pith. sign in

arxiv: math/0606143 · v2 · submitted 2006-06-06 · 🧮 math.CO · math.PR

Correlation decay and deterministic FPTAS for counting list-colorings of a graph

classification 🧮 math.CO math.PR
keywords graphdeterministiccorrelationdecaylistsizealphacounting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We propose a deterministic algorithm for approximately counting the number of list colorings of a graph. Under the assumption that the graph is triangle free, the size of every list is at least $\alpha \Delta$, where $\alpha$ is an arbitrary constant bigger than $\alpha^{**}=2.8432...$, and $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of the graph, we obtain the following results. For the case when the size of the each list is a large constant, we show the existence of a \emph{deterministic} FPTAS for computing the total number of list colorings. The same deterministic algorithm has complexity $2^{O(\log^2 n)}$, without any assumptions on the sizes of the lists, where $n$ is the instance size. We further extend our method to a discrete Markov random field (MRF) model. Under certain assumptions relating the size of the alphabet, the degree of the graph and the interacting potentials we again construct a deterministic FPTAS for computing the partition function of a MRF. Our results are not based on the most powerful existing counting technique -- rapidly mixing Markov chain method. Rather we build upon concepts from statistical physics, in particular, the decay of correlation phenomena and its implication for the uniqueness of Gibbs measures in infinite graphs. This approach was proposed in two recent papers \cite{BandyopadhyayGamarnikCounting} and \cite{weitzCounting}. The principle insight of this approach is that the correlation decay property can be established with respect to certain \emph{computation tree}, as opposed to the conventional correlation decay property with respect to graph theoretic neighborhoods of a given node. This allows truncation of computation at a logarithmic depth in order to obtain polynomial accuracy in polynomial time.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.