pith. sign in

arxiv: cond-mat/0511442 · v2 · submitted 2005-11-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Static vs. dynamical mean field theory of Mott antiferromagnets

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords fieldmeandynamicaltheorydifferenceshartree-fockstaticalready
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Studying the antiferromagnetic phase of the Hubbard model by dynamical mean field theory, we observe striking differences with static (Hartree-Fock) mean field: The Slater band is strongly renormalized and spectral weight is transferred to spin-polaron side bands. Already for intermediate values of the interaction $U$ the overall bandwidth is larger than in Hartree-Fock, and the gap is considerably smaller. Such differences survive any renormalization of $U$. Our photoemission experiments for Cr-doped V$_2$O$_3$ show spectra qualitatively well described by dynamical mean field theory.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.