pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0606461 · v1 · submitted 2006-06-20 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

Chandra Observations of Candidate "True" Seyfert 2 Nuclei

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords seyfertemissionfourobscurationsoftx-rayextendedhidden
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The Unification Model for active galactic nuclei posits that Seyfert 2s are intrinsically like Seyfert 1s, but that their broad-line regions (BLRs) are hidden from our view. A Seyfert 2 nucleus that truly lacked a BLR, instead of simply having it hidden, would be a so-called "true" Seyfert 2. No object has as yet been conclusively proven to be one. We present a detailed analysis of four of the best "true" Seyfert 2 candidates discovered to date: IC 3639, NGC 3982, NGC 5283, and NGC 5427. None of the four has a broad H-alpha emission line, either in direct or polarized light. All four have rich, high-excitation spectra, blue continua, and Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images showing them to be unresolved sources with no host-galaxy obscuration. To check for possible obscuration on scales smaller than that resolvable by HST, we obtained X-ray observations using the Chandra X-ray Observatory. All four objects show evidence of obscuration and therefore could have hidden BLRs. The picture that emerges is of moderate to high, but not necessarily Compton-thick, obscuration of the nucleus, with extra-nuclear soft emission extended on the hundreds-of-parsecs scale that may originate in the narrow-line region. Since the extended soft emission compensates, in part, for the nuclear soft emission lost to absorption, both absorption and luminosity are likely to be severely underestimated unless the X-ray spectrum is of sufficient quality to distinguish the two components. This is of special concern where the source is too faint to produce a large number of counts, or where the source is too far away to resolve the extended soft X-ray emitting region.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.