pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0704.3704 · v3 · submitted 2007-04-27 · 🌌 astro-ph

Recognition: unknown

Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph
keywords samplingevidencemethodsefficientastronomicalbayesiandatadegeneracies
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In performing a Bayesian analysis of astronomical data, two difficult problems often emerge. First, in estimating the parameters of some model for the data, the resulting posterior distribution may be multimodal or exhibit pronounced (curving) degeneracies, which can cause problems for traditional MCMC sampling methods. Second, in selecting between a set of competing models, calculation of the Bayesian evidence for each model is computationally expensive. The nested sampling method introduced by Skilling (2004), has greatly reduced the computational expense of calculating evidences and also produces posterior inferences as a by-product. This method has been applied successfully in cosmological applications by Mukherjee et al. (2006), but their implementation was efficient only for unimodal distributions without pronounced degeneracies. Shaw et al. (2007), recently introduced a clustered nested sampling method which is significantly more efficient in sampling from multimodal posteriors and also determines the expectation and variance of the final evidence from a single run of the algorithm, hence providing a further increase in efficiency. In this paper, we build on the work of Shaw et al. and present three new methods for sampling and evidence evaluation from distributions that may contain multiple modes and significant degeneracies; we also present an even more efficient technique for estimating the uncertainty on the evaluated evidence. These methods lead to a further substantial improvement in sampling efficiency and robustness, and are applied to toy problems to demonstrate the accuracy and economy of the evidence calculation and parameter estimation. Finally, we discuss the use of these methods in performing Bayesian object detection in astronomical datasets.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analytical and Machine Learning Methods for Model Discernment at CE$\nu$NS Experiments

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Shape correlations in CEνNS allow likelihood and CNN analyses to discriminate sterile neutrinos from NSI and approximately localize sterile parameters in favorable regions.

  2. GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples

    astro-ph.IM 2019-10 accept novelty 5.0

    GetDist implements boundary-corrected KDE with automatic smoothing for analyzing weighted and correlated Monte Carlo samples, plus plotting and diagnostic tools.