Recognition: unknown
Empirical Bernstein Bounds and Sample Variance Penalization
read the original abstract
We give improved constants for data dependent and variance sensitive confidence bounds, called empirical Bernstein bounds, and extend these inequalities to hold uniformly over classes of functionswhose growth function is polynomial in the sample size n. The bounds lead us to consider sample variance penalization, a novel learning method which takes into account the empirical variance of the loss function. We give conditions under which sample variance penalization is effective. In particular, we present a bound on the excess risk incurred by the method. Using this, we argue that there are situations in which the excess risk of our method is of order 1/n, while the excess risk of empirical risk minimization is of order 1/sqrt/{n}. We show some experimental results, which confirm the theory. Finally, we discuss the potential application of our results to sample compression schemes.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Autoregressive Learning in Joint KL: Sharp Oracle Bounds and Lower Bounds
Joint KL yields horizon-free approximation but an information-theoretic lower bound of order Omega(H) for estimation error in autoregressive learning, with matching computationally efficient upper bounds.
-
Online Set Learning from Precision and Recall Feedback
A hypothesis class is learnable in this online precision-recall feedback model if and only if it has finite VC dimension, with algorithms achieving regret bounds in realizable and agnostic settings despite ERM failing.
-
Importance Sampling for Statistical Certification of Viable Initial Sets
An importance sampling framework with a derived empirical Bernstein inequality for weighted variables provides finite-sample guarantees for statistically certifying viable initial sets in control systems.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.