pith. sign in

arxiv: math/0201265 · v2 · submitted 2002-01-28 · 🧮 math.NT

On some claims in Ramanujan's `unpublished' manuscript on the partition and tau functions

classification 🧮 math.NT
keywords ramanujannumbersomedeltamanuscriptclaimfunctionspartition
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Towards the end of his life Ramanujan wrote a manuscript on properties of the partition and tau functions, some parts of which remained unpublished until very recently. Nevertheless, this manuscript gave rise to a lot of subsequent work. In it Ramanujan considers congruences for $\tau(n)$ modulo some special primes q. He proves for example that $\tau(n)\equiv \sum_{d|n}d^{11}({\rm mod}691)$. He defines $t_n=1$ if $\tau(n)$ is not divisible by q and $t_n=0$ otherwise. He then typically writes: "It can be shown by transcendental methods that $$ \sum_{k=1}^n t_k=C\int_1^n {dx\over (\log x)^{\delta}}+O({n\over (\log n)^r}). $$ where r is any positive number" (after stating some weaker estimates for the above sum). The number $\delta$ is a positve rational number depending on q and for the positive number C Ramanujan usually wrote down an Euler product. In this paper it is shown that Ramanujan's claim for every $r>1+\delta$ and each of the special primes q is false. Furthermore, we correct a 1928 paper of Geraldine Stanley who claimed to have disproved Ramanujan's claim in case q=5.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.