Foundations of Topological Stacks I
read the original abstract
This is the first in a series of papers devoted to foundations of topological stacks. We begin developing a homotopy theory for topological stacks along the lines of classical homotopy theory of topological spaces. In this paper we go as far as introducing the homotopy groups and establishing their basic properties. We also develop a Galois theory of covering spaces for a (locally connected semilocally 1-connected) topological stack. Built into the Galois theory is a method for determining the stacky structure (i.e., inertia groups) of covering stacks. As a consequence, we get for free a characterization of topological stacks that are quotients of topological spaces by discrete group actions. For example, this give a handy characterization of good orbifolds. Orbifolds, graphs of groups, and complexes of groups are examples of topological (Deligne-Mumford) stacks. We also show that any algebraic stack (of finite type over $\mathbb{C}$) gives rise to a topological stack. We also prove a Riemann Existence Theorem for stacks. In particular, the algebraic fundamental group of an algebraic stack over $\mathbb{C}$ is isomorphic to the profinite completion of the fundamental group of its underlying topological stack. The next paper in the series concerns function stacks (in particular loop stacks) and fibrations of topological stacks. This is the first in a series of papers devoted to foundations of topological stacks.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A \v{C}ech--Stokes Pushout Groupoid: a Log/Kummer Betti Presenter for Stokes Torsors
A Čech-Stokes pushout groupoid gives a log/Kummer Betti presentation of Stokes torsors for meromorphic flat connections along normal crossings divisors.
-
Spherical Milnor Spaces II: Projective Quotients and Higher Topological Structures
A spherical Milnor space construction yields projective quotients and double quotients that encode Z2-twisted principal bundles and obstruction classes in low-degree cohomology.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.