Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Difference of optical conductivity between one- and two-dimensional doped nickelates

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/9901235 v1 pith:HFYV2RPH submitted 1999-01-22 cond-mat.str-el

classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords nickelatesconductivitydifferenceopticaldopedone-spectrumtwo-dimensional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the optical conductivity in doped nickelates, and find the dramatic difference of the spectrum in the gap ($\omega$$\alt$4 eV) between one- (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) nickelates. The difference is shown to be caused by the dependence of hopping integral on dimensionality. The theoretical results explain consistently the experimental data in 1D and 2D nickelates, Y$_{2-x}$Ca$_x$BaNiO$_5$ and La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$NiO$_4$, respectively. The relation between the spectrum in the X-ray aborption experiments and the optical conductivity in La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$NiO$_4$ is discussed.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools