Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Study of the atmospheric pressure loading signal in VLBI observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv physics/0311096 v1 pith:KZH3N72Z submitted 2003-11-19 physics.geo-ph

classification physics.geo-ph
keywords pressureloadingmodelatmosphericdisplacementsobservationstimeadmittance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Redistribution of air masses due to atmospheric circulation causes loading deformation of the Earth's crust which can be as large as 20 mm for the vertical component and 3 mm for horizontal components. Rigorous computation of site displacements caused by pressure loading requires knowledge of the surface pressure field over the entire Earth surface. A procedure for computing 3-D displacements of geodetic sites of interest using a 6-hourly pressure field from the NCEP numerical weather models and the Ponte and Ray [2002] model of atmospheric tides is presented. We investigated possible error sources and found that the errors of our pressure loading time series are below the 15% level. We validated our model by estimating the admittance factors of the pressure loading time series using a dataset of 3.5 million VLBI observations from 1980 to 2002. The admittance factors averaged over all sites are 0.95 -+ 0.02 for the vertical displacement and 1.00 -+ 0.07 for the horizontal displacements. For the first time horizontal displacements caused by atmospheric pressure loading have been detected. The closeness of these admittance factors to unity allows us to conclude that on average our model quantitatively agrees with the observations within the error budget of the model. At the same time we found that the model is not accurate for several stations which are near a coast or in mountain regions. We conclude that our model is suitable for routine data reduction of space geodesy observations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools