pith. sign in

arxiv: 0905.1422 · v1 · submitted 2009-05-09 · 📊 stat.AP · stat.ME

Auditing a collection of races simultaneously

classification 📊 stat.AP stat.ME
keywords racesauditingbatchescollectionauditerrormarropprobability
0
0 comments X p. Extension
read the original abstract

A collection of races in a single election can be audited as a group by auditing a random sample of batches of ballots and combining observed discrepancies in the races represented in those batches in a particular way: the maximum across-race relative overstatement of pairwise margins (MARROP). A risk-limiting audit for the entire collection of races can be built on this ballot-based auditing using a variety of probability sampling schemes. The audit controls the familywise error rate (the chance that one or more incorrect outcomes fails to be corrected by a full hand count) at a cost that can be lower than that of controlling the per-comparison error rate with independent audits. The approach is particularly efficient if batches are drawn with probability proportional to a bound on the MARROP (PPEB sampling).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sublinear Risk-Limiting Audits from Direct Ballot Selection and Statistical Ballot Manifests

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New statistical ballot manifest verification and direct ballot selection RLAs reduce audit effort by an order of magnitude at 3% margins and improve sample complexity by 55% over Minerva at 1% margins in large elections.