pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: astro-ph/0701896 · v2 · submitted 2007-01-31 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

Relation between photospheric magnetic field and chromospheric emission

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords magneticfieldh-indexinter-networkemissionfluxnetworkchromospheric
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We simultaneously observed the Stokes parameters of the photospheric iron line pair at 630.2 nm and the intensity profile of the chromospheric Ca II H line at 396.8 nm in a quiet Sun region at a heliocentric angle of 53 deg. We perform a statistical analysis of network and inter-network properties.The H-index is the integrated emission in a 0.1 nm band around the Ca core. We separate a non-magnetically, H_non, and a magnetically, H_mag, heated component from a non-heated component, H_co in the H-index. The average network and inter-network H-indices are equal to 12 and 10 pm, respectively. The emission in the network is correlated with the magnetic flux density, approaching a value of H 10 pm for vanishing flux. The inter-network magnetic field is dominated by weak field strengths with values down to 200 G and its mean absolute flux density is 11 Mx cm$^{-2}$. We find that a dominant fraction of the calcium emission caused by the heated atmosphere in the magnetic network, has non-magnetic origin (H_mag = 2pm, H_non = 3pm). Considering the effect of straylight, the contribution from an atmosphere with no temperature rise to the H-index (H_co = 6pm) is about half of the observed H-index in the inter-network. The H-index in the inter-network is not correlated to any property of the photospheric magnetic field, suggesting that magnetic flux concentrations have a negligible role in the chromospheric heating in this region. The height range of the thermal coupling between the photosphere and low/mid chromosphere increases in presence of magnetic field. In addition, we demonstrate that a poor signal-to-noise level in the Stokes profiles leads to a significant over-estimation of the magnetic field strength.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.