pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 0904.4702 · v3 · submitted 2009-04-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Size Bias in Galaxy Surveys

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords biassizegalaxiesgalaxysurveyscutsmagnificationonly
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Only certain galaxies are included in surveys: those bright and large enough to be detectable as extended sources. Because gravitational lensing can make galaxies appear both brighter and larger, the presence of foreground inhomogeneities can scatter galaxies across not only magnitude cuts but also size cuts, changing the statistical properties of the resulting catalog. Here we explore this size bias, and how it combines with magnification bias to affect galaxy statistics. We demonstrate that photometric galaxy samples from current and upcoming surveys can be even more affected by size bias than by magnification bias.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Machine-learning applications for weak-lensing cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Machine learning techniques can mitigate limitations in traditional weak-lensing analyses and enhance extraction of cosmological information from galaxy imaging surveys.