pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0606725 · v3 · submitted 2006-06-29 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

The metallicity dependence of the long-duration GRB rate from host galaxy luminosities

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords metallicitygalaxyhosthostslgrblgrbssharpvalue
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We investigate the difference between the host galaxy properties of core-collapse supernovae and long-duration gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs), and quantify a possible metallicity dependence of the efficiency of producing LGRBs. We use a sample of 16 CC SNe and 16 LGRBs from Fruchter et al. (2006) which have similar redshift distributions to eliminate galaxy evolution biases. We make a forward prediction of their host galaxy luminosity distributions from the overall cosmic metallicity distribution of star formation. This appoach is supported by the finding that LGRB hosts follow the L-Z relations of star-forming galaxies. We then compare predictions for metallicity-dependent event efficiencies with the observed host data. We find that UV-based SFR estimates predict the hosts distribution of CC SNe perfectly well in a metallicity-independent form. In contrast, LGRB hosts are fainter on average by one magnitude, almost as faint as the Large Magellanic Cloud. Assuming this is a metallicity effect, the present data are insufficient to discriminate between a sharp metallicity cutoff and a soft decrease in efficiency towards higher metallicity. For a sharp cut-off, however, we find a best value for the cutoff metallicity, as reflected in the oxygen abundance, 12+log (O/H)_lim ~ 8.7+/-0.3 at 95% confidence including systematic uncertainties on the calibration of Kobulnicky & Kewley (2004). This value is somewhat lower than the traditionally quoted value for the Sun, but is comparable to the revised solar oxygen abundance (Asplund, Grevesse & Sauval 2005). LGRB models that require sharp metallicity cutoffs well below ~1/2 the revised solar metallicity appear to be effectively ruled out (abridged).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.