plasma dynamos and astrophysical dynamos. We can divide dynamos into three types: 1. magnetically dominated helical dynamos which sustain a large scale magnetic field against resistive decay and drive the magnetic geometry toward the lowest energy state, 2. flow-driven helical dynamos which amplify or sustain large scale magnetic fields in an otherwise turbulent flow, and 3. flow-driven nonhelical dynamos which amplify fields on scales at or below the driving turbulence. We discuss how all three types occur in astrophysics whereas plasma confinement device dynamos are of the first type. Type 3 dynamos requires no magnetic or kinetic helicity of any kind. Focusing on type 1 and 2 dynamos, we show how different limits of a unified set of equations for magnetic helicity evolution reveal both types. We explicitly describe a steady-state example of a type 1 dynamo, and three examples of type 2 dynamos: (i) closed volume and time dependent; (ii) steady-state with open boundaries; (iii) time dependent with open boundaries.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.