pith. sign in

arxiv: 0708.3075 · v2 · submitted 2007-08-22 · 🧮 math.LO · math.NT

Defining the integers in large rings of number fields using one universal quantifier

classification 🧮 math.LO math.NT
keywords forallexistsmathbblargeepsilonfieldsformulaintegers
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Julia Robinson has given a first-order definition of the rational integers $\mathbb Z$ in the rational numbers $\mathbb Q$ by a formula $(\forall \exists \forall \exists)(F=0)$ where the $\forall$-quantifiers run over a total of 8 variables, and where F is a polynomial. We show that for a large class of number fields, not including $\mathbb Q$, for every $\epsilon>0$, there exists a set of primes $\cal S$ of natural density exceeding $1-\epsilon$, such that $\mathbb Z$ can be defined as a subset of the ``large'' subring $$\{x \in K : \ord_{\mathfrak p}x >0, \forall \mathfrak p \not \in \cal S \}$$ of K by a formula of the form $(\exists \forall \exists)(F=0)$ where there is only one $\forall$-quantifier, and where F is a polynomial.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.