pith. sign in

arxiv: nlin/0402006 · v3 · pith:GF5K6M2Rnew · submitted 2004-02-05 · 🌊 nlin.AO · cond-mat.other· cs.CC· nlin.CG· q-bio.MN· q-bio.OT· q-bio.QM

Updating Schemes in Random Boolean Networks: Do They Really Matter?

classification 🌊 nlin.AO cond-mat.othercs.CCnlin.CGq-bio.MNq-bio.OTq-bio.QM
keywords updatingschemesnetworksrbnsbooleandifferentrandomallows
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper we try to end the debate concerning the suitability of different updating schemes in random Boolean networks (RBNs). We quantify for the first time loose attractors in asyncrhonous RBNs, which allows us to analyze the complexity reduction related to different updating schemes. We also report that all updating schemes yield very similar critical stability values, meaning that the "edge of chaos" does not depend much on the updating scheme. After discussion, we conclude that synchonous RBNs are justifiable theoretical models of biological networks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.